I strongly disagree with this block and respectfully request a thorough review of the decision. I have not engaged in any sockpuppetry, nor do I have any connection to the alleged account. If there is any evidence against me, I would appreciate the opportunity to review and respond to it, rather than being blocked without explanation. All the pages I created even the were that were in review are taken down and deleted, Wikipedia is a public domain, nobody can just play around with user accounts, I was not harming anyone, nor I did any illegtimate activity nor used multiple accounts. I want my work to be unblocked and reviewed asap by some sane persons here. I just had 27 edits and joined Wikipedia recently, this is not a welcoming behavior.

Blocking someone without clear proof is unfair, and I believe this decision has been made in error. I have always followed Wikipedia's guidelines and contributed in good faith. Please reconsider this block and provide clarity on why this action was taken. I am willing to cooperate fully to resolve any concerns. Also I want my pages and edits to be relive as it were there. Thank you. Johnkay2025 (talk) 14:19, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This block is based on a COI VRT ticket, which limits who can review this to checkusers and those with access to the COI VRT queue, which I do. I have examined the ticket and I believe that the block is justified. I am not allowed by policy and documents I have signed to reveal the exact information presented there. I am declining your request; you may make another for review by someone else who can see the ticket, or you can appeal to the Arbitration Committee via email(see their page for instructions). 331dot (talk) 19:45, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]