Hello ItsNotmyname, I reverted your qualification "Nationalist" from the Igor Durlovski page because it was nowhere to be found in the cited links. You restored it with the comment that it is from "The Guardian" reference link, but a simple search of that article reveals that that qualification does not exist in the source citation. Therefore, please remove that qualification, or provide a citation from a different source (if one exists) that can support it's validity. Otherwise it should be considered your own opinion, which is not in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines.

The citation you added does not describe the informal citizen organization "Za Zaednicka Makedonija" as Nationalist, it just states that "Nationalists storm the parliament". There is no basis to establish a connection between the organization and that qualification in the economist article. At best it is a stretch. I recommend this qualification be removed, as we already have 6 references to articles on the subject - NONE of which directly qualify the organization as Nationalist. Insisting on this qualification sounds like a personal agenda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeroColera (talk • contribs) 17:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The group is stated as nationalist from multiple sources, including on the protests page on wikipedia 2017 storming of Macedonian Parliament and external sources https://www.economist.com/news/europe/21721509-party-backed-russia-fears-losing-office-might-mean-jail-some-its

The link between the attackers in the parliament and the actual group "Za Zaednicka Makedonija" has also been established and no one is disputing that. That is why there is the reference about the group in the article in the first place. Trying to present the group like a non Nationalist, despite all the reports breaks the WP:NPOV and further reverts could be considered WP:VANDAL. Thank you ItsNotmyname (talk) 18:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I undid the addition of the word "democratic", added to the link to the Macedonian parliamentary election, 2016... Why was it there in the first place? It almost seems like you want to disrupt the neutrality of that particular statement. Please do not re-introduce this word again, as I will consider it WP:VANDAL PeroColera (talk) 19:21, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PeroColera the elections were democratic, and were recognized as such, it is important information. I dont see how this would "hurt the neutrality". Why you insist so much on deleting this information? Deleting information like this is WP:VANDAL. ItsNotmyname (talk) 21:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ItsNotmyname Whether or not the elections were democratic is not relevant to this article, nor to the controversy - and since almost all elections are democratic, what exactly is the purpose of that qualification? The protests were not AGAINST the elections, as it is clearly stated in the following paragraph. I am not insisting to remove it, you are insisting to include it. Please stop, it is not relevant information, and it serves to paint the event in a negative light, which is a clear violation of the WP:NPOV — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeroColera (talk • contribs) 08:37, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ItsNotmyname, you have now cited 5 separate articles about the controversies paragraph of this page. Out of a total 7 citations, ALL are related to this incident, which represents a small portion of this persons professional life and career. You clearly have an agenda to make this page ALL about the controversy, so I will ask you politely to remove citations that offer no additional information (I recommend 1,2,3 and 6), and to remove any discussion about the controversy NOT directly related to Durlovski's role in it. Consider yourself warned. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. PeroColera (talk) 08:59, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PeroColera please stop vadalizing my page and Igor Durlovski page by deleting information and references. Thank you. ItsNotmyname (talk) 10:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]