Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page United States Census has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 17:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 28bytes (talk) 04:10, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Beast With a Million Eyes, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:18, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:List of serial killers by number of victims with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! MaenK.A._Talk 20:59, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Connor munkirs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. §everal⇒|Times 21:09, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 28bytes (talk) 21:12, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for disruption and vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. 28bytes (talk) 21:19, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Further to this, your vandalism of the Cthulhu article has been reverted ([1]). PurpleHeartEditor (talk) 03:33, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Munkirs101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear wikipedia admins I understand how my actions were inappropriate i promise nothing like it will happen again if my account is unblocked i will respect and follow the editing guidelines so please wikipedia unblock my editing writes Munkirs101 (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, Wikipedia is not a place for "epic bad asses" who "don't like being around people" (as per your ego-page) - it's an encyclopedia of knowledge. Although we have a handful of 14 year-olds who understand rules, policy, and the concept of community, it's clear so far that you're not ready for that yet (✉→BWilkins←✎) 19:00, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Would you mind telling us some of the constructive edits you plan to do? - Vianello (Talk) 18:51, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]