User talk:Master S P
|
Master S P (talk) 22:20, 11 January 2010 (UTC) I pretty sure i didn't label it as blatant vandalism, i changed the sentence so it made sense (Theres a difference between Nation of Islam and Islam which are completely two different religions so therefore he would not be considered as 'Muslim') Master S P (talk) 22:20, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Master S P,
- You didn't label it vandalism; it's complicated. Someone thought your edit was vandalism, and left a warning on your page. User:Scientizzle came by to say he didn't think you'd vandalized. Then User:LessHeard vanU came by to redact the incorrect warning, sort of making it look like Scientizzle was talking to you. It should be all sorted now; no one thinks you were vandalizing, and sorry for the rough start. --Floquenbeam (talk) 22:26, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
January 2010
<redacted>
- To be honest, I don't think this counts as blatant vandalism at all...in fact, it might well be an important point to consider in that article. here's the edit. Is [[Nation of Islam|Black Muslim]] really an appropiate piped link for the claim? — Scientizzle 21:14, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Master S P (talk) 22:49, 11 January 2010 (UTC) oh o right lol..i was confused for abit there, thanx for that though :) and no problem :)