I have seen that you have made edits to the T.S. Eliot article before. I am interested in your comments on a recent change. A recent sub-section about the sculptor Jacob Epstein was made to the T.S. Eliot article. I deleted the addition and explained my reasons on the talk page.

Here is what was removed: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=T._S._Eliot&action=historysubmit&type=revision&diff=877562978&oldid=877549994

Some have mentioned on the talk page that the Epstein material should be put back. Would you please look at the changes and make your opinion known on the Eliot talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:T._S._Eliot#Jacob_Epstein

WikiParker (talk) 22:06, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zygocactus (talk) 14:20, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Included in my first edit's comment was a link to the Valley News article announcing Maggie Cassidy as the next editor of the Valley News, replacing Martin Frank. Here are additional links that confirm Cassidy's new role at the Valley News: VPR Seven Days VTdigger[reply]

Thank you for providing the sources. In the future, please make sure the entire article is updated, and put at least one of these links in as a reference. --Ken Gallager (talk) 14:22, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And sorry for the snippy tone. I get annoyed when it seems people aren't reading the edit summaries, and in this case I was guilty of it. --Ken Gallager (talk) 14:37, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ken,

You may know me as the primary author on Wiki of the article "White Mountain Art." I know you a familiar with Wiki policies, so I thought I would reach out to you.

There is a site, https://www.alamy.com/, that sells images. They have for sale this image:

https://www.alamy.com/english-benjamin-champney-mount-washington-1858-20-september-2006-original-upload-date-the-original-uploader-was-johnjhenderson-at-english-wikipedia-71-mount-washington-from-sunset-hill-bc-1858-image189297555.html

It's a painting of Mount Washington by Benjamin Champney that I uploaded to Wikipedia Commons. Isn't this a violation of policy to sell an image that's in the public domain?

Let me know your thoughts.

JJ (talk) 14:28, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John, That's discouraging, isn't it? I found your file on Wikimedia Commons, and sure enough, it's listed as being in the public domain. You'll want to get some more opinions than mine on this. Mine is that since it's public domain, anyone is free to do what they want with the photo, include charge others to get a copy from them. Buyer beware, unfortunately. We have this question come up regularly with regard to publicly available geography data. But as I said, check with some other people as well. Maybe I'm overlooking something. --Ken Gallager (talk) 17:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's the conclusion I came to. Let the buyer beware. JJ (talk) 21:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Marlborough(car). Since you had some involvement with the Marlborough(car) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 22:25, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ken, please remember to include a description, source, and author with every file you upload. The file upload wizard can make this easier. Thanks, AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:45, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since I've been using the file upload wizard, this statement confuses me. I thought my photos included the things you mentioned? Perhaps source (self) and author (self) needs to be typed out explicitly? I thought that's what the licensing selection was for. --Ken Gallager (talk) 11:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be using Special:Upload, not WP:File upload wizard. Most of your uploads include "Photo by Ken Gallager," which is sufficient, but your recent uploads from the beach did not. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 13:54, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll find that. Thanks, --Ken Gallager (talk) 11:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion of the name of the Concord stagecoach article can, I think, now be closed. Because you had previously shown interest and I believe you have an interest in the history of the Concord area, would you please make it clearer which name you prefer. I'm strongly against the article name Concord coach but if you hold the balance I think you should be the one to make the decision. Right now your thoughts published on that talk page are a little equivocal. Thanks and regards, Eddaido (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you fix the broken links (such as in templates) created by this page move? GiantSnowman 14:48, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you specify? I've fixed all the double redirects. --Ken Gallager (talk) 14:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No reply. I think the broken template links had automatically updated by the time I saw the message. --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:25, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tuckerman Ravine --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:30, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TruthToBeSpoken (talk) 18:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote:

The olive green you were seeing on the New Hampshire ancestry map must be the gray areas, which are unpopulated. I decided I didn't want to make the caption any longer and just left it as gray. Let me know if you were seeing something else.

I can see a town or two as gray, what I am seeing as olive is a scattering of towns in Coos County, particularly the southern, central and eastern parts. I'm guessing my monitor shows colors a bit different from yours; maybe color-boxes in the caption would help. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 13:58, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the towns in Coos County are the gray ones. You're right that it would be better to have the shades as a legend. Now to figure out how to do that! Thanks, --Ken Gallager (talk) 14:16, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiProject Wisconsin Barnstar
		You have earned the WI barnstar for all of your work on locations in Wisconsin. Thank you for all your help! -- Dolotta (talk) 17:07, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thank you! --Ken Gallager (talk) 17:33, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help and curation of the List of people who died on the Presidential Range page by the way, including fixing my own mistakes. Much appreciated! :) Sayden (talk) 02:59, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	I've never seen such good work as you did at the Leadville, Colorado article and I've been here for over ten years. I nominate you for the Wikipedia Copyeditor of the Year Award!!! Gandydancer (talk) 16:51, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Guess what - you won!!! Your prize is in the mail! Thanks for your great work on that article. I mostly wrote it and my work can always benefit from a good copy edit. (It was a long time ago but I used to live just down the road from Leadville, in Granite.) Gandydancer (talk) 17:00, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Woo hoo! Thanks. It was a fun article to edit, as I'm sure you know. --Ken Gallager (talk) 19:39, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fernandinho (footballer, born 1985). Since you had some involvement with the Fernandinho (footballer, born 1985) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Matthew hk (talk) 15:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the post-edits here! I asked User:RickKfoury to add citations for his new stuff; do you have any? Spike-from-NH (talk) 12:52, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, this is all Rick's info. It does sound like he has some comprehensive knowledge of the rail systems over the last 50 years. Cites will be appreciated, for sure. --Ken Gallager (talk) 13:25, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]