Wikipedia editors seem to make sure those, who want to add a limited one line section get reverted multiple times as if they never produced an edit and then they ***ban you***.

It seems wikipedia by default enourages the editors to revert the edit up to three times just to invoke either of command { { subst:uw-3RR } } or { {subst:an3-notice } }

Egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Protection_policy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Office_actions#Currently_under_scrutiny

[...] I will NOT tell a senator, artist, news-figure, etc. to GOFIXIT. It is our responsibility, not theirs, to get the information correct. These are not contributors--they are the subjects of whom our contributors write.

it is a violation of the privacy policy to reveal their IP, whereabouts, or other information sufficient to identify them

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/CheckUser_Policy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy

http://utrs.wmflabs.org/privacy.php

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mxztswnr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

no reason not to allow to add a new section "Controversy" to "Azimuthal equidistant projection"

Decline reason:

Block evasion verified by checkuser. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:34, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mxztswnr (talk) 12:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]