Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ClayFighter (series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interplay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

a decision made by the game designers that did not surprise anyone, oh man, I kinda giggled. I created the article 2 years ago but all the text were added by... you know who. It's his style/trademark, readers have to deal with it, though I confess I never read that text he added. About those links you removed, they can't stay even as external links? 2 or 3 of them are really useful... P.S. now a "bonus", a month ago he added this: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Doan%27s_Hollow_Public_School&diff=524576434&oldid=524576084 , Katherine VanGoethem section, nothing crazy about it, but in my opinion this is probably the edit of 2012 (deserves a special prize), that's why I'm sharing it with you. (...) take care and happy 2013. =) o/ --Hydao (talk) 15:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for sending this message but I have to say "Lol" again because of your edit summary. gvnayr made two sweet edits, this one, and the other one with the "frameless" thing. :\ ... so helpful. Anyway, retro game Guru said that he is high-functioning autistic (that's why he is so obsessed with his number of edits...). It's really sad but whatever. About the other article you just edited, I have a "bad memory" about it: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=World_Soccer_%2794:_Road_to_Glory&diff=446832806&oldid=446771464 ... "One of the main critiques of the game is that the blue and red stripes of the Russian flag are reversed. Stupid. Meanwhile, the flags of Argentina and El Salvador is oversimplified, while the Ecuadorian flag looks like Colombia. This is because Ecuador's yellow stripe should be the same length as the other stripes." ... Heh, as I remember he was blocked for many copyright infringement, then when he got unblocked, crazy gvnayr said to the administrator: "oh I have learned my lesson", and days later he added that text, erm. He was lucky that I didn't report it to the administrator who blocked him... I was too nice to gvnayr... Amen. o/ --Hydao (talk) 15:58, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hoshi wo Sagashite..., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Extraterrestrial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi,

A few months back you moved the article Gauntlet (Donald R. Lebeau video game) to Gauntlet (1984 video game) quoting the rule that we should "Dab by year first".

This only applies if the year itself is sufficient to clearly identify that specific game. Since you'd have seen (I'm assuming you checked first) that there were two unrelated games called "Gauntlet" released in 1984, the "corrected" title could apply to either, and hence isn't a suitable qualifier. For this reason, I've moved the article back to its original title.

Hope this explains things,

Ubcule (talk) 23:49, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

(Copied from Ubcule's talk page) Didn't know about the other 1984 game. Thanks for letting me know! --Jtalledo (talk) 14:04, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Well, no offence, but it *was* clearly listed on the dab page- this is the sort of thing that should be checked before reorganising pages. Anyway, it's been fixed now. Ubcule (talk) 21:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

(Copied from Ubcule's talk page) I see now it was on the dab page, but I was expecting it to be in the hatnote. I believe sharing a title and a release year would merit a mention up top. Sorry if you took offense. I was just trying to help out. --Jtalledo (talk) 21:15, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

The reason the hatnote didn't mention the other 1984 game specifically is because it wasn't necessary- the original title (Gauntlet (Donald R. Lebeau video game)) didn't differentiate the game by year, and identified it uniquely. Since it was unlikely anyone looking for the Micro Power game would have arrived directly (and mistakenly) at this article, it wasn't necessary to specifically clarify or mention it in the hatnote; the generic link was enough.

BTW, what I meant was that I intended "no offence" towards you. I think I said what I wanted to say, and didn't intend to make a bigger deal of it than that. :-) All the best, Ubcule (talk) 21:41, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited All-Star Baseball, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NFL Prime Time '98, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

I felt the spammy nature of that blockquote violated this part "An editor has expressed a concern that this Section lends undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, controversies or matters relative to the article subject as a whole. Please help to create a more balanced presentation." which I had recently looked up only to find you removed it.

I wasn't trying to be adversarial, I just wanted the ridiculous derailing of the article to be removed. It's such a sensitive topic to feel like we're selling out and letting spammers of that fund collect donations via the 3 url links after the block quote. It looks much better now and it's a version of the page which I can feel proud of. Tomato expert1 (talk) 20:50, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

I didnt make inconstructive edit on playstation :s — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weeeeooo (talk • contribs)

Hey Jtalledo. Hydao here. Yes, I know it is not right at all creating another account (lame username and with a typo lol) but I'm doing this for the good of English Wikipedia.

Yesterday I sent This Message to the administrator who blocked gvnayr, not sure if he/she is still active anyway...

And I just noticed now that you basically removed all the text added by gvnayr in few articles.. this is not life jtalledo, gvnayr make 50 edits like crazy and then you (or anyone else) basically remove all the "sh*t" with 2 or 3 edits. waste of time, calories, neurons, etc.

What's the solution... Do you have any idea? Can we "analyse" this matter once for all with an administrator (who are into video games as well) or something? And reach a decent/mature consensus? Thanks. --AgaintsFakeAndNonsense (talk) 14:52, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neo Geo X, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Color bleeding (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Please put the references about the Undertaker back. Pages like these must have more than one reference of the moves. And William Moody also managed Calaway with the name Percy Pringle III when Calaway was wrestling in 1984-1990. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Diggertaker (talk • contribs) 18:24, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Fantasy zone arcadeflyer.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Primal Rage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emulation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Jtalledo. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000(talk) 22:06, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WWE Brawl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE Brawl until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Richard BB 22:03, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Jtalledo, GVnayR (talk · contribs) has a very serious mental issue. I think it is better "ignoring" him, there's no hope for him, really. Now he started changing "frameless" to "border". I guess the creature suddenly got sick of "frameless". Months ago he made hundreads or thousands of edits (changing XXXpx to frameless), sadly frameless is not "fashion" anymore. "The Greatest Wikipedian" just got sick of frameless huh. Just wondering, "border" will last how long..? This is very but very sick. --89.214.165.134 (talk) 02:47, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi, please use the "undo" button rather than the "reject" option from pending changes when the edit you're reverting is not vandalism. Pending changes is designed to keep vandalism out of the live version (the one readers see); it's not supposed to be used for content control beyond screening for disruptive edits, and deprecating a revision after it has been accepted is not on. I'm sure you didn't man anything by it, but please keep this in mind in future. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:01, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

I know this has nothing to do with the English Wikipedia, but GVnayR was blocked here. "Sockpuppeting, being disrespectful towards an admin, vandalism, etc."

One of his accounts (talk page): "What are You!?! You say you are RyanVG yet you have many forms, you have many names yet none fit, many views but none the same, you make edits with many adresses yet don't take credit for it, you say you are one but act as many.... Alright heres my question why is it that you are stating one thing and reverting another?--Matterfoot 23:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)"

I don't even want to mention other accounts lol. Very awkward. --89.214.72.179 (talk) 17:59, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey there. Got a couple questions for you about the recent page moves for the Pin(something)Bot articles. First off, was there a discussion on moving these articles? If so, where was it? Just curious.

On the pinball article: I think the new name has three significant problems, two related to policy: First, the name is effectively all-caps, which I thought was reserved for common acronyms (though I can't seem to find a policy/guideline that discourages that - I know there was one at one point, but it may have been dropped). Second, the dot in the middle of the name is basically untypable without knowing its escape sequence, which makes it impractical for the majority of users. WP:TSC discourages this - if it's determined that PIN(dot)BOT is truly the most appropriate title, we need other forms of the title to redirect to it.

Which leads me to my third issue: You moved Pin*Bot (video game) to Pin Bot, removing the disambiguation on the NES title. I believe this is likely to cause confusion, both because the pinball article is unquestionably the primary article on this topic (and the NES game is a derivative), and also because people might expect Pin Bot to redirect to PIN(dot)BOT (the pinball article). I think regardless of whether there's any punctuation in the NES title, we should keep the "(video game)" disambig and also put disambig links at the top of each article linking to the other.

What are your thoughts? — KieferSkunk (talk) — 05:14, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

I am positive that in the arcade version the third character is the host from Smash TV. I remember it because I was laughing so hard when he came up my character got killed. Unfortunately, I have no evidence other than my memory.

http://www.destructoid.com/retrose-tinted-total-carnage-111855.phtml has the quote, "If you manage to have 120 of them by the end of the game, you enter a bonus level called the Pleasure Domes, filled with cash, prizes and Smash T.V.'s Mutoid Man." But the version he reviewed and posted screenshots from is the SNES version.

If I ever see the arcade version again, I'm willing to waste a roll of quarters to see if my memory is correct. Plus I have someone ready to take pictures. Unfortunately it's a mighty big IF. Wd40 (talk) 12:48, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

……………

It's possible. Then again when they make fewer than 2000 cabinets, ANY one of them is rare. And it's possible that the port to the game consoles is slightly different from the cabinets. But there doesn't seem to be ANYTHING to back up my memories from 20 years ago. I guess I have to withdraw my assertion pending hard evidence. Wd40 (talk) 01:49, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tom Vu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom Arnold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.

Please read: WP:TWABUSE. 70.134.228.161 (talk) 19:38, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Dag nabbit. I was supposed to link to WP:NOTE in the edit summary and now I've been templated by an anon user. Natch. --Jtalledo (talk) 18:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Don't be disingenuous; you were templated because you assumed bad faith on the part of another editor, not because you forgot to link to a template. 75.0.193.159 (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

I made a mistake, yes, but geez, this is just Wikipedia. People seem to take this stuff way too seriously. No need to be like I ran over your cat or something. Also, have a great day! --Jtalledo (talk) 11:10, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your flippant attitude is disgraceful. You made a serious mistake. Accusing others of bad faith is one of the worst thing one can do on Wikipedia, but blaming the victim is even worse. An apology is in order. 71.139.152.184 (talk) 14:22, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Whoa there buddy. I'm not the one who just used a personal attack in my edit summary. I was just trying to defuse all this tension with some levity, but I guess you're not having any of it. I said I was wrong, but I guess that's not good enough. So I'm sorry if you were offended. It would be nice if you said sorry for calling me an "ahole." But hey, water under the bridge dude/dudette. --Jtalledo (talk) 22:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)