Does anyone have any idea why my searches for the names of WikiProjects keep coming up pointing to the articles on issues of the Grantville Gazette?

I am an unregistered editor, and I attempted to edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=College_tuition_in_the_United_States&action=history where I see you have edited recently, but 'Nasnema' just now apparently vandalised the page, and reverted my edits, falsely claiming that I did not cite my sources; I did cite my sources.

I am a religious person who believes in God, and I do not wish to cause unnecessary pain or trouble for 'Nasnema,' but also, I must defend the truth and what is right: It would appear that this user is valdalising this page, & falsely claiming that I am --which makes a good case that I should not join Wikipedia. Could you please look itno it? Thank you.71.101.40.113 (talk) 17:08, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you read WP:ASR, you will see that many of the redirects you have created should not exist, since they are in the articlespace and redirect to the Wikipedia namespace and are therefore self-reference. In general, cross-namespace redirects should not exist. Thank you for trying to help Wikipedia, but please make sure you understand policy before creating so many redirects. Timrem 19:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, JHFTC, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Timrem 19:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you know, the Uncle Ben in FNSM isn't the real Uncle Ben (as opposed to Bucky and Todd's resurrections). --DrBat 20:39, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:43, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you use the user box layout that I use. I developed it for when the page is mostly user boxes. Some of your boxes are partially hidden on my 1024x768 screen. Please note that I switch my table from two colums to three columns after I run out of Babel boxes. With my previous layout, I had problems with a lot of unwanted empty space. The table system fixed that. Will (Talk - contribs) 04:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The template Chadbryant created got deleted as a attack page [1] so thus why cant the other one be? DXRAW 23:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It may well be, but you're too involved in the situation to make a dispassionate, neutral decision on whether to speedy it. I reverted your edit not because you were wrong, but because your viewpoint was potentially biased.-Toptomcat 15:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 04:15, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Yah, yah, yah, I just forget sometimes. -Toptomcat 04:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the heads up about "The Tremendous Adventures of Major Brown". That's awesome! Here's the Unfiction discussion about it. Thanks again! --Quadraxis 03:57, 28 December 2006 (UTC) Heh. Cool. I was worried I'd be jumped on by Wiki-nazis screaming 'ZOMG ORIGINAL REASERCH' about this- kudos are a pleasent surprise. -Toptomcat 19:13, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Light has alwase fasinated me. I don't recal where I had heard the speed of light issue from (bad me for not haveing a source!) but I'll see what I can find.

• Researchers Slow Speed of Light To the Pace of a Sunday Driver

That shows how flexable the speed of light is...

• Experiment to measure the effect of a magnetic field on the speed of light in vacuum - Fermilab P-877 - That might have been the study...

---J.S (T/C/WRE) 03:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speed_of_light#.22Faster-than-light.22_observations_and_experiments has some interesting info on FTL observations. ---J.S (T/C/WRE) 03:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the compliment on that high school deletion discussion! Noroton 21:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC) It was deserved. -Toptomcat 21:59, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! In January, you participated in the discussion for the 2nd deletion nomination of Ultimate X-Men (story arcs). After two months of rewriting, reorganizing, and referencing, the article is now undergoing a WikiProject Comics peer review. Your editorial opinion would be most welcome to help us improve the article to A-class status. Thanks for your time! - fmmarianicolon | Talk 06:41, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop blanking talk pages like you did here. This is called vandalism. You agreeing with an editor who contributed one (1) edit on that same talk page and nine (9) edits total is a bit strange, but ok. But you better come up with the wikipolicy you think to implement here. Misou 01:25, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I was wondering if you would be willing to help me write either Seikichi_Iha or Shorin-ryu_Shido-kan. Tkjazzer 21:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have a little experience with it but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Scottalter is a much higher ranking student. Unfortunately, he is extremely busy until summer. Tkjazzer 23:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up on the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Battlefield 1942 mods (5th nomination. Bfelite 23:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since the reason for your AFD nomination has been addressed, please consider withdrawing it. Colonel Warden (talk) 08:39, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you might be interested in Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#userboxes, as Taxa is posting about you.--Prosfilaes (talk) 14:29, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great UserPage. Let the critics be damned! It is immediately obvious that you are not just listing userboxes "willy-nilly." You probably know more about yourself via this process. Self discovery is wonderful. Taxa should try it herself. I have used a number of them. Thanks for grouping them together. In the words of The Guvenator, "I'LL BE BACK"--Buster7 (talk) 21:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. -Toptomcat (talk) 23:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you've no idea who I am, you are receiving this message because of your British Empire UBX! If you are a regular editor to articles related to the British Empire please sign up (no pesky newsletters!) to the project and help better organise and improve articles within our scope! Thanks --Cameron (T|C) 21:01, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user wants you to join WikiProject Alternate History.

Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 13:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Moon-speak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 03:57, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JHFTC. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hello, JHFTC. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JHFTC. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]