Hello, Jodie25! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! ```Buster Seven Talk 21:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC) [reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your edit here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Barry_Fuller&diff=562411292&oldid=562410874

Has changed the dates to the incorrect format, and requires people to undo this and it is really rather time consuming and annoying, see here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Seb_Brown&diff=562543916&oldid=562335258 Read here about correct formating: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:MOSNUM

So if you could ensure that you do not continue to do this, it's one thing to use the incorrect format, but to change the correct format for the entire article to the incorrect format is really quite bad and must not be done. The edit would have to be undone manually now and would be very time consuming and annoying. I have contacted user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ohconfucius to see if they can sort it out as they did for Seb Brown. But please make sure you're doing things correctly first. A quick look at your talk page suggests that this has been an issue a few times before.

Thanks.

92.40.254.19 (talk) 17:59, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Barry Fuller you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Barry Fuller for things which need to be addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:07, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please respond point-by-point to the comments I've made on the article? That would make it easier for me to re-review. Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:53, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I can't find any record of the players you have added being associated with AFC Wimbledon. Could you provide references (which you should do anyway or remove them if there are none. I also noticed that there are players not on the list that your own reference says should be there (selects top 10) also the under 18s squad reference to AFC Wimbledon's homepage is out of date and many of those players have moved on as confirmed in the aforementioned selects top 10 article. Could you amend these and please remember to provide references when you're adding new information. This is very important.

Thanks. Pawac (talk) 20:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for adding a reference and removing the old one, however there remain players that have no references at all, have been refernced in the article you just added but haven't been added to the squad and you've also not amended the issues raised with the players mentioned in the "selects top 10" article. You've used this as a reference yet the players mentioned in the article as being part of the under 18s, have not been added to the under 18s squad here.

• The players that have no references are: Charlie Craig, Ollie Haines, George Oakley, Callum Overton & Charlie Taylor.
• The players referenced but not included are: Danny Gallagher, Taylor Roles, Chris Slavin, Jaevon Mitchell, Powell Ulcah, Jamie Hardwick, Ian Smith, Jack Watret, Steve Sergeant, Malik Smith, Jaszime Johnson, Duane Williams, Rushane Brown, Nehemie Mole, Dalvin Donnelly, Jordan Jackson, Ola Fadehan & Tyrell Samuda

• I cannot stress how important it is that you always add references when you add information, this is the main rule of Wikipedia and not including references is one of the main reasons the AFC Wimbledon article failed its good article nomination. I also cannot make sense of why some references have been added, but the information they provide has not been included and why a reference has had some of its information added, but other bits not added. Please can you make sure not to do this and to always reference new information you add to the article.

• Thanks. Pawac (talk) 05:21, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• • Thanks for adding a reference for Callum Overton & Oliver Haines. However, there is still no reference for Charlie Craig, George Oakley and Charlie Taylor.

• • Also, you've again not done anything about the "selects top to" article in which it is used as a reference but none of the information in the article has been added to the page. I cannot make sense of why there is a reference on the page, but none of the information it provides has been used.

• • Also, you've again not done anything about the reference you added yesterday that references some of the under-18s squad, but includes players that have not been added to this page. I cannot make sense why you chose only to add some of the information from this reference.

• • If you could please not ignore these issues, I have raised them three times now, because they are of concern and do play an important role in how the AFC Wimbledon page is rated, as previously discussed. If you cannot add references for the remaining players than they'll have to be removed. Also the players referenced will have to be added...I mean they're referenced afterall.

• • I'm not sure how often you talk to people on Wikipedia, but it comes across as being extremely rude when you do not reply to them, even with a simple thanks or something, but especially when they're raising issues with edits you have made and helping you improve them. There may well be a reason you've chosen not to remove the unreferenced players and not added the referenced players (though I can't think of one) but if you do not communicate then it appears that you're just ignoring these issues, especially when they're raised multiple times. This also extends to when giving other users tips like remember to reference all new data you add to an article (which, as previously mentioned, is one of the things seriously preventing the AFC Wimbledon page from being a good article) and again it does come across as rude when there is no reply. Just common courtesy.

• • Please don't keep ignoring the issues raised, I'm bringing them to your attension as you're the one who has either added the unreferenced data or adding references but not any or all of the data they include. Thanks. Pawac (talk) 21:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• • • Thanks very much for your response, for sorting these issues out and for your co-operation. Though I have noticed that Nehemie Mole, Dalvin Donnelly, Jordan Jackson, Ola Fadehan & Tyrell Samuda are still not included, is there a reason for their omission? About the possible issue with under-18s and the college acadamy, I am about 80% into creating a seperate page for the AFC Wimbledon development & under 18s squad like other teams have, that will be linked underneath the 1st team on the main wimbledon page, mainly to not make the wimbledon page look so long (another issue raised in reply to the good article nomination) and so that more information can be included about said teams. I am hoping to complete it and get it online in a day or two. Once it is online it should allow us to expand upon the under-18s and college acadamy without fear of taking up too much space. I'm sure you'd be able to contribute greatly to this when it is online, which would be great, such as the staff you mentioned in your reply. Thus far it has squads, brief info and list of graduated in the same style table of those on the current wimbledon wiki page.

• • • Indeed it is good to see that people care about this article and can bring a lot of information to improve it, such as yourself. Though we do have to ensure that everything is correctly referenced to get that good article that we all want. Thanks again Pawac (talk) 00:13, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Barry Fuller you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Barry Fuller for comments about the article. Well done! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:29, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jodie,

You seem to have had problems with your Featured List nomination. I have deleted this page Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/List of AFC Wimbledon seasons/archive1 because this is not the place to nominate lists. I have looked around and found that you have (correctly) nominated it here also: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of AFC Wimbledon seasons/archive1. Best wishes. Graham Colm (talk) 20:16, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS. And I think you have made a similar mistake here which I have deleted Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Featured article candidates/List of AFC Wimbledon seasons/archive1/archive1. Graham Colm (talk) 20:21, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Jonathan Meades (footballer) does not have an edit summary. As a result, I undid some of your edits here because you did not justify them (e.g. removing valid data - the author's name - from a reference). Dave.Dunford (talk) 09:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you're going to undo people's edits, the least you could do is provide an edit summary. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and nobody knows how long Meades will be out injured. He also won't be 21 for ever. The score in a pre-season friendly he played in is inconsequential in a summary of his entire career. I've reverted back - please don't revert unless you address these issues. You really should make the effort to read some of Wikipedia's policies. Dave.Dunford (talk) 18:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for replying. I've responded at User talk:Dave.Dunford#Jonathan_Meades. Dave.Dunford (talk) 20:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Luke Moore (footballer born 1988) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 07:32, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Luke Moore (footballer born 1988) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Luke Moore (footballer born 1988) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:41, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Luke Moore (footballer born 1988) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Luke Moore (footballer born 1988) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 14:22, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of AFC Wimbledon seasons may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:51, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Mattythewhite (talk) 23:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 AFC Wimbledon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Dickson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Lolley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Lolley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Telfordbuck (talk) 17:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jake Goodman (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:29, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Luke Berry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:31, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jake Goodman (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jake Goodman (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:34, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 AFC Wimbledon season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Nicholson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I recently updated the stats on the Kevin-Sainte Luce page. I've noticed you are an avid editor of the AFC Wimbledon club so I thought I'd let you know as a new user I was unable to locate how to properly edit the side box to properly show that it has been updated to the 5th of April, 2014. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickgreyden (talk • contribs) 20:32, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I've just updated them now :) --RichardOwen97 (talk) 12:29, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article History of AFC Wimbledon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

copied from main text and therefore almost identical & uneccessary

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Hello. Don't know if you were aware that someone had proposed this for deletion... I've removed the prod, and posted to the talk page as to why, but you may want to take it from here. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 15:11, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Football League Championship Apprentice of the Year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. GiantSnowman 15:43, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Football League One Apprentice of the Year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. GiantSnowman 15:43, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Football League Two Apprentice of the Year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. GiantSnowman 15:43, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article AFC Wimbledon league record by opponent has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, OR, poorly referenced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiantSnowman 17:12, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AFC Wimbledon league record by opponent is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AFC Wimbledon league record by opponent until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 08:23, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jake Reeves. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GiantSnowman 17:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jamille Matt, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 10:07, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please also try and remember to try and update the career stats table whenever applicable! Thanks, GiantSnowman 08:39, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited AFC Wimbledon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Valley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jake Reeves. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GiantSnowman 06:50, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jodie25. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Harry Smith (footballer, born 1995). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GiantSnowman 08:45, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please add your sources to this article? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 20:36, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, Jodie25. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at James Hanson (footballer, born 1987). GiantSnowman 13:52, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jodie25. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you're trying to say/do at James Hanson (footballer, born 1987) so I've reverted your changes. Please use WP:EDITSUMMARIES in future. GiantSnowman 07:30, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2008–09 AFC Wimbledon season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2008–09 AFC Wimbledon season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 09:52, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]