User talk:Mrpmpfan
September 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to PSP Go. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chimpanzee - User | Talk | Contribs 13:21, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at PSP Go, you will be blocked from editing. Chimpanzee - User | Talk | Contribs 15:11, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to PSP Go. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox.
Naluboutes, NaluboutesAeria gloris, Aeria gloris 16:16, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Zune HD, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dancter (talk) 16:54, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC)November 2009
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Dragon Age: Origins. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 11:39, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Dragon Age: Origins are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Chimpanzee - User | Talk | Contribs 12:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mannix the pirate
A tag has been placed on Mannix the pirate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Anna Lincoln 11:47, 20 November 2009 (UTC)