Archives

Archive 1

You have put a "context" tag on International orange. What extra context do you think is required? (Hohum ^@) 17:01, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for noticing my tag. I think the article, especially the lead section, can be added some more information similar to Safety orange to provide more context. JETH888 (message) 18:09, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
107		Greater Underwater Propulsion Power Program (talk)	Add sources
19		USS Sacramento (PG-19) (talk)	Add sources
29		Lorenzo M. Tañada Sr. (talk)	Add sources
107		Land Bank of the Philippines (talk)	Add sources
113		V-boat (talk)	Add sources
4		KNVB Academy (talk)	Add sources
206		Maxime Vachier-Lagrave (talk)	Cleanup
35		Variant of concern (talk)	Cleanup
292		Cainta (talk)	Cleanup
42		Deforestation in the Philippines (talk)	Expand
97		Allied submarines in the Pacific War (talk)	Expand
31		Joey Lina (talk)	Expand
561		COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
922		Makati (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
398		Big-box store (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
24		Green retrofit (talk)	Merge
226		Frente de Todos (talk)	Merge
650		Writer (talk)	Merge
33		Cleveland Diesel Engine Division (talk)	Wikify
190		History of the Philippines (1965–1986) (talk)	Wikify
21		W. Ian Lipkin (talk)	Wikify
5		Interference of the footings (talk)	Orphan
11		Political economy of oil in Angola (talk)	Orphan
3		Diabene, Ghana (talk)	Orphan
26		Pepsi Football Academy (talk)	Stub
34		Sabina Shoal (talk)	Stub
3		National Football Academy of Lithuania (talk)	Stub
16		SARS-CoV-2 Eta variant (talk)	Stub
4		Stadionul CPSM (talk)	Stub
35		Rolex 12 (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mapúa University logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Andok's. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:23, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to review the Andok's article. I appreciate your feedback and concerns regarding its notability. I would like to address these points to help clarify why I believe it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria.

Regarding the reference to "Wife of Andok’s owner" by the Philippine News Agency, this demonstrates that Andok's has garnered recognition even from official government sources. Such recognition from a reputable government news agency underscores the notability of the subject.

Also, the sources used for the founder's interview are from well-established and credible news outlets, and they have undergone fact-checking processes. This ensures that the information presented is reliable and verified. It's essential to note that these interviews are not first-hand publications by the founder but rather have been subjected to journalistic standards.

I believe that the combination of government recognition and reliable sourcing should establish the notability of Andok's. If you have any further questions or need additional information, please don't hesitate to reach out. I'm committed to improving the article and ensuring it meets Wikipedia's standards. JETH888 (message) 17:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Andok's. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:23, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to review the Andok's article. I appreciate your feedback and concerns regarding its notability. I would like to address these points to help clarify why I believe it meets Wikipedia's notability criteria.

Regarding the reference to "Wife of Andok’s owner" by the Philippine News Agency, this demonstrates that Andok's has garnered recognition even from official government sources. Such recognition from a reputable government news agency underscores the notability of the subject.

Also, the sources used for the founder's interview are from well-established and credible news outlets, and they have undergone fact-checking processes. This ensures that the information presented is reliable and verified. It's essential to note that these interviews are not first-hand publications by the founder but rather have been subjected to journalistic standards.

I believe that the combination of government recognition and reliable sourcing should establish the notability of Andok's. If you have any further questions or need additional information, please don't hesitate to reach out. I'm committed to improving the article and ensuring it meets Wikipedia's standards. JETH888 (message) 06:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NCOMPANY, requires significant coverage (about the restaurant) in multiple independent secondary sources. Interviews with key personnel from the company are all primary sources and therefore not independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andok's and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeth888! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 08:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeth888,

Thank you for creating QR Ph.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi, Jeth888! Thank you for your interest in writing articles for Wikipedia. I'm concerned, however, with the amount of close paraphrasing that was added onto this article. A lot of the § Overview section appears to have been copied and paraphrased, something that we don't allow on Wikipedia. Content should be written and summarized by the editor, in their own words. Besides this, this article would benefit from more sources. QR Ph has existed for a while now, and the BSP has done a lot in pushing for its implementation, such as in their "Paleng-QR Ph" initiative. This and a lot more can be detailed further in the article. Please do remember, however, to summarize in your own words, rather than copy text. Something short and simple is better than paraphrasing text from another website. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chlod}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Chlod (say hi!) 08:24, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeth888. Thank you for your work on QR Ph. Chlod, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Article subject passes WP:GNG but the article content has problems. Tags have been added accordingly.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chlod}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chlod (say hi!) 08:53, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeth888. Thank you for your work on Andok's. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:47, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Andok's. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoraVoro (talk) 12:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeth888. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andok's, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]