Langbahn Team – Weltmeisterschaft

User talk:Gaismagorm

Archive list:

Archive 1

A Thank you

Sangsangaplaz (talk) 14:37, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yipee! Gaismagorm (talk) 14:38, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Happy Recent Changes patrolling! Also do you use any tools? Sangsangaplaz (talk) 14:43, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I do, I use Twinkle! It's really helpful for reverting multiple edits at once, and also warning users! Gaismagorm (talk) 14:44, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Same, although I also use Wikipedia:Ultraviolet on PC. Patrolling is a bit difficult on mobile to be honest. Sangsangaplaz (talk) 14:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, fair enough. Gaismagorm (talk) 14:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How long have you been patrolling? Sangsangaplaz (talk) 14:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Idk, a year perhaps. Gaismagorm (talk) 14:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've been editing for longer but I started really patrolling around a year ago Gaismagorm (talk) 14:53, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Have you made any big edits, like 2000+ bytes edit? Also you may notice I don't have a great track record like you do if you look at my talk page ':D. Sangsangaplaz (talk) 14:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've made pretty big edits (though the big ones are usually just reverts of spam or blankings). Also it looks like you've turned over a new leaf it seems, good job! Gaismagorm (talk) 14:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
How is your name coloured anyway? Like it's a cyanish blue. Sangsangaplaz (talk) 15:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's a signature. I've only recently got it. Check out Wikipedia:Signature tutorial if you want to learn how to do so. Also check out Wikipedia:Signatures for the guidelines for signatures. Gaismagorm (talk) 15:04, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
👍 Sangsangaplaz (talk) 15:09, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, it works! Sangsangaplaz (talk to me! I'm very lonely) 15:23, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Lovely! Gaismagorm (talk) 15:36, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello Gaismagorm! The thread you created at the Teahouse, What to do about a broken AFD, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:48, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

dang. I wonder why I don't always get these. Gaismagorm (talk) 11:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) These are new, the bot was just approved on 20 October. Myrealnamm (💬Let's talk · 📜My work) 14:09, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ah okay thanks! Gaismagorm (talk) 14:10, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mary Franson

Fine. Whatever. 216.168.91.124 (talk) 14:11, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello Gaismagorm! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Why do some categories on some pages seem unremovable?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:21, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello Gaismagorm! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Question about revdel, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:26, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think AFD was the correct answer

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alu-Oshaeraen Shrine was a correct nomination in my view, PROD? Not so much. I thin you made the correct call. I have explained why in that AfD. As with almost all things here, opinions differ. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:19, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah okay, thanks! Gaismagorm (talk) 18:58, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

You keep removing my edit :(

Hi thanks for your graciousness! I’m so curious to know why you insist on keeping this random quote from a random interview. It seems awfully vindictive and petty against Li. There are also several typos. Do you not see it? Thanks! The part that should be removed is below.

In 2024, after the US presidential election, Li described the Kamala Harris campaign as a "$1 billion disaster", stating that Democratic donors where misled by the campaign to believe "that this is an eminently winnable race" 2601:41:4300:9370:F5D7:9266:2426:B6E5 (talk) 05:39, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The main issue is that your summaries are misleading and generally don't explain the removal, only the caapitalization changes. I do admit that the last time I reverted, I probably should have backed down as you did explain yourself and that was my bad. Gaismagorm (talk) 11:47, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I’m sorry for not being clearer. That’s totally my bad. Are you ok with me restoring the edit and the capitalization changes? The role is in fact Women’s Co-chair believe it or not haha. I’ll make sure to provide a comprehensive edit summary. Happy holidays :) 2601:41:4300:9370:1484:88C8:A0B0:DD51 (talk) 13:04, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Happy holidays to you to :) Gaismagorm (talk) 13:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2024

man I haven't edited since last year

Perfect time to make this joke right now Gaismagorm (talk) 00:04, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

Sorry to be a little late in getting back to you. I decided not to RevDel since no real people were mentioned, nor was any hate speech used. It's rank, but we get that sort of thing a lot.

Of course, another admin might have seen it differently. Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, sounds good! Gaismagorm (talk) 11:13, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try to be a little more sparing with revdel requests, cause recently I guess I noticed that I've been making some for edits that in hindsight don't really require revdel! Gaismagorm (talk) 11:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

Bubalo P page

Hello, the current content reduces his career to a political trial, waged by the opponents, from which Predrag was cleared and pronounced non guilty. https://www.slobodnaevropa.org/a/bubalo-presuda-luka-beograd/31530411.html Mini011 (talk) 17:20, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article already mentions how he was aquitted of all charges. The trial still happened, even if it found him not guilty. Gaismagorm (talk) 17:40, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for reverting IP users disruptive edit on my talk page. Ana Bego (talk) 14:33, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

no problem! Gaismagorm (talk) 14:33, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
For your work against vandalism. GREEK MYTHOLOGY 123 (talk) 22:37, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a ton! Gaismagorm (talk) 23:54, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 February 2025

Janet Street Porter is NOT Jewish!

Hi Gaismagorm - The link to the Guardian article has no mention of the information in the entry.Janet actually grew up in Fulham, London, UK - she often mentions this on UK TV show Loose Women. She had one sister who passed away a few years ago. She never talked about being Jewish, nor having this heritage.

The details given about being of Ashkenazi Jewish heritage and growing up in the US as one of 4 sisters applies to an American woman with a similar name who is cited in the disambiguation note at the top of the Wiki entry about the UK Janet Street Porter.

So I kindly request you amend the information, thank you. 2A02:6B6F:E63D:8700:38DE:DE7C:7ABF:6F1C (talk) 22:58, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

huh? the only edit I made to the page was getting rid of a misogynist comment made by a different unregistered user. I believe you are trying to reach @Edwardx. Hope this helps. Gaismagorm (talk) 00:55, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

From Amazon link to her book about her early life called Baggage https://www.amazon.co.uk/Baggage-My-Childhood-Janet-Street-Porter-ebook/dp/B003TSDL4W/ref=sr_1_1?crid=HJ66GBCXK7KB&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.2H05laeLlZy9GqK-AvfNKELHGaL8aPtyVgB6Y0FLH2arYvPorhNc3F5B0YG3LCbLQ1eK2WuKC1FRt8tiP2mcH2aDl7K341Zpet7AlnPw5H6dNuTFKLrBhhno2CGtLggl9QLMHFZTwbbB65CuTKDbLHBf7vnif3KE3RYpJWaWaIgacRBdL9hfKuoMNESI475miyv3G9LmskEYH6paFUp-_y47jz130DqKdxwhCSexJVM.5bpSLQAjj38uuGT1xHCuYyBu_t_k90D2idmIq89lF8A&dib_tag=se&keywords=Janet+street+porter&qid=1739661167&sprefix=janet+street+porter%2Caps%2C77&sr=8-1&asin=B003TSDL4W&revisionId=696d46d0&format=1&depth=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:6B6F:E63D:8700:38DE:DE7C:7ABF:6F1C (talk) 23:18, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello Gaismagorm! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Question regarding content assessment appearing in see also sections., has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:11, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2025