Archives

Archive 1

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

The Body Acoustic

added links pointing to Time After Time, Puffy, All Through the Night and Shaggy

Detour (Cyndi Lauper album)

added a link pointing to Tony Brown

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	For your help on combating inflated sales and other contributions to List of best-selling Latin albums, I proudly present this barnstar to you! Erick (talk) 13:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 88marcus I was looking at the Draft:List of best-selling Latin albums and I think we should add the album Hijas del Tomate by Las Ketchup because according to the source I used for the worldwide sales the album sold around 2.6 million copies. The album was certified Platinum in Europe and Mexico and 4x Platinum in the U.S. but I was hoping you could look at the book about Spanish certifications to see if it received any higher certification than just a single Platinum. Could you look that up please? FanDePopLatino (talk) 02:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@FanDePopLatino: I only saw the platinum cert there, but you can download de book (only the certs. parts) via Mediafire (search for mediafire there, the certs are divided like: 1979 to 1990, 1990 to... and so on) on the article List of best-selling music artists.--88marcus (talk) 02:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks. FanDePopLatino (talk) 03:29, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was reading Enrique Iglesias sales and I guess its sales are really inflated. The album has only 1.66 million certified units, of which 1 million comes from RIAA "shipments". As of 2017, the album was not listed among "The Top 25 Biggest Selling Latin Albums of the Last 25 Years", which means its actual sales are less than 568K in the United States, according to Nielsen. source

With all of these, don't you think selling more than "6 million" copies worldwide is inflated? If so, can you find another source for its sales which represents a better sales number in compare to its certified units? Albums like Más and Vuelve have much more certified units for the "six million", with Vuelve doing much better and not even comparable on the charts. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 20:13, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@آرمین هویدایی: You're right. I tried to find something like 4 million but couldn't find any. Only 5 million and I included it there. If you think is inflated, just delete the information. Regarding US sales, Nielsen Soundscan did not cover all stores at that time and until the mid 2000s it was very difficult to give an accurate figure for sales by Latin artists. That's why Shakira, Ricky Martin and other artists have certificates much higher than sales calculated by them. The list you mentioned is about Nielsen sales, probably.--88marcus (talk) 22:38, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I got it and thanks for finding the source, I think 5 is ok. And thanks for explaining, yes I also saw Ricky Martin sold 987,000 sold at BMG Music Clubs, which Nielsen did not count as an example. آرمین هویدایی (talk) 11:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why Michael Jackson’s available certifications are too low? His claimed sales of the 'Thriller' and 'Bad' albums surpass million mark, with 1.5 million and 1 million respectively, although Guinness records lists 'Thriller' as having sold 3 million copies in Brazil. Jackson’s total available certification from brazil is only at 280k and that’s just does not seem right.TruthGuardians (talk) 17:29, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TruthGuardians: It's Sony Music's fault. All his albums and DVDs have at least one gold record in Brazil, but they didn't bother to certify them. I know this because since 2003, Brazilian CDs and DVDs have come with a code that represents the number of albums that were brought to stores, for example: 12 thousand (AA12000) copies of DVD Number ones were distributed initially, then another 2 thousand (AB 2000), then 2.5 thousand (AC 2500) and so on. It's the only way to know how high his sales were in Brazil, after 2003. Guinness's 3 million is as inflated as the 120 million sold copies of Thriller they posted on the site years ago, but by searching in old Brazilian newspapers you will find reports that Thriller sold over a million copies there by 1989. (codes can be viewed on the Chartmasters website or on the Ukmix forum)--88marcus (talk) 22:39, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the crash course. I’ve been in contact with the Michael Jackson Estate and they said that the 3 million figure for 'Thriller' is actually on the low side of what Sony America records prove. According to insiders, Jackson’s records were purposefully lost for political reasons to push native artists. They have receipts proving this. Based on this, I don’t believe the number is inflated. Especially considering that it sold 1.5 million copies as of 1991. It’s not hard to believe that it has sold a minimum of another 1.5 million since. Especially after Jackson died in 2009, you couldn’t keep his music in the shelves. Guinness records have since updated 'Thriller' to 66 million, but need to now be updated to 70 million pure albums sold worldwide. The album has sold 120 million records worldwide. The record keeping company needs to lower Elvis’ inflated number of a billion claimed sales. Not sure if you have noticed lately, but all year long, Jackson’s records have been certified and re-certified all over the world. Brazil needs a complete audit if you ask me, and I hope that this gets straitened out. Thanks for your time.TruthGuardians (talk) 01:35, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sing Gary Barlow album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Have you ever come across a source stating that MJ has sold more than 400m records, but less than 750M?TruthGuardians (talk) 00:42, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TruthGuardians: Unfortunally not. :( --88marcus (talk) 01:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know this a little silly, but can we change private dancer's sales figure to 11 million. I feel like that would be more appropriate since the certifications add up to 8.4 million? Miaxh (talk) 15:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Miaxh: sure! 11 is still accurate, as is 12kk.--Markus WikiEditor (talk) 17:58, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Liza Minnelli New York New York single cover.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Liza Minnelli New York New York single cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Barbra Streisand discography

added a link pointing to New York

Higher Ground (Barbra Streisand album)

added a link pointing to New York

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you thanked me for my edit on the “List of bestselling albums by year in the United States” a while back. I’m currently in an edit war with someone who believes that Brooks had the bestselling album of 1991, despite Carey outselling him through pre-SoundScan sales. Nielsen SoundScan started tracking albums in late May 1991, which would disregard the first five months of album sales for that year. The page states that Nielsen should only be taken into account for the years 1992 and onwards; 1991 should adhere to the old rules. I’m having a hard time communicating with them as they believe MRC Data is the only factor in this situation. What should I do? Ironman1p (talk) 16:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marcus. Do you happen to know if The Lion King (1994 soundtrack) actually sold 1.2 million in Brazil? I early included those figures in the List of best-selling albums in Brazil), but book hasn't a preview when trying to re-verify tbh. Also, do you think this source is ok to use? Information forwarded by Aftenposten but not sure at all about the domain. Cheers, --Apoxyomenus (talk) 01:46, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Apoxyomenus: Hi. I couldn't find nothing about the sales of TLK soundtrack, only about the VHS which sold over 900,000 here at the time. link The site you mentioned seems reliable to me.--Markus WikiEditor (talk) 18:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:¿Dónde Están Corazón? single cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 00:54, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Redeeming Sin Lobby Card.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Levivich^[block] 06:36, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kylie's Confide in Me.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:I Wish You Love More from The Bodyguard cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Christina Aguilera with the LA Phil poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:10, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Several years ago, there was a dispute regarding the Certifications table on album pages and whether or not we include pure album sales in its own column with sources (as certification numbers, and pure sales numbers aren’t always the same). This discussion has recently been re-opened here. If you have the chance, please comment. --Blastmaster11 (talk) 01:14, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Tropical Nights (album)

added links pointing to Hollywood, Remastering, Broadway, Mastering and The Singer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

At Carnegie Hall (Liza Minnelli album)

added links pointing to LP, Medley and New York

Liza's Back

added a link pointing to New York

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi how are you doing ?. Can you add Oasis to the 75 million mark on the biggest selling artists in music history please ?. I follow this quite closely and I believe they have crossed the threshold. Can you have a look at this and add them to the list please ?. Many Thanks 178.167.180.191 (talk) 20:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Markus can you help me out with this please ?. Thank you 31.200.159.213 (talk) 15:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jeremy The Remix.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 21:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeremy The Remix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy The Remix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 23:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Try My Love (Jeremy Jordan album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giant Records.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening (Peruvian time), I would like to touch on the topic of the million copies in Brazil of Shakira with "Pies Descalzos" since no matter how many times I find references for sales of more than a million they are reversed, if the closest figure is used it will not It makes sense since Madonna's album "True Blue" certified "Gold" and its figure is one million based on a Pop page as a source. I found sources of sales of 1 million and even more, however they are reversed by adjusting to just 500,000. AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 02:59, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @AlexanderShakifan29:. Shakira's sales that these sites report are exaggerated, the most reliable sources say 500,000 and 750,000 in Brazil. As I follow Wikipedia in Portuguese, I noticed that some sites published sales of 1.5 million copies after a user posted this unsourced information in Shakira articles. It's circular information, it happens all the time on Wikipedia. Can we come to an agreement and leave maybe 750,000? Regarding Madonna, the gold certificate received is only for sales in the CD format from 1990 to 1996. In 1993, reliable newspapers and magazines stated that the album had sold around 800 thousand copies in the country. You can speak in the article's talk if you disagree with the inclusion of "1 million" as claim sales.--Markus WikiEditor (talk) 19:07, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding that, before someone in Portuguese Wikipedia edited those 1.5 million, a page from Brazil from 2016 called "Diario de Santa Maria" published it. It can be used as a reliable source considering that the figure of 500,000 and even 750,000 are from YEARS AGO. AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 20:04, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Link: https://web.archive.org/web/20160622130818/http://diariodesantamaria.clicrbs.com.br/rs/cultura-e-lazer/noticia/2016/06/skank-spice-girls-e-shakira-o-que-esses-artistas-tem-em-comum-6097519.html AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 20:05, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AlexanderShakifan29: It's a question of coherence. If Shakira had sold 1.5 million copies with an album here she would have come to live in Brazil, not even in Colombia did her album sell all that. All these sites don't work with artists' sales issues, they take information from Wikipedia and fan sites, and sometimes from information given by record companies. In music articles on Wikipedia there is a consensus not to list sales much higher than the certificate received, except in cases of very old albums, released when there were few organizations that audit record sales, etc. For example, it is not stated that Beatles, Elvis, Michael Jackson sold 1 billion but rather more than 500 million and a note talking about these billion-dollar sales. Shakira's certificate was only Platinum, for 250 thousand copies sold, there is no record (or maybe I haven't found it yet) in any record label conference, or Brazilian TV show Shakira receiving a diamond record, or 6x platinum for selling 1 .5 million here. Her album that came after didn't even reach 250 thousand. regarding the information that the estimates of 500 thousand and 750 thousand are from years ago, there are more current people talking about this number and CD sales are low after the artist stops promoting it. That would be to say that the album sold 750 thousand after its release, which is the sum of all the albums released by Shakira together. I think this is a bit unlikely to be true. The estimate of 500 thousand was given in 2020. After I have said all this, what do you think should be done so that you and I can reach an agreement?--Markus WikiEditor (talk) 20:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In this case I consider that the closest is the figure of 750,000 copies, as you said, you can edit it in the article. AlexanderShakifan29 (talk) 01:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Markus WikiEditor! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Bing Crosby several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Bing Crosby, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:12, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Doniago:. I understand the rules, but this user is a difficult case to handle. He was expelled from the Spanish Wikipedia for turning the Bing Crosby article into a fan page, as well as for poor writing and disregard for references. He threatened to use multiple IDs and said it would be impossible to stop him from editing the Bing Crosby page. Eventually, he was expelled. Here on the English Wikipedia, he had some issues as well for doing the same things he did on the other wiki, but he stopped editing. However, he continues to use different IDs to edit the page, as you can see in the edit history. It’s impossible to communicate with him, as you must have seen. I kept all the information he added, but he continued to revert changes. It’s difficult to deal with a user like this. Markus WikiEditor (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your explanation, but the point remains: you (or the IP; I've warned you both) should have initiated a conversation at the article's Talk page by now. If they continue to try to re-insert their edits, we can request page protection, but evidence that you've attempted a good-faith dialogue on the Talk page (i.e. explain the situation and why you feel your version is stronger or what the IP is doing that's problematic, and avoid conduct issues or issues occurring else-wiki), and that they haven't reciprocated, would make for a much stronger case for protecting the page. I hope this helps! DonIago (talk) 17:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I filed a request at RFPP but it was declined in part because there is no existing discussion regarding the content dispute. I'm happy to keep reverting the edit-warring IP when I see them trying to push through their edits, but I don't really understand the nature of the content dispute. If you could start a Talk page discussion (and the IP doesn't respond to it), we'll be in a much better position to get the page protected. DonIago (talk) 13:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Doniago: It appears he has stopped vandalizing the page. If it starts again I'll make a post on the Talk page.--Markus WikiEditor (talk) 00:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Evergreens: Celebrating Six Decades on Columbia Records, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:11, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi how are you doing today ?. I found two links that say Oasis has passed 100 million sales.. The first I had was from the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame website. Oasis were nominated to be inducted this year. On the profile of the band it said they had sold over 100 million records worldwide, of course the link seems dead since the event is over. is there anyway we could have the nominees bios archived by anyone on here ?. I have another source would that be enough to get the band to the 100 million sales mark ?. Regards 92.251.155.97 (talk) 22:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. For Oasis to be included in the list of artists who have sold over 100 million copies, a calculation is needed. They are artists from the 1990s, I don't know if the certificates of less than 60 million are enough to include them in that section. You should register on Wikipedia, as it is the easiest way to communicate with other editors. I don't even know if you will get that response. Markus WikiEditor (talk) 00:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I found the Rock and Roll hall of fame quote from this years induction saying they had 100 million sales . how many cert sales do you think they need 92.251.155.97 (talk) 01:40, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. You could ask in the Talk of the article. Markus WikiEditor (talk) 01:56, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi you said you were going to do a calculation is that correct  ?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.251.149.132 (talk) 13:31, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi can you update the above please. Oasis have updated sales of 1.5 million units in the UK since 19 July. Can you add please ?. Regards 178.167.132.104 (talk) 11:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@178.167.132.104: You can do that in the article by yourself.--Markus WikiEditor (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I cannot do it on the best selling music artists of all time. It should have been 1.5 million certs you missed 300k certs for Definitely maybe that needs to be added also. Is that ok please ?. Thanks 178.167.132.104 (talk) 16:16, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@178.167.132.104: Strange. When we search for Oasis in BPI website appear that they have only two certifications since July: Half The World Away (+300) and Live Forever (+300). When I click in general BRIT Certified appeared more two updates only in September. Maybe you can see here link and included here in the talk the name of the single/album and the amount of copies that need to be included. Markus WikiEditor (talk) 16:25, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely Maybe went 9x platinum in September, you can clearly see it so they should have another 300k. I notice that site does not update bands certs for weeks but when you go through week by week and you can clearly see extra certs for all artists. You can have a look. Thank you 178.167.132.104 (talk) 22:07, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Refrescante, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sergio Gonzalez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Fuego (Menudo album)

added links pointing to West Coast, East Coast and Cashbox

Feliz Navidad (Menudo album)

added a link pointing to Cashbox

Los Fantasmas

added a link pointing to Cashbox

Quiero Ser

added a link pointing to Cashbox

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Abba - The Singles - The First Ten Years (cover).jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 07:11, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did the right thing. I included the name of the website: Spotify. Are you sure you are right about that? Markus WikiEditor (talk) 07:40, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you took an image from some Internet source, then in the "source" column you need to indicate the page on which the file you took is located. — Ирука¹³ 07:49, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I did that! I included Spotify Markus WikiEditor (talk) 07:53, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To what page? — Ирука¹³ 07:56, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give me an exemple of a page which use the right source from Spotify? English is not my first language and I don’t understand what is wrong with that. I saw multiples pictures that use only the website name here in Wikipedia for years... thanks in advance. Markus WikiEditor (talk) 08:13, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Diff/1257705977/1257714795. — Ирука¹³ 08:26, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now I understood! Thank you! I'll fix soon me past edits. Markus WikiEditor (talk) 18:00, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Reaching Out (Menudo album)

added links pointing to Rock and American

Vem Pra Mim

added a link pointing to Single

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quiero Ser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marvel.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help me to add these please if I give you all the figures ?. Is that ok please ?. Regards 92.251.131.222 (talk) 18:33, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'll do that soon. Markus WikiEditor (talk) 21:05, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ayer y Hoy (Menudo album)

added a link pointing to Menudo

Evolución (Menudo album)

added a link pointing to Playback

Refrescante...

added a link pointing to Michael Sullivan

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Markus! I searched on El Siglo de Torreon and found nothing. Have you tried El Informador? Erick (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking into it @Magiciandude. I'll check out that Informador link too. Thanks. :) Markus WikiEditor (talk) 17:44, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]