Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

User talk:Hajor

Where are you now Hajor? I need to reach you


//please add new messages at the bottom//


So you quit wikipedia

Farewell Hajor! You made great contributions.

Abögarp

Why did u quit?

Was it something I said? Just kidding. Good job... while it lasted. --Vizcarra 20:43, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sad to hear you're leaving. You'll be missed. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 02:36, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, SqueakBox 18:51, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not another top class contributor leaving? What is going on? Sorry to lose you. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 19:12, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Take care, Hajor. Hope you would come back soon. -- PFHLai 03:14, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You will be missed. - BanyanTree 03:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no

Don't know why you quit, but if it's because of the wikimaffia: people who erase your articles and do horrible things liek that, don't worry, you can find nice people too... or that's what i thought :)

Gaudio 12:51, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pic of the Day

Hi Hajor,

Sorry to see that you have left the building. Lets hope its more like a wikibreak - it was certainly nice to know that there was someone else around who didn't believe that pylons had to carry electricity. In any case, at the risk of whistling in the wind...

POTD

Just to let you know that your photo Image:USA.NM.VeryLargeArray.02.jpg is due to make a reappearance as Pic of the Day on the 19th December. I've reused the same caption as last time, but you can make any changes at Wikipedia:Picture of the day/December 19, 2005. -- Solipsist 19:56, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]



Felix Navidad

Tony the Marine

O.K. Hajor, so you don't believe in Santa, but I still want to wish you and your loved ones all the happiness in the world and the best new year ever. Your friend, Tony the Marine 04:26, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(P.S. It saddens me that you left the project but, I understand)

See you, man. It was fun while it lasted! I hope you have great success in all that you do!!!!! I love the phrase, best epitaph for your userpage. εγκυκλοπαίδεια* 05:33, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes

I can't believe how long it took me to find out about your departure, and it really saddens me since you were, hands down, the best wikipedian I ever worked with in the Mexican cats. I would definitely enjoy working with you once again, but I can't ask you to reconsider it; I am flirting with the idea as well. In any case, happy holidays and the best of lucks. Your friend, Ruiz 01:19, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ancient Near East warfare taskforce

I see you’re a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Egypt. Might you be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Ancient Near East warfare task force, which will include wars of Ancient Egypt such as Battle of Megiddo? See the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Ancient Near East taskforce? Neddyseagoon 15:45, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Georgia Move

As a past participant in the discussion on how to handle the Georgia pages, I thought you might be interested to know that there's a new attempt to reach consensus on the matter being addressed at Talk:Georgia (country)#Requested_Move_-_July_2006. Please come by and share your thoughts to help form a consensus. --Vengeful Cynic 03:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mexico

jsut wondering, is there a reason for Mexico not being at México (the proper title). Currently the properly accented name redirects to the unaccented one (and that's contrary to all MExican cities and states articles, which are located at the spanish (accented) name. -- Drini 00:25, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hajor hasnt been here in over 8 months but I believe the reason is that the common usage for Mexico and Mexico City in English is without the accent but that common English usage doesnt really exist for other Mexican places in the same way, Panama is the same. I have a memory of having this conversation with Hajor and him saying something like this though I couldn't swear to it, SqueakBox 01:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject name commentary

Can you comment on this Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mexican-Americans/Chicanos#The_name_..._again? Thanks --evrik 18:49, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dual license Image:USA.NM.VeryLargeArray.02.jpg

Hi Hajor. I'm a member of the Freeciv community. We would like to use your Image:USA.NM.VeryLargeArray.02.jpg to represent one of the Wonders of the World in the game. Would you mind dual-license it as GPL as well, since that is the license of Freeciv? Best, Himasaram 05:54, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hajor left the project in 2005, SqueakBox 23:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Demographics

Because of India's rich diversity, no one image can represent all of India's one billion people. That is why I propose selecting a new demographics image every three months. This would allow for a regional balance and would show India as a whole. Many people have agreed that this is the only way to represent India's rich and varied diversity. Since you have voted for a change in the sections, I wanted to update you on this proposal. I would love to hear your comments on talk:India. Thanks so much. Have a great day!

-Coollemonade 23:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:UAE.ZayedIbnSultanAlNahayan.01.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih 14:32, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:121-546.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:121-546.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:121-547.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:121-547.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:121-548.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:121-548.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:55, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:121-561.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:121-561.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:121-603.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:121-603.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:121-604.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:121-604.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hajor

I am guillermo 7777, how are youGuillermo7777 (talk) 00:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I need to reach Hajor urgently. How do I contact him? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.48.175.111 (talk) 00:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:121-605.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:121-605.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:121-616.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:121-616.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:30, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:121-20p00.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:121-20p00.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Fair use rationale for Image:121-20p01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:121-20p01.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Egypt.Cairo.Panorama.01.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Egypt.Cairo.Panorama.01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BlueAzure (talk) 00:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:NewZealand.PhilGoff.01.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:NewZealand PhilGoff 01.jpg. Commons is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image(s) will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:NewZealand PhilGoff 01.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 11:03, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mexico.EmilioPortesGil.01.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mexico.EmilioPortesGil.01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 17:34, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Chile.JoseMiguel.Insulza.01.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Chile.JoseMiguel.Insulza.01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 22:47, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Brazil.LulaDaSilva.01.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Brazil.LulaDaSilva.01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cuba.HabanaVieja.Street.01.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cuba.HabanaVieja.Street.01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Mexico.VicenteFox.02.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mexico.VicenteFox.02.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:AmnestyInternational.IreneKhan.01.jpg

File:AmnestyInternational.IreneKhan.01.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Irene Khan 2003.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Irene Khan 2003.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:121-561.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:121-561.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Pais (talk) 19:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Deletion of Bint

Proposed deletion of Bint

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bint, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -calvinps- (talk) 11:19, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Islas Marias.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Islas Marias.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ViperSnake151 18:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mexico.ChiapasState.CoA.01.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mexico.ChiapasState.CoA.01.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:21, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rice rocket

An article that you have been involved in editing, Rice rocket, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rice rocket. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dbratland (talk) 23:19, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Hajor! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. José Joaquín Trejos Fernández - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Ángel Aníbal Guevara - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Jorge Mario García Laguardia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Alonso Cueto - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Barbados.OwenArthur.01.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Barbados.OwenArthur.01.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:56, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:CostaRica.MiguelAngelRodriguez.01.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:CostaRica.MiguelAngelRodriguez.01.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:56, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Beaver Island (Antarctica) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any sources supporting the existence of this geographic entity

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PinkBull 08:54, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alonso Cueto has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article remains unsourced and so notability cannot be verified.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JodyB talk 21:36, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Haiti.GerardLatortue.01.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Haiti.GerardLatortue.01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Kelly hi! 04:50, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mexican $2 coin-1996.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mexican $2 coin-1996.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Armbrust Talk Contribs 16:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mexican $5 coin-1996.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mexican $5 coin-1996.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Armbrust Talk Contribs 16:18, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion, guidelines for use at WP:MINOR). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

For well-established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:25, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mexican 5c coin-1996.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mexican 5c coin-1996.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:42, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mexican 10c coin-1996.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mexican 10c coin-1996.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mexican 20c coin-1996.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mexican 20c coin-1996.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mexican 50c coin-1996.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mexican 50c coin-1996.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:51, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mexican $1 coin-1996.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mexican $1 coin-1996.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:53, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mexican $10 coin, 1996 issue.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mexican $10 coin, 1996 issue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:59, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:CostaRica.MiguelAngelRodriguez.02.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CostaRica.MiguelAngelRodriguez.02.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:52, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 23:26, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Category:Caribbean countries

Category:Caribbean countries, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ecologist Green Party of Mexico

The article Ecologist Green Party of Mexico has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Badly needs a re-work and additional sources for verification.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:59, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bibliotheca Alexandrina requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gpsmycity.com/attractions/bibliotheca-alexandrina-27107.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 01:15, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CopyrightedFreeUseProvided

Template:CopyrightedFreeUseProvided has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. B (talk) 17:43, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:RussiaNorthOssetia.Highlight.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RussiaNorthOssetia.Highlight.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:15, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Independent Mexico has been nominated for merging

Category:Independent Mexico has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:17, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Hajor. Thank you for your work on Zacatepec F.C.. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Page move looks OK

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:09, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Buenos Aires Underground

Buenos Aires Underground has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:22, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]