Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Horcoff, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Be Bold!
• Learn from others
• Be kind to others
• Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
• Tell us a bit about yourself
• Our great guide to Wikipedia

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 01:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:07, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hercílio Luz Futebol Clube, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campeonato Brasileiro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Jô Fernandes.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of http://www.metodista.br/rronline/rrjornal/jo-retorna-aos-campos-apos-tres-anos-sem-jogar. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - I saw your note on the file talk page. The photo is credited to Marcelo Argacho/RRJ in this article. OTRS confirmation of permission would be needed. I've switchged the tagging to indicate the photo lacks evidence of permission. You can follow the instructions for donating material noted in the above warning message. After you have sent in the permission email, you can add {{subst:OP}} to the file description to note that a permission email has been sent. Regards --Whpq (talk) 12:45, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Esporte Clube Água Santa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UOL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Estádio Municipal Alfredo Chiavegato.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Estádio Municipal Maria Tereza Breda.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Estádio Pedro Benedetti.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:07, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:RB Bragantino.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening,

please don't revert me (and others, for example administrator User:Drmies) to reinstate a version of a person who has no competence, very poor English skills and that engages in overdetail (all those PAOK matches belong in 2020–21 PAOK FC season, not in Mr. Ferreira) and overlinking to exhaustion. In addition, they also do sockpuppetry which is forbidden by WP standards (User:Μπούλης is another account of User:Αθλητικά, i have been told by the admin i mentioned here that there are probably more accounts).

• If you want to complain more about me, please do it here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Drmies#Abel_Ferreira_2). And have the courtesy of notifying me when you do so, please.

Tenha uma boa semana, obrigado --Quite A Character (talk) 23:09, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• An example of the sockpuppet's "competence": they write, in horrible English "In the league, PAOK was in 6th place when Ferreira left PAOK". Then you click on this ref (https://www.sportime.gr/paok/fereira-telos-oristika-apo-ton-paok/), and that is not mentioned ONCE in that Greek article! --Quite A Character (talk) 23:43, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Quite A Character: Again, I understand there are mistakes to be fixed, but if you're that interested about the subject, why not correct the language mistakes and find a proper ref, instead of simply reverting? Certainly the article would improve. Horcoff (talk) 23:46, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I tried, spent the last 30 minutes browsing the web, found nothing in English, Portuguese or Greek, only that last match against Granada. More: I apologise for the rollback, it was wrong and that was why i wrote to you here. To say, in one or two lines, he qualified Braga for the Europa League, is not the same than mentioning ALL the matches he managed in Europe with PAOK, then do it twice (for the two seasons, i repeat that is already covered by the clubs' individual season articles). Speaking about that, the Greek sock wrote 8, 9 or 10 times that, against Ajax "...the referee in the second match wronging PAOK with 2 penalties against HIM which should not have been given" (to paraphrase their "English"; why am i not allowed to say they have poor English skills? I have zero Greek skills, and i don't mind people telling me so).

I will not assume good faith in users like this, and neither will @Drmies:, who blocked them OK? They engaged in similar disruption in Ferreira's successor: i added references, categories, templates, then they reverted EVERYTHING (please see this, to see that i'm not lying https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pablo_Garc%C3%ADa_(Uruguayan_footballer,_born_1977)&diff=986592596&oldid=986589491), and when i politely confronted them about the possible vandalism, they told me to go get a pair of glasses. --Quite A Character (talk) 23:59, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Continue the good work, sorry for any inconvenience --Quite A Character (talk) 23:59, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Indeed, improvement is all we want! It was biased (basically, other than that inexcusable criticism of a referee in an ENCYCLOPEDIA), with the person writing here and there that Ferreira was a horrible manager (i remember one bit that said he "only finished in second place in the league").

Write to me whenever you need halp, i will do the same. Abraços! --Quite A Character (talk) 00:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jô Fernandes.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jorge Mauá has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about semi-pro footballer which fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 04:42, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:RB Bragantino.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The MOS you pointed me to says "a column named "State League" can be added to players who appeared in Brazilian football". That is contrary to the consensus you point to at WP:FOOTBALL (consensus that I contributed to!) that says state games should be included with normal league stats in the infobox.

What I am trying to say is the figures need to match - either we include the state league with the domestic league stats in both infobox and stats table, or we keep them separate in both. Does that make sense? GiantSnowman 14:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GiantSnowman So, if I included a State League column in the stats table, it would be incorrect to also update the infox with the sum of national league + state league stats? I don't think I quite understood it. Do you mean we have to sum it up in both the table and the infobox? Wouldn't it be misleading? Horcoff (talk) 14:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's what I say - because I think it's misleading to have an infobox which says 55 league games and a stats table which says 39 league games (or whatever). Worth raising at WT:FOOTBALL? GiantSnowman 14:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, probably. I think a footnote on the infobox could also help. Horcoff (talk) 15:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I hope you are doing good. I created a page on Wp couple of days’s before which was deleted before due to some socket puppetry issue, I recreated the page Mutahir Showkat and did modification in it there, there are some WP users who are trying to create the mess in this page by saying that I’m connected to this person, which isn’t true as I don’t know this person personally I just know him via news sources but there are some users who had gathered together and are trying to put this page down I mean to say they are doing campaigns regarding this page to get it deleted please help me out please. Nurupa (talk) 23:07, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A little late I think as I already blocked for socking. Is there more socking/canvassing I need to look at? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Or is it the cry for help above. I got one too. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Deepfriedokra Yes, it's the message above. He messaged me probably because I submitted a request for protection for Marcelo Freixo, which she/he basically overwrote with her/his own submission for that article. Probably other users got the same messages, too, but since it's blocked that shouldn't be much of a problem now. Horcoff (talk) 18:47, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that mangled RfPP. Glad he's blocked. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:49, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Adriano Michael Jackson. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 13#Adriano Michael Jackson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:10, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 04:17, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in 2021 Turkish Grand Prix, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Linking the bolded text in the lead of articles should be avoided. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 04:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Atletico goianiense.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SC Atibaia.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Márcio Bittencourt article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 08:37, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uhh…I actually did provide a source and you removed it. Horcoff (talk) 15:12, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Gabriel Fernando Almeida a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:16, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning. Per this message (please see here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2001:8A0:7643:2400:20F7:F51C:6DBA:9E73), the following:

I understand what you mean regarding the difference between coaches and managers, i just thought "coach" (or "head coach") was more of an American-English approach, and "manager" was the correct British approach. Problem solved there, thanks for explaining.

As for the club names, and with all respect to you, what you say does not make much sense. If you pipe one club in storyline (16 years here and i still don't understand what's the problem in writing club names in full in storyline, after all it's the ARTICLE'S NAME), you pipe all of them, not just the long ones. No worries there also, i have already arranged the contents in Mr. González's article.

Have a nice (new) week, tchau from Portugal (ah, and no rule broken if you want to write to me in Portuguese; if you need anything from me wiki-wise just drop by)! 193.137.135.5 (talk) 12:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Horcoff. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

• Wikipedia:Requested moves
• Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac (talk) 11:21, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:São Paulo Futebol Clube (AP).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CAJoseense.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CA Linense.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:14, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Horcoff. Thank you for your work on Beto Cachaça. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

could you add this name to the target article somewhere, along with a good reference

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:18, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It's done. Horcoff (talk) 12:36, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:AD Bahia de Feira.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file. Redundant to Commons' File:Associação Desportiva Bahia de Feira.png which is more detailed. No encyclopedic use remaining here, and no educational use to justify uploading to Commons.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ajpolino (talk) 21:54, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:União Mogi.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]