Friday, 27 December 2024

Hello. I noticed you contributed to many Kurdish related articles. I just created the Racism and discrimination in Turkey article. If you like take a look over it and see if it needs any improvements of changes regarding the Kurdish section of the entire article in general. Thank you. Proudbolsahye (talk) 10:18, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You two can also canvass each other for adding AntiTurkism tags to your own articles. BTW have you ever given a thought to why no sooner than ASALA stopped their terrorist assassinations, PKK began killing innocent Turks? Oh, no I forgot that the PKK's leader was staying at the residence of a Greek ambassador and traveling with a Greek Cypriot diplomatic passport! I am confused: What is common to all these? Hating some people or their country? --E4024 (talk) 10:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024, why do you write this rubbish on my page? or your contributions are only personal attacks?--Gomada (talk) 13:07, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There's an Anti-Turkism page as well. You can go express your anger there. Thank you. Proudbolsahye (talk) 10:28, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested, User:HistoryofIran has been reported here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:01, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That user has a ethnocentric Persian view on anything Middle East related. I am new here and don't know what the best way is to take back what is ours as Kurds. Persians have taken credit for things that it's clear it's not theirs. We need more Kurds on Wikipedia with good knowledge of our culture and our history. Tekosh (talk) 17:02, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Gomada for your kind words. I will make the map regardless. You should discuss what is the appropriate source to be used with Takabeg. P.S. Thank you for your wonderful contributions on Geographical name changes in Turkey. Proudbolsahye (talk) 19:46, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but i discuss with people who doesnt think that, they know everything. There is no problem to make maps about region of zazaki. But when you make a map and you put Zazaistan on map, then you help a political group and that is not objective.--Gomada (talk) 14:41, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gomada the map I made does not say Zazaistan. It simply shows the area in which the Zaza language is spoken. Proudbolsahye (talk) 19:22, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the Barnstar! --Ahmetyal (talk) 12:03, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gomoda, Please note that edit wars are not permitted in WP.(see Edit warring). If you have sources about Germiyanids you can of course edit the article Germiyanids. Otherwise changes in the article Yakup II of Germiyan which is perfectly in accord with Germiyanids and the sources may be considered as editwar. Cheers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 06:49, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i know WP policy, but thanks. Btw, i think you and the user who edited the article of Germiyanids should read the sources. In each edit, i wrote, but you (both) wanted to take attention to turkishness. There are already 5 sources (read Germiyanids) which say;

• 1-Kurdish
• 2-Kurdish and Turkish.

My purpose is not an editwar. I neutralize the article. Therefore, i think it would be better to check your own edits. Cheers.--Gomada (talk) 07:08, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Kurds may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• page14.html 5Accordint to Internationa l public organisation such as UN-HCR, Mehmed Uzun is Kurdish).</ref><ref>http://ejts.revues.org/index771.html (According to the "European Journal of Turkish

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:04, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know your reference for Shahab al-Din Suhrawardi, was deleted.[1] I have noticed lately, that some "new" users have been removing references(added by me) from articles. In this case, in their haste to remove another reference, they mistakenly took my addition of a page number to your reference as a reference added by me. --Kansas Bear (talk) 03:18, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. The user has deleted reference where says -Kurdish village- and claimed, -it is Kurdish nationalism-, but same reference is used as Persian background.--Gomada (talk) 21:59, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:08, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have some questions regarding your Kurdish related changes to the Suhrawardi article.

(1) You have claimed "This Kurdish[3] inhabited region in present-day northwestern Iran was controlled by the Kurds up to the 10th century and its inhabitants were mainly mystics." Your reference is M. Th. Houtsma, E. van Donzel, E.J. Brill's first encyclopaedia of Islam 1913-1936, BRILL Publishers, 1993, p. 506, ISBN 9004097961. I checked this book today and on the page 506 I couldn't find anything related to Kurdish presence in the mentioned region. This page of the encyclopedia, which is also available on Google Books, talks only about the early years of Muhammad's life in Mecca, etc. So, it seems to me that your reference is not correct. Could you please provide the correct reference?

(2) You have claimed that "Shahab al-Din Suhrawardi was a Kurdish philosopher." Your reference is "M. Kamal, Mulla Sadra's Transcendent Philosophy, p.12, Ashgate Publishing Inc., 136 pp., 2006, ISBN 0-7546-5271-8." I will get a copy of this book soon. In the meantime, could you please justify the use of a book related to another philosopher here? With so many books and articles about Suhrawardi himself, you seem to have chosen to ignore all of them and cite this one. Could you please state where this claim comes from? I mean what references does the author (M. Kamal) offer? You have used the same source in another Wikipedia article called Sohrevard. In my humble opinion, this is not a strong source for two clear reasons: first, it's a work about another philosopher! two, it appears to be the only source stating such a claim. I would really appreciate your feedback. Thanks! HamidRJ (talk) 02:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HamidRJ & Gomada - I added some information (on the Suhrawardi talk page) about the Kamal book that casts doubt on its reliability. Hope that helps clear some of that up. Dmvjjvmd (talk) 16:06, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gomada, can you help me to fix this article, because is should be extended and some parts of it is useless for a History article. It is overfilled with language related debates. What do you think about it? I recently added Dersim Rebellion and Sheikh Said rebellion sections but it is still not enough for such an article. Please help for improving. Zaf silamî --Laser Perşikita (talk) 22:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ma be xêr Laser Perşikita! Actually, the so called article is unnecessary. There is not a seperate Zaza history and as you said, there is only information about langugae in an article of "history". Most of claims are written in this article Zaza people too. Both rebellions (Sheikh Said rebellion and Dersim Rebellion) have articles. There is also Timeline of Kurdish uprisings There is nothing else to mention in such an article. So, why should we need such an article? I'd propose to nominate the article for deletion.--Gomada (talk) 15:39, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, thank you for your suggestion and deletion. Weş û war bê.--Laser Perşikita (talk) 11:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted you. A splinter Armstrong church (the Church of the Great God) is not a reliable source for anything but itself. We'd need multiple sources from academic historians to show that "Medo-Persian Empire is a common alternative name, not one used mainly by certain religious groups. Doug Weller (talk) 17:25, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Yazidis, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you.

You must stop marking edits such as this or this as vandalism: they are obviously not, per the definition given at WP:Vandalism. Calling others' edits vandalism inappropriately may be construed as WP:Personal attack. LjL (talk) 15:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LjL, thanks for information. I replied on Yazidis talk page.--Gomada (talk) 17:03, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add photos of Shayma Qasim (Miss Iraq 2015) to commons? She is Kurdish and was threatened by ISIL.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Exclusion123 (talk • contribs)

Hi, sorry but I don't have her pics. The user who uploads pics to commons must have copyright licence (must be free content/freely licenced).--Gomada (talk) 22:46, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An Assyrian ip vandal is trying to disrupt articles by changing sourced contents. See the contributions of 86.129.192.202 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) please. Can you please make a request for page protection for Kurdish-related articles?

Hello, Gomada. You have new messages at Talk:Muhammad ibn Rustam Dushmanziyar#Daylamite origin.
Message added 13:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

HistoryofIran (talk) 13:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gomada. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gomada. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi you added Kurdish culture as a category for the article Nasreddin - I don't think there is a source for this in the article. Kurdish is mentioned once, but it is unsourced. If you are going to add the category can you also please add a WP:RS to the article supporting it? I haven't been able to find any.Seraphim System ^(talk) 11:02, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Seraphim System:Hi, I added information of a Kurdish collection to the article. There is second collection which is written in Sorani dialect of Kurdish (in 1967) by Gîwî Mukriyanî (Gyoui Mukriani), but unfortunately, it's difficult to find a link for that on the internet.--Gomada (talk) 10:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Seraphim System ^(talk) 10:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gomada. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Silav heval ! Di gotar li ser Samand Siabendov hatiye nivîsand ku Ferheng 1959 hatiye weşandin ema min Çavkanîya rûsi bi Google wergerand û li vir hatiye nivîsandin ku ew ferheng 1957 hatiye weşandin . Avestaboy (talk) 15:51, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, what's wrong with you. You can't stay on the page with false information just in case you want to. You cannot delete data.Always the same seneryo. It's your turn. There's vandalism. Stop being a fascist. The zazas are against oppression of fascism. 188.57.23.43 (talk) 14:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Medieval Kurdish physicians has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:35, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abu Hanifa Dinawari. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 12:00, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Medieval Kurdish philosophers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 13:34, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kurdish mountain climbers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Medieval Kurdish philosophers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]