Hello, Heepman1997, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Telephone numbers in Yugoslavia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Masum Ibn Musa  ^Conversation 08:26, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The

Adventure

Hi Heepman1997!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi Play The Wikipedia Adventure This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:11, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Please don't add unsourced speculations to articles (see WP:CRYSTAL) as you did to Greek drachma. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a blog or a forum. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 14:47, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Yurt may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ak öý and gara öý ({{IPA-tr|ɑk œj, ɡɑˈrɑ œj|}} - In [[Turkmen language|Turkmen]] the term is both literally "white

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:51, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Premium-rate telephone number may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• first digit of 1900 numbers is mainly '''9'''; such numbers were converted from the 0055 prefix (for example, 0055 55 123 would become 1900 955 123.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:58, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heepman1997,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether 0848 should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/0848 .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Firm and Fruity

added a link pointing to Cool for Cats

Kraina Mriy

added a link pointing to Sverdlovsk

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Great Divide (Unida album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Garcia and American Recordings. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Suzi Taylor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Neither being naked in a magazine nor clothed on a reality TV show is sufficient.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 16:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to DragonForce, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heepman1997. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Mestnyi oros, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 03:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Former Australian dialling codes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yass. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Allthefoxes. Heepman1997, thanks for creating I'll 'Ave Ya!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. No sources, and because of that, may not meet notability guidelines. Please try to add some sources that help show the songs notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 03:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mamonov and Aleksei requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 02:31, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Chris Crocker, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 06:22, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TISM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Records. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Chesnaught555. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Crowded House— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ches (talk) (contribs) 12:12, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Bogus Deep Purple. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Deep_Purple#Band_split_and_solo_projects_.281976.E2.80.9384.29. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Deep_Purple#Band_split_and_solo_projects_.281976.E2.80.9384.29 – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. JamesG5 (talk) 05:36, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pyotr Mamonov, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Igla and White Zombie. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at ABCDEFG (album), you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 06:11, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at The Boy Bands Have Won. Binksternet (talk) 06:11, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to The Safety Dance. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 15:00, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

your edit at List of musicians who play left-handed because you gave no reference. Further, the article on Rami Yosifov contains no references and it could well be nominated for deletion. Also, if you put something, anything, on your user page then your user name will change into a blue link rather than being the red one that it is now. This suggests to others, or at least to me, that you are not the dead end that red links suggest and that perhaps you are even a serious editor who intends to stay around. The "User Page" tab at the top left of this page will change color too. Consider it, Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 16:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to James the Red Engine. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SummerPhD^v2.0 01:13, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Men Without Hats. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 17:31, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heepman1997. I've just reverted your edit to this article. As far as I know, there aren't any standard romanisations of Yiddish, so I felt that in an English-language Encyclopaedia, a romanisation that used English conventions (and so was more legible to English speakers) was more appropriate than the German-based romanisation you changed it to. If you reply here, please PING me, as I will not be watching this page regularly. --ColinFine (talk) 19:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Doors (album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Robvanvee 06:37, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heepman1997. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heepman1997,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Fisting the Dead should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fisting the Dead .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, XyzSpaniel Talk Page 15:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jared Hasselhoff, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Robvanvee 12:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You added a French pronunciation to the article Molyneux, namely [mɔlˈɳɶː]. I have some questions about that. First, why do you think the French pronunciation of a name from Anglophone countries is relevant for the English Wikipedia? We also do not include the French pronunciation of Wellington. (Maud Molyneux may be named as an occurrence of the name in the francophonie, but just like Dora Forbes this was one of her adopted English aliases.) Second, where does this come from? It looks wrong to me. I'm pretty sure the French would pronounce this as a three-syllable word, not just two. And ɳ? That sound does not occur in French phonology.  --Lambiam 10:40, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was watching a Varg Vikernes video in which he responds to Stefan Molyneux regarding a particular topic and added that pronunciation based on the way Varg said it, since he lives in France and has learned French. Heepman1997 (talk) 20:15, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That explains the ɳ, since it does occur in Norwegian phonology, as in the pronunciation of Vikernes's name: [ˈʋiːkəɳeːs]. So the template should not have been {{IPA-fr}} but {{IPA-no}}.  --Lambiam 02:47, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect... the addition is content that you personally transcribed into French IPA, which is original research. The transcription is based on the pronunciation of a Norwegian immigrant to France, who may or may not speak perfectly accent-free French, and whose biography (Varg Vikernes) does not inspire confidence in his academic expertise. At best, it's a sample of one French speaker making a reasonably educated attempt to pronounce an English surname that diverged from the French pronunciation centuries ago. Even if you provided a full citation to the video, one can't consider it a reliable source. The information isn't useful to a reader, at least because it can't be relied upon. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 22:05, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have now removed it as being OR.  --Lambiam 02:38, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. You added a German pronunciation to the article Gebrochts, namely [gɛˈbrɔxts]. I have some questions about that. First, why do you think the Standard German pronunciation of a Yiddish word is relevant for the English Wikipedia? We also do not include the German pronunciation of Kugel. Second, where does this come from? It looks wrong to me. I'm pretty sure Germans generally pronounce the first vowel as an ə, not as an ɛ. Perhaps that is how it is pronounced in New York Yiddish – I don't know but would actually expect an ɜ there – but, anyway, that is not what your contribution claims.  --Lambiam 15:02, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Great Divide (Unida album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jennica✿ / ^talk 09:06, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heepman1997. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Zijan (band), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Domdeparis (talk) 15:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Oleg Skrypka. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 03:21, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heepman1997. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sex (band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable - doesn't meet any of the criteria of WP:BAND. No coverage in independent sources as far as I can tell, although the band's name creates *MANY* irrelevant hits.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PKT(alk) 13:37, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article James Paull (musician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non-notable musician who was part of a band. Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kb.au (talk) 08:40, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Enjoy the Silence. Robvanvee 05:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Ivan Doroschuk. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 12:19, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 12:48, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Heepman, I've blocked your account for one week due to long-term issues with you adding unsourced content, in spite of many warnings. If these issues persist, you will be indefinitely blocked. Swarm ♠ 02:10, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am an autistic person and am interested in the history of autism. He is not well known among most autistics, and I created his English wikipedia page from various online sources. Ylevental (talk) 14:48, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heepman1997. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Uriah Heep Living the Dream.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:DC Miedzianik.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Sorry I have to do this, I'm just not clear on the specific reason you provided. Ylevental (talk) 00:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I sent you a better replacement image btw. Hope it works for you. Ylevental (talk) 00:53, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Portal:Vopli Vidopliassova requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section P2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a portal based on a topic for which there is no non-stub header article, and there are not at least three non-stub articles detailing subject matter that would be appropriate to discuss under the title of that portal.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 21:52, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add Brenton Tarrant to the "Notable people" section of Grafton, New South Wales. "Notable" has a special meaning on Wikipedia and you can read this at Wikipedia:Notability. In the case of Brenton Tarrant, he does not meet the requirements of the general notability guidelines especially since he is "notable" for only a single event. Please note that this was discussed at WP:AWNB#Christchurch mosque shootings and the Grafton article was specifically protected to stop new and anonymous editors adding Tarrant. --AussieLegend (✉) 09:49, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Chrisye, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Chrisye and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Chrisye during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 15:56, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Jared Hasselhoff. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:13, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:TISM, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:TISM and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:TISM during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Meszzy² (talk) 07:24, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Grazhdanskaya Oborona, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Grazhdanskaya Oborona and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Grazhdanskaya Oborona during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 08:51, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether 6 portals which you created are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether they should be deleted.

The pages will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Six single-navbox automated portals for musicians or bands until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the pages during the discussion, including to improve the pages to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notices from the top of the pages. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:00, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Crass, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yintan  08:57, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Heepman1997,

I have reverted your last edit at the article Kätlin Aas. The Cyrillic alphabet transliteration of her name and Russian language IPA are unwarranted and odd inclusions. Aas is Estonian, not Russian. ExRat (talk) 22:33, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erkin Sidick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uyghur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding IPA for the article North Macedonia, but you added by mistake IPA-bg, while you should have added IPA-mk. I would appreciate if you can update your edit. GStojanov (talk) 18:27, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't like having to nominate it for deletion, but the book doesn't seem to be notable by itself for Wikipedia.

Additionally, someday, I will try to get back the picture of Mitchell and Miedzianik. Ylevental (talk) 19:22, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect River.exe. Since you had some involvement with the River.exe redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:28, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cryptomnesia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Perry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:23, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heepman1997,

Thanks for creating Ibrahim Emin! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

All biographies of living (pr recently deceased) people need references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 06:38, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Ibrahim Emin, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 06:39, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Soma Mukhopadhyay has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --Nahal^(T) 07:34, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Soma Mukhopadhyay.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on Soma Mukhopadhyay.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:15, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bkissin were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

While Yukhu is notable, WP:NMUSIC says that an individual band member is not individually notable unless they have a notable solo career.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ibrahim Emin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ibrahim Emin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heepman1997! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 14:29, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed you adding IPA transcriptions in various articles, particularly for Tuvan, Mongolian, etc. Do you use sources for the pronunciations, or are you fluent in them? 45.83.140.53 (talk) 20:25, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected a lot of his additions in IPA. Just because someone can transcribe something in IPA, doesn't mean they're fluent in the language(s). –some random human behind a screen (talk) 03:13, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing the death date template. I had no clue how to handle ambiguous date cases. DBigXrayᗙ 10:40, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Adalita (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ... discospinster _talk 16:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Adalita (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page - there are only two articles and they are related. The Adalita article links to the album article and this disambiguation page will never need to be seen.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 13:32, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Kuzhuget Shoigu, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:21, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Nisvanis, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 13:15, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Heepman1997,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged What's Really Going On? for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TomCat4680 (talk) 06:25, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. WMSR (talk) 01:22, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ibrahim Emin, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heepman1997. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ibrahim Emin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DannyS712 (talk) 08:34, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kuzhuget Shoigu, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Britpop. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Llemiles (talk) 19:50, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heepman1997. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kuzhuget Shoigu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DannyS712 (talk) 15:31, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hooray for Boobies. Looks like your block from April 2018 for the very reason I'm issuing this warning has not had the desired effect. Perhaps a longer block is what's needed. Continue with the unsourced info and we will be going to WP:ANI which no doubt will result in a longer one. Robvanvee 09:24, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Robvanvee 06:37, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continuing to add unsourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 08:31, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nisvanis, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MiedzianikAutobiography2ndEd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Heepman1997. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nisvanis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! TheImaCow (talk) 14:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Vrijeme skorpiona.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:What.cd home page after d-day.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 23:06, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bogus Deep Purple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of citations

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MordecaiXLII (talk) 09:08, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Universal fire has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:11, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bogus Deep Purple has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources do not support the term "Bogus Deep Purple" at all

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]