Dear Lantay77, the Mannheim Business Angels is a legitimate and existing organisation. I do not understand what is promotional about detailing its existence, its vision, mission and values ? We are Not looking for funds or money we are in fact a provider of funding and financing as well as free coaching and mentoring in Europe. Furthermore the association is a Non Profit and our members are not payed or compensated for there contribution. In addition to being committed to our values, all members of our organizing committee have signed the MBA-oath (see http://mbaoath.org/about/the-mba-oath) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nltlo22 (talk • contribs) 13:16, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! It says that you are the operator of User:LantayBot. Be advised that the unauthroized use of bots is strictly prohibited, and LantayBot will probably be blocked shortly. See WP:BOTPOL for the policy on bots. Thank you!--Unionhawk ^{Talk E-mail} 19:20, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I welcomed your bot. For some reason the BOT suffix didn't strike me until afterward. Calabe1992 21:01, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In The Nutcracker, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Robert Irving (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lantay77. You have new messages at Unionhawk's talk page.
Message added 18:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Unionhawk ^{Talk E-mail} 18:44, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just feel arachnids should beincluded Eagles4life3 (talk) 00:36, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank u for considering my edit Eagles4life3 (talk) 01:07, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With this ever dramatic world including WikiDrama, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 18:46, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lantay77. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Katie^talk 01:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@KrakatoaKatie: Thank you for giving me rollback rights. I will let you know if I have any questions. Lantay77 (talk) 02:58, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yes those are the right words written originally but now the band and students have shortened it to the version I changed it to Viktorvald (talk) 03:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

sorry i just got a wikipedia account and was messin around with my friends! Violinwitch (talk) 03:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lantay77. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Te iubesc Dodo!, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: "This does not include poor writing, vandalism and hoaxes (G3), material not in English, badly translated material, etc." - it's in Romanian. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 03:13, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lantay77

Short version

I was wrong. You were right. I apologise for my mistake.

Long version:

I kind of grok the Romance languages. My starting point is Italian - o la lingua più bella, la lingua più semplice!

It took me a little while to realise that it was in Romanian as it didn't use diacritics in â, ă, î, and so on. For a moment I thought it might be in Portugese. What was I thinking?

I didn't run it thru Google Translate as I thought the lack of diactics might bork it up. I was wrong about this. I should have known far better.

Pete AU aka--Shirt58 (talk) 10:55, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Shirt58: No problem. Thanks for letting me know. Lantay77 (talk) 07:08, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lantay,

Thank you for looking over my page. This page was not created for promotion. Rick Simpson is one of the most famous cannabis activist celebrities in the world and I was shocked that he didn't have a wikipedia page yet. When I compare the page that I made with Jack Herer's page and Marc Emery's page, I don't understand why Ricky's page is promotional considering that they look identical. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Herer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Emery

I want to contribute to wikipedia, but I am confused because I don't see how I am promoting him. Can you specifically point out in what way or what specific things make this page appear promotional to you? That way I can do better next time. I read through all of the rules and made sure that his page was not promotional. If there is one specific thing that I did that made it sound promotional please let me know and I will remove that. Rick Simpson is the most famous person that I ever heard of that doesn't have a Wikipedia page. He has 330,000 facebook likes and he is mentioned thousands of times in articles all over the internet. This is a big celebrity and he for some reason has no wikipedia page. I used Jack Herer's wikipedia page as a template to write Ricky Simpson's page. Writing which books he wrote and which website is his I considered to be the correct thing to do because Jack's page has the same thing. Thank you for your time.

Cannabisscientist (talk) 17:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)cannabisscientistCannabisscientist (talk) 17:10, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi how are you Sahani p (talk) 07:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	For being awesome
	YOU ARE AWESOME! :) Shadow4127 (talk) 12:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!!! Im Tiffen Cristy

Maybe I just clicked it or one of my siblings clicked it..

Sorry!!

And I am just a newbie here thats why I didn't know about editing and uploading some articles or pages...

I wish you understand that..

I'm just like you, we all make mistakes..

Again, I'm sorry and thank you that you see my mistakes...

Tiffen Cristy (talk) 09:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Tiffen Cristy (talk) 12:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lantay77. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]