Archives

Archive 1

I was in the middle of bundling Portal:Malibu, California into a bigger group and we edit conflicted. Feel free to revote. Legacypac (talk) 06:50, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Legacypac: - No problem mate, revoted. Meszzy² (talk) 06:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Meszzy2, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Manchester Mirror, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A7 cannot be applied to print products, also is part of another notable newspaper and claims coverage in reliable source. If you are interested in learning more about how speedy deletion works, I have compiled a list of helpful pages at User:SoWhy/SDA. You can of course also contact me if you have questions. Thank you. SoWhy 07:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SoWhy: Cheers mate. That was a sloppy job on my part - don't know how I missed the link in there and didn't make the connection between the Manchester Mirror and the Mirror. Staying up way too late. Thanks a bunch. :) Meszzy² (talk) 07:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

you deleted my draft of Giga Herbs- can you bring it back, I sent you a bubble tea Frogman2099 (talk) 15:07, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Frogman2099: - Thanks for the bubble tea! Should be restored at Draft:Giga Herbs. :) Meszzy² (talk) 02:36, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Government of New York City same editor? You want to bundle it too? Portal:New York plus portals for the bourghs all exist. Legacypac (talk) 11:00, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Legacypac: Sure, feel free to bundle whatever you think is appropriate. I trust your judgement. Meszzy² (talk) 11:03, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

-- ferret (talk) 11:34, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion taking place as to whether Portal:Adele should be deleted at MfD.
You are being notified because you were a participant in the previous nomination discussion.
Thank you, –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 21:02, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you are active on Wikipedia and are still interested in helping out with urgent tasks on our large Schools Project, please let us know here. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sent to project members 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC). You can opt of messages here.

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added many references to the article Alanwrick1 (talk) 00:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Alanwrick1 Thanks, you can remove the BLPPROD tag Meszzy² (talk) 00:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks. Alanwrick1 (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I may refer to your proposed deletion of the Eloisa Marchesoni, since yesterday the page has been scammed by user 37.163.229.71. Moreover, refering to the Dawn article, the word trader has been only used to explain her history/past experience. She has numerous articles showing great Notability and fulfiling WP:GNG.

I have also added more reliable sources to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dictations (talk • contribs) 07:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Dictations The only proper reliable secondary sources I see in the article only provide a trivial mention of her for the purposes of the quote, and are not providing coverage of herself. The two I saw that do provide coverage of the subject were a medium post and an advertisement for a podcast - so I believe the article does not meet our notability guidelines. You are of course free at any time to remove the PROD tag if you think otherwise - but I'd ask that you explain with more detail your reasoning before we end up in AfD. Meszzy² (talk) 07:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for being so helpful and caring!

Yes, i have removed some references which might create ambiguity for the viewers.

Anyhow, I will recheck and will do some more research and will try to addup more reliable sources!

Thanks again! Dictations (talk) 07:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dictations (talk) 07:57, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed that you recently removed a G12 tag from Draft:Sukhpal Singh Gill. The removal was correct—the draft no longer met the criteria at the time you removed the tag. As a heads up for the future, there's usually a little more to do in these cases—namely purging the copyright violations from the page's history.

When there are versions of the article that contained substantial copyright violations that have been subsequently removed, the versions that had copyright violations should generally be revision deleted under criterion RD1 (Blatant violations of the copyright policy). In order to tag these versions for revision deletion, feel free to use the {{Copyvio-revdel}} template in order to flag specific revisions for deletion. If you'd like a GUI tool to make it easier to label exact revisions that you would like to delete, also feel free to install the cv-revdel usescript located at User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.

Happy editing! — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 03:32, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Red-tailed hawk Oh yeah I usually do request a rev delete — but this one must've slipped through me somehow, sorry about that! But I didn't know about the script so thank you for that! Will be nice as when there's a bunch of ranges doing it manually is a real pain sometimes.. Meszzy² (talk) 06:00, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]