Thank you for your response on WP:RO. Just wanted to let you know that I appreciate it. --Biblbroks's talk 13:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, JoanneB', from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! User:JoanneB (talk) 06:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• FROM YOUR FRIEND:

 ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:05, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

	HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!	from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
	Wishing JoanneB/Archive2007/June-November a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

I hope you return from your wikibreak soon, and keep contributing for many years to come. -New England ^{Review Me!} 00:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

	HAPPY FIRST EDIT DAY!	from the BIRTHDAYCOMMITTEE
	Wishing JoanneB/Archive2007/June-November a very Happy First Edit Day! Have a fantastic day! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee

Have a good day! umdrums 05:06, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alf notices more balloons than food and goes off to get some party snacks

Hello, may I ask for your participation in an RFC established for user Bluemarine/Matt Sanchez? The reason for the Request for Comment is set out in the RFC summary here. Whether you support or oppose it, your input would be appreciated.Typing monkey 20:16, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...Bubba has just put the Motorhead article into the Featured Article process - the nom is at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Motörhead, maybe you'd care to watchlist it and see if there's anything you like to do on it from the feedback?--Alf ^melmac 23:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Is this your bot? It has just subst'ed some infoboxes into the page. I was just wondering what the reason for this was. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 10:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thought it looked suspicious. Turns it out it wasn't a real account, just someone pretending to be one. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 10:28, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this bot yours? - user:AxwynBot Secretlondon (talk) 10:37, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Highly doubtful that the bot belongs to Joanne. She hasn't been active since October 24. It looks to me, that the bot may have been created and made to look like Joanne's. It's happened before. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 13:53, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It has happened before, indeed! I should leave a message somewhere that any bot that looks like me, isn't, as I'll never run a bot. I have no idea how, nor do I have any desire to do so. Thanks for responding KOS, I happened still be logged in and saw the orange bar but could have easily missed it for weeks. Kind regards, --JoanneB 18:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's good to see you scroll by my watchlist, though. :) Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 18:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What, not even a budgie-bot? :p --Alf ^melmac 18:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm now there's an idea! :-) --JoanneB 18:19, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I can see it now.... It'd be the prettiest bot in the world! ;) I got on Skype when I first noticed this in order to alert you Joanne, but alas you weren't there. Good thing you were still logged in! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:24, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be, indeed! Most headstrong, too, I'm afraid :) We'll have to ask these people to operate outside of Dutch office hours from now on ;) --JoanneB 18:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, it was brought to AN/I too. [1] I left a link to this discussion there. Just letting you know in case you want to chime in there yourself. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 18:33, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see a host of names here that have not passed my watchlist in.... oh, too long.--Doc^g 18:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed! Guess that wasn't the bot maker's intention, but it's a very nice side effect! Those were the days... ;)--JoanneB 18:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK Joanne, I made your new monobook - don't forget to purge your cache next time you log on. :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 21:59, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose you confused me with 207.28.167.1? See the history of Emphasis (typography) for why I think that. --Fr33ke (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did, sorry! I left you a welcome message instead, I see you've been around for quite some time but haven't been properly welcomed. --JoanneB 21:28, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All right, no problem. Thanks for the welcoming :) --Fr33ke (talk) 21:35, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! :) --JoanneB 21:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]