Hello, Johnj1995,

Just a reminder that any time you tag any page for deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/CFD/RFD/etc.), you need to post a notice on the talk page of the page creator informing them of the tagging. It can be helpful if you use Twinkle and set up your Preferences to "Notify page creator" and make sure all CSD criteria boxes are checked off. Then Twinkle will post these messages for you which is convenient. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:46, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnj1995,

Redirects from old user pages to new user pages are permitted when an editor changes their username. There are typically a lot of incoming links and even though the username isn't currently used by an active editor, they are not tagged for speedy deletion unless the editor deletes their main user page and the page becomes a broken redirect. But user talk pages are usually retained.

Thanks for all of your contributions, I come across your deletion taggings every day which makes things easier for admins patrolling CSD categories. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I only tagged this page because the user moved their user page and then reverted the move, which triggered a "User self-renaming or moving user talk pages into article talk space" filter. Johnj1995 (talk) 19:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Johnj1995, I also wanted to add, "Thank you!" for all of the work you do. I think I come across your tagging and edits on a daily basis which is quite a commitment as a Wikipedia editor. Just today, you retagged some CSD G5 articles and drafts where you not only spotted the tagging mistake but spent time tracking down the original sockmaster and correcting the tag. It may seem like a minor matter but if there is a question about the page deletion, it really helps things to have a correct deletion summary.

I hope you consider requesting some additional editor permissions and taking on some more responsibilities. Some of them can really making your editing easier and as such an active editor, they could come in handy. Thanks again! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:05, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Barnstar of Diligence

Hello, Johnj1995, Every day I see past and present incidents where you have corrected misapplied templates, frequently by new editors. These are not edits that get a lot of attention so I thought I'd award you a barnstar for catching these errors and straightening up draft pages and articles that might be infrequently viewed by others. Thank you for your diligence! Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t change speedy deletion tags as you did here. It’s just annoying to deal with. Also read WP:R3 before putting R3 speedy deletion tags into redirects. That redirect wasn’t recently created and thus didn’t qualify for R3 speedy deletion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 19:24, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. It is indeed not user space. I think I need to have my eyes checked. -- Whpq (talk) 01:48, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please do not talk file talk pages for speedy deletion as WP:CSD#F2. This criterion only applies to file description pages, not their corresponding talk pages. Previous discussions, most recently Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 81#File talk pages which consist only of boilerplates, wikiproject tags, and/or text which has been copied to Commons, did not find support to delete local talk pages of files hosted on Commons. ✗plicit 13:34, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Jane Bowles.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 19:13, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source credits: "Photograph: Terrence Spencer/Time & Life Pictures/Getty Images" -- Whpq (talk) 19:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:OVERLINK – we don't link to countries in the vast majority of cases. Thank you. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:45, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I work for CAAC and I'm so glad that making the list of airports in China more standard and more professional with your help! But there are still some problems I can't solve: 1. The construction work of Dalian Jinzhouwan International Airport has not started yet (this project just premitted by State Council and CMC on October 2022, and then it needs NDRC's premit to start constructing). Also the project of Nagqu Dagring Airport was abandoned already due to choosen location in a too-high elevation. Foshan Gaoming International Airport(Pearl River Delta International Airport) is not under construction too, there is 25 airports under construction formally, but I can't edit the Template:Airports in China; 2. I added the talks to Urumqi Airport and Wuxi Airport for moving the article to the correct name, but there is no effects, especially senior-editor refused my request for moving "Ürümqi Airport" to "Urumqi Airport" after I pasted the evidence of movement's feasibility. 二武是大猫 (talk) 14:28, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Johnj1995 -- I've declined a couple of your recent G11 speedy requests on old userspace article drafts. Generally this kind of material is viewed as harmless unless highly promotional in nature. If you feel strongly, then blanking is acceptable if the editor is long-term inactive, or you can of course take the drafts to WP:Miscellany for deletion. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 02:25, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The term "aftermath" is implying a disaster in tone here when used in a current event manner. Please use a different word like "results" "outcomes" or something else if you need to differentiate between the election itself and things occurring afterwards. Please do not keep using the term "aftermath of" for elections even when there are problematic aspects to the elections because them being elections makes them inherently contentious and extra due caution is warranted. Please don't keep using the word "aftermath" when talking about specifically things relating to elections. Sumstream (talk) 04:44, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. While I'm sure it's not your intent, the actions you are taking on Miss Afghanistan are getting into edit war territory. This may be in part due to a misunderstanding about what a WP:set index article is, but even if you believe you have a firm grounding in WP:policies and guidelines, the approach you are taking on that article suggests that it might be time to back away from it completely.

If you believe that it's vital the information not be included, rather than continuing to revert, I would suggest beginning a discussion on the talk page and working to develop a consensus to remove it. —siroχo 04:10, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johnj1995, discussions did take place prior to the removal of the Airlines and Destinations table in that article. Please see the talk page and this discussion at WP:ANI. Sunnya343 (talk) 20:05, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused about this connection. The source says that the connection restart is delayed but the booking machine says it is bookable here and now. Am I wrong footed here? The Banner talk 21:52, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Source is https://www.aeroroutes.com/eng/231210-uans24inc, which says that "United continues to file following route although reservations remain unavailable or only available at highest fare classes". United previously opened reservations for this route earlier this year, but this was only at the highest fare rate and the schedule for this flight (until March 30, 2024) was later removed: https://www.aeroroutes.com/eng/231002-uanw23hkg Johnj1995 (talk) 22:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So, I am wrong footed. Clear. The Banner talk 22:16, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good day. Please stop reverting the edits made adding "Charter" tags to Part 135 charter operators in airport destination tables. This was previously discussed at the WP:AIRPORTS talk. If you have further issues with this you are welcome to re-start the conversation, but unilaterally reverting good-faith, sourced edits made following extensive discussion is disruptive. nf utvol (talk) 20:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The listing of JSX and Contour Airlines should be consistent on all airline articles. Either list the flights as charter or do not list the flights as charter. There should be consensus on this. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This has previously been discussed in WP:AIRPORTS and in the BNA talk page a while back, sorry if you didn't see it. I can't just click my fingers and do it all immediately, I'm working through them as I get a chance. You're also welcome to help with adding the tags if you don't feel that it's being done fast enough. In the meantime, please stop the disruptive reverting. nf utvol (talk) 20:28, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for redirecting the articles to drafts! I'm incredibly new to AfD & speedy deletion criteria. Didn't even notice The Haunted Cop Shop of Horrors 2 got moved to draft space, sorry! Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 04:12, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How did you come to suspect that this draft was generated by artificial intelligence? Was the lack of references one of the factors? Robert McClenon (talk) 05:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aha! It's the first sentence, in which the bot says what it was doing. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for tagging it. I rejected the draft because of the lack of references, which is especially a problem with a BLP. Then I nominated the draft for deletion. Wikipedia needs a lot of work to be done by bots, and it is done by bots, but it doesn't articles written by bots. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:13, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help me move the Kashgar Laining International Airport to "Kashi Laining International Airport"? You can read the reason in the description of last edition.

Someone always undo my movement in Kashgar Laining International Airport by unreasonable, even though I posted official AIP source or other resources to show the real name is "Kashi" and not "Kashgar" anymore. So I found the KHG airport manager to provide me a logo picture inside the KHG terminal. And I added the referance 8 by Xinjiang SASAC to provide the reality of "Kashi Laining International Airport". 二武是大猫 (talk) 13:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a draft. It's in draft space, but it is webhosting by a CU-blocked user, and most of what they produced were hoaxes. Drmies (talk) 17:17, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Please tell me if Draft:Games I Been is a draft, or an abuse of draft space. See also User talk:Lasha563--the list of deleted drafts, and their comments at the bottom--and then considering restoring the tags. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  User:Drmies, sorry I didn't see this earlier. I re-removed with it because WP:UCSD don't apply to draftspace. I believe that is because WP:G13 results in automatic deletion eventually so it is seen as busywork to expand WP:U5 to cover draftspace as well though you could inquire more about the reasoning at WT:CSD. The Pages were created too early for WP:G5 to apply unless an older blocked account is found, and draftspace duplicates are explicitly covered by WP:NOTCSD point 16. We are allowed to redirect those to get rid of them under limited circumstances, and I have done so with Draft:Unrecognized countries. But unless both title and scope are a close match that will draw complaints, so I have left the rest for WP:G13. Apologies for the procedural tangle. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9890:12E8:5E1F:8654 (talk) 18:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • As for Draft:Games I Been I think that is a test page, potentially WP:G2, or maybe a deliberately disruptive creation disguised as a test, potentially WP:G3. But if it turns out it does attempt to cover some actual sporting event then tagging will only result in delaying WP:G13 when the WP:G2 is removed so I am not going to touch it so it can be deleted in another three months when it will be indisputably eligible for G13. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9890:12E8:5E1F:8654 (talk) 18:54, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • After reading their talk page, I would bet that this was subtle disruption, possibly intended to waste our time and tie us in procedural knots, but listing at WP:MFD or taking any further time on this would just be giving them what they want, all G13 requires is that we do nothing. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9890:12E8:5E1F:8654 (talk) 19:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't think they do subtle disruption. G13 means this stuff is left for months. They weren't out to get us tangled up procedurally. Drmies (talk) 19:59, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      • You would know them better than I. Drafts aren't indexed by search engines, so length of time is mostly unimportant as the pageview change is usually nil. But if you are willing to take the heat on any redirects that may not be quite perfectly right then go ahead, I just prefer not to have to answer any complaints unless I am on firm ground in terms of both policy and procedure. 2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:9890:12E8:5E1F:8654 (talk) 20:50, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
        • The heat, if any there were, wouldn't have been on you. Drmies (talk) 21:48, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Izumo Airport, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your most recent change there was a revert with no edit summary. The anonymous user reverted you and I accepted it at pending changes because I don't know why you undid it. If you had left an explanation, what would it have been? City of Silver 00:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

This is with respect to that change which I can not see : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wisdood&diff=prev&oldid=1209468033

Yours sincerely, Wisdood (talk) 09:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS Was it a sort of spam ?? --Wisdood (talk) 10:08, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was spam and was probably similar to this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category_talk:2007_FIBA_Americas_Championship&oldid=1209468182 Johnj1995 (talk) 16:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Johnj1995. I had a question regarding this edit. In it, you changed “Two Israelis are shot and killed in an attack at a gas station near Eli, West Bank” to be “Two Israelis are shot and killed in an attack at a gas station near Eli in the occupied West Bank” (green bolding being the addition). I wanted to ask why you did that addition? Earlier in the day, I had removed it from the phrase due to it being irrelevant to the actual event being reported and seemed more POV. Since I removed it earlier, it would be a violation of 1RR to revert it. So, I wanted to ask your reasoning on that addition and maybe why you think it is relevant to the event? The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 06:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I probably should not have added that, although the page was not subject to edit restrictions when I made my edit. I believe that the phrase "occupied West Bank" was used in current events listings before the war began. I have removed these words. Johnj1995 (talk) 19:32, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you haven't seen the aircraft they say just Alaska for mainlines and Alaska horizon and Alaska SkyWest for regional. Lucthedog2 (talk) 16:16, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for trusting me to edit the article of chinese airports during this period. but now, i'm tired to discuss with some wiki managers, and follow their command that make me very confused. so i decided to quit every wiki editing, so please continue to maintaining the airports list in china. and many many thanks. 二武是大猫 (talk) 17:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! What made you think that my custom rationale for deleting this unambiguous UPE needed to be "cleaned up"? I know you are a valuable editor and significant asset to this project, but please ... don't do that again, if you don't mind? Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And then you did the same thing again at Draft:Yash Shah. Does it not occur to you that if I write a custom deletion rationale instead of using the standard Twinkle options, it's probably for a reason (such as making it easier for my fellow admins to follow my reasoning)? You also removed a custom rationale at User:Jettmuu/sandbox, replacing it with a generic one that is not applicable (there's no text in the page). Please confirm, here in this thread, that you'll stop doing this. Many thanks, regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:19, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,I am Sh.Wiki Wiki 7. Thanks to Wikipedia for the edit. Report on Wiki Contests! Thank you. Happy editing! A.Viki Wiki7 (talk) 15:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Johnj1995,

I saw you removed this CSD tag as "not valid" without reading the rationale or finding the reason. Same reason or the film disambiguator you've added was recently moved per Special:PermanentLink/1230815921#Requested move 17 June 2024, and maybe because it was closed and went through WP:RM/TR, there was a bit delay with the moving. As the DAB page stands, it's not necessary per Wikipedia:PTM, and should be removed as tagged earlier. Pls consider reverting your edit. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 14:43, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed it, as that's a Hippa violation to mention patients names. I didn't know where I write that. I will remove it again, and add that if i can find where I add that. Ready2Edit73 (talk) 22:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You removed a speedy deletion request with the edit summary "User talk pages are not normally deleted". A quick look through my watchlist gives me three user talk pages that I successfully nominated for speedy deletion recently:

• User talk:2400:C600:462F:8312:1:0:8DE7:B3CE (G10)
• User talk:2600:1006:B065:70C8:92D9:D8DD:7A91:76B2 (G10)
• User talk:Baronsmith61 (G11)

Evidently they are deleted, including under G11 which was what you removed. It's not really necessary to delete it, blanking achieves basically the same effect, but it is done. And it does send a stronger message, I would say. So I think removing the tag was improper. I'm not going to re-request speedy deletion since you've now removed the promotional material, but I just wanted to let you know. --Un assiolo (talk) 20:55, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:DELTALK, user talk pages are generally not deleted as they are usually needed for reference by other users. Individual edits may be deleted or redacted for privacy reasons or because of harassment or other serious violations. Exceptions to this are occasionally made if there is a good reason for the deletion. Johnj1995 (talk) 21:05, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A user talk page that has no history or content other than spam or abuse is not needed for reference by anyone. This is the case with the three listed above and with the one from which you removed the template. --Un assiolo (talk) 21:29, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I saw you undid my edit on the returning EWR-POS route with the reason "not a regularly scheduled flight." It's a seasonal route just like many others that is bookable as a regular flight unlike some other seasonal routes from POS. It's also a returning route. There is no reason to remove it from the destinations list on the basis that it's "not regularly scheduled," because for that seasonal period, it is, and it is bookable as such. If the route is not reinstated after that period, then obviously it can be removed.

Thanks. Randomusername0902 (talk) 02:00, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnj1995,

Just a reminder, if an editor has removed a PROD tag from an article or file, it shouldn't be added back, even if the editor who removed didn't offer an explanation for its removal. It looks likes you added back all of the PROD tags removed by User:108.49.49.128 which was incorrect and I, GB fan and Explicit reverted your edits. There might be an exception for sockpuppets but, to be honest, I haven't run into that yet on this platform. Basically, a PROD tag can only be added to an article or file once.

Thank you for all of your many, many helpful contributions while you are patrolling. It's appreciated! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:01, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only reverted the removals because the IP had been replacing the prods with redirects and not removing any other content on the page. Three speedy templates (including a g7 that you later converted to a prod) were also removed by the IP. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:52, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I saw you deleted the map made for the 1891 Dutch elections calling it an invalid image. Would you mind expanding on that a bit? Why was the image invalid and why is it less valid than any other Dutch election map? Dees de Jong (talk) 02:06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My bad on the removal there - got careless and saw they'd won gold at the Olympics before, so assumed it meant first of the 2024 games. Didn't realize all three of their previous golds were in field hockey, so it truly was their first-ever individual gold. The Kip ^(contribs) 22:39, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Johnj1995, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Improvolution, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Improvolution.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CFA}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

C F A 💬 19:40, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What else, friend? Hey, in the article I created, I already put the missing categories in it. I want you to put the article back on display. Lmpesantezt (talk) 01:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please continue editing the article in draftspace and then move it back to mainspace when it is completed. Johnj1995 (talk) 02:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Some references have already been added, ¿Now you could remove the draft article and make it the main article, please?.Lmpesantezt (talk) 03:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johnj1995,

Just a reminder that any time you tag any page for deletion , the page created is an product that is indian govt initiative and we are the manufacturer we are adding these information for indian citizens to create awareness ,let us know if you need further information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramesh kumar AM (talk • contribs) 04:14, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good tag, John. Page was obvious spam. —C.Fred (talk) 10:18, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi and thanks for adding a reference. I'm trying to make up my mind on how explicit referencing should be on airline-destination tables in airport pages. Suppose airline X flies from airport A to 10 destinations and we have a reliable independent source which substantiates 4 of the destinations from airport A. Should that reference be added once next to the name of the airline X in the wikitable, or should it be added 4 times next to each destination. The former makes the wikitable easier to read and more attractive, but the latter makes it more explicit - ie you know exactly which URL to look at. I'm tending towards adding a reference just once, but wondered what you thought. Pmbma (talk) 19:55, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the report at WP:UAA but please note that some wikis allow organisation accounts - see Commons policy for an example, the German wiki is another. Please don't report users at WP:UAA if they haven't edited on this wiki. Cabayi (talk) 08:58, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like your user page protected from recreation? Per policy, I could do either ECP or full protection—your choice. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:13, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you but not necessary at this time. Protection would only be useful if the page was repeatedly created as vandalism. This was probably created accidentally after I edited a page that that user created. Johnj1995 (talk) 22:19, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi John, I've noticed a bunch of your CSD tags on draft articles - there's really no need to tag these most of the time, especially not for things like "test edit". If you put a CSD tag on them, you're asking an admin to come around and look at this one specifically kind of urgently. If you just leave it, Liz or Explicit or josh or whoever will just come by in six months and sweep it into a bin. Saves everyone some energy to just ignore them. -- asilvering (talk) 17:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Johnj1995! You recently nominated Draft:Chauhan sept of Rajput-Sikh lineage for speedy deletion because the page was created by a known sock puppet. In this case, the article was created by IP 180.229.33.160, and you linked to the SPI for Truthfindervert. However, I'm not seeing this IP address listed as one of the suspected or confirmed sock puppets. Can you provide more information as to why you connected this IP address to Truthfindervert? Thank you! Take care, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:19, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johnj1995 - quick question because I'm inexperienced with page moves and deletions - I just moved Commend International to draftspace and inadvertently created a redirect from mainspace to draftspace - which you've put a CSD notice on, which makes sense. I just wanted to ask if the talk page (which is now a redirect to Draft talk) needs to get CSD'd as well, or if that just gets taken care of automatically due to the main redirect getting CSD'd. Sorry if this is a stupid question - I don't normally work on this kind of stuff BugGhost🦗👻 16:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Literally the minute I sent this message, both the article and the talk page got deleted - so I guess that answers my question! Thanks, and sorry for the bother! BugGhost🦗👻 16:18, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brother why are you deleting my article give Syed Shahzaman1 (talk) 12:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not seeing the WP:G11ness. . . . . -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:14, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should not have been tagged, after seeing the message on the user's talk page. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:16, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I declined three CSDs you requested in draft articles for promotional only articles. All three had only an infobox, which was not inherently promotional. They may be non-notable, but there's no reason right now to delete them as they're drafts. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 20:29, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

whoops, apologies for the edit conflict there. I can revert my tagging as G11 is fine. Star Mississippi 02:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sock edits were before master was blocked, so don't count as block evasion. On the 6 month count, I see non-automated edits 5 months ago. Thanks. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:41, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When a flight is not year round but seasonal, it is enough to move it to a section "seasonal". Just plain removing it is not the best option. The Banner talk 15:50, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And the end dates are in the given source, so I restored them. Please be more accurate. The Banner talk 15:59, 4 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I noticed that you marked Nayanahari Abeynayake as unsourced ([1]), despite it having many external links. In cases such as this, it may be more helpful to include a {{no footnotes}} tag instead. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nivia Sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Accessories.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the sockmaster to the G5! I hate CSD on my phone. jellyfish ✉ 21:27, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I apologize in advance for my mistake in moving the article in an inappropriate way. I would like to request that the "Sabang, Aceh" page be moved back to "Sabang" which was moved by someone in 2012. Ariankntl (talk) 03:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The city of Sabang in Aceh is a major topic that is more widely known than other entities with similar names. Per Wikipedia policy, disambiguation pages may be moved to "Sabang (disambiguation)" if needed. Please help, thank you. Ariankntl (talk) 03:05, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Johnj1995. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:Junior The Jenius performing at Skyway Theatre in Minneapolis, MN.jpeg, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:27, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Johnj1995. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of File:RABBY HASAN.png, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand where exactly you disagreed with the action I took. If you want to write on the talk page the redirect, why do I have to open a discussion about something so blatantly wrong. LefterDalaka (talk) 19:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mariscal Sucre International Airport, you may be blocked from editing. 119.234.32.102 (talk) 04:56, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Guayaquil Airport. 119.234.32.102 (talk) 05:13, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! 119.234.32.102 (talk) 04:57, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I declined the CSD on Septimius Awards as the edits were hours before the sockmaster was blocked. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:35, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]