Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mantis, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 15:17, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Annoying Orange. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. ⅊™ 01:09, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Devil's Arithmetic, you may be blocked from editing. Shearonink (talk) 00:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, mis-marking edits as minor as you did here, here, here, here, here and here. Before marking any more edits as minor, review When not to mark an edit as a minor edit. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with the above series of edits at The Devil's Arithmetic, you may be blocked from editing. Shearonink (talk) 00:14, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Devil's Arithmetic, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please stop adding unsourced and erroneous material to Wikipedia, such edits are considered to be vandalism (even if you intend to revert the material back to its un-altered state.) Shearonink (talk) 03:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:38, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]