Hello, Jamesbuc, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 07:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Just a reminder...any information about you goes on your User Page only! Kukini 07:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should only link once in an article, unless there are special circumstances as to why you are linking again. Also, there is not need to add the second "Shriek of you know what I ..." there isn't a pipe linking problem with the title. Bignole 12:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahhhh.. I see. Sorry about that. :) Jamesbuc

James, responding to your note on the Village Pump: The personal attacks from that anon user on Talk:Wrong Turn 2 are absolutely not allowed on Wikipedia under WP:NPA, and you did the right thing by looking for help at the Pump. You could also go to the administrator's noticeboard when it becomes a major problem, such as the anon user vandalizing your user page. Let me know if you have any other questions! | Mr. Darcy talk 20:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What about all the people in Scream 3. Sidney didn't know them. They were killed to bring her out, but that's more of a motivation for killing. Bignole 14:00, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly the people in scream 3 were mostly just a way to bring her out of hiding. The fact that the killer was after her (oh and maybe Gail and Dewey) still counts Jamesbuc

I've deleted that "I'm Right" topic from the discussion page for it's uncontrolled incivility, personal attacks, and forum chat by the Anonymous user. I don't know if you edit it regularly or not, but hopefully it should be clear to edit with concern for this guy attacking people. I also put the "talkheader" up there as well. The Anon has recently been blocked for his incivility, and I'm sure that if he keeps it up that he'll eventually be blocked for good. He appears to want to do nothing but start trouble. I saw that he also edited on the Bleed film page as well; I hope he didn't give you trouble over there as well. Bignole 03:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Help is much apprechiated. Now if only there was a cookie award like in Unencyclopedia. Jamesbuc

LOL. Well, he bumped over to my page so I got a taste of what you got. Bignole 12:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is what I was talking about, it's going to cause a lot of perceptional judgement. Like, Norman for example doesn't "kill women", his "mother" does. LOL, see, now we get into the problem of, even though he is his mother, the rage he has for women was in mimicking his mother. So, does he really hate women, or is he so delusional that he doesn't know the difference between his feelings and his mother's?

Can Andy be a real enemy? He's always trying to take over Andy's body (until the 3rd film, and then Andy isn't around anymore).

I think Jigsaws can be removed completely because the "people who he believe waste their life" could(might already be) covered in his "M.O." section.

Nancy's defeated Freddy 3 times. Freddy doesn't have specific enemies. The Parents were at one time his enemy, then they were afraid of him.

This is why I think we'll have trouble with this. Are people's enemies those that they kill, or those that try and kill them? Are they people that have succeeded in getting away, or just put up a good fight? "Enemy" (IMO) is probably a section that should be done away with, just because of it's ambiguity in detailing it. Otherwise we are going to be playing mix-n-match with the "standards" for filling it in. I agree about Jason's death, but part of that is Original Research on my part (I'm doing the deductive logic to say "he grew from a boy to an adult, so he couldn't have drowned), and it will be challenged by others. Many fan websites will either list his death as a boy, or at the "Jason Goes to Hell" stage, or leave it open. I think we should look at the Jabba the Hutt Infobox and pull what we can from that one, and fill those in, since Jabba is a featured Article. I also think Padme Amidala is a featured article as well. Bignole 13:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's where I think we're getting into the realm of fan infomation and not encyclopedic information. For Freddy, he's died every single film, technically. Like, when I look at Padme Amidala's infobox, I think what they did was remove any section that relies on interpretation, and not clear facts. Padme has affiliations but they don't list the "Empire" or the "Separatists" as enemies of hers, or Palpatine doesn't have enemies or dates of birth and death. The reason I keep citing Star Wars as examples is because it seems that currently only the Star Wars people have managed to get any of their fictional characters on the Featured Articles list. I'm not trying to dismiss anything, just follow an example that has managed to reach the top status on Wikipedia for encyclopedic content. But right now, I'm not going to worry, I trust you to do what you think is best. I have two specific characters that (once I manage to find the time) I have to work on and at least get all of their fancruft out from the text. Bignole 16:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The way the storylines are going, it's hard to think it isnt! Meateater 14:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• • The news?! lol Meateater 12:50, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bleedfilm.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jamesbuc. You have new messages at Plastikspork's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Plastikspork (talk) 04:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since there is one image of Stu Macher and Billy Loomis the original Ghostface killers, could you add in three more images of the other Ghostface killers please?

1. [Loomis] and [Altieri], the second Ghostface killers.

2. [Bridger], the third and final Ghostface killer.

3. [Roberts] and [Walker], the fourth and new Ghostface killers. 31.48.57.250 (talk) 21:21, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jamesbuc. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bleed (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bleed (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The Film Creator (talk) 07:45, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bleedfilm.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]