Archive 5

←

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Hi. I had to contest your request for speedy deletion of this article. It's in Albanian, and though the author is a pain in the neck, judging from the version history, we have to follow accepted procedure. Favonian (talk) 14:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Which should be to delete it... CSD G1 specifically includes non-English text on the English Wikipedia.... Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 14:23, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Rather wish you were right, but it says in WP:CSD: "This excludes poor writing, partisan screeds, obscene remarks, implausible theories, vandalism and hoaxes, fictional material, coherent non-English material, and poorly translated material." Favonian (talk) 14:28, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, that's new - it used to be the other way around. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 14:30, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

why will you not let me delete Lindsay Doo's self penned biography? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.190.19.6 (talk • contribs)

Because there are accepted procedures for deletion, and blanking/vandalism aren't included. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 14:46, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

I gave this notice to user 81.135.1.181 : " Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. but content dispute. However, if further reverts occur the 3RR will be applied. This dispute has been explained in the article Israeli settlement. There is no need to mention this in Settlement. "

If further reverts occur, don't fall in the 3RR trap, but inform me (or another admin if I'm no longer online) and I (or this other admin) will apply the 3RR rule. JoJan (talk) 14:55, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, though I will have to disagree with you that repeatedly adding unsourced controversial personal opinion in an effort to subvert the aims of building an accurate encyclopedia is not vandalism... Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 15:08, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

I was being helpful. Do you know what it's like to be me?! I am a loner! So don't ruin my life anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.58.245.125 (talk • contribs)

I am sorry to hear that, but please don't vandalize WP. Thank you. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 15:15, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

I believe that the original deletion of the page "Maryland Teenage Republicans" is unjustified.

There is no reason for why this page should be deleted. There are many similar pages to this, for all types of political, religious, or philosophical reasons throughout wikipedia. If Wikipedia is intent upon being a factual (and not censorship) website, then I would highly suggest keeping this page and its content in whole.

I contend there is a liberal anti-Maryland Teenage Republican movement on Wikipedia, and the article was deleted based on lies, mistruths, and flat out lies. The organization is absolutely one of the most influential organizations in Maryland, if not the nation. I strongly disagree and disapprove with your deletion of the page and I strongly request that it not be deleted again.

There is no "consensus" to delete the page - the organization exists whether Wikipedia approves of their mission and goals - or not. Do you censor history as well? Do you leave out all of the negative history of the world and simply re-write it as you see fit. This is an outrage. The Maryland Teenage Republicans exist - there are hundreds of members - and they have a legitimate purpose, goals, and focus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetruthspeaker09 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

1) If this group is one of the most influential organizations in Maryland/the nation, there should be no problem coming up with reliable secondary sources to prove that the group meets the WP:ORG notability requirements for inclusion in this encyclopedia.

2) There is a consensus to delete the page - hence the consensus at the deletion discussion.

3) Please refrain from personal attacks. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 13:00, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Please stop reverting the page, it is completely biased and was rewritten by a Colorado Avalanche fan to the point where it could not be reverted back to its original form. Its better with less info than something singing his praises without facts. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.250.95.95 (talk) 16:12, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Please use the edit summary then - otherwise it just looks like you are blanking sections, a form of vandalism. 16:59, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Great anti-vandal work! As someone learning the many pitfalls of this trade, my best wishes to you. Jusdafax 18:38, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! :-) And thank you for your help on this especially busy day. If you have any questions, or need any help, please feel free to ask. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 18:44, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Please check it out and fix them...thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.81.161.103 (talk) 21:12, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Unless I am mistaken, someone can only be born once... Please supply a WP:RS for the correct year. Thanks. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 21:15, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Are you watching this guy? I'm not sure, but I have a feeling that he's going to get himself blocked sometime soon. By the way, thanks for getting that Level 2 warning to him, I'm too busy. --Delta1989 (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Seems to have quit - thanks for the heads up. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 12:41, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Please let me know why you've flagged my page for deletion when it isn't promoting an organization or advertising it. I've provided sources as well? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mostafa ma (talk • contribs) 16:50, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Could you please not delete my contributions as it hasnt violated any Code or practise regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcashleylee (talk • contribs)

Please see WP:ELNO and WP:SPAM for the relevant WP policies. Thanks. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 15:15, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

I still don understand. Why have you let the likes of the labour club and the AIMI sites on then. i beileve they are both classed as advertsing under your code of practise. Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcashleylee (talk • contribs)

Please see the section in WP:SPAM on "Inclusion of one spam link is not a reason to include another." Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 15:27, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

I dont think you understand it is not a SPAM Link the two sites are towns located in very close proxmity to each other. Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcashleylee (talk • contribs)

Actually, it's not only me - 3 other editors felt it was external link spamming because you were inserting the same link into multiple articles. Also, the linked site has advertising that someone is making money off of... Finally, in order to actually sign your comments, please use 4 tildes after your comment, i.e. ~~~~ Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 15:47, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi just seen this editing. Isn't the the purpose of the links section to provide further reading? Surely local sites are of interest to the reader? Brixtonboy (talk) 16:09, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a web directory, but rather an encyclopedia. Links to a church that happen to be in town are not very useful to a general encyclopedia reader. Neither are links to sites which contain a lot of advertising, and the purpose of adding the link is driving traffic toward that advertising. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 08:10, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Respectfully, I'm challenging your revert of my edits @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucas_Neill. On what basis did you conclude unconstructive or worse?

Tapered —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tapered (talk • contribs) 23:13, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Because a small two word addition that didn't make any sense looked like vandalism. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 23:19, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

The words were "Grosso fell." I'd just done an edit, changing my wording becuase I thought it could be improved. That information was left out. I checked the 'minor edit' box, and as I recall left a cursory explanation. I had also just finished a much larger edit, so one might suspect an afterthought. As I recall, the larger edit was reverted too. This is good procedure? What's entertaining is that I was undoing a consistent POV 'editor.' Tapered (talk) 02:13, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

But it IS like WoW but crappier —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.200.231.246 (talk) 03:02, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi - I noticed you have contributed recently to one or more of the decade articles (1990s, 1960s etc). I am proposing some major changes to these articles, as I have outlined in Talk:1990s/Archives/2012#Suggested_reform_of_decade_articles, and I would be interested in hearing your views in the first instance. Thanks. Kransky (talk) 09:01, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

I'll take a look, but I think the most I've done is revert some vandalism with Huggle, so I haven't even seen the full articles. I'll take a look. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 02:33, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

For this bit of tidying up. Thanks for all your efforts on recent changes as well. See ya 'round Tiderolls 02:22, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

No problem, my pleasure. Keep seeing you on Huggle, so thanks for all your efforts as well! Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 02:33, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello!

The information there is general knowledge, not of a promotional nature. Stop deleting it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.87.243 (talk) 02:52, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Information on specific courses with web links is promotional. Wikipedia is not a directory. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 03:00, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

What web links? The web links I added was for the Wikipedia page for the LEF, a government training program in Ontario.

And when you add information you're supposed to provide references, which sometimes means including links. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.87.243 (talk) 03:14, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

If you would take the time to Google that topic you would find it is a legitimate government program, the only of its kind, in Canada. And if you go to the links you're fussing about, they're WIKIPEDIA pages. You're deleting links to other wikipedia pages. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.231.87.243 (talk) 03:22, 19 October 2009 (UTC) \

1) The web links were referring to links promoting specific schools. 2) What I was referring to was general interest. A general reader of a global encyclopedia would not care about a training program in 1 city in the world that is not at all notable. Please stop reverting, and take your case for inclusion to the talk page to garner consensus for addition. Thank you. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 03:37, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Pardon me sir, but I am new to the whole Wikipedia thing, and I was wondering who/what gave you the right to wield so much power. Please reply/contact me whenever possible. In all honesty, what gives you the right to ban my account from editing? All of this for simply stating my views on certain pages? Do reply, and if this is reported as vandalism, I will have lost all faith in Wikipedia - the little that I started off with. Wtopnews (talk) 03:42, 19 October 2009 (UTC)wtopnews

Because persistent vandals get banned... Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 00:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for taking care of this vandal on my user talk! --Vishnu2011 (talk) 21:38, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

No problem. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 00:41, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about the accidental reversion and warning. You beat me to the revert, and igloo reverted your edit by accident. Very sorry. Cheers --[midnight comet] [talk] 01:06, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

No problem, it's happened to me. Thanks for your help with vandal fighting. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 01:09, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

With your revert of my undo,you reinserted the following phrase: "Matthew is poo." InspectorSands (talk) 01:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, per Huggle that's the edit I was reverting and removing that phrase. Not sure what happened, sorry. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 01:46, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

... for this :) I noticed you once or twice while huggling. Keep up the good work. ≈ Chamal ^talk ¤ 02:03, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

No problem, and thanks. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 02:11, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Stop deleting the description of twintip skis, that is how they are defined by the community and how they are defined to the world. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.66.55.54 (talk) 02:23, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Why are you deleting my editing to the mmi page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.227.67.183 (talk) 23:18, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Maybe because it's vandalism? Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 23:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Oh my gosh I am so sorry about the editing thing that was my 11 year old sister trying to be funny sorry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Heyninjagirl (talk • contribs) 23:42, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

I had given him a :L3 NPA the last time; I skipped :L1 and gave him a :L2 after this edit, which was aimed at a user this person tends to harass. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 23:54, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up - he blanked his talk, so Huggle didn't see that and went with an L1 = I've just upgraded him to L4 since this seems to be a persistent problem. Thanks! Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 23:57, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

And since he just did the same to me, I've reported him to AIV. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 00:00, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

I was on my way to do just that when I noticed. He's blocked now. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 00:04, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

And he's continued to make personal attacks, culminating in this. Talk page privileges revoked for remainder of block. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 02:38, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

The Leftbrain111 edits are more accurate than anything else that has been posted previously on Paz. All of the edits done by Leftbrain111 are being run by Paz Lenchantin in person. This is very important, as many of the facts listed previously were not technically correct and were legally an issue. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.154.54.27 (talk • contribs)

Those edits blanked more than half the page without explanation - therefore it looked like Vandalism. Please use the edit summary to explain what you are doing. Thank you. Furthermore, if you are saying that the subject is "running" the edits, then that's a WP:COI issue. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 01:30, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

In reference the Paz Lenchantin edits, it is important that you realize that all sources were not removed and only the most current and accurate sources were put in place. Accuracy is paramont and thus some of the material was fact checked with Paz directly. There is no COI issue, as Paz is not the author of any of the edits or additional text. If you are worried about vandalism, it might be in your interest to stop putting up information that is neither relevant or accurate. Please take the time to reread the edits presented carefully, as I'm not sure why you would have any problem with them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leftbrain111 (talk • contribs) 06:22, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Well, putting in the edit summary "This is Paz..the following changes were okayed by myself. it is current and accurate. Please stop undoing it!! if you have any further questions you may speak to my manager (email address redacted)" contradicts what you are saying now. As you have been blocked for vandalism/disruptive editing, there really isn't any need to take this any further. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 12:29, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Why did you take off my post for Most Haunted Live On Stage it is not fake A Candela (talk) 01:23, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Because when you post "This is not fake" on an encyclopedia page it looks like vandalism. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 01:31, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

shall we just wailt for a annoucement then A Candela (talk) 01:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Everything in this encyclopedia must be verifiable, so waiting for it to be officially announced would be good. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 01:40, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi Leuko, thanks for the speedy revert of the vandalism on my talk page. Cheers :-) Marek.69 ^talk 02:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

No problem, my pleasure. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 12:29, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Can you please send me a message about your aims and reasoning ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidangles (talk • contribs) 21:55, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Um, to create a reliable encyclopedia backed up by verifiable sources? What's your aim? Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 22:09, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

...for watching my talk page :) De728631 (talk) 22:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

And for cleaning up behind the vandals, too. De728631 (talk) 22:49, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

No problem, just huggling. :-) Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 22:50, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

...I would like to thank you for doing the same with my talk page. It is very strange that I even had a vandal, it was the only time my user page has been visited. Also the Jackie Robinson edit that I made had nothing to do with literacy. I don't know how you get the vandal edits corrected so quickly, keep up the great work. Dkpiatt\^{What's Up} 04:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

No problem - Vandals are like that - sometimes they don't make any sense. :-) I use a tool called Huggle to revert vandalism quickly - it reads the recent changes feed, so basically you can get to it almost instantaneously. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 15:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi Leuko,

is there anything in particular you have against the article for Temptation. I spent hours writing it and backing it up with numerous references from reliable web sources... —Preceding unsigned comment added by The house kidd (talk • contribs) 19:15, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, when I first looked at it, it was nothing more than a copy-and-paste from the Twilight article, so I initially tagged it for deletion. Now I am still not seeing any indication that it meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for inclusion. A couple of blogs and listing sites is not the kind of non-trivial coverage in reliable secondary sources that WP requires to ensure verifiability. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 19:26, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

How did you catch that revert of my revert at Luis Jiménez so fast? Good work. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 23:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

By using WP:HUGGLE. :-) Thanks, Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 23:14, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Hmmmmmm. Looks a little . ....... technical for me, an old fashioned sort of editor. Carptrash (talk) 23:19, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

:-) It's really not that difficult to operate, just a bit fast paced. :-) Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 23:41, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

you are wrong im not a vandal i made legit edits

pourquoi est-ce tu me detestes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.130.162.176 (talk) 23:32, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

It doesn't matter whether are right or wrong, you are engaged in an edit war, so that's why you got the message. FYI, I have requested page protection to stop the edit war. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 23:41, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

I really wasn't trying to war but I appreciate the warning. - 4twenty42o (talk) 23:42, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, I don't think anyone tries to edit war, but it happens... Just didn't want to see you get blocked like I have been (when I wasn't keeping track) for something so trivial... Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 23:47, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Right on man.. Cheers!! - 4twenty42o (talk) 00:05, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

many appologies for that aparent "vandelism" i will try to ensure it will not happen again —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gibbo045 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

I wasn't aware I was vandalizing. Fastily has tagged images for which permission and licenses have been assigned/granted as I emailed the photographer's permission to use to your Permissions section and posted a copy of that email on his talk page as well. I seem to be coming under a lot of fire at the moment which is extremely irritating. Deeiva (talk) 23:35, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

I'm sure you are no vandal but your actions do in fact denote vandalism. I strongly suggest you read WP:CIVILITY and WP:AGF thoroughly before you continue editing. -FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 23:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Also, if you post something, anything, on your user page then your name will appear in blue rather than in red, red being sort of a red flag, as it were. Carptrash (talk) 23:43, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

What they said.... Thanks guys (or girls). Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 00:07, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Well I've decided to completely remove all content and request that all images that were linked to this page be removed immediately as I and the photographer have now withdrawn permission for them to be used on Wikipedia. Deeiva (talk) 12:03, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

I think once you have turned them loose, they are then copyright free forever. I could be wrong but . . . . . . . ........ 14:55, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Leuko, are you following the discussion about the history section on the article about Brazil? - --Lecen (talk) 00:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Not that I know of, should I be? Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 04:01, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Don't ignore the first rule of WP: which is good faith, and don't try to be a Rules lawyer, either.

If you are going to revert, I suggest you first check what you're reverting.

Rather than be so pig-headed, and get into a battle you can't win, why don't you show some common courtesy and check the information?

Walter Gotell went onto be a very famous actor, most notably, playing General Gogol in the Bond-movie franchise. Appearing in We Dive at Dawn was only his third movie role, but the biggest of his career to date.

That was why I was including his name (I added it at the end because he was uncredited).

Google search results to make my point

The way you have behaved has been quite obnoxious and bullying - I think an apology would be welcome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.254.108 (talk) 21:10, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Everyone can make mistakes, however, making personal attacks in the edit summary, such as you did, is never acceptable, and is not being what you call a "rules lawyer." Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 21:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Leuko, judging by the IPs and edits it is probably Stephen Paternoster using an IP so it might not be worth fighting to keep his page unblanked. --Narson ~ Talk • 23:58, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I so that you took some interest in this article, and I welcome your comments at the [AfD discussion] for National Coalition Against Legalized Gambling. Kind regards, Hazir (talk) 11:17, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Please don't bite the newbies as you did here [1]. This was an attempt to provide the references asked for, and not vandalism. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 22:15, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

But saying "I know the person, please see Facebook" is not exactly a WP:RS, and using approved standard templates is designed not to be "bitey," but if that is the way it was interpreted, I apologize. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 22:20, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

I agree with you about WP:RS but you gave Birdman146 a level 2 vandalism warning. If you had to give a warning, it probably should have been one about reliable sources. Better yet, a short pointer on the article's talk page to WP:RS would have been more useful to the user. --NeilN ^{talk ♦ contribs} 22:29, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

My bad, I thought I did... Must have clicked the wrong menu in WP:HUGGLE. Thanks for sending the appropriate message to the user. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 22:54, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page! — Oli ^OR Pyfan! 22:27, 21 November 2009 (UTC).

A tag has been placed on Zhe Zeng requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Darrenhusted (talk) 21:37, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

There is absolutely no reason to delete the Brandon Banks page. There are many, many pages just like. He is a prominent player on a major college football team. He is likely to be playing professional football next season and thus have a page anyways. Please reconsider deletion.Topgun530 (talk) 14:07, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Hmm, the page I nominated for deletion was about some 11 year old non-notable kid writing about himself. I am not sure we are talking about the same page. But in any case, you should contact the admin that actually deleted the page (it will be in the page logs) because they have the ability to undelete, whereas I don't. Thanks, Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 04:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

I think you're incorrect. The page has you tagged as the person who deleted it.Topgun530 (talk) 04:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

That can't be - I am not an admin, so I can't delete anything. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 04:35, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Looking at the logs, it looks like User:Acroterion actually deleted the page, I would suggest contacting him/her. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 04:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

I kvetched @ you about an earlier undo in Oct. Now it's my turn to eat a little crow. On an unnamed discussion page after a perfectly legitimate edit of a contemporary bio page, I taunted the subject using a curse we'd both understand. Can I edit it out? Tapered (talk) 20:22, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, yes, you can edit it out and then save it, but it would still be in the page history. The only way to completely get rid of it from public view is to request Wikipedia:Suppression. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 04:34, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

I believe the Brandon Banks page was deleted without just cause. I believe the wrong page was deleted. Please assist. Topgun530 (talk) 23:59, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Please see the prior discussion. You need to contact the admin who actually deleted the page. I am not an admin and do not have the ability to delete or undelete. Failing that, WP:Deletion review would be the next step. Leuko ^Talk/_Contribs 04:18, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Institute_of_Science?diff=315164465

You messaged about above change. FYI this is a dynamic ip ie keeps changing so no use of messaging. creates a hell of a problem for us too @ wikianswers.com hope above info helps

I am a super At wiki ans. thats why thought should tell you cheers http://wiki.answers.com/Q/User:Gaurav_s —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.128.77 (talk) 22:11, 22 December 2009 (UTC)