Thank you for uploading Image:Giorgio 3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 19:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Hi, there isnt so much info about Alfa trucks on the internet, but if you look at for example http://www.trucksplanet.com/catalog/index.php?id=100 it list both civilian and military trucks prodcution years. Let me know if you find other good sources about these trucks, im also intrested about writing these to the English wikipedia. -->Typ932 ^T·C 17:28, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pontoon fenders has been proposed for a merge with an article you've edited. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. 842U (talk) 13:34, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cazzola, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao, sto segnalando a qualche wikipediano attivo su it.wiki e anche un po' qua questo Wikipedia:JSTOR, magari interessa. Mi pare di non aver scorso il tuo nome nell'archivio delle richieste approvate.

In "Requirements" c'è scritto che bisogna avere "a minimum of 1000 edits to the encyclopedia": l'ho inteso in senso "largo", e da certi commenti dovrebbe essere così, anche se comunque tu sei abbastanza attivo qua su en.wiki... Secondo me l'importante è dimostrare che si è utenti attivi e capaci di trasmettere le consocenze su più fronti. Anche se va male, sapranno che esistiamo, e ci verranno incontro, se serve ed è possibile, nei prossimi anni (parlano di un aumento delle licenze). Ovviamente se hai già un account su JSTOR non c'è alcun vantaggio ed è sconsigliato, ma non posso sapere chi di voi l'ha già.

Ti informo come ho informato altri contributori usuali su it.wiki. Tu sei molto attivo sia nelle voci lombarde che quelle di motori, e sei amministratore, quindi hai un sufficiente impatto medio e una buona trasversalità.--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:39, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cassoeula, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Help. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LukeWiller. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LukeWiller. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LukeWiller. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Legnano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Borgo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Legnano, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Arona, Cina and Marocco (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LukeWiller,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username CAPTAIN MEDUSA and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Church of Beata Vergine Assunta for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CAPTAIN MEDUSA}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 11:09, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Basilica of San Magno, Legnano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Provost

Church of Beata Vergine Assunta, San Giorgio su Legnano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Presbytery

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done thanks. --LukeWiller (talk) 07:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC).[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Olona, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castelseprio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done thanks. --LukeWiller (talk) 16:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC).[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Olona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Field, Lura, Po and Monte Stella

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done thanks. --LukeWiller (talk) 16:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Hello there, and thank you for your many additions to Legnano! In the future, would you please get into the habit of adding punctuation before citations (MOS:CITEPUNCT)? It would save other editors the time of changing it. Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 14:42, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Olona, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campo dei Fiori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --LukeWiller (talk) 15:26, 18 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Battle of Legnano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Miniature

Guido da Landriano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lodi

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --LukeWiller (talk) 19:44, 16 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Hello
Seeing your extensive contribution to the thread i am more thinking on a restructure and condensing of this aticle. in my opinion it is too broad and too much fringe than the actual topic (the battle) itself. so im thinking of creating a draft and than showing it to you first and if you agree, not agree or even edit additional info. to it, in the next days. in my opinion this specific article should focus only on events in 1176, the battle and the resulting aftermatch, everything else should have its own thread or be in the respective existing threads in order to avoid doublings and repetition over several threads. also i would base the article more on primary sources rather then secondary sources (and no conjecture). i will let you know when it is finished, take a look and decide if its acceptable.
PS.: is there really need for a map with location in the infobox? in light of the info. on location as well as coordinates, it is also not customary in the other related articles.
Greetings

im afraid i disagree with that assessment, the article includes entire passages that do not deal with the topic and are better off in other, still non-existing, articles like 'carcano' 'milan(1162)' and 'alessandria' and if these are not enough then there are further articles such as 'lombard league' 'guelphs and ghibellines' or 'frederick I' -also as an example informations such as the castle of legnano(while interesting and well researched) are utterly useles for this article and better off in the article on 'legnano', dont you think? this article should begin with the failed peace treaty and the renewel in january 1176 of the lombard league, this article also misses out on important information (for exmaple) such as the emperors war (christian of mainz) against the normans (carsoli march 1176) and why these were present in venice 1177 and the lombards not yet obtained a seperate peace in 1183, all that for the aftermath section. this article needs a good look through and a restruction. your contribs. are safed eitherway, so edit them to the coresponding articles if you like or not.
greetings
PS.: a map is therefor then not necessary as the function 'Location' wil suffice in revealing the location along with the given coordinates, also i agree that medieval battles are largely conjecture in seconday literature and that is why this should not be a collection of conjectures from said lit. but an informative article based on the known facts -no matter how brief it might be. also the enire premise of the article is wrong that this was a conflict between the 'north italian municipalities' and the emperor in light of cremona and pavia, also the neglect of northern italy is utterly false in light of three imperial diets and five campaigns.

ofcourse there wont be an edit war, but do consider posting some of the info into the more appropriate threads. again this is more about condensing the article with a clearer and better comprhendable structure smth. like:

Prelude -lombard league and the emperor's fifth campaign -montebello and the renewel of armed conflict

The Battle

Aftermath

Significance
it is not really about changing the article or replacing the content, though the aftermatch section needs more information.
greetings

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Battle of Legnano (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Brenner, Barbarian Invasion and Roncaglia

Oath of Pontida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Giuseppe Mazza

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:31, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --LukeWiller (talk) 08:46, 30 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flag of Italy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Unknown Soldier and Charity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --LukeWiller (talk) 08:47, 30 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Il Canto degli Italiani, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Patriot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --LukeWiller (talk) 07:42, 12 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Hello, LukeWiller,

Thank you for creating Bollettino della Vittoria Navale.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Bollettino della Vittoria Navale on Google Books.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

scope_creep^Talk 01:04, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canegrate culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rovio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:39, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Si prega di completare la pagina Draft:Vittoria Schisano ٬Please complete the page Vittoria Schisano زاید الوصف (talk) 07:29, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Foibe massacres

added a link pointing to Pola

Istrian-Dalmatian exodus

added a link pointing to Pola

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dalmatian Italians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cockade of Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emilia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Italian diaspora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emilia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Italian cuisine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern Italian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Name of Italy into Italy. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 02:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, indeed, except that I've always managed to screw up any template that comes within a mile. I've sort-of half-done the Brinkmann ref (or at least a Brinkmann ref), but managed to balls it up, so there's bits of template all over the place. I was wondering if you could sort it out for me (it's in the sources section now...). You seem like someone who would do that very efficiently... best Haploidavey (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm ridiculously pleased with my self, having fixed the problems with the Brinkmann ref. Unfortunately the ref above it seems to be malformed. Haploidavey (talk) 21:30, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tourism in Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Six Nations.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cinema of Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maciste all'inferno.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geography of Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gondo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of rivers of Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Po.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the new map in SVG format.

Let me know if there are any further modifications you would like me to make. Also, I have added what I think is the correct name in Italian (Mappa di parchi nazionali e regionali in Italia) as a placeholder, but can you please verify that it's correct? If it isn't, please change it on Wikimedia Commons. --Nsophiay (talk) 20:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LukeWiller! I hope you're doing well! I was going through some logs, and I saw that your user page has been torn up a number of times by vandals and trolls. I also noticed that it had no protection at all. I went ahead and fixed that for you. ;-) If you don't want this protection applied and would like it removed, let me know and I'll be happy to do that for you. I just figured I'd help you out and let you know about it. ;-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:14, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ISTAT.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agriculture in Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Industry.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm afraid an article you recently created, Theatre of Italy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It uses a strong essay tone in several parts, most statements and claims are not sourced, and a significant percentage of the existing sources are unreliable (personal websites and term papers) or don't support what the article states.

It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ► LowLevel73 ^(talk) 11:47, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Luke Willer, I clicked unintentionally the reverse bottom to revert John Florio's picture, before writing a comment. I am going to write here, why I think the image of Florio is more important in the page 'Culture of Italy'. John Florio was of Italian origin (unlike Shakespeare) and Florio was the main ambassador of Italian culture in the Elizabethan era and in the following century (through his dictionary), the main influencer of Italophilia in the XVII and also he is one of the major lexicographer of English language. I read you are Italian and I also invite you to read the following page, where it explains Florio's influence on Shakespeare. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza_di_Giovanni_Florio_sulle_opere_shakespeariane — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.66.217.217 (talk) 13:21, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I wrote you in talk and then you reverted it as a vandalism. So I guess, you wanted just to impose your opinion. We can add both images to the pages. As I wrote, John Florio is the main contributor to the development of Italophilia in the English world in the XVII century and on.

"John Florio is one of the most prominent linguists and educators in Elizabethan England, Florio was greatly responsible for the spreading of Italian letters and culture throughout educated English society. Especially important was Florio’s dictionary, which – thanks to its exuberant wealth of English definitions – made it initially possible for English readers to access Italy’s rich Renaissance literary and scientific culture" (Award-winning author Hermann W. Haller) 79.66.217.217 (talk) 13:46, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Sport in Italy

added links pointing to Rally, Endurance race, Motoring and Benelli

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Rosetta Barnstar
		Awarded for your efforts in improving the article Folklore of Italy from the Italian language article. Awarded by Cdjp1 (talk) 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Cdjp1 (talk) 16:45, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Traditions of Italy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Palestine and Epiphany.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Traditions of Italy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Grand Canal and Corpus Christi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was wondering why my contribution in Italian architecture was removed (among other things, I realized that I was not even logged into the Wiki by mistake). I added the Apulian Romanesque Architecture, a very normal and very formal object of study in any book of the history of Italian art, in the Romanesque area. I await an answer, thanks. Dominy Talosyen (talk) 22:53, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Commedia all'italiana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steno.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cinema of Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Il sorpasso.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Continuavano a chiamarli... er più e er meno has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM. No reviews found

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theatre of Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Samnite.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved this article to draft space, other than IMDB, you haven't added one source. The article needs multiple independent sourcing. Regards. Govvy (talk) 10:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ugo Fantozzi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Le Monnier.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article I due evasi di Sing Sing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 22:28, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No real disagreement with your eliminations of unsourced claims re Italian, but please do keep in mind that ^{[citation needed]} has a function, and can take more than just a few days to be satisfied. Barefoot through the chollas (talk) 19:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I due evasi di Sing Sing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I due evasi di Sing Sing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 03:49, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

he is removing all croatian names for croatian cities which were occupied by fascist italy in WW2 and chaing them with italian names, while having all other people reverting back to prior situation before his interventions, banned due to his high position 89.17.4.83 (talk) 00:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LukeWiller . I noticed that you used ethnicelebs.com as a reference for biographical information in Ron DeSantis. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 18:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Italian Peruvians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ligurian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Italian Bolivians is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 16:50, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on I due evasi di Sing Sing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I due evasi di Sing Sing. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:54, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Italian Uruguayans, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Italians in Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Years of Lead.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Himayuney (talk) 21:09, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LukeWiller. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:I due pericoli pubblici, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LukeWiller. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "I due pericoli pubblici".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:26, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LukeWiller!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when citing journal articles, like those which you added to Roman republic, please do not just provide a {{cite web}} citation. More bibliographic information adds substantially to the credibility and verifiability of the locations cited. I think NebY's expansion of one of your citations here would be a good thing to do. Ifly6 (talk) 19:08, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In case you don't know already, Wikipedia's editor can do most of it automatically. Once I'd found that journal webpage https://riviste.unimi.it/index.php/noema/article/view/9955, I could paste that URL into the Automatic tab of citation builder in Wikipedia's editor - all I had to add was the publisher. It would be quicker and easier for you, because you knew where you'd found the article and that you'd cited an authentic, scholarly peer-reviewed publication, compliant with WP:RS and WP:SCHOLARSHIP; I had to discover that. Hope this helps. NebY (talk) 20:02, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read the citations that are generated. Some of the citations you've added to Roman republic are in all caps instead of sentence or title case and also lack important language metadata. Also, the existing style uses {{harvc}} for parts of an existing work; per WP:CITEVAR additions should be consistent with the existing style. The added citation to the OCD⁴ article on Brennus, for example, should have been added inside the OCD⁴ section and should have noted its print publication date rather than its posting online. WP:CITE's Date a book that is identically reprinted or printed-on-demand to the first date in which the edition became available applies here because it is the online-"printing" of an existing book published in 2012. Ifly6 (talk) 22:59, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also want to explain why I reverted a certain edit you made linking some random website. Wikipedia prioritises citations to reliable sources. I consider this, foremost, to be WP:SCHOLARSHIP; I also think unreliable sources should be removed in part because their addition actively misleads readers (both by leading them to the wrong sources and also by giving a misleading impression of rigour). Some of the sources you've added are also rather old. WP:AGEMATTERS in these cases: one of the cases for example talks about one of the Crassi who is alleged to have been a member of the democratic party. Such reductive readings of Roman politics, rendering them into democratic and aristocratic parties, are discredited. See Optimates and populares. Ifly6 (talk) 23:03, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roman expansion in Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Veneti.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of coins in Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solidus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of earthquakes in Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apennine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Fall of the Fascist regime in Italy. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 08:06, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HI! In your opinion, shouldn't the Marco Polo page have "Italian merchant" or at least "Italian (Venetian) merchant" written in the lead? With perhaps a note explaining that already at the time the inhabitants of the peninsula were called Italians, like in the Niccolò and Maffeo Polo page. There is a discussion about it 158.148.249.134 (talk) 16:53, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in my opinion "Italian" is correct. The concept is explained in the chapter: Name of Italy#Evolution of the territory called "Italy". I hope I have been of help to you. Regards. --LukeWiller (talk) 17:06, 24 October 2023 (UTC).[reply]

could you correct the page? 5.168.76.133 (talk) 19:29, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, I can't, it's just my opinion: there is in fact a discussion about it. Regards. --LukeWiller (talk) 21:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Milan, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:11, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For all your work on pages concerning Italian culture. JackkBrown (talk) 17:42, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm editing the Neapolitan cuisine and Cuisine of Abruzzo pages, if you want to have a look at it too, that would be great. JackkBrown (talk) 20:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think of the Italian language article on Neapolitan cuisine? Is it better than the one in English? https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cucina_napoletana. JackkBrown (talk) 11:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your work on the Milan article! LibStar (talk) 06:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you also put this link to all the other pasta dishes? If you want to. Page: List of Italian dishes. JackkBrown (talk) 12:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Only if you want, you could also add the link you added to the Pavese agnolotti page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1190440329) to all the other pasta dishes on the List of Italian dishes page. JackkBrown (talk) 15:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I did it all. I just have two doubt: is "timballo" a pasta dish or is it just pasta? Should "pasta e ceci" be written in italics or not? JackkBrown (talk) 17:03, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the list I have added many unknown foods, I don't know whether these should only be included in the regions. My question is: should all regional foods from the various regions also be added to the main lists (e.g. "tortino di riso alla valdostana")? If you want, you can check all the main lists down to the regions, because I have certainly added some really unknown foods that perhaps shouldn't be included in the main lists as well, because otherwise the regional lists don't make sense (of course I'm always referring to the List of Italian dishes page). JackkBrown (talk) 23:12, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What shall we do? I'm done for tonight. If you want you can do something tonight, I will check this afternoon. JackkBrown (talk) 00:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. I removed two/three foods from the main lists. JackkBrown (talk) 14:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On the "Crescia" page there is a reference without the text, where should it be? Surely not there. JackkBrown (talk) 15:01, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here: Crescia#Local variants. JackkBrown (talk) 15:05, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work on the Lombardy section of the List of Italian dishes page. JackkBrown (talk) 17:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to ask: should the template "Plainlist" also be inserted in the "Type" section of the infobox or only in the "Region" and "Country" sections? Panzerotti. JackkBrown (talk) 20:49, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here I have added some foods, I don't know in which paragraphs to add them, could you help me? JackkBrown (talk) 17:10, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm referring to the five foods I added just below the paragraph. JackkBrown (talk) 17:21, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is an old question, but you can answer it if you want (in any case, I will look for all the foods I have listed myself): Talk:List of Italian dishes. JackkBrown (talk) 17:28, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where? JackkBrown (talk) 18:47, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here: Talk:List of Italian dishes#Italics or not?. JackkBrown (talk) 19:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But... is this link the answer to all my questions about cursive? Is it? So I can consult this link and never ask anyone this kind of question again? JackkBrown (talk) 19:12, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tourism in Italy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bellagio.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello colleague. I would like to ask you if you could recommend a user who could translate one fragment from archaic Italian into English? With respect. Smpad (talk) 13:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, I wrote the article about an influential Levantine merchant Khwaja Bedik.

There is an interesting primary source that writes about him, an Italian traveler Pietro Della Valle, in this book (edition) — Viaggi Di Pietro Della Valle, Il Pellegrino. He writes his name as Chogia Abedik. Information is scattered through pages 848—852.

I asked a colleague from the Russian wiki to translate what was written about him (Chogia Abedik), but he is an amateur learner of Italian. This is approximately what I received:

"Chogia Abedik is very important and respected among them [Armenian Christian gentlemen from Julfa]; this not only means that he is a good Christian and a good friend, as always was with the people of the Franks; but that that he is so religious and pious that it [represents] a mirror of religiosity and Eastern Christianity. This lies in the fact that no matter how many sons a person has, he still spends all his [wealth] on the construction of churches and decorations of [their] walls, silver crosses, cups and other necessary things. And in this new Isfahan Julfa, where they were forced to move after the king destroyed the ancient Armenian Julfa, which was located on the border with Turkey on the Araks River, out of ten churches, one was completely built and maintained by Chogia Abedik with his own money, and in another [church] he contributed most of the funds, although [its construction] is attributed to the names of other [people]. And [still] he helped and helps to create countless works of art in the surrounding villas every day. But I do not want to be silent about another manifestation of his kindness. In the wars that took place in Armenia and Georgia, when [the lives] of many thousands of Christians were turned upside down, and they became slaves, out of the love of God, at his own expense, he redeemed [from slavery] and freed more than four thousand people, diligently looking for them even in distant lands, [he returned] sons to fathers, wives to husbands, and relatives to relatives so that they would not be lost. And in order to do this, not having enough cash and not being able to quickly sell the silks he had, he borrowed them from the Shirvan Khan, who was also the son of a Christian Armenian, giving him as a pledge the silk and what he had owned. This is real mercy, I don't know if more can be done."

I would like to ask you to correct/rewrite the text, since Italian is your native language.

I will be very grateful to you. With respect. Smpad (talk) 14:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Easter food, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Expedition of the Thousand, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:28, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Expedition of the Thousand, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you like to help me solve the problems of references 21 and 28? JackkBrown (talk) 22:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, which of these foods would you move to other paragraphs? JackkBrown (talk) 04:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but before moving the foods from the other foods paragraph (e.g. frico is neither fish nor meat nor pasta, etc.; perhaps I could move it to the cheese dishes paragraph), I need to understand in which paragraphs to move them. JackkBrown (talk) 01:53, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lombardy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Apennine and Kilometro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		For your work on Lombardy. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:36, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, how are you? If I can give you some advice, on the List of Italian dishes and Italian cuisine pages we use the "lang it" template, not simple italics, and, if you can, try to avoid overlinking. Thank you very much for your very useful contributions and have a nice day! JacktheBrown (talk) 15:04, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted the IP of the usual permanently blocked spanish sockmaster at ancient Rome, but now he is distrupting the page battle of Lepanto (Flenaot, Floutomb, Tranblit are some of his socks active there) to hide that most ships were from Italian states and put Spain first in the intro and the infobox (this he did a lot of time ago with another sock). In my opinion, given the number of ships involved, Venice should be first in the infobox and we should restore the part of the intro he removed in which the ships and captains are listed. Note that in the previous years he also tried to the switch the number of ships from Spain and Venice. Now he doesnt do that anymore, 'cause it was literally invented out of nowhere, so he came up with the story that Philip II financed the league the most and so he was the leader of it. Which I suspect to be non-sense and should be removed. In any case most ships were Venetian and the political leader of the Holy League was the Pope, so why should Spain be first? no one knows. John of Austria (who he has also tried in the past and on his page to make a Spaniard...except he was German, altough it's true he was the half-brother of Philip II) should be first among the listed commanders, but the countries in the infobox should be listed accordingly to the number of ships. I think. 2A01:E11:17:40B0:6C11:25E0:1350:5186 (talk) 15:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to ask you something: I have a strong doubt about ravioli; it.wiki writes that they are a first course, while en.wiki writes that they are a type of pasta. JacktheBrown (talk) 17:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but what's the correct concept? Because I need to know in which paragraph of the list of Italian foods and drinks page to put this food ("pasta varieties" or "pasta dishes"). JacktheBrown (talk) 18:53, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Same for gnocchi? JacktheBrown (talk) 20:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Same for casoncelli? JacktheBrown (talk) 14:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you're adding some images to the list of Italian foods and drinks page. A little while ago I was looking for a nice image to add to the ciambella page, but I only found images of American donuts; would you like to help me? JacktheBrown (talk) 08:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roads in Italy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Serravalle and Milestones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If it existed, I would give you a barnstar for your choice of images :) JacktheBrown (talk) 14:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in your opinion are the articles on Giuseppe Garibaldi and Giuseppe Mazzini of quality? The Italian-language Wikipedia page on Garibaldi has 435 references, including notes (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giuseppe_Garibaldi); I don't understand why there's such an exaggerated difference. JacktheBrown (talk) 18:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have just added the "Refimprove" template (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Giuseppe_Garibaldi&diff=prev&oldid=1217428377). However, my question was intended as follows: why is the article in Italian so long, while the one in English is "only" 90,910 bytes long? It cannot be a question of language, because Garibaldi is very well known worldwide. JacktheBrown (talk) 19:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to expand the article? Or is it OK according to the policies of en.wiki? Some time ago I was told that even if a particular article is longer in it.wiki it's not necessarily better, because the references in the English language Wikipedia are better (and this is true, it's full of gossip references in Italian language articles. I'm not referring to Garibaldi). Also, to quote an article, the article on Italy is better in the English-language Wikipedia, as is the article on the Roman Empire. JacktheBrown (talk) 20:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So if I wanted to expand the article I couldn't because it's already good enough, or could I expand it? JacktheBrown (talk) 20:33, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In your opinion, does the page on Giuseppe Mazzini also need new references? JacktheBrown (talk) 11:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your choice of images, always of excellent quality. JacktheBrown (talk) 18:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please put the images in alphabetical order on the list of Italian foods and drinks page. JacktheBrown (talk) 23:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Italian language in Croatia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you had added this text that I just removed, please see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Antonio_Bajamonti&diff=prev&oldid=1217779071 --Joy (talk) 20:55, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, an user has deleted some images from the list of Italian foods and drinks page (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Italian_foods_and_drinks&diff=prev&oldid=1219614276); since you're the biggest contributor as far as adding pictures is concerned, in a positive sense of course, if you want to check whether this user has deleted beautiful pictures, that would be a good thing; it would be nice to keep the most beautiful pictures in terms of quality (example: "pecorino romano", a very good image, unfortunately deleted). JacktheBrown (talk) 22:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted two images and restored two, otherwise the user (with all due respect to him) could certainly delet my changes; I don't trust. JacktheBrown (talk) 23:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Autostrada A2 (Italy), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Petina, Polla and Palmi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Autostrada A12 (Italy), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Roma and Levanto.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Luke, I am Barjimoa but I cannot log in from the house I am right now, because here i don't have the password. Please reconsider your position. I know you are in good faith, but terms here are EXTREMELY important.

The dominant concept is that the partisans fought an "Italian war of liberation" from BOTH Nazi occupation and the collaborationist Fascists (https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerra_di_liberazione_italiana). And this is why it's called Liberation day. You can do a rapid check on the bibliography here (https://it.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Bibliografia/Resistenza_italiana) to see how serious scholars and the vast majority of people talk of a Liberation war; only a few biased authors (usually neo-fascists and non-historians) speak only of a civil war. It is not my opinion, not long ago I had the opposite opinion, then I had the chance to read some books about this topic and realized what a massive mistake I was led to believe.

The point is this: the Italian resistance heavily fought against the Nazis, giving a contribution to the Liberation of Italy from German occupation, and whoever reads "Italian civil war" automatically excludes this by definition because it's a concept PRECISELY created to exclude that aspect and limit everything to Italians vs Italians (giving equal legitimacy to the Kingdom of Italy and the RSI state). As I said, the Italian civil war article uses as a source Giorgio Pisanò, a non-academic and a neo-fascist. His goal was to reduce the Italian Resistance to a civil war in order to eliminate the role of Italian resistance against Nazi Germany. Another one who popularised this concept is Giampaolo Pansa, again not a scholar; he wrote books without even putting sources and bibliography in them. They are polemic books by journalists, not good for doing history.

On the other hand this concept, based on the argument that the Italian resistance did nothing of value against the Germans, has been totally disproved and rejected by most serious and academic historians and also by people who where in the Resistance and wrote excellent sourced books and memoirs (Villari, Flores, Franzinelli, R. Cadorna, Bencivenga, I.Muraca etc. etc.).

To be fair, there is one serious scholar who talks of a civil war: Claudio Pavone. He himself, however, says that the "civil war" is a SUB-ASPECT of the Liberation war, which is the dominant concept and more broadly refers to the war against both German occupiers and the collaborationist Fascists. So, if we use him to rebrand the whole Liberation struggle solely as a civil war, he is misquoted.

So one can say that, within the Resistance and Liberation war, there is ALSO an Italian civil war (according to Pavone) but reducing the "Italian liberation war" to only an "Italian civil war" follows an old and always rejected biased thesis. 2A01:E11:17:40B0:31ED:3784:5E7:6A17 (talk) 16:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Autostrada A18 (Italy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cassibile.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, how are you? I would like to ask you if you think cappuccino and bagna càuda originated in Italy; in my opinion, yes. JacktheBrown (talk) 14:30, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What I think is wrong is the imposition: these two users edited these two pages without first reaching a consensus, which is not correct for Wikipedia; I hope to resolve this situation as soon as possible. JacktheBrown (talk) 14:47, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Autostrada A24 (Italy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Autostrada A1.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	GREAT work on the Italy article!!!!!!!!!! Moxy🍁 12:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Autostrada A26 (Italy)

added a link pointing to Arona

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Autostrada A35, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chiari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you like to help me with this page? The marinara sauce article explains "marinara sauce" (Italian-American) and at the same time alla marinara (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alla_marinara, Italian), creating an exaggerated confusion. JacktheBrown (talk) 03:49, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Autostrada A55, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rivoli.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please, when adding images (for example on the Italy page) pay attention to the MOS:CAPTIONS. JacktheBrown (talk) 13:37, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Milan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civic Arena.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao, visto che siamo entrambi lombardi ti scrivo in italiano, ho creato la voce "Parco naturale lombardo della Valle del Ticino" in inglese, ma non stato capace di riportare in questa versione la mappa presente nella omonima voce italiana (che, rileggendola, andrebbe migliorata di molto), tu sai come si potrebbe risolvere il problema? ciao FabioRomanoni (talk) 19:48, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grande Raccordo Anulare, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Latina and Ardea.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raccordo autostradale RA11, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:12, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Italian folklore, would you maybe be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 16:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are Italian, and you have been editing Wikipedia for 17 years almost exclusively articles related to Italy because of patriotism or whatever. I understand that its imposible not to have some tiny bias from time to time, but this is complete nonsense.

Olive Oil is not an exclusive Italian thing, it is part of the cuisine of many countries. Furthermore, Olive Oil was also introduced to Argentina even centuries before the arrival of Italian immigrants, mainly by Spaniards.

Be careful next time about introducing national biases. Dreom (talk) 11:23, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:LukeWiller, forgot to tell you but this user above was yet another sock of User:JamesOredan/User:Venezia Friulano. Admins blocked him. When you are suspicious that users or IPs are socks of his (he is a Spanish chauvinistic user that is obsessed with Italy, Portugal, Britain, and edits in fields such as history, climate, languages etc.) collect the evidence and ask the admin Daniel Case on his talk page to block, he has dealt with this a lot. Or file an investigation page. Or inform me and I will report them to Daniel Case or open an investigation page, as I usually have others to report. If they bother you here you can ask other admins to have your talk page protected, I did that in the past. Barjimoa (talk) 12:30, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of education, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Temple of Olympian Zeus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Italians in North America before 1880, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lido.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why did you remove my edits? JacktheBrown (talk) 17:08, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

All right, thank you for your kind and quick reply. JacktheBrown (talk) 18:15, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should remove the sentence "During the 17th and 18th centuries, Italian economic importance waned significantly." from the first part of the article; why, while the wikilink refers to the whole of Europe, is this sentence only present on the Italy page and not, for example, on the Spain, France, England, and Netherlands pages? JacktheBrown (talk) 16:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand, what does it matter if I'm not a native English speaker? JacktheBrown (talk) 13:42, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to modify the sentence "However, in 2018 Italy's healthcare was ranked 20th in Europe by the Euro Health Consumer Index.", firstly by reporting the current result (2024), and secondly because it's quite strange, almost impossible, that it's in 20th place. Would you like to collaborate with me in the creation of this sentence? JacktheBrown (talk) 14:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20th place is almost impossible, from first places to 20th is almost literally impossible. JacktheBrown (talk) 14:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Luke,

I noticed in the articles for Split, Croatia, Zadar, Rijeka, Šibenik, etc, you placed the Italian versions of the names in the native_name line. However per Wikipedia Template:Infobox settlement it states the native_name is:

“ Name in the local language, if different from name, and if not English. In this case "native" does not mean indigenous but is related to de facto language that is not English. This will display below the name/official name.”

and that

” If there is more than one native name, in different languages, enter those names using {lang}}, instead.”

Given the location, would Italian be the local language? Perhs the Croatian and Italian language versions would be in the other_name line as usual being it is an alternate name used? other_name is defined as:

” For places with other commonly used names like Bombay or Saigon”.

However for Kotor you put the Italian versions in the other_name line instead of native and didn’t preface it with {nativename|it}}? Is there a difference for the articles? OyMosby (talk) 20:56, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your reply on my talk page to my original comment here, you presumably agree?

Also, your reverts of my reverts of you instating the definitive historical name in the intros comes across a bit condescending and dismissive. Zader dates back to the 12 century so is in fact centuries old for example. I referred to my earlier diff as I didn’t want to re write it but also didn’t want to leave the diff blank.

Your diffs aimed at me state:

” It's not a question of explanations, but of common sense, it has been the historical name for centuries, it is not a historical name like the others.”

I understand you disagree with my disagreement of your proposed introduction format from 2022. Could we civilly discuss this? My first impression is that saying it was historically one specific name implies there weren’t others that were non-Italian. Perhaps you could explain why I may have the wrong take or interpretation here? Also could we keep the conversation here for context? I think going back and forth on each other’s talk pages is a bit confusing. Cheers. OyMosby (talk) 21:40, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Huh, so you mean Zara was not the only name that was used centuries ago but was the official city name for the greater amount of centuries whereas Zadar was dropped at a point and was more locally used amongst Slavic populations in the meantime? While Zara may have been the longest serving official name, does it validate exempting other historical name from being listed as well? Could list in order of how long each was used in terms of organizing by relevance?

Also I see you updated the infoboxes which is appreciated. Could you take care of Rijeka and Trogir as well? OyMosby (talk) 22:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I meant Zader. I don’t see the controversy of my typo. Zadar is the modern version of Zader hence the typo, as autocorrect pushes Zadar as the spelling. I think it’s an odd word choice “admit” as I wasn’t trying at hiding anything. Hold on, I specifically said “may have” for the sake of argument of ordering the list. I have to read further before being absolute on the subject matter. But I am aware enough that there were other versions. The point is Zara wasn’t the only name used in the past so it still seems undue to write off others under the assumption that Zara was the longest running official name. You deem a list as not needed so we are in a disagreement. Perhaps there are users more specialized in city/town intros that could give extra input? OyMosby (talk) 22:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of the infoboxes on those two other pages as well. Much appreciated. OyMosby (talk) 22:39, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your patience today on the Italy page, I would like to apologise. JacktheBrown (talk) 22:49, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strada statale 4 Via Salaria, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Montereale and San Vito.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, it would be better to put the various paragraphs in alphabetical order; what do you think? JacktheBrown (talk) 20:59, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I was confused by the first paragraph. JacktheBrown (talk) 12:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strada statale 7 Via Appia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oria.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Strada statale 12 dell'Abetone e del Brennero, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ponton and Faedo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forgive me, I hadn't notice that the 'literature field' linked directly to 'Italian Literature' rather than 'general Literature'. Thank you for fixing it! Pincermitosis (talk) 15:43, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on American Revolution. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ~~ Jessintime (talk) 15:38, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I've noticed you adding the same few sentences in Zadar, Krk (town), Šibenik. There are some neutrality issued with these edits, because my sources tell me that "communicating in Italian" was a necessity for many people, and did not represent their 'ethnicity' per se. But first things first: every sentence needs a source, and I'm asking you to further discuss this at Talk:Zadar#c-Ponor-20241211104600-Ethnic_Italians with proper quotations, as the only relevant source you provided is not readily available to me (or many). Ponor (talk) 11:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LukeWiller. In your recent edit here you mention you removed duplicate content but what was removed doesn’t appear anywhere else in the article after removal. Did you mean to remove something else? Cheers. OyMosby (talk) 18:52, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion was started on Talk:Dalmatia more than a month ago. {{citation needed}} tags were also added, that you removed today. The sources are there, but they are just a decoration, because what's in the artice is not said in the sources. That's pure and simple original research. Please, discuss before reverting over and over again, we've had too much of that from your side already. (see above) Ponor (talk) 15:53, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]