Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:A separate reality.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:11, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're messing the Castaneda article with arbitrary edits. How about to respect the discussion in talk page first? 201.34.145.63 (talk) 01:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you must not have read the talk page before writing this. Please add your comments and let's talk. Mmyotis (talk) 08:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me your 5 minutes (or less):

• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Religion#Please_stop_changing_the_existing_summary_table.

Thank you so much. Good luck!

Angelo De La Paz (talk) 15:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard this, this user is trolling. He has put this on the userpage of at least 8 users and reverted my replies. Herunar (talk) 16:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to address the dispute. —Largo Plazo (talk) 20:59, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the "Deleted Section" section from the talk page. Joshua Issac (talk) 19:45, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your email. I don't have much time on my hands at the moment for editing, but I am sure you will do a great job improving the article. I'll be standing by to supply advice, sources when I can find them, copyediting and general help. I don't have a lot of sources for mesoamerican religion and anthropology in my house and I am unable to get to a proper library at the moment. But please go a head and commence work on the article and I and probably most of WIkiproject Mesoamerica (thought about joining?) will be ready to offer help and assistance.·Maunus· ·ƛ· 18:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Thanks for making those additions. When I saw you'd changed the page I was afraid you'd reverted earlier version with all the meat info. It's really crazy to have long sections in the veg article about eating meat. If you have a chance, take a look at revising the 1st ph of the Judaism section too. Thanks Bob98133 (talk) 19:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you joined the discussion at Drug policy of Sweden as a neutral party in response to a Third opinion request, but are now actively involved in the dispute. Third opinion is limited in scope to helping resolve issues between two parties, but at present your involvement takes it out of the scope of our intervention. I can't ask you to stand down, but if we continue forward with your active participation, I think that we will have to suggest that the parties seek mediation. What do you think? Thanks. --Kevin Murray (talk) 09:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree with your comment. It seems that we have come to somewhat varied conclusions. I'm not sure whether I should stay involved going forward to mediation. I've asked for advice from a long time 3O participant. Thanks! --Kevin Murray (talk) 10:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment on my talk page. I left my reply over there. It felt good to have another editor show they also felt some concern. Even if we see it different ways? The WP:GHBH comments needed to be made in my opinion. I get the feeling that now it's been mentioned, if I'm on the right track at least, that the problem will cure itself? I'm awaiting another administrators responce, so I'll cool the ArbCom request for now.--Sting Buzz Me... 01:56, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/TheNautilus. Tim Vickers (talk) 02:08, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First thing's first: thank you! Secondly, ref 18 said something like "Catholic Herald, 7 January 2005", right? If so, I thought that the cite gave next to nothing to work with; how do you tell which article made on 7 January 2005 could be used for the article in question? Mouse is back 01:36, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your imput, Sir. InternetHero (talk) 23:42, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, do you mind just saying something about me here. The users (one is a World of Warcraft player) and the others seemed to have put a lot of effort into this "rfc/U", but they completely take it out of context. I tried following that flow-chart thing for Dispute Resolution, but I lost my patience in accordance to the clause in respect to seeking an admin. Anyway, this is what I mean. "Forgets" to emphasize that I sought help from 2 admins and didn't lose any courteousy. I you can, just try and give your opinion on me. InternetHero (talk) 20:46, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I beat you by a minute. Barnstar please! </joke> -kotra (talk) 01:01, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:ShadowVsScientology was recently banned. I noticed it on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Cirt. The user behind this account apparently opperated another trolling account in the past. Nobody noticed this new account until the RFA. I just pointed it out on the talk page because the user's comment seemed to be getting at some broader issue with User:Justallofthem that didn't seem helpful. Cool Hand Luke 01:27, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, why did you revert my edits and claimed them to be in violation of WP:PEA? Why at least did you not discuss them? I think they are in lineand do not violate the policy. LOTRrules (talk) 17:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your last two edits to Messianic Judaism - you've completely obliterated the lede which was written over a long period of time by consensus. If you're going to do something as bold, please bring it to the talk page. Best, A Sniper (talk) 00:56, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Unitarian Universalist Barnstar
		In appreciation of your contributions to Wikipedia's contents in general and the Unitarian Universalist coverage in particular. Keep up the fine work! Ecoleetage (talk) 14:09, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is a celebration of your input to the project, which I find impressive. Plus, anyone who lives in Norwalk deserves praise! :) Ecoleetage (talk) 10:48, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The only thing I've deleted is unsourced:

"Organized religion" generally refers to an organization of people supporting the exercise of some religion with a prescribed set of beliefs, often taking the form of a legal entity (see religion-supporting organization). Other religions believe in personal revelation.

And non-NPOV IMO. I'll be back in a couple of hours probably to reply. Regards. adriatikus | talk 14:45, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The next Connecticut Wikipedia meetup will take place sometime during April 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please list on the meetup page whether or not you can go. Also please contribute ideas for topics and dates! Hope to see you there!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:55, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The 2nd Connecticute Meetup will take place on April 18th, 2009 at Real Art Ways cafe and arts center in Hartford, Connecticut. Please state whether or not you can attend on the meetup page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) because your name was on the invite list. 16:31, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the Criticism section was recently vandalized. Many of the posts that held references were removed by a Castenda fanatic & inserted his own POV in the article (which I have removed). You were doing a good job before Mmyotis I hope you can take a look.

Kind regards Bill

--Bill-- Monday April 13, 2009

	New England Wikimedia General Meeting
	The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future! Potential topics: What is a Wikimedia chapter and should we work towards one? Planning of regular Boston meetups (any other New England cities?) Planning for upcoming coordinated events (Wikipedia Love Libraries, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiknic, etc.) Outreach to universities (WikiProject Academical Village) and cultural institutions (GLAM) Wikimania DC is this summer. Your ideas!
	Sunday, April 22 1:30 PM – 4:30 PM	Conference Room C06, Johnson Building, Boston Public Library—Central Library 700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

Message delivered by Dominic at 08:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.[reply]

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

• Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
• Research: The most recent DR data
• Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
• Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
• DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
• Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
• Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

--The Olive Branch 19:18, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

U.S. Ada Lovelace Day 2012 edit-a-thon, Harvard University - You are invited!

Now in its fourth year, Ada Lovelace Day is an international celebration of women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and related fields. Participants from around New England are invited to gather together at Harvard Law School to edit and create Wikipedia entries on women who have made significant contributions to the STEM fields. Register to attend or sign up to participate remotely - visit this page to do either. 00:34, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cleargreen Incorporated is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cleargreen Incorporated until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Yworo (talk) 19:50, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You say that it's notable for various reasons, but as far as I can tell, it's never been mentioned in any news articles. You do realize that for it to be notable, at least two independent third-party reliable sources have to have reported on it, right? Please let us know where these sources can be found. Yworo (talk) 00:08, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to the 2nd Annual Wikimedia New England General Meeting, on 20 July 2013 in Boston! We will be talking about the future of the chapter, including GLAM, Wiki Loves Monuments, and where we want to take our chapter in the future! EdwardsBot (talk) 09:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NE Meetup #4: January 18 at MIT Building 5

Dear Fellow Wikimedian, You have been invited to the New England Wikimedians 2014 kick-off party and Wikipedia Day Celebration at Building Five on the Massachusetts Institute of Technology campus on Saturday, January 18th, from 3-5 PM. Afterwards, we will be holding an informal dinner at a local restaurant. If you are curious to join us, please do so, as we are always looking for people to come and give their opinion! Finally, be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. I hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Women's History Edit-a-thons in Massachusetts this March - You are invited!

New England Wikimedians is excited to announce a series of Wikipedia edit-a-thons that will be taking place at colleges and universities throughout Massachusetts as part of Wikiwomen's History Month from March 1 - March 31. We encourage you to join in an edit-a-thon near you, or to participate remotely if you are unable to attend in person (for the full list of articles, click here). Events are currently planned for the cities/towns of Boston, Northampton, South Hadley, and Cambridge. Further information on dates and locations can be found on our user group page. Questions? Contact Girona7 (talk)

NE Meetup #5: April 19th at Clover Food Lab in Kendall Square

Dear Fellow Wikimedian, New England Wikimedians would like to invite you to the April 2014 meeting, which will be a small-scale meetup of all interested Wikimedians from the New England area. We will socialize, review regional events from the beginning of the year, look ahead to regional events of 2014, and discuss other things of interest to the group. Be sure to RSVP here if you're interested. Also, if you haven't done so already, please consider signing up for our mailing list and connect with us on Facebook and Twitter. We hope to see you there! Kevin Rutherford (talk) and Maia Weinstock (talk)

(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

You're invited to the Peabody Essex Museum Edit-a-thon Spring 2014

On May 3rd, the Peabody Essex Museum in Salem, Massachusetts will be hosting a Native American and Chinese Art edit-a-thon from 9:00-5:00 pm. You are more than welcome to attend, as there will be free food and drink, and an outing afterwards. If you are interested, please sign up here, as we would love to see you there!

If you have any questions, please leave a message at Ed Rodley's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

Adrianne Wadewitz edit-a-thons in Southern New England

As you may have already heard, the Wikipedia community lost an invaluable member of the community last month. Adrianne Wadewitz was a feminist scholar of 18th-Century British literature, and a prolific editor of the site. As part of a worldwide series of tributes, New England Wikimedians, in conjunction with local institutions of higher learning, have created three edit-a-thons that will be occurring in May and June. The events are as follows: May 21st at Northeastern University's Snell Library, in the Digital Scholarship Commons on the second floor May 22nd at Brown University's Rockefeller Library, in the Digital Scholarship Lab June 25th at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (exact location TBA), where we will also be hosting a "how to conduct an edit-a-thon" session beforehand We hope that you will be able to join us, whether you are an experienced editor or are using Wikipedia for the first time. If you have any questions, please leave a message at Kevin Rutherford's talk page. You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.

The article Amalia Marquez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Biography on a non-notable, possibly living person. Article is essentially a WP:COATRACK to talk about Cleargreen Incorporated, who don't sound like a particularly swell bunch of folks, but who do have their own article if people want to write about them.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:35, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amalia Marquez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amalia Marquez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 09:01, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Cambridge, MA on October 16! (drop-in any time, 6-9pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:29, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mmyotis/Amalia Marquez, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mmyotis/Amalia Marquez and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Mmyotis/Amalia Marquez during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:43, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mmyotis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sunday July 16, 1-5pm: New England Wiknic

You are invited to join us the "picnic anyone can edit" at John F. Kennedy Park, near Harvard Square, Cambridge, as part of the Great American Wiknic celebrations being held across the USA. Remember it's a wiki-picnic, which means potluck. Sunday July 16 New England Wiknic (also on Facebook) 1–5pm - come by any time! Look for us by the Wikipedia / Wikimedia banner! We hope to see you there! --Phoebe (talk) 16:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

Hello, Mmyotis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Liberalism and progressivism within Islam into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. 💵Money💵emoji💵^{Talk💸Help out at CCI!} 16:33, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]