Archives

Archive 1

• Per your unblock appeal at UTRS I've restored your talk page access to allow you to post an unblock request here in the interest of transparency. As I noted to you in my response at UTRS, any use of this page outside of making an unblock requests and/or answering questions regarding an unblock will result in the talk page access being revoked. Good luck with your appeal. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:15, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I would try to abide and get fellow admins confidence back.Md iet (talk)

__Unblock Request__ This request is for making an appeal to fellow Admins to consider my case so that I can rejoin Wiki for making positive contributions.

I feel ashamed at looking at the sock puppetry page on my name. It was only adamancy that fellow associate with independent view are not sock, but now I fully understood that any of your influence or help will also matter and you are still a defaulter, whether Wiki notice it or not.

I was also adamant in accepting friendly advice of fellow editors/admins to restrain from DB related articles, but I could further understand now how to avoid such editions and why neutral looking information with proper source are critical for making Wiki more powerful and effective.

There were problems and allegations that I was having pro tilt toward DB related article. Everyone has some tilt toward toward his POV, but it is to be presented in consideration all POV. I would try to correct my self in this line. Till I improve further, I will voluntarily not edit DB related pages and work with their talk pages.

I apologize for the inconvenience caused to Wiki because of me, and feel isolated to make any positive contribution in Wiki platform most admired by me.

Hoping to have a fair chance.Md iet (talk)

Hello, Md iet, I have restored your basic editing rights, as per the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive278#Standard_offer_unblock_request_from_Md_iet. However, you may only continue editing under the following restrictions:

1. You will not edit any articles which relate to Dawoodi Bohra, even distantly.
2. You will not participate in discussions on Talk:Dawoodi Bohra, nor on talk pages of Dawoodi Bohra-related articles.
3. You will not participate in discussions regarding Dawoodi Bohra or related topics on English Wikipedia.

If you are not sure if a topic in which you interested would fall under this ban, then ask an uninvolved editor for advice before editing articles or participating in discussions about that topic.

Please review the policies on WP:Neutral point of view, WP:Reliable sources, and WP:Original research before resuming your editing.

I look forward to seeing your positive contributions to the English Wikipedia.--Aervanath (talk) 21:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Aervanath:, with hope that my new inning is as per your expectations. Md iet (talk) 15:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Condition 1 and 2 are perfectly clear and there is no confusion at all.

Regarding 3, I am in no mood to discuss DB related matters.

I will be thankful to fellow editors/Admin if it is acceptable that I just point out my POV to neutral editor like Ajaymehra/Qwerrtus on their talk page, no discussion, and let them decide to put forward or not in their own manner wherever they want if they feel it right.

Thanking again to all concerned to give me a chance to prove myself. Md iet (talk) 15:59, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you made some edits to the infobox of the article on Husayn ibn Ali regarding his children.[1] According to one of your edit summaries, your change was so that "children [were] listed in sequence of age and as per reliable sources." It would be really helpful if you would modify the section on "Family" to list the children in chronological order, giving their mother's, and citing the reliable sources that you referred to. This would improve the article a lot.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:42, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for suggestion.--Md iet (talk) 01:51, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You've been proposing removing the word "Gaṇarājya" from the lead of India ever since April, without getting any consensus (or indeed any agreement whatsoever) for it. And every now and then you come back to say "Hope by now I can presume having consensus".[2][3][4] You keep very politely inviting people to comment, and I get the impression that you think if they don't comment, they can be presumed to agree with you. But that shows a misunderstanding of how Wikipedia works; without active agreement, you don't have consensus. Everybody on Wikipedia is a volunteer, many of them busy in real life, and you have to be satisfied with them registering disagreement once. Silence does not give consent! All that happens when you keep making the same proposal, and suggesting that there's probably consensus for it 'by now', is that people get impatient with you, as I'm sure you've seen. Please realise that nobody agrees with your suggestion and stop making it. It's time to move on. Bishonen | talk 09:13, 22 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

@Bishonen:, Thanks for taking time to put your comment and advice. It seems you have not properly understood my proposal and motive behind. "Ganrajya" means republic and it is associated with "Republic of India" as "Bharat Ganrajya". 'Republic of India' given alternate Hindi word but main name 'India' remain without alternate. My aim is to add alternative Common name "Bharat" (known to billions English literate) along with main name 'India'. People have objection for adding alternative with both 'India' as well as 'Republic of India' of clumsiness. As 'republic' is secondary word and clarified else at Information box, it can be avoided in the lead.

I will be happy if both name "India" as well as "republic of India" are with alternate word in the official language of India, but "India" should have the alternate name written along with it first.

Earlier my proposition was to add "Bharat" as alternate English name. Due to lack of sufficient reliable references it was dropped. Now this is a separate proposal with altogether different reasoning. With above explanation I request you to revisit my proposal and advice.--Md iet 04:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I understand. But none of the other editors on the article agree with you. I'm not here to get into the reasons for your suggestion or for other people's lack of enthusiasm for it, but purely as an uninvolved administrator to advise you to drop it now. Repeating it on the article talkpage is becoming disruptive. Also, as regards the article Germany, it seems obvious that the case there is different, as there are no political angles with regard to the name Deutschland, but there are with India or Bharat, as you mention yourself ("Tamil people of India which are a minority part are against Hindi for political reasons"). I'm sure both you and people like User:RegentsPark and User:SpacemanSpiff know far more about those angles than I do, so I decline to enter into a discussion of them. The other people on talk also seem to feel that they have come to the end of discussing it — you see how they first referred you to WP:IDHT, WP:TE and WP:DE (did you click on those links and read?) and then stopped answering you altogether? Please be more sensitive to the exhaustion of other volunteers. I'm sure you have other interests on Wikipedia than simplifying the first sentence of India to make it "short and less clumsy" — don't you? To me that seems a very minor matter. Unless there are underlying political motives which I don't understand. But in either case, please drop the issue or I will have to consider article banning you from India and Talk:India. Bishonen | talk 13:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks, My motive is to give reader a common name at the beginning itself, but I also feel, there seems to strong political motives and a group denying the same, which shouldn't happen at fare Wikipedia. Anyway I am dropping it at present as per your advice, but experience admin like User:SpacemanSpiff (seems to be Tamilian) should work in the interest of Wikipedian mass users.

Please don't blame me for hidden motives. My motives were made very clear in my explanation. When I proposed 'Bharat' addition and not removing 'Bharat Ganrajya', people just deleted it claiming that it is making sentence more clumsy. My explanation of clumsiness was given due to that reason. My main intention was never to remove clumsiness but only give fare ness in expression on which Wikipedia shouldn't bulge.--Md iet (talk) 04:14, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed some of the content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from here or elsewhere online. Perhaps the Indian mine safety directorate performs the same functions as that in the United States, but regardless, it's not okay to copy this content without saying where you got it. — Diannaa (talk) 17:50, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Per my decision as the banning admin, which I've logged at AE, you are now free to edit talk pages and other pages regarding the Dawoodi Bohra, except articles. The article ban remains in place. Let me know if you have any questions, Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 20:50, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks EdJohnston, hope this would help me to point out/propose contribution. I understand that articles 'regardingDawoodi Bohra' covers all the Dawoodi Bohra specific articles topics having involvement of the community. General Islam / earlier history article common with other section of Islam covers vast subjects and no way directly interfere with Dawoodi Bohra interest.--Md iet (talk) 03:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Robvanvee. Md iet, thanks for creating Fakhruddin Shaheed!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article still needs references and expansion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Robvanvee 16:17, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for suggestions, specific categories added. Will appreciate if you can help further in the matter suggested.--Md iet (talk) 05:09, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your topic ban has been lifted. [5] Please remember what EdJohnston advised when editing this topic. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 15:01, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Abdul Husain Husamuddin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 12:19, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.ismaili.net/heritage/node/10624. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:38, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I would recheck.--Md iet (talk) 02:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

While the <gallery> tag is a good way to prevent the main article text from going all over the place, it is not an excuse to create galleries of marginally relevant photos just to decorate a page. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a gallery! Images should be used only to provide a better understanding of what is being said in a text. If you are interested in making galleries, use Commons, e.g. c:Al-Masjid_al-Nabawi_المسجد_النبوي. --HyperGaruda (talk) 06:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Sir , for watching my contributions to an Eagle's eye. Photos selected are of important locations of the subject articles having historical values and architectural importance in themselves, making value addition. You are always welcome to replace them with better ones.Md iet (talk) 13:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please can you suggest a good article for "Bohras" to link to in {{Shia Imam Chart}} (bottom left)? At the moment it goes to a disambiguation page listing several meanings of Bohra, but I'm not sure which meaning is most appropriate for this template. Thanks, Certes (talk) 15:01, 28 August 2017 (UTC) Bohra may link readers to proper destination. Necessary correction is done, thanks.--Md iet (talk) 16:29, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fatema , Ali and Shia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. HyperGaruda (talk) 15:18, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mohammad Family tree has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. HyperGaruda (talk) 15:36, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zaidiyyah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zaidi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Isma'ilism.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Dhtwiki (talk) 05:31, 13 October 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.164.0.75 (talk) [reply]

Last insertion of chart on 10th October in Isma'ilism was done by [6], and not me. I have tried to satisfy editors, will take care further.--Md iet (talk) 02:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC) If you want to remove the chart added by somebody else, don't make me scapegoat here.--Md iet (talk) 03:45, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Tree shia islam nn .pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:22, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Md iet. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sheikh Galip has been introduced into the picture. His name is Galip Hassan Kuscuoglu. But when you say Sheikh Galip he will be confused with the very famous Mevlevi Şeyh Galip. i.e. the name Şeyh Galip should be resevered for Şeyh Galip. Thanks108.31.158.157 (talk) 02:53, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, necessary correction made. Will be thankful further if such guidance is continued.--Md iet (talk) 05:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to the chart, it looks like most of the tariqat emerged from Alewite which is not correct. This should be corrected. All these tariqat are Alevi, and Alevism is not connected to Nusayrism.108.31.158.157 (talk) 03:28, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Same comments for this one as well. Alewite is not related to the most of the tariqat in this chart but it looks like they are Alewite108.31.158.157 (talk) 03:45, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Same comment for this chart as well. Bektashism had been influenced by Hurufism but it is not ghulat, it is more related to Sufism and Alevism. On the other hand Alewite/Nusayrism is like Hurufism i.e. ghulat. This should be corrected in the other charts as well, thanks. 108.31.158.157 (talk) 03:55, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--Md iet (talk) 03:57, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If Nusayrism and Hurufism are ghulat. It might be considered assigning same color for these sects other than gray, since the latter would be confused with Twelver108.31.158.157 (talk) 00:51, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --Md iet (talk) 04:21, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Same comments for this one too. Acoording to chart, it looks like Alevis and Bektaşis are ghulat and Alewite is sufi, I think it should be the opposite. Alevis and Bektaşis are not ghulat but Sufism.108.31.158.157 (talk) 04:04, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What about Hurufi? Is it Ghulat?--Md iet (talk) 04:10, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Q: Do they consider Fazlallah Astarabadi (Naimi) as God incarnate? Nusayrism considers Ali as God incarnate. I think Hurufis consider Fazlallah Astarabadi (Naimi) as God incarnate. If the answer is yes, Then both of them are ghulat. But Alevis and Bektaşis are not ghulat..161.253.75.216 (talk) 20:22, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --Md iet (talk) 04:22, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Md iet, please stop adding advocacy to the FGM articles. Those articles must reflect the views and language of high-quality, mainstream, appropriate sources. SarahSV ^(talk) 04:07, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, please help improving rather complete deletion.--Md iet (talk) 04:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you consider showing Pamir Ismailism (Türkistan Alevîliği) founded by Nasir Khusraw al-Qubadiani in some of your related templates, too. Thanks..161.253.75.216 (talk) 22:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely.--Md iet (talk) 14:21, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zoeb bin Moosa; looks like his name is forgotten, thanks.161.253.75.216 (talk) 19:20, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He was first Dai-ul-Mutlaq and part of the Dai box depicted.--Md iet (talk) 14:20, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Md iet, re: these edits, I asked you in December not to add any more advocacy to FGM articles. If it happens again, at that article or any other, I intend to ask that you be topic-banned from the area. SarahSV ^(talk) 20:52, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I want to apologize for using rollback to revert your edit. For some reason I wasn't able to load the page to revert manually; I kept getting a "secure connection failed" message. SarahSV ^(talk) 21:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is it advocacy to make viewer aware about the all the information available in reliable sources regarding the matter to come to right approach for solution? Being the sensitive issue, I realize that better it be discussed before inclusion of any matter in the article. In future I will take care of it. In my last edition in religious view, matter revised by me was of my inclusion only.

To help aware the menace of doing FGM using whatever methods available and making the life of innocents venerable, a better approach is required to control the dangerous practice.--Md iet (talk) 06:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with the edit is that it relied on a 29-year-old non-MEDRS source for a health issue. SarahSV ^(talk) 05:35, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oldness and type of the report is not so important if it is based on actual survey done. Only matter most is whether it is authentic.--Md iet (talk) 13:17, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Age and type of report matter a great deal. For health issues, sources must comply with WP:MEDRS. SarahSV ^(talk) 00:56, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see User talk:EdJohnston#User:Md iet. User:SlimVirgin is proposing you be banned either from Female Genital Manipulation or from the Dawoodi Bohra. You can reply on my talk page if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 21:40, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've proposed that you be banned from the topic of FGM across all of WP:ARBIPA. See this post. You can reply if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:15, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have already proposed my self to take self styled topic ban from FGM and in fact already started practicing. Thanks Ed, for hearing my just arguments and considering them. I will further abide by guidelines given by you. Thanking again,Md iet (talk) 03:42, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again User:Md iet. You have offered to take a 'self styled topic ban from FGM'. Just to clarify, that means you will agree not to edit on the topic of Female genital mutilation anywhere on Wikipedia, neither articles, talk pages, or in project space? Such a ban would apply not just to FGM by the Dawoodi Bohra but everywhere. Let me know. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 02:45, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As per your analysis I “may not be able to edit neutrally about Female genital mutilation as it applies to the practices of the Dawoodi Bohra”. Hence the main concern is for my comments or modification where DB is involved. Although In my self styled topic ban I have not specified any boundry and I will constrain myself from the topic, but defining it further as above by you is not understood. Thanks,Md iet (talk) 03:21, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That means you would also be agreeing not to edit Female genital mutilation or Talk:Female genital mutilation. EdJohnston (talk) 03:39, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely. In future as I get more conversant as of SV on the topic, I may take help of them to add my views at least to talk page to make life of FGC/FGM affected some what better. Thanks, Md iet (talk) 12:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, per the above discussion I will be entering this voluntary restriction in WP:EDR:

User:Md iet has agreed to abstain indefinitely from making edits about Female genital mutilation on all pages of Wikipedia, including both articles and talk. This is a voluntary ban but it can be enforced by blocks. The ban can be appealed in six months (that is, after 11 November 2018) at WP:AN.

Do you agree? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:55, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, as per above discussion, Md iet (talk) 03:27, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Logged at WP:Editing restrictions, in the 'Voluntary' section. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:45, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EdJohnston, although I have agreed as above, but when the ban is voluntary, is there any guidelines to restrict appealing period? If it is not, it has to be also voluntary.Md iet (talk) 02:54, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is normal to have some interval before an appeal is allowed. If you believe six months is too severe, what would you propose instead? And how should people verify in the future that you have become able to edit neutrally about Female genital mutilation? EdJohnston (talk) 02:59, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, EdJohnston, Six months is not an issue, but when the ban is voluntary, person proposing it seems know his limitations and he is to be best judge. Let him come out with appeal when he finds himself fit; decision to allow him further or not is always rest with Wiki.Md iet (talk) 10:43, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, you can appeal the ban at any time, but anybody reviewing your appeal will expect to see some evidence that the previous problems won't recur. EdJohnston (talk) 16:15, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.  Bishonen | talk 14:55, 27 April 2018 (UTC).[reply]

• I don't mean to nag you about the discretionary sanctions, Md iet, but it looks like it was over a year since you were last reminded of them. That means you're supposed to get a new alert. Bishonen | talk 14:55, 27 April 2018 (UTC).[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Imam chart-Galibi.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate file is available, the above file may be deleted.Md iet (talk) 03:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Imam chart-Hurufi.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate file is available, the above file may be deleted.Md iet (talk) 03:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Imam chart-bektashi.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate file is available, the above file may be deleted.Md iet (talk) 03:09, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you for trying to improve the quality of the article, but your edits are not matched by your edit summary!there is the paradox! At here I removed the daily news because there is not any text! do you attach every reliable sources in every places that there is no sentence there? In fact what is it confirmed by such source?! exactly anything. You nominated that I had removed the reliable source, while you deleted the book that I attach! what does it mean? Also at this edit, I removed the sentences be not suitable for Wikipedia and actually without source. why did you revert it? Regards!

You have not only removed 'daily news', but complete related material. I think you wanted to have link for referring the history. Generally in the citation book name /article name/ writer/publisher details are given. For getting the material I have added link also to see pdf copy of the material, thanksMd iet (talk) 10:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:22, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, tried to reduce pixels, hope it's ok now.Md iet (talk) 15:49, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Md iet, it seems that you haven't been alerted to the discretionary sanctions for gender-related controversies. Because you've asked to continue editing FGM-related pages, I'm posting it below. This is a formality only; it doesn't imply any wrong-doing on your part, and I'm acting here as a fellow editor, not as an admin. SarahSV ^(talk) 22:37, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SarahSV ^(talk) 22:37, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks SV for your kind alert for completing formality on your part for future. I would take special care on the part. Let me make you further clear that I am with you to fight against menace of FGM. Our aim should not be create a feature article for fame, but to help victims of real FGM and reduce complicacies arise due to the same.Md iet (talk) 07:08, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Md iet, I've closed your topic ban appeal here with this result: "The community declines to withdraw the topic ban." Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 08:01, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for wishing best Kevin, this was as expected till something extra special is not thought off. Let us give that some more time..Md iet (talk) 15:45, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Salaam, I want to ask a question. Do you consider At-Tayyib Abu'l-Qasim to be the Imam Mahdi? I noticed a parallel between the stories of At-Tayyib and Muhammad al-Mahdi (whom Twelvers consider to be their occulted Imam and the Mahdi), that is Occultation. I had to edit the article Mahdi because Twelverism was confused with Shi'ism, which as you know also includes Isma'ilism. I am also thinking of leaving most of the Twelver beliefs of the Mahdi to the article Muhammad al-Mahdi, because the section on Shi'ite views is mostly reflecting the Twelver POV. Leo1pard (talk) 15:26, 18 November 2018 (UTC); edited 15:37, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit edit is correct. Bohra consider At-Tayyib Abu'l-Qasim to be the Imam Mahdi. This is to be included in the article under heading of Isma'ilism. Twelverism do not include Ismailism, but Shiaism include both Twelverism and Ismailism. After Shia Imam Jafer there is bifurcation. One group with Imam Ismail called Ismaili, another group with Imam Musa khadim is now known as Twelvers. Thanks, for your consultation, Md iet (talk) 12:19, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Md iet. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Imam chart-nim.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Abdul Qadir Hakimuddin into Syedi Bava Mulla Khan. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:14, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Diannaa, I am the sole author ([7], [8]) of the copied material please.Md iet (talk) 03:42, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In that case atrribution is not required for this edit. Something to remember for the future though :) — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 04:28, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Gate near Imam Husayn Zarih.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:30, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi to all, I've begun a discussion on standardizing the transliteration of Isma'ilism/Ismailism and its adjectives across Wikipedia. As one of the principal contributors to the main article, I invite you to give your opinion on the matter. Constantine ✍ 17:23, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Syedi Lukman ji.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

You've made an assertion of notability, but the article desperately needs more citations

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 06:20, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Rosguill:, For reviewing the page and pointing out necessary addition required. Reputed national News paper report, tourism and encyclopedic forum published information details are added accordingly. The family tree included clearly points out his links to many Dawoodi Bohra Dai. His classic artistic Dargah photo, report of his death anniversary(Urs) in national paper and, a tourism spot declared by tourist agency further clarify his notability. Hope this is up to your satisfaction.Md iet (talk) 04:55, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Md iet, I see that the Dainik Bhaskar source doesn't use the "ji" suffix for the subject's name. Is this an honorific? If so, the article should be moved to Syedi Lukman. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:53, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, being done.Md iet (talk) 06:52, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Md iet,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Winged Blades of Godric and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Dawoodi Bohra Events, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Winged Blades of Godric}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

∯WBG^converse 06:37, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, @Winged Blades of Godric:. I have modified the content and page name. The page will be build further. Hope this is up to the mark.Md iet (talk) 10:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Urs/Milad Dawoodi Bohra Saints, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:42, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @CASSIOPEIA:, sources and citations being added.Md iet (talk) 12:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Entrance of Mosque having Mausoleum Tayyar.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Name plate zarih tayyar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ali, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sayyida Ruqayya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Sayyidah Ruqayya Mosque into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:45, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Diannaa. This will surely be taken care of. Md iet (talk) 14:19, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Old Lulua Mosque.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Ruins of Anwar Mosque before restoration work.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Old ruin of Lulua mosque of Fatimid era.jpeg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:Ruins lulua mosque with entrance and window.jpeg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Urs/Milad Dawoodi Bohra Saints and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Urs/Milad Dawoodi Bohra Saints, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 04:44, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Md iet! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 04:44, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tunnel imam salamia.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 💵Money💵emoji💵^{Talk💸Help out at CCI!} 01:02, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Urs/Milad Dawoodi Bohra Saints, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Md iet. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Milad Dawoodi Bohra Saints".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:21, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Nabi samuel campus 1.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Syedna Mohammad Burhanuddin.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:26, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Qibla mustansir.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use, very low quality.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 13:49, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Photo 48th dai bohra.pdf. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Mkame Ibrahim, Kaaba.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tourist image. Half of it is crowd, can't tell what the subject even is.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:46, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Imam chart-kay-suf.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Microsoft Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:56, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Imam chart-s.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Microsoft Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:56, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Imam chart-zayd.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Microsoft Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:58, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Imam chart0a.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Microsoft Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 18:58, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Family Tree linking Dawoodi Bohra Dai with some noted Duats.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Microsoft Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 20:38, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hisne afida Yemen.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:47, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Tree linking Dawoodi Bohra Dai with Rasulullah.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Microsoft Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 21:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dawoodi Bohra Dais with noted Duats has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Miqaats of Syedna Burhanuddin has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:54, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Dawoodi Bohra social gathering.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page File:Family tree Dawoodi Bohra Dai.pdf has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

F10 No foreseeable use since there's a better substitute at User:Md_iet in the form of a template version

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Trialpears (talk) 05:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Dai of the Dawoodi Bohra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solanki.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

corrected, right link added. Md iet (talk) 06:37, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Nabi Daud.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 17:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC) No further information is available with me at present. Any body who wants to help in this regard to fix the issue may do it or else necessaryaction can be taken.Md iet (talk) 14:26, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Burhanpur Dargah Case. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 20:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]