Archives

/Archive 1. /Archive 2

i swear to god i meant to put it in the summary, but my dog had to go out, so i got up, i let her out, and then i saved and forgot... I'LL EXPLAIN HERE THOUGH!!! well, i have sent several letters to nintendo (e-mail) and they are all including starfox 2 questions... every time i get a reply it goes something like:

we have no plans to release a new f-zero, game & watch (gallery), or kid icarus game in the near future.

THEY ALWAYS DODGE MY QUESTIONS ABOUT STARFOX 2. plus, after hearing from that guy (or girl, whatever) on the talk page, i was so shook up i went to some forums and they were all suggesting such things like that of the game being released.

compromise: ive sent a letter to nintendo (this time SPECIFICALLY about starfox 2 and only that game), if they reply back saying maybe (or better), it goes back up, but until then, we leave it w/o a rumor. deal? Hollywoodd 08:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

I am sorry, but that is not good enough. Statements need to have reliable sources; message board posts are not reliable sources (anybody could write them), nor are e-mails (it's very easy to fake e-mails, so they cannot be considered reliable). If there are rumors, you need to substantiate them using reliable sources. - furrykef (Talk at me) 08:52, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey! how come you removed "knuckio" from the somari page? it's related to sonic bros! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angus Nitro (talk • contribs) 03:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because the page isn't about Sonic Bros., it's about Somari. It's basically another ROM hack with a graphics change; anybody could make that. Somari is special because it's a very advanced ROM hack that just happens to replace Sonic with Mario. If we listed every ROM hack where Mario was replaced with a Sonic character or vice versa, the article would probably get really long. - furrykef (Talk at me) 04:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WT:Only_make_links_that_are_relevant_to_the_context#Break 1 for the current discussion. I'm letting everyone know who has a comment on the relevant talk pages. Obviously, we're not going to push anything through without a full discussion of every issue, including whether to merge at all. My sense is that there's wide agreement on all the big points, but the devil is in the details. - Dan Dank55 (send/receive) 19:54, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

A discussion regarding inactive sysops and bureaucrats on Wikia Gaming was started, I'm leaving this message as a courtesy to allow you to comment. Your logs indicate you have not made a single admin/bureaucrat action (protect, delete, block, user rights) since you were given access. Regards.

--Charitwo ^(talk) 17:29, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Furrykef can you help me recover these pages and import them to wikia gaming when you have time?

• List of weapons in Resident Evil 4
• List of units in Star Wars: Battlefront II
• List of vehicles in Star Wars: Battlefront II
• USA Story
• GLA Storyline
• China Storyline
• United States of America (C&C: Generals)
• China (C&C: Generals)
• Armoured units of the USA (game)
• Aerial units of the USA (game)
• Aerial units of China (game)
• List of maps in Battlefield 2
• Economy (StarCraft)
• Infantry units of China (game)
• Armoured units of China (C&C: Generals)
• Infantry units of the GLA (game)
• Armoured units of the GLA (game)
• Infantry units of the USA (C&CG)
• Structures of the USA
• Structures of the GLA
• Structures of the Chinese
• Soviet Union (C&C: Red Alert)
• Allies (C&C: Red Alert)

Thanks --Cs california (talk) 04:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply just do some when you have time and I guess you can use<s></s> to cross out the ones you did. --Cs california (talk) 23:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article you created: List of phrases from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of phrases from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted {{Findsources3}}.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:

1. List the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the .
2. You can request a mentor to help explain all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.
3. When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
   Here is a list of acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
4. You can vote to merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 12:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Portal. It has not been discussed at undeletion so it shouldn't have been recreated. --Quentin Smith 12:24, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am considerably enlarging the :fr:Hélium article from a translation from (in English). I stumble on the fact that apparently the file "Helium article read with helium.ogg" has stayed on en:wp. Could you upload it to Commons, so that everybody can use it ?

Thanks in advance         Trassiorf (talk) 05:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was just that I thougt to see on the History page that it was you who put it on the page. I'll try to see where I can find this file. Sorry for the disturbance, and thanks all the same. Trassiorf (talk) 21:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a major contributor to Lupin III, I thought you'd want to know that that article is currently under going a Good Article Reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps. The article currently fails the good article criteria, as detailed at Talk:Lupin III/GA1. Its reassessment is on hold for seven days to allow time for the issues to be addressed. Thanks. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 02:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Furrykef

Just thought I'd introduce myself and say "thank you" for starting the Guitar wikibook. I'm editing and proof reading the Guitar wikibook. Basically trying to reach consensus about replacing certain ascii tab exercises with images. I've added two new pages: Scale Manual and Technical exercises. I'm providing the scales and technical exercises in tab; so as not to exclude those guitarists who do not read music. I've added beginners exercises to the jazz page and started the pages on flamenco and classical guitar.

I'm happy to get any advice on the work I've done and hope you will find a moment to check my work.

Thanks --Sluffs (talk) 13:18, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback, but I'm afraid I'm not really interested in the guitar wikibook anymore. I haven't even looked at it in a couple of years, and it wouldn't surprise me if much of what I've written has been rewritten by now. I'm sure you can find somebody else who might be interested, though. - furrykef (Talk at me) 13:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nude celebrities on the Internet, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nude celebrities on the Internet (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  – iridescent 16:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, a Legacy section deals with the continuing impact and appeal of the subject matter. I can see no other place to put the present demand for the game. It shouldn't go in the introductory paragraph or Reception, as Reception deals mostly with initial sales and media attention. If you know where it should go, at least move the information instead of being a deletionist. Deletionists like to target IP editors, especially, and do minimal effort to gain respect and credit. 74.194.224.252 (talk) 19:41, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've put it on the Talk page. There's a reason that I'm a deletionist, though: I have minimal time, and if I expended a lot of effort trying to find the proper place for stuff, well, it would take time away from other things, both on and off Wikipedia. - furrykef (Talk at me) 22:23, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I am an editor here on wikipedia. There is this other editor cosmic latte who has been vandalising the Michael jackson Page with the last 24 hours he has made over 50 edits to major parts of the article without even discussing with other editors who have been warning him. he has in the passed been guilty of vandalism. Please speak with him. I also believe that he uses other names such as TimothyHorrigan and Rodhullandemu. please speak with this individual he has put block on his vandalism so you cant undo what he has done. This is making wikipedia look really bad as Michael Jackson is one of the most searched article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knighttrain (talk • contribs) 22:35, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 11:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I've never been able to complete an aneurysm, either - I always get the "you were thinking about your next round of golf" message, despite putting the clip on in the illustrated location. If you do find out how to do it, please put it in the article. :) Tevildo (talk) 20:46, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's the same message I'm getting... - furrykef (Talk at me) 21:01, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Carbon monoxide is psionous and anyone who breaths it will drop down dead." _Why_ do we not have an article on Martyn Berry? _Why_ am I posting this here? Miss you so much... Tevildo (talk) 20:32, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you miss me so much, how come you never talk to me? *geniunely puzzled* - furrykef (Talk at me) 23:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any interest in dermatology? If so, we are always looking for more help at the Dermatology task force, particularly with the ongoing Bolognia push. I can e-mail you the login information if you like? There is still a lot of potential for many new articles and redirects. ---kilbad (talk) 21:55, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked at Pages that link to "Phrases from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" and, excluding User and Talk pages, there are about 90 of them. If you want to change the section title (which I agree is currently ungrammatical) then the burden falls on you to plough through 90 or so links and change those that need changing. (Not all of them will need changing as some of them will point to other sections.)

I am in the process of replacing such section links with redirects. However, this is a big job, even for just Hitchhiker's, and it is going to take a while. At its conclusion, changing section titles will be much simpler.

Finally, looking at some of these links, the favoured version of the phrase appears to have two commas, as in "Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything". This is also grammatical, the second comma being optional.

If you wish to respond, please do so here. HairyWombat 19:57, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have to say I don't really appreciate my reasonable edit being called "vandalism", which is what you used as the edit summary when you reverted it. Never call something "vandalism" unless the intent was to destroy rather than to improve. I also disagree that "the burden falls on me" update the links; neither does it fall on you or anybody in particular. Wikipedia is a community project. I am updating at least some of the links anyway, but not because I think I'm personally obligated to.

I think the one-comma version is preferable in this case because that's how the title of the book Life, the Universe and Everything is generally written. British English also tends not to use the Oxford comma, and as HHGttG is very British, it seems appropriate to apply British style. - furrykef (Talk at me) 06:16, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated all the links I could find. It really was not a big deal. - furrykef (Talk at me) 06:44, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you visit the link I gave above (this one), you will find another 50 or 60. (If breaking that many links is not vandalism then I would like to see what is.) You seem keen to take on this task, so I will leave it in your capable hands. Best of luck. Bye, HairyWombat 16:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was the link I used to fix the links. Did you actually look to see if any were still broken? Can you show me one that is? I don't think there are even 50 or 60 links total that link to the section in question. And to answer the question "if breaking that many links is not vandalism then I would like to see what is", the answer is malice. Vandalism implies malicious intent. If there is no malicious intent, it is not vandalism. From Wikipedia:Vandalism: "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism." By calling it vandalism, you are saying I acted in bad faith. I'm sure you can understand why I don't appreciate that.

Also, I fail to see why you found it preferable to retain a grammatically incorrect section heading instead of just fixing it. Fixing all the links took maybe ten minutes of effort, and that was just me acting alone. If it were really necessary, I could have found somebody and said, "Hey, Bob, let's go through these links and I'll get A-M and you get N-Z." You could also have posted somewhere asking for help even if you didn't want to fix any of the links yourself. Why settle for a grammatically incorrect section heading when there are ways of dealing with it? - furrykef (Talk at me) 18:23, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey buddy, I saw an article with LTBB codes and I noticed one I knew was missing, the one to turn into Yosemite Sam. I put it there XD I wanted to know how to perform Free-For-All and Free Turbo... the FFA one, I know that involves pressing Y+X several times and then R, but I only get it by accident sometimes =p —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.78.208.110 (talk) 00:28, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Furrykef! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Hi Kef, there's currently an ongoing discussion about splitting the Stop Online Piracy Act page at Talk:Stop_Online_Piracy_Act#ONGOING_DISCUSSION_-_Splitting_the_Article. You've familiarized yourself with the entry before, and your insight and perspective on the matter would be appreciated. Hope to see you there, Sloggerbum (talk) 23:53, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Furrykef,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, were it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 19:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I'm a good candidate 'cause I'm not all that much of an administrator around here. I'm more of an ordinary user who just happens to have admin powers he rarely uses. Thanks, though. - furrykef (Talk at me) 23:42, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Continued removal of the content without consensus to do so is disruptive editing at best, and you should know better than that. I shouldn't have to remind you that if you make a bold edit and it's reverted, you should discuss it on the article's talk page, as per WP:BRD. While it's being discussed, the [[WP>:STATUSQUO|staus quo]], which is the content remaining in the article, prevails. Please don't edit war over this. --AussieLegend (talk) 16:13, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Continued removal of content without consensus is disruptive editing, huh? What's putting lies into Wikipedia, then? - furrykef (Talk at me) 16:20, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The User:Nymf makes all undo what I edit in Wikipedia Article. I need help please. He undo all just annoy me. Without reference or without reason.

examples:

for example a new picture: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Walker

list of Albanian americans delete he withot references and grounds. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Albanian_Americans

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Arta,_Greece&action=history

from older revision: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jim_Belushi&oldid=530122564

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Belushi&oldid=530035768

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Masiela_Lusha&action=history

it can not go on like this.

Yours truly User:Anthony.al

He's just asking you to provide sources for the information you add. There's nothing unreasonable about that. - furrykef (Talk at me) 00:54, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ..

may you please take a look at football records in spain ,this page is containing various different records in Spanish football, the user : 49.244.108.56 keeps removing some of them because he believes they are not needed and if you took a look at what he adds or removes you can see he is doing that biasing since he is working hard to remove Barca records allowing only real records !! the 3 records i added are well referenced from the related club website and even classified clearly under national records even not just a club records !! so anything clearer than that even ?? how should someone opinion or even bunch of people opinion about it make a difference in that ?? its a clear case...the related club classified it as record , so if someone likes it or not it shouldn't stop being a record .

and since its referenced I can't see any reason to remove it .

the website : http://www.fcbarcelona.com/club/the-honours/detail/card/fc-barcelona-team-records

what is really weird...there is some records similar to those added ( like i added ) but he added them related to Real Madrid so obviously he doesn't have a clear measure in that.\

I tried sending other for help also but i found no response so far, I just think the whole thing is turning into a circus as that :) and for the protection of integrity of wikipedia someone should act in someway !! making it clear (neither way i dont care ) just don't leave it for somenoe to decide oh i hate this club so i dont want his records and im making my hard to remove them and bringing everyother possible records for the club i like ??! take a look at it please because this IP : 49.244.108.56 has long history of doing that !

he is the same range of ip from 49.244.125.32 also he is the same as 49.244.161.201 and by the way it's all belongs to a user has been blocked before but i dont know why they unblocked him again ! it's just as a circus as that

thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3878:81E0:A0A2:1EFE:E57C:DD88 (talk) 17:29, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Codename Lisa (talk) 06:48, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Furry is not a sexual fetish, although it is some people's sexual fetish (well, anything might be some people's sexual fetish). Other people should please remember that! --Zzo38 (talk) 06:44, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not for the inclusion of the word "all" in the statement "...as an influential figure to all the composers...". I couldn't complete my rationale in the edit summary, so I brought it to the talk page for discussion, so you know. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 18:14, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to let you know that this was probably not your intended result. :) It's already been reverted but if you're using a semi-automated tool you might want to make sure it isn't introducing the same kinds of errors elsewhere. Protonk (talk) 20:04, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. I meant to lowercase it but my keyboard was set to Japanese mode and I hadn't noticed. Sorry about that! - furrykef (Talk at me) 22:22, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I definitely spent too long trying to scrape an invisible dust spec off my screen where part of the "E" should've been. Protonk (talk) 22:27, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Widow maker, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Maestroso simplo (talk) 01:34, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of obfuscators for .NET has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has been tagged for notability for more than a year - and this is a list of external links, which should not be hosted on Wikipedia per WP:ELNO and WP:NOTLINK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrOllie (talk) 11:38, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing Furrykef a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Wseef (talk) 11:58, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing Furrykef a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Elsa Enchanted (talk) 14:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Furrykef.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Stalked you from Wiktionary. Your "stuff you don't care about" page seems to have an encoding hiccup in the title, but I'm not sure whether it's a joke, because there's stuff about mojibake on that same page. Hmmm? Equinox ◑ 17:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, not a joke, I'm afraid. Thanks for the heads-up. - furrykef (Talk at me) 17:41, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed now. - furrykef (Talk at me) 17:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Furrykef. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 13:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. I am sorry to bother you on your own discussion page, but I require immediate administrator action. A Mr. Rishabh Puri has contacted me, requesting that his Wikipedia page be removed immediately. The page is already under discussion for deletion, but the admin involved has not been responding to my messages or requests. Are you able to help get this page removed? Thank you. DimitroffV (talk) 16:05, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• There has to be a consensus to delete the article. That the subject of the article wants it removed is not relevant; we wouldn't delete Donald Trump if Mr. Trump told us to delete it. Nonetheless, since the article appears to fail to meet the notability guidelines, I expect it will probably be deleted soon, and I have cast a vote to delete the article. - furrykef (Talk at me) 21:06, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, That's Lobstertainment!, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:34, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think statements that are plain as day should require a source. - furrykef (Talk at me) 23:14, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If it's that obvious then finding a source should be trivial. DonIago (talk) 00:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If it's that trivial, you can do it yourself. - furrykef (Talk at me) 01:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I shouldn't be so blunt. But I don't consider it trivial even though I consider the information in question to be obvious. Not only do I have to find a source, I have to figure out whether it should be considered "reliable" (is a Futurama wiki reliable? Seems doubtful) and then I have to insert the reference and format it correctly and everything. Some things justify that kind of effort. I don't think this does. So I think the "burden of referencing" (or whatever you want to call it) should currently be on you, because you're the one who wants the reference so much. - furrykef (Talk at me) 01:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikis aren't considered reliable per WP:SPS. I did link to information about reliable sources in my initial post, but am happy to answer any questions about them to the best of my ability, or we can discuss at the article Talk page so that other editors following the article might weigh in. WP:BURDEN makes it explicitly clear that when there's a concern regarding verifiability, it's incumbent on editors who wish to add the material to provide a source, which makes sense (to me at least), because why should someone who doesn't care if the material is present have to make the effort to...prove no sources exist? Anyway, if you want to work with me to try to find a source, I'm happy to do so, but I can't tell whether you're interested in adding the material or not at this point. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 02:14, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, not anymore. It's a lot easier to just drop the matter. So much for that bit of trivia, I guess. - furrykef (Talk at me) 02:56, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Sorry for any tension this may have caused; if you change your mind, I'm happy to try to help out. Cheers! DonIago (talk) 12:42, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect NeoRageX. Since you had some involvement with the NeoRageX redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:50, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing Furrykef a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Coffeesweet (talk) 17:19, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Time flies when you're having fun, right? :-)

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:16, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Matadores has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable compilation. No reliable sources found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:05, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Furrykef. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 17:00, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Furrykef,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 17:02, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Giant Enemy Crab. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 2#Giant Enemy Crab until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 21:17, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We urgently need a Wikipedia article on the famous neuorscientist, Mikhail Lebedev. Can you please finish the article on Mikhail Lebedev this weekend? It needs to be nominated as a good or featured article within 30 days. I Already started. Please see Draft:Mikhail Lebedev (neuorscientist). — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek (talk • contribs) 01:08, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While the storm clouds gather far across the sea, Let us swear allegiance to a land that’s free, Let us all be grateful for a land so fair, As we raise our voices in solemn prayer.

God bless America, land that I love Stand beside her and guide her Through the night with the light from above From the mountains, To the prairies, To the ocean white with foam God bless America, My home sweet home. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:387:F:4C10:0:0:0:7 (talk) 04:44, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ed Logg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gauntlet. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day, Furrykef, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 11:38, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rockapella, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Big Con.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case a human ever reads this: I did that on purpose. - furrykef (Talk at me) 06:11, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hey, Furrykef. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 20:19, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminversary! All the best: Rich Farmbrough 14:16, 26 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]