Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Electronic cigarette topic area, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

QuackGuru (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Electronic cigarette topic area. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

QuackGuru (talk) 15:17, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Resilience Project has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence that the project is specifically notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 02:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When you reversed your move of Compressed gas, you failed to move the corresponding talk page back. Any reason for that? --RexxS (talk) 20:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Compressed gas as fuel a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Compressed gas. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:43, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've been editing Wikipedia longer than I have. Why not check out the WP:Requested moves page to familiarise yourself with how to move a page rather than conduct disruptive cut and paste moves? —  AjaxSmack  03:55, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of bitcoin wallets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of bitcoin wallets until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 23:14, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of bitcoin wallets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of bitcoin wallets until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 10:13, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Genetics4good. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Building analysis software has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is already a much more detailed page on the same topic named "Building Energy Simulation"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Xiongy 17:32, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello Genetics4good,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Restart Project for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Genetics4good. I see that you recently changed your username.

Your username reflects an interest in promoting gene therapy. Please be aware of WP:SOAP, which is policy.

Also please be careful to use high quality sources per WP:MEDRS when editing about health, and please be sure to summarize them accurately. In this diff and this diff you misrepresented this source as supporting content saying that gene therapy is used in infectious disease vaccine. There is no actual use for that yet. As the site says it "has promise" for that. Jytdog (talk) 14:52, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jytdog,

I changed my name because I wanted to do more edits on genetic modification in general, and most things I altered on it so far actually made things more objective and accurate (wheras in the past they were very negative, sometimes even without any references whatsoever), and making things more accrurate is my intent.

I don't want to "promote" anything, rather just make the the potential of the technology clearer.

As for the saying that gene therapy is used in infectious disease vaccins today: I never wrote that. I just tried to make it clear that it could be used in the future for this purpose; ie read:

"Resistance to infection (immunity) may be acquired following a disease, by asymptomatic carriage of the pathogen, by harboring an organism with a similar structure (crossreacting), by vaccination or by gene therapy"

Genetics4good (talk) 11:23, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comparison of archive repair programs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of archive repair programs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:12, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you are not sure the difference between primary sources and secondary ones please ask. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:23, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Genetics4good. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dating.ai, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:13, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Unknown Africa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability guidelines for films

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 19:34, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your user name suggests a particular interest in Genetically modified crops, and your edits do contain interesting information. I notice you tend to overinterpret for the encyclopedia, bordering on WP:OR, WP:SYNTH, and WP:CRYSTAL. You also do not fill out all reference information -- which would be easy to do using the dropdown template in the upper left edit header; WP:CIT -- and your punctuation often follows a reference rather than going before it; see WP:REFPUNCT. I'm writing to ask you to take your time and care for making better edits. Following you here if you wish to reply. --Zefr (talk) 15:37, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

With this edit today, you promote MTI (WP:PROMO), do not provide a complete source (WP:CIT), propose future possible benefits (WP:CRYSTAL), and ignore punctuation guidelines (WP:REFPUNCT). Guess you're not interested in improving as an editor. --Zefr (talk) 16:51, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I wanted to add something about multiple trait integration as all those listed genetic modifications only add one trait (so they're not any better than say cross-breeding, which does integrate several traits). Feel free to edit it and make it better. Regarding the reference info: I'm still old-skool and use what I'm accustomed to (plain wikitext editing rather than the VisualEditor, and plain reflinks rather than templates, since reflinks are easier to use.Genetics4good (talk) 17:00, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would also echo Zefr's request to take more care. You are editing in a very controversial area and your username implies that you are biased towards GM which may lead you to problems. As editors we need to leave our real-world biases at the door and ensure that our edits reflect all the sources that exist (both positive and negative). And regarding references, if you cite papers, you can use this tool to generate refences from the digital object identifier (DOI). You should also have a toolbar above the wikitext window that says "> Cite". If you click on that and then select "cite journal" from "Templates" you can enter the DOI into that and then click on the magnifying glass to fetch the author/title etc. SmartSE (talk) 12:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in genetically modified organisms, commercially produced agricultural chemicals and the companies that produce them, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

I'm posting this as a continuation of the very good advice from other editors just above. Please understand that this is just a formality, to make sure that you are aware of the rules, and I am not in any way implying that you have done anything wrong. Thanks. --Tryptofish (talk) 14:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Runs through how to format references. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:11, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and follow this. You have been here for a bit and should take the extra time to format properly. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Genetics4good. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aviation biofuel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reactor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mortar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wrinkle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:44, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Genetics4good, I noticed you edited pages related to and have an interest in genome sequencing. As I'm a new user and just getting to grips with Wikipedia I would really appreciate help with creating a page for a genetic sequencing and research start up (called Sano Genetics) that I'm working with. I want to avoid COI where possible, so would be really grateful if you would have the time to write a brief page up about the company or if you could help point out where I went wrong with the original page. Any help would be really appreciated and given your interest in genetics you might find the company interesting too! Either way, best wishes and thanks for reading this - Clarealev (talk) 20:42, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Clarealev.

I'm not sure whether there isn't always going to be some sort of conflict of interest (COI) as you are being paid by that company (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Clarealev ). Beyond that, a page you create also needs to be noteworthy (but perhaps that might not be an issue since the company you mention also works with whole genome sequencing and whole exome sequencing, whereas SNP is more common in the industry. I also read it puts emphasis on ethics.

I see that the main reason for the rejection of the article was "Unambiguous advertising or promotion".

I can't read the original draft, so I can't see what you need to change. My advise would be to make a simple article (stub) first and expand it later and use the talk page then to discuss the issues the other wikipedians have with the article. That said, I would think an article like this is better written by someone which isn't related to the company in any way.Genetics4good (talk) 14:56, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Genetics4Good,

Thanks for your response - I agree that some level of COI will be hard to negate entirely, which is why it would be great if someone else was able or willing to rewrite the article who is entirely outside of the company - is there any way you would be interested in doing this? I am happy to send or email you the original stub, just to help get a framework which you could change/delete as you see fit. Otherwise, I'm not sure how else I can proceed. I'd really appreciate it if you were able to and it wouldn't have to take too much time or be more than a basic outline. Thanks for your advice and help on this! - Clarealev (talk) 15:06, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) It is a tiny start up company at the moment and very far from meeting our notability requirements for companies. Consequently, any attempt to create the article, regardless of whether it is promotional or not, is very likely to result in it being deleted. SmartSE (talk) 17:02, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I already thought the notability would be an issue. Clarealev, perhaps it's best to wait with making the article untill there is more press coverage and until the company has grown somewhat ? I personally won't make the article either.

Genetics4good (talk) 15:54, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carfree city, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ANPR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the arctic fire addition; I've tuned up the paragraph a bit. I missed the peat fire news. Uh-oh... but thanks for calling it to our attention. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 13:30, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Genetics4good, please keep in mind that disambiguation don't use references; they are supposed to link only to existing articles. I have replaced the reference with a link to Grease trap which mentions 'Fats, oils and grease' and defines it as FOG Leschnei (talk) 12:44, 6 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Genetics4good,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Boothsift and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Steven Fuller (disambiguation) for deletion, because it is unnecessary and disambiguates only a single page.

If you feel that the page shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boothsift}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

BoothSiftTalks 06:08, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malthusian catastrophe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Food shortage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Information privacy law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Race (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Antimicrobial resistance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Flash (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mayor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hiroyuki Abe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 16:00, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Genetics4good,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username TheLongTone and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Down-wing politics should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Down-wing politics.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TheLongTone (talk) 15:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello -- in this edit and others you make on other articles, you don't fill out source information, causing other editors to come in and clean up after you. Here is Citer which allows you to enter a DOI or URL, among other sources, to complete a citation by bot, then allowing you to copy and paste the completed source into the article. There is also a Visual Editor bot that will help you. Please try harder to complete your sources. --Zefr (talk) 16:19, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you please take more care with See also links. You have added two that really don't make a lot of sense in the past few minutes. The purpose of See also is to direct the reader to topics that they will very likely be interested in, given their interest in the article's topic. It is neither for subtopics, which should be discussed, linked, and cited in the article; nor in wildly different topics or minor sub-sub-sub-topics that are vaguely related to something or other. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:44, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Chiswick, the single cell protein link you removed at agriculture does seem to be on target at the Agriculture article since it appears to become a large part in agriculture (microorganism farming is also mentioned in the report from Rethink X (rethinking agriculture) and it hasn't been mentioned at all at the agriculture page. Genetics4good (talk) 08:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, I do not agree that single cell protein is a valid See also link at Agriculture. It is way too minor a sub-sub(-sub) topic. I think you are meaning that Agriculture includes Animal husbandry; an aspect of that is feeding; an aspect of feeding is researching and introducing novel foods for certain purposes; one such novel food is single cell protein. Roughly correct? If so, we have an implicit hierarchy something like

Agriculture

Animal husbandry

Animal feeding

Novel animal foods

Single cell protein (for humans, etc)

For this reason, it is NOT appropriate to tangle up the top-level article with see alsos. If the topic were of major importance at top-level then it would get a section of that article. Instead, it will make more sense to discuss it (far) lower down in the hierarchy, with or without its own article. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:06, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well actually, I didn't mean using single cell protein for fodder, but rather to make protein for humans (so a bit like meat substitutes, ...). Think Quorn and the like, but also done with microorganisms like bacteria, ... So in this sense, it would be way higher in the hierarchy you mention.

Can you reintroduce the link to circular agriculture (removed at Agriculture page I believe) ? It is different from the other methods (sustainable/eco, ... agriculture) as it involves a top-down approach (so government-driven), the others tend to be bottom-up (farmer-driven).

Genetics4good (talk) 11:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, single cell protein for humans remains a very (very very) minor aspect of agriculture. In fact if it's created in an industrial vat it isn't agriculture at all but part of the food industry. I've added it to the hierarchy above to save redrawing the whole diagram here. I'd be really grateful if you'd stop modifying the top-level agriculture articles and think slowly and carefully through what I've said until you understand the reasoning. You are right, by the way, that it's not "farmer-driven"; it isn't farming/agriculture at all. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:42, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, circular agriculture isn't really agriculture, it's more like a system of managing agriculture in a sustaineble way within the current economy. However, links at the see also section don't need to fall directly in the same category, they just need to be "related" topics.

As for single cell protein/microorganism use being a very very minor aspect: sure it is currently used very little in the industry, but in the Rethink X report, it is said to increase a lot within the industry, together with other techniques.

Genetics4good (talk) 14:17, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also be grateful if you could stop adding any number of minor topics as See alsos to Animal husbandry. All of them so far have been inappropriate, and they will I believe all be removed in due course as against consensus. Your continuing after being asked (here, at 08:06 today) is WP:DISRUPTIVE editing: please read that policy if you are not already familiar with it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw this, and will abide. PS: I did saw your notice earlier, but that was just for the agriculture article itself, didn't think then I needed to stop editing all other articles focused on the agriculture field. I'll work on other topics instead. Only wanted to introduce info on some food inefficiency topics, not yet covered here at wikipedia, and of significant value as circular agriculture is taking hold.

Genetics4good (talk) 12:53, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that disambiguation pages like RCB and NCP are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory
• Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).

I have modified both articles with a link to Photosynthetic efficiency#Chloroplast biogenesis which is the only article I could find that mentions these proteins.

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 13:00, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Clean gas. Since you had some involvement with the Clean gas redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Wug·a·po·des​ 04:07, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VR HMD mount is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VR HMD mount until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 17:04, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved your article David Kipping to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can continue to work on the article with minimal disruption. Currently the article is incompletely translated from French, and as a result its references and parts of the article body are not working. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 16:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Terrascope requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 15:47, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

not yet notable

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Kipping and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:David Kipping, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 07:50, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Genetics4good! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 07:50, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Low-emission zone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ANPR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Environmental issues with coral reefs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diadema (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Biorefinery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Grease

Hermetia illucens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Grease

Insect (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Grease

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Biorefinery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Grease

Hermetia illucens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Grease

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Artisanal mining, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terre des Hommes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:19, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JavaHurricane were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Global Organic Textile Standard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Global Organic Textile Standard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JavaHurricane 07:57, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	Congrats with having exactly 10k edits! Here's to having exactly 10k more. Cheers, Utopes (talk / cont) 19:28, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This needs to be properly sourced and cited within the article. Just posting links to a website as a reference isn't going to be enough.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Global Organic Textile Standard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Global Organic Textile Standard, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:17, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Genetics4good

Thank you for creating Goma stove.

User:Sam-2727, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this redirect! In the future, I'd recommend using WP ARCHER to categorize your redirects.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sam-2727}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sam-2727 (talk) 14:42, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Genetics4good,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kiverdi, Inc for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 18:56, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Plastisphere, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PET (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Environmental migrant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Restoration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:27, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Earth Day!

Hello! Wishing you a Happy Earth day on the behalf of WikiProject Environment and WikiProject Ecology.

What is this? Earth Day is an annual event celebrated around the world on April 22 to demonstrate support for environmental protection. First celebrated in 1970, it now includes events coordinated globally by the Earth Day Network in more than 193 countries. What you can do!! Actively participate in our Wikiprojects. Promote an awareness of the natural environment and world. Tag and assess articles under the scope of these projects. Patrol articles related to environmental protection. Maintain articles listed at Wikipedia:List of controversial issues#Environment, Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Popular pages, Wikipedia:WikiProject Ecology#Pages needing attention, etc. Participate in the delsort. and so on... Newly nominated content Energy in Turkey Energy policy of Turkey Electricity sector in Turkey Similar events Earth Hour International Day of Forests International Mother Earth Day World Environment Day World Soil Day World Water Day

---

When man tries to fight nature, he invariably loses. Nature invariably wins. It is only when man is wise enough to live with nature that he really gets anywhere. --Elmer T. Peterson

---

---

• Discuss this newsletter
• Unsubscribe (Ecology)
• Unsubscribe (Environment)

---

Sent by Path slopu (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Environment and its related projects. © Copyleft 2020

• Wikiproject Holidays
• WikiProject Ecology

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Meat price, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quota (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:46, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I have been noticing that you have been editing a lot recently on articles related to Climate change. You should join the WikiProject as well! Sadads (talk) 23:15, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slow Food, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Genetics4good. Years ago I contacted you with concerns about advocacy, recentism, and neutrality in your editing [1]. You never responded, and other editors have reached out to you with similar concerns.

It doesn't look like you've changed your editing in all this time, judging by some of your recent editing at Island country and Palm oil. Could you respond this time? --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 20:21, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at Talk:Island_country#Reverting_to_earlier_version

Genetics4good (talk) 14:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Genetics4good. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David Kipping".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:57, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Peer-to-peer energy trading requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:07, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Potting soil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grit.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Parallel parking, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ban.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wakanda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shuttle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Remittance, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Abra, Stellar and Ripple.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello
You added some content to this page a while ago, citing "New Scientist, January 2020". Could you elaborate? Page, issue, volume number, article title, author, etc? It’s a little sparse, as it is. Thanks, Moonraker12 (talk) 12:24, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what the article name was. If I wrote it like that, it was mentioned in the (Dutch) New Scientist, issue of January 2020. See whether you can find it at https://www.newscientist.com/issues/ if you want more info.

Actually, no: the burden of proof here is on the person who adds stuff to the articles, not the person querying it, so saying I read it in a magazine somewhere, but if you are interested feel free to search out the evidence for yourself (I'm paraphrasing) doesn’t really cut it. And if you are going to claim that Hydroelectric projects produce at least 3 to 4x as much CO2 as an equivalent coal-fired power plant, then you are going to need something a bit more substantial. Otherwise it will have to go. Moonraker12 (talk) 23:05, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, found the English New Scientist article and updated ref. Weird that Dutch version is much thicker and comes monthly rather then weekly (English version seems to be weekly). Genetics4good

Thanks for that; I've copied it over to the Hydroelectricity article also. Regards, Moonraker12 (talk) 22:16, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Government by algorithm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:48, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thanks for your useful addition to Reproductive health. However, I feel it's a little bit of a non sequitur in its current placement. Would you consider integrating the info further down in the article, such as under the "maternal health" header? Thank you, Jessicapierce (talk) 19:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator of Solar Foods please go and read its talk page: [2]. Thank you! Jjanhone (talk) 12:26, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cryptocurrency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gemini.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Genetics4good, I've reverted several of your edits from September 2019. You seem to think invasive species and xeno DNA are the same thing, and went through and added this to a few pages. I've reverted 4 of your edits:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hachimoji_DNA&oldid=914450097
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Artificially_Expanded_Genetic_Information_System&oldid=914450566
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genetic_pollution&oldid=914451402
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Genetic_pollution&oldid=914453172

If you did any more of these it would be nice if you reverted yourself. Invasive Spices (talk) 16:48, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did those edits a long time ago, and don't remember exactly what I changed there any more. However, I do remember that I didn't think both were the same thing, but they can be seen as "similar" in the sense that any species that have xeno DNA certainly aren't "natural" and can be seen as a threat to the natural world (similarly as how environmentalists see genetically modified crops today). I don't agree with that latter notion, but again do think there are issues if crops would have xeno DNA (which obviously isn't the case as of yet and I doubt it will ever come that far).

--Genetics4good (talk) 17:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are right the English version is weekly. I see you have resolved the cite above. Without knowing about your edit I cited a September 2019 issue in List of least carbon efficient power stations. If you need more checked from the English New Scientist let me know as I have 2020 print copies up to early September. Chidgk1 (talk) 16:17, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bioplastic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pathway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed you changed some section titles to very long phrases or even full definitions on Human genetic enhancement. This is a heads up that most Wikipedia article subsections have concise titles. Northern Moonlight | ほっこう 18:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Stranded asset has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:57, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Career-oriented social networking markets has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Le Deluge (talk) 17:43, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Film industry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CGI.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Life spans of home appliances is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life spans of home appliances until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GRINCHIDICAE🎄 20:39, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Allma. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 15#Allma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sfern824 (talk) 21:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nationally Determined Contributions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Measure.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Genetics4good. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Global Organic Textile Standard".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ƏXPLICIT 03:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stranded asset, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decommissioning.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Digital euro. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 28#Digital Euro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 22:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Genetics4good, thank you for your contributions! As I saw from your edits on Smart Contract, you need an introduction into the Wikipedia:RefToolbar Instead of this one ^[1] there would be this one ^[2] --Geysirhead (talk) 09:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To archieve it quickly, insert URL, click on the magnifier at the URL, wait a minute and voilá the fields will be autofilled.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Climate change in Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monitoring.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sustainable tourism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greenway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Subscription business model, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Content.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya. Just letting you know it's not-done to change your comments after people have replied already, as their reply may become illogical. Instead, reply to the reply or if you do need to change your comment, underline the added context, so that people won't be confused by the logic of the conversation. Thanks! FemkeMilene (talk) 16:54, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Refugee employment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Host.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sexual harassment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Audio.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to identify the source of the material in your edit when copying within Wikipedia. I think it came from Deforestation_of_the_Amazon_rainforest

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. For future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding a link to the source and the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved. It is not too late to add the attribution. See Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia#Repairing_insufficient_attribution which explains how to do so.S Philbrick(Talk) 12:24, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you are right. I will try to remember that and add it in the edit summary next time around.

--Genetics4good (talk) 15:19, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Genetics4good, Thanks S Philbrick(Talk) 16:00, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inspired by your comments over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Climate change, I created the waste valorization article and noticed that you were also working on Non-timber forest product article. Glad that we found some distinct articles that can capture the questions you had about forest valorization, Sadads (talk) 12:52, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Boaz Trust and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 12#Boaz Trust until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 20:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Comparison of tablet computers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Extremely outdated. Doesn't look like it will ever receive the attention to get it up to date because there's so much to do. Also I think it's a lost cause because the number of tablet computer products is a ton from hundreds of brands. Such a ubiquous category of products means it's impossible to get all or even at least half listed in a single Wikipedia article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wildlife smuggling hubs in Asia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Smearing large numbers of places with loaded terms based on a single primary source which is now link-dead. No functional definition of what a "wildlife smuggling hub" is. There could be an article here, but WP:TNT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Comparison of free off-line satellite navigation software has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of risk analysis Microsoft Excel add-ins (2nd nomination)/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of power management software suites/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of XMPP server software/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of DNA melting prediction software

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Victorinox Cybertool.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, in the creation of a new article (Anti-Waste and Circular Economy Law) I researched other relevant Wikipedia articles to link to and found your edits and peer review suggestions on the European Green Deal article extremely helpful. Would you be willing to take a look at my article if you have the time? Thank you! Nustudent1120 (talk) 14:23, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Digital euro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

to be replaced with a translation ready to be moved here from user name space: User:Aeroid/Digital Euro

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aeroid (talk) 11:56, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why did you add this? Thanks! Jtbobwaysf (talk) 04:44, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Quilombolo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references and all the content of this article is already said in the appropriate article Quilombola.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BaduFerreira (talk) 20:28, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahindra HyAlfa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahindra HyAlfa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 18:39, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Nutrient Recovery and Reuse has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 19 § Nutrient Recovery and Reuse until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bright green environmentalism has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 23:04, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed the deletion of Onward ticket. My reasons are given at the article page. If you disagree you can remove the PROD template but I'd appreciate if you'd give me your reasons, so I can assess whether it makes sense to do a full AfD on the article. Oblivy (talk) 03:12, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]