Hello, Hr54ankush, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:29, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I returned your draft to your sandbox. Wikipedia already has an iPhone 15 article. Instead of creating a new duplicate article, you should work on improving the existing article. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also reverted your additions to the iPhone 15 article. A lot of your additions lacked citations to reliable sources. Everything you add to Wikipedia needs to be supported by reliable, inline sources.

There are also problems with tone. You should be writing in a neutral tone, and rely on facts. For example, you wrote

The IPhone 15 redefines the standards of Digital privacy and Security with its meticulously designed features, ensuring that users remain in control of their personal data. At the forefront of defense is the implementation of a strong Password System, serving as the primary barrier against unauthorized access to the device. Complementing this is the option for facial recognition system, offering seamless yet secure ways to unlock the IPhone , authorize transactions, and access third Application software.

• Saying that redefines the standards of Digital privacy and Security... doesn't help the reader. For starters, the phone doesn't redefine standards, engineers do, so it's misleading to say that the phone does this. But if you do want to talk about how Apple (I assume) redefined standards, you should discuss the standards that were redefined, and how.
• with its meticulously designed features - "meticulous" is an opinion, not a factual statement. If someone notable expresses this opinion, you can report it (with attribution), but you can't state an opinion in Wikipedia's voice.
• ensuring that users remain in control of their personal data. This isn't accurate, it's marketing hype. You can explain the privacy features, but you can't say they ensure anything. If you can provide a solid citation that no iPhone 15 user has shared any private information via their phone, that might be ok.
• At the forefront of defense - don't use flowery, metaphorical language like this, use plain English
• is the implementation of a strong Password System, serving as the primary barrier against unauthorized access to the device. - again, rewrite this in plain English.
• Finally, this is unsourced. Everything you add to Wikipedia needs to be verifiable, and the reliable source that allows users to verify the factual claims must be cited.

Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:42, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed the journal you cited: Zeitschrift für Klassische Homöopathie. You cited a 2006 article from a homeopathy article? Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You just readded this same content, without addressing the aforementioned issues. Please don't start an edit war, fix the deficiencies before you restore this information. Also, it isn't clear to me that all of this merits a whole section titled "Privacy", the various parts might fit better in existing parts of the article. Darkage7_[Talk] 21:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I've moved your new article to draft space as it appears to be a duplicate of Yamuna Expressway. I encourage you to make edits to that article, rather than working on a duplicate article. I'll also second the tips and pointers given by the users in the above section. Best of luck with editing! ForsythiaJo (talk) 01:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it was done by mistake. Hr54ankush (talk) 03:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Hr54ankush/Sugarcane juice, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —C.Fred (talk) 02:48, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Sugarcane juice. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Read WP:MEDRS - advise you not edit content concerning human health and diseases, as this is not undergraduate material. Zefr (talk) 02:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at User:Abhi Suthar/PUBG Mobile/Hr54ankush Peer Review, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not publish these pages in mainspace. Publish them in userspace by adding the "User:" prefix to each new title. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move your school assignments to mainspace. These pages should only be added to your userspace and are not part of the encyclopedia. Please do *not* do this again. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 03:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ankush

Wikipedia administrators have flagged some of your content as AI generated.

The first instance was the iPhone article, pleae do not use AI generated content.

I am seeing multiple issues being reported for your work.

Please stop, slow down, read in detail what the issue is, ask questions to the editor of the page to clarify any well research and well written changes you are about to make before actually making them.

Sincerely

Ushnish Sengupta

Ultush (talk) 18:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hr54ankush. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yamuna Expressway, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hr54ankush. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Yamuna Expressway".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:22, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]