Hello, Kamranhg! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Scientizzle 21:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hello, Kamranhg. Regarding the above article that you created: This topic already is addressed in the article Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi. Is there some reason why two articles are necessary? It is likely that the article you created will be redirected to the existing article soon unless it is made clear why a seperate article is warranted. Regards, Accurizer (talk) 00:14, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Accurizer, basically we are working in USA and UK with this spiritual personality and we have somewhat different point of thought, what has been put on the other page that you are pointing to, so it makes it necessary for us to let our opinion deliver to the world. Thanks. Kamranhg (talk) 00:20, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this title is causing confusion, we can change it but can we have right to tell the world what is the exact truth . Kamranhg (talk) 00:21, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For any kind of clarification I can be reached at <redacted> Kamranhg (talk) 00:25, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Presuming that citations from reliable sources can be provided for the differing points of view, they can (and should) be addressed in the same article. Wikipedia does not support different article versions for the UK and US. Accurizer (talk) 00:33, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Kamranhg. It's not that we don't believe you but, in order for the information to be contained in Wikipedia, it must be verifiable. Wikipedia is not a publisher of primary sources and original thought. Again, can you cite one or more reliable sources for the information? Accurizer (talk) 00:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kamranhg, with all respect, I think you may be misunderstanding what Wikipedia is about. You should take time to read the following policies: Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research, and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Thanks, Accurizer (talk) 11:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Scientizzle 22:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We strongly beleive on His Holiness and true teachings of His Holiness and not on any fictionary information and selfmade concepts. All information provided on this article are truely and factual based on properly sourced information. If you think you are a true lover of His Holiness Don't mess up with the article.--Asikhi (talk) 06:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. Specifically, your edit to User:Asikhi may be offensive or unwelcome. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. — Scientizzle 21:57, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Monogram.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hajreaswad.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 20:19, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hajreaswad.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Hajreaswad 1.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Hajreaswad 1.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've seen your edit on the article, and have no doubts whether or not the organization that you've added may be related to Shahi, however, you had listed the organization where the organizations which Shahi have founded are listed. So, kindly, if you can find any reputable sources the organization can too be listed there.

What has come across as a surprise is, the Messiah Foundation International seems to believe Shahi to be the Mehdi, and Anjuman Serfaroshan-e-Islam doesn't, so is this (All Faith Spiritual Institute) a subsidiary of the MFI or is it an individual organization promoting the interests similar to that of the MFI (As it too believes Shahi to be the Mehdi, according to the website)? (For personal clarification, please). ----  Nasir | ناصر یونس  have a chat  19:29, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't doubt that this organization may be related to/or even founded by Shahi, however you need to bring in reputable sources saying so. (All Faith Spiritual Movement was established by His Holiness Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi in early 2000. Have you not seen All Faith name in book "The Religion of God"?) A comment that User:Kamranhg passed on.

User:Kamranhg, I have reserved a copy of the First Edition from an office of the MFI from my local area, and it is distributed by RAGS International, which is a former name to the MFI. The question that really strikes is, according to the First Edition of the book, the preface is written by AlGohar but the web-book found on your website mentions that the book, 1/ is distributed by All Faith Spiritual Movement Int'l and 2/ the preface is not credited to AlGohar, rather to All Faith... and then mentions a couple of names to the contacts.

I understand that there are many organizations attributed to Shahi, but I begin to doubt the authenticity of them all. Please do bring in reputable sources saying that Shahi has founded All Faith... and then it reserves all rights to be posted up. ;) Thanks and no hard feelings.

Hoping to co-operate even better. ----  Nasir | ناصر یونس  have a chat  19:15, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]