Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Blake Simington (Australian), by Dzubint (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Blake Simington (Australian) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Blake Simington (Australian), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Blake Simington (Australian) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you've decided that making threats is your preferred method of dispute handling. I would advise against this procedure. I would also advise you check the signatures on the page you accuse me of deleting, and refer to the above signatures. I have no idea what the Blake Simington page is and have no interest in it. It is very easy to check the logs to see as to who has deleted what. I suggest you take the matter up with the relevant editor, and withdraw your accusation against myself immediately. As to the Group C page, there were numerous inaccuracies in the Group C page which have now been corrected. If you dispute any of the information added or corrected, then that is what the talk page is for. This is how Wikipedia works. It is an open source document. --Falcadore 02:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Group C piece needs a re-write to reflect the begginings of Group C touring car regulations was 1965, not 1973. Do you want to? --Falcadore 21:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to John Howard. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please feel free to post any questions or comments on my talk page. --Theunicyclegirl 01:20, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Scientology, you will be blocked from editing. --Theunicyclegirl 01:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Matt Greenway, by Pharmboy (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Matt Greenway seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Matt Greenway, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out (or delete portions of) page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Emo (music), you will be blocked from editing. TheLetterM 20:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whether you think scientology is cool or not has no say in the matter. Wikipedia is an information source and having people going around thinking that Osama bin Laden reformed the Church of Scientology would be bad. Please see WP:NOT#OR, WP:SOAP, and WP:ANARCHY. Also, in case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. . And about the whole unicycling jab, please refrain from making rude comments such as that. It's not a personal attack, but please see Wikipedia:No personal attacks just so you're clear. Thanks! --GorillaWarfare ^talk 21:02, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Dylan Lake 01:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Scientology. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You seem to have a thing about Scientology and anuses. I suggest you grow out of it. --Rodhullandemu 00:27, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Al-Qaeda has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. (ESkog)^(Talk) 01:20, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]