User talk:Lakers/Archive 1

• Thanks for the support position. However, I've decided to withdraw my acceptance because of real WP:CIVIL concerns. I will try again later when I've proven to myself and others that my anger will no longer interfere with my abilities as a Wikipedia editor. Thanks again, and I'll see you around here shortly. :) JuJube 04:26, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome. I'll start it slow since I just joined. Just one tiny change in an encyclopedia article and see what happens.MAB1970 07:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My particular script does more than just rollback (it also allows me to customize the edit summary with a little popup and opens the user's talk page for me). If you want mine, you can go to User:Rory096/monobook.js, it's the first one, or, if you just want the rollback function in general, you can go to WP:TW, which is a similar script. --Rory096 07:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I think we should rewrite this section if you mind me asking you this...

"Independent sources estimate 50,000 to more than 100,000 deaths; the Kurds claim about 182,000 people were killed. Amnesty International collected the names of more than 17,000 people who had "disappeared" during 1988. [2] The campaign has been characterized as genocidal in nature, notably before a court in The Hague. It is also characterized as gendercidal, because "battle-age" men were the primary targets, according to Human Rights Watch/Middle East (hereafter, HRW/ME)."

If we can add this section to it.

"This military operation, code-named the "Al-Anfal" campaign, resulted in the death of at least 180,000 people"

Source: Humanitarian Intervention: the United Nations in an evolving world order - Page 183 by Sean D. Murphy

It doesn't really sound encyclopedic due to the number of sources we can rewrite with my version on top and than add Kurdish sources since it sounds like a good starter any opinions? Lakers 04:52, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you can add a source from the UN that would be great. Kurdish sources are fine provided they fall under Wikipedia:Attribution#Reliable_sources -- Cat ^chi? 10:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support in my recent successful RfA. --Anthony.bradbury 17:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism doesn't count today YankeeDoodle14

Well don't worry too much (a few inaccutate AIV reports won't hurt), but just as a suggestion: The best thing to do is check the timestamps. When you're viewing the diff of a revision, you can, of course, see what time it was made. You can then compare that to the time of the last warning to determine if the vandal has vandalized after the final warning. If you already knew that, don't worry about it, though. Heimstern Läufer 02:48, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Lakers, I think something is wrong regarding your message on my talk. I, only one time arranged participant list there, to organize participants in alphabetic order, since there is a comment there as "", nothing else. Regards. Must.^{T C} 05:31, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that most cleanup templates, like "unreferenced", "fact", "cleanup" etc., are best not "subst"ed. See WP:SUBST for more details. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 17:36 2 April 2007 (GMT).

Don't be too overzealous in placing that template.. WPSS already has a hard time maintaining categories; it is better to place them in categories that have many articles (let's say 50+) rather than small ones like Category:Turkish people of Brazilian descent. I was warned about this some time ago by another user, so I am just passing the message on :) Baristarim 01:05, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok no worries.. Cheers! Baristarim 01:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No prob! I just appreciate all people who clean up Wikipedia, especially those who are never given credit. And you keep getting in the way of my reverts! GRRR! jk.GOLAASTL24 05:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for giving me one, too! Mawfive 16:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I respond to your comments there. Quadzilla99 07:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I don't think it could ever make it to FA—I just can't find anything more mentioning him than articles saying: "Fuller got 2 sacks in this game", or one or two random interviews where he states "We'll be good this year" or "I'm happy to be in Philadelphia" which wouldn't merit inclusion into the article to expand it. I'll keep expanding it if I can. I don't want to add meaningless quotes to the article or unimportant things to expand it. Quadzilla99 07:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I know him and I know that he is harmless, really. The way he said is funny, I don't know if you know but "King is dead, long live the King" was an old French expression before the Revolution. So it was kinda funny in context :) In any case, it is a bit Point, but it was pretty obvious that it would be noticed. Nevertheless, because he was able to point out the coordinator issue out, that led to a discussion in the talk page and it was decided not to have a coordinator - so at the end of the day it was constructive: WPTR never had a "coordinator", and having such coordinator for a whole project is kinda against the spirit of Wikipedia. In fact, the user before him was also self-apointed, so it showed everyone that it was a much-ado-about-nothing at the end of the day :) Which makes his edit-summary even more witty considering the analogy with the French revolution. Listen, believe me when I tell you that you shouldn't be too worried about him - there is so much worse "gaming" going on in Wikipedia, everything from outside coordinated "ethnic gangs", e-mail canvassing, users who use multiple accounts, indef banned users who keep on resurrecting themselves just to troll and users who treat Wikipedia like a forum and post comments with the intention of creating disputes. I have been tracking two users for months who are keeping on mutating user IDs and are very subtly vandalizing Wikipedia - real trolls, in other words. Heck, I have even seen users come back from 3 years of inactivity to vote in an AfD!! If you ever see him do something too Pointy, leave a note at his talk page or tell me, I will let him know, if it is something big I will run in with the fire-extinguisher :) In any case, it never hurts to have a good sense of humor - they are just articles after all :) Cheers! Baristarim 10:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check this one out for example [1] - and I know worse things that happen around in Wiki since I am also a avid Net-surfer in general, and that's saying something! Baristarim 10:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I got Google Talk.. As for Makalp, well this issue did come a few months back in WP:AN, but after discussion it pretty much became obvious that he was harmless since he uses his real name and one account only and edits in such a way that will be obvious to every one - but that's not it, he does good work with templates and organization across many articles. He doesn't usually do point edits and when he does he has a good sense of humor. Anyways, as I said if you notice something serious just let me know.. So, how are things? I also do RC patrol from time to time, and I have been running into you often for the last couple of days.. Baristarim 11:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to the Trains WikiProject! Thank you for adding your name to our project membership list. Our goal is to build the most comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. As a project member, you may add the project membership userbox to your user page if you wish.

If you haven't done so already, please add our main project page to your watchlist and take some time to review the Trains project manual of style where we have collected guidelines and suggestions on notability and style for a consistent representation of rail transport related material. If you're curious about where to start, we've gathered a few suggestions in the Trains project to do list. If you'd like to specialize in a particular area of study within rail transport, take a look at the current Trains project task forces.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the project talk page or on my talk page. Again, welcome and happy editing! Slambo (Speak) 11:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He has vandalised again, he edited Bradford Bulls at about 11:30 which was after your final warning.GordyB 11:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind he has now been blocked for something else.GordyB 18:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- just a note to say that I've left an inquiry about your addition of the "sources" template at Talk:Asser. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk) 11:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you beat me about 10 times today in reverting. keep it up :-) West Brom 4ever 20:06, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thank you for reverting vandalism! — zero » 21:41, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The category needs to be emptied before it can be deleted. Any user can do the updates or you can wait for a bot to get around to doing it. The speedy delete request was removed, since this is not a valid speedy reason. Vegaswikian 06:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I nominated another article written by the same user for AfD earlier, and I'm going through his contribution list to see if any others merit the same. The AfD nominatin for Happiness!!! is incomplete. Please go to the page and click on "preloaded debate" to create the articles AfD page, and then paste the {{afd3}} tag on the right at the bottom of the page found via the "log" link. If you have any questions, either see WP:AFD, or ask me. Regards, Flyguy649^talk_contribs 07:21, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, hello. What's up? I assume that you sent that message for me, but it is a bit unclear. I was by no means intending to vandalize the Underoath page, I just felt that the article seemed quite out of place and did not present the situation very well. The way this all works is quite strange.

Hi. Thanks for rating the Cardus article. I agree that for WPBiography the importance should be Low, but I would have thought that for WP Cricket the importance should be Mid, perhaps even High. After all, Cardus is probably the most famous of all writers on the game. A. A. Thomson has a High rating and Alan Gibson a Mid rating, yet neither is as important a figure as Cardus. JH (talk page) 08:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Lakers,

Here my a few sentences about arguments on your post;

• WPKurdistan;

User Bohater, declared himself as Lead Coordinator.Is there a need to say anything further. It was funny for me at the beginning, I posted my edit summary there "Revolution:...". Please check these edits also [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Kurdistan/Participants&diff=prev&oldid=118284494 previous and [

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Kurdistan%2FParticipants&diff=118489588&oldid=118486352 later]. Please also check , User:Antivandalism and User_talk:Antivandalism to see what happens.

• Ayran; Ayran is a definite Turkish origin drink, which is consumed in many countries. I removed WP Armenia and WP Syria tags but keep WPTR and WP Azerbaijan tags. Please see my other edit summaries here and

here. What is the difference of Armenia and Syria and other countries like as Greece, Albania, Macedonia, Hungary, Germany etc. Is it need to add these conutries project tags also here. I think this is meaningless. Please dont hesitate to contact with me in the future, I dont want to have a bad image for a positive contributor to wiki. Thanks for your time. Regards. Must.^{T C} 17:48, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed false information and vandalism. 64.231.1.33 21:00, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed in the log that this article was passed, but when I looked to find a review as mandated in the WP:GAC instructions, I noticed your name, but no review accompanying the passage of this article. Are you saving it to finish later or something? All GA passings are supposed to be accompanied by a written review on the talk page, nothing terribly complicated, its just if people don't give an explanation, its very hard to determine exactly why someone passed an article, and if they did it with WP:WIAGA intentions or not. Plus, somebody could easily speedy delist this article on the grounds of improper passage. Homestarmy 21:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you can, try to paste {{talkheader}} + {{WPBiography}} (for Bios). Thanks for your help btw! Baristarim 05:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

However, in the future, try to rate a bit more conservatively the importance ratings, we already have a huge workload for so many little people for WPTR!! It is even hard to have article drives for one or two articles. Maybe you can also join if you would like? Baristarim 05:02, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed comment, I had only taken look at one article - sorry :) Baristarim 05:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problems. Welcome to WPTR btw! Cheers! Baristarim 05:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, we should be done with the ratings soon. When I first came to WPTR seven months ago, WPTR was in shatters - I personally put 3000 of 3700 WPTR banners and with the help of some other users revamped the project pages including its template {{WPTR}}. Now that the ratings will be done soon, I feel like it will have become a "full and functioning" project. It is really nice, there are so many articles that need to be worked on - I can stay on Wiki for the next 50 years! I am sure that in the future WPTR will have diverse enough articles and mini-projects which will be able to interest non-Turks... Baristarim 05:17, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Achristl has blanked Earth, I reverted the blank and saw your warning to this editor so I am forwarding the matter to your capable hands. Carlossuarez46 02:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for deleting my page! =] i appreciate it! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mcoop06 (talk • contribs) 03:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I appreciate the barnstar!Inter16 05:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you rated the Traditions of Texas A&M University article as "start-class". I would like to read your rationale as to why you rated the article "start" instead of "B". After reading the criteria for "B" it seems to me the article can be a "B" or "B-".--Blueag9 (Talk) 07:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it's much apprechiated! > Kamope < 11:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the project! Hope you enjoy contributing to it. Looking forward to your ideas!--Yannismarou 13:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I removed your unreferenced tag at James McCune Smith. It looks like the only issue is the lead. Since the lead is supposed to summarize the article, it should not contain any information that is not explained in more detail in the article. All of the facts mentioned in the lead are referenced in the article, and so it doesn't really need any additional referencing. Thanks for your help in looking out for articles in need of help, this one DOES have some fixes needed, but its level of referencing is actually quite good. Happy editing! --Jayron32|talk|contribs 03:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of WPGreece
		Thank you for assessing Greek articles, congrats. Graeco 07:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lakers, thanks for your support in my successful RfA. As the picture shows, the goddesses have already bestowed my new weapons, which I hope to use to good effect. If you ever need assistance, or want to give me feedback on my use of the admin tools, please leave me a message on my talkpage. --Akhilleus (talk) 17:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You voted twice, I removed your second vote. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 09:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You voted twice there, too, I removed your second vote. Perhaps you may want to search the page for your user name before voting in an RfA? —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 09:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. —KNcyu38 (talk • contribs) 09:46, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your help!

		The Turkish Barnstar of National Merit
		For your help in organizing and assessing WikiProject Turkey articles! Keep up the good work! Baristarim 21:28, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. By the way, there already is a list :) I redirected them.. Baristarim 01:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting me on my recent nomination for adminship, which passed with a tally of 45/0/0. Please let me know if I can help with something or if I make a mistake. Cheers! --KFP (talk | contribs) 15:02, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your support in my recent RfA, I have now been promoted. J Milburn 17:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to call your attention to the correct way to complete a GA nom, per the instructions at WP:GAC, so that GimmeBot can convert the templates to {{ArticleHistory}}. Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:58, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The April 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:22, 6 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The May 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 15:12, 9 June 2007 (UTC) [reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lakers (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The user may have used a similar proxy, since I use AOL which switches I.P's constantly and it catches proxies every now and than. My account here is to revert vandalism and clean up Wikipedia blocking me is unacceptable.

Decline reason:

There's nothing a sysop who sees this can do (checkuser blocks are tricky, and the relevant parties have been notified or you can notify them via email), so I'm going to procedurally decline the request to clear it from the category.— Chaser - T 05:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please wait, I'll ask Ryulong about this. Riana ⁂ 07:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Artaxiad#Artaxiad 2—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 07:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say your best bet is to email Dmcdevit (the checkuser for this case) about this.--Chaser - T 18:26, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The June 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Hello Lakers, I suppose this may be boorish of me at this late date, but it seems to me that you passed Talk:Shunga in a — um — rather abbreviated process? I'm aware that, in its early days, the {{GA}} marque was awarded with practically no process overhead whatsoever; it was simply affixed to a page because one thought an article was good. Enchantingly simple. Perhaps you feel that is the way these awards should still be handed out today. But as you may gather from the comment I left on the Shunga talk page, I feel that the real deliverable a reviewer offers a group of contributing editors is a serious written review of their work; otherwise, I feel, the marque has no meaning and with the absence of meaning it should not be handed out. Perhaps you and I are on opposite sides of a deep philosophical divide here, so I won't bore you with argument. But I do have some hope you might contribute to the Good Article process in its current, less enchantingly simple, form. It is a faint hope, to be sure, but hope springs infernal. Take care. — Gosgood 18:04, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are looking to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by August 14! Kirill 03:35, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting nine coordinators from a pool of fourteen candidates to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by August 28! Kirill 17:37, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The August 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 09:54, 8 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

The October 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

Delivered by grafikbot 14:23, 3 November 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: Editors for the newsletter, GAN backlog reduction drive Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene sums up our "Five years of military history"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:15, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors, "Military Historian of the Year", New Incubator, Black Project Report Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: bahamut guides us through "Nominating military biographies for deletion"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:46, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:11, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:10, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:01, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:58, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:58, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:24, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 23:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Body of a dead soldier, Battle of Bitola.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 00:47, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]