"Hi, you deleted a list of Related ethnic groups in Gorani (Kosovo) and left only South Slavs. But I am not understanding: Are South Slavs one ethnic group?"

Not one. South Slavs are a group of several ethnic groups, but the reference to South Slavs here means that ALL South Slavs are related to Gorani, not only those 4 which you named. Croats and Montenegrins are also related to Gorani like Serbs and Macedonians. It is quite sufficient to write only South Slavs. It is also written like that in the Serbs article and many other. PANONIAN (talk) 17:05, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was thinking that maybe you would like to join the WikiProject Bulgaria. There you can also find and contact users who are trying to improve Bulgaria-related articles. If you would like to get involved, just visit the participants page and/or inquire at the project's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.

Be sure to ask if you have any questions. I see you have edited before, but it was some time ago. So be sure you can contact me. --Laveol ^T 18:09, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Здравей, много добре разбирам позицията ти и напълно я споделям, просто през XVIII век това географско име не се е ползвало, т.е. допускаш анахронизъм. Ако е толкова важно все пак да се подчертае, че Паисий може би е роден в съвременните граници на областта Македония (някои от селата в Самоковската епархия, които претендират да са му родно място, не са в тази географска област), напиши го така. За мен не е толкова важно, освен това македонистите в английската Уикипедия налазват всичко, в което е споменато името на областта, а тяхната позиция често се поддържа от някои администратори и се получават големи спорове и проблеми, в които аз лично не искам да навлизам.

Тоест: нямам нищо против да споменеш, че Банско е в областта Македония или дори да върнеш на Пиринска въпреки анахронизма, но наглеждай статията да не я налазят, че нищо чудно да се озовем в позицията, че Паисий си бил етнически македонец, ама нещо се бил объркал :P От такъв тип са съображенията ми, не от друг, просто много безсмислици създадоха македонистите тук напоследък, а аз не съм войнствена личност. Todor→Bozhinov 15:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry - they don't want Paisius - check mk wiki to see for yourself. --Laveol ^T 05:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

English please. --MacedonianBoy (talk) 09:56, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes i would be interested by the material. if you have any time available to you please do scan me the documents. especially regarding, radozda, misleso, draslajca, vevcani, oktisi and podgorci. Thank you for the offer. :) PMK1 (talk) 04:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanx for the information. I assume you got my reply? PMK1 (talk) 06:47, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:ARBMAC I am banning you indefinitely from Prilep-Bitola dialect and its talkpage for repeated edit-warring. Moreschi (talk) 23:05, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don't understand what are you talking about. What banning? I am not banned and I wasn't a reason about edit warring, I am one of the parts of the discussion. Is my oppinion a problem?--JSimin (talk) 18:01, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are banned. "Banned" means: You are no longer allowed to edit those pages. (You are currently not technically blocked, that means you are still technically able to edit there, but you may get blocked if you do.) Please edit something else. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:43, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

But what is the reason? I didn't made something different from you. What is this? Attempt to retribution with people with other opinion?--JSimin (talk) 18:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement/Archive28#Edit-warring on Prilep-Bitola dialect. I'm going to revert you once more, if you continue after that you will be blocked without further warning. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:56, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see now. I can not define your action as a part of merited behaviour. You didn't find an oportunity to convince in your rightness and now you are trying to force your opinion. Is that some Wikipedia principle? To delete my arguments even from talk page? Why you forgot that this one sentence is namely the other scientific POV - expressed correctly, as a notdominant opinion?--JSimin (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A note of advice friend. FutPerf is always like that, pushing his own POV in the name of neutrality. He never answers any questions, just does whatever he wants without any reasoning, essentially pushing rank. If I were you I'd ask another admin to send him a warning. 79.131.210.137 (talk) 20:02, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Can you explain the reason you added Dimitar Dimitrov to the Children's Writers category? This article has now been picked up by a bot and included in the Children's Literature Project and it's difficult to assess as there is nothing in the text to indicate that he has written anything for children or is notable in that field. A quick Google search didn't help and I thought it might be best to ask you, since you seem to know more about him than I do. --Plad2 (talk) 07:29, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Dimitrov has published short stories for children. Biographical note in his book "The name and the mind" (Skopje 1999) referred to three separate editions with stories for children - "Shepherd boy", "Goodbye childhood" and "Where we are children". I added this information in the article. Regards, --JSimin (talk) 01:10, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--Plad2 (talk) 07:13, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]