Welcome to Wikipedia, Intelligent Deathclaw! Thank you for your contributions. I am Ciaran Sinclair and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Ciaran Sinclair (talk) 04:24, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--Niemti (talk) 23:44, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I emptied your fridge...

and did this. Brohoof! ViperSnake151  Talk  01:53, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fallout: Equestria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fallout: Equestria (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Ryulong (琉竜) 07:07, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment here [1] made me laugh. Howicus (talk) 16:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fallout: Project Brazil, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brazil (film), Mod and Episodic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 02:49, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Active Worlds. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t • c »  02:50, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

as a courtesy, i would like to notify you that i have mentioned you on User talk:GSK#Comment_.2B_Active_Worlds, however there is no obligation for a response.

if it is acceptable for me to ask, who was your father that worked with AWI? --Roy Curtis (talk) 03:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

I've closed this nomination as its only aim was to disrupt the encyclopedia. Please find better ways to contribute here than pulling a stunt like this. Nate • (chatter) 04:31, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also because I ended up on your posting to your userpage instead of your talkpage unaware, please add a link to your talk page immediately in your signature, which is required by WP:SIGLINK. Nate • (chatter) 04:51, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dogecoin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. atomicthumbs‽ (talk) 00:22, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dogecoin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dogecoin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. atomicthumbs‽ (talk) 01:29, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No offense meant, here - it's a good article, but (sadly) I don't think the subject matter belongs on Wikipedia at this point. Maybe if someone commits an enormous dogecoin crime... atomicthumbs‽ (talk) 03:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Citation Needed", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because Your current username may be misleading/confusing as it is so similar to an existing wikipedia tag.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. I also see that you were originally named 'Intelligent Deathclaw' - why the change? Dialectric (talk) 03:52, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The signature is purposely made smaller to reflect that. Plus, I also left a short notice that explains the special difference between me and the template. I just changed my username because it wasn't taken and it seemed so reflective of the culture of the site. I thought it was a crime that nobody had even bothered to claim it. [citation needed] 04:14, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If I had known at the time I totally would have. You have mined a gem, friend. ResMar 06:27, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really sorry to say this, but I object to your username. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to say that I added your name to the UAA page, not to report you, but to get others' opinions. I think you are very nice. You have a very nice way about you. Please don't be offended. Best wishes, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:05, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Result: This handy link. By the way I am not personally bothered if the sig gets modified a bit, just try not to make it too confusing or people will complain. As a username in the page history, or in contributions I think it is fine. The problem is that people use real links to [citation needed] tags in discussions. You don't want to look like one of them. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:15, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cool accountname. Cool userpage. Much respect. There's even a shade of blue named after you. bobrayner (talk) 00:50, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coinye West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Proposed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fallout: Equestria, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you're getting tired of hearing this by now, but your username is great^{[citation needed]}. --Jakob (talk) 02:15, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cryptocurrency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Internet phenomena (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Citation Needed. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Fallout: Equestria".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fallout: Equestria}}, paste it in the edit box at , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just made an entry on ANI that you may be interested in, I'm trying to see if there is anything policy-wise that can be done to improve articles on cryptocurrencies across the board. Looking forward to your input. Breadblade (talk) 20:38, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

me too. entry on ANI I feel our difference on comments are best talked about with a 3rd party as judge. I have made an ANI too about how you refuse to talk to me and repeated choose to keep subjective info in the page. lets allow wikipedia protocol to settle this. cheers. KR 16:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevoras (talk • contribs)

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "CryptoCurrency". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 17:11, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

i understand there's debate on whether worldcoin is notable enough. and the debate is on going still. "turn to worse" is ur personal assessment only. most will say Worldcoin hit another milestone with today's news: http://voiceofrussia.com/news/2014_01_30/Worldcoin-speed-of-transactions-5546/

if conclusion later is to remove worldcoin, i will accept. but for now it looks like a bunch of uninformed ppl just trying to surppress news instead. KR 06:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Cryptocurrency. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I hope you're not discouraged by this, you do a lot of valuable work on this topic. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm not. Citation Needed | Talk 19:54, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|This seems really silly knowing that my block ends in a day, but after finding out about [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kevoras]], I would assume that my violation of 3RR is nullified because I ended up reverting the edits of a then-unknown sockpuppeteer per [[WP:NOT3RR]]. [[User:Citation Needed|<font color="red">Citation Needed</font>]] | [[User talk:Citation Needed|<font color="red">Talk</font>]] 23:15, 31 January 2014 (UTC)}}

Technically no because you weren't reverting puppets of a blocked user. But I'm happy for you to be unblocked in any case. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:57, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've disabled the request since the block expired now a few hours ago. Like Callanecc said, the block was valid as they weren't a blocked user at the time you were reverting. only (talk) 11:48, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Some of your edits appear to be disruptive. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Stop tagging valid articles with Articles for deletion (AfD) tags. These edits are unhelpful and useless. -Fnlayson (talk) 07:50, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree the article should be kept, let's have a clean close. By expressing a "strong keep" opinion, you meet the WP:BADNAC criteria. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User:Citation Needed/The Dogecoin Weightloss Challange, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Citation Needed/The Dogecoin Weightloss Challange and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Citation Needed/The Dogecoin Weightloss Challange during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:56, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/San Diego#January 2016. Thanks. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 01:55, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Vitalik Buterin —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jtbobwaysf (talk) 16:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coinye is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coinye until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:19, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]