THE SKY IS FALLING, THE SKY IS FALLING!

Oh wait, the world's simply blowing up! :D

Hi Ironyx64! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Don't. It's against Wikipedia policy... and is idiotic.

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ford's Theatre. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Shanata (talk) 03:57, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Re-opened has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

definition only

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shanata (talk) 04:00, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ford's Theatre, you may be blocked from editing. Shearonink (talk) 04:04, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Ironyx64, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shearonink (talk) 04:05, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ironyx64, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ironyx64 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ironyx64 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 04:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell? It's a userpage, moron... --Ironyx64 (talk) 04:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{cleaned up}

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Ironyx64, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Shearonink (talk) 04:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If I can't put the templates on my userpage I'll put them here. Thank you for your idiocracy.

And if you put them up here again or misuse your talk page in other ways, your talk page access will be revoked. Bencherlite^Talk 04:26, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for your disruptive editing, demonstrating quite clearly that you are not here to contribute in a positive manner to Wikipedia. Messing around on your userpage is one thing, but repeatedly messing around in mainspace is not acceptable. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bencherlite^Talk 04:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ironyx64 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Somebody needs to edit WP:TSINF. If I can't edit it, then PLEASE get someone to...

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you

1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲_水 08:57, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.