Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. An edit that you recently made to Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! GiantSnowman 16:39, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Entirely relying on single source. Please add more sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohamed Atikuzzaman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mohamed Atikuzzaman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:13, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FNH004! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:13, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not meeting WP:NFOOTY. Bangladesh Premier League is not a fully professional league.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohamed Atikuzzaman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mohamed Atikuzzaman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 08:42, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Do not remove "decline notices" or comments.

Hitro talk 07:57, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

S0091 (talk) 22:24, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:00, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Nehme1499. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mohamed Aakib, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nehme₁₄₉₉ 14:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Greenman was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Multiple rejections are being ignored. Do not resubmit.

Greenman (talk) 12:04, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dylan620. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Kieran Hayes—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Dylan620 (talk) 05:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please note that everything you add to an article must be verified with reliable sources, and the burden is with you to provide them. Please do not add unsourced content into an article, such as the edits you made to Nayeem Hasan. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 16:45, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Abu Shaeid, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onmyway22 talk 08:17, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FNH004

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Amir Hakim Bappy, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 ^Talk 12:39, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FNH004

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Mohammad Nehal, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 ^Talk 11:13, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sohel Rana (footballer, born 1991) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 11:39, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amir Hakim Bappy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Hakim Bappy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BlameRuiner (talk) 11:42, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rostam Islam Dukhu Mia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rostam Islam Dukhu Mia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BlameRuiner (talk) 11:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FNH004,

It is not appropriate to move pages that have been tagged for an AFD discussion to Draft space. Doing so will not end the deletion discussion and these moves will be reverted.

Do not move pages from Draft space into main space until you believe they are ready and can survive a deletion discussion. One way to determine this is to submit your drafts for AFC review, AFC reviewers can tell you whether or not your draft is in good enough shape to avoid speedy deletion or being tagged for AFD. Once a page has been deleted through an AFD discussion, it can not be recreated so it is best to make sure your drafts meet Wikipedia standards before moving them into the main space of the project.

If you have questions about your articles and Wikipedia's deletion processes, please bring them to the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:41, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foysal Ahmed Fahim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jamie Day. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/FNH004. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 15:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FNH004 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Was blocked on 27 November 2021 and the block was supposed to expire on 4 December 2021

Decline reason:

Seriously?!? The block still has a little over 4 hours to go and I considered extending your block as you appear to be wasting our time. Yamla (talk) 10:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi there, thank you for updating the statistics section on Rahbar Wahed Khan. I noticed you forgot to update the date at the top of the table to the date of the most recent match to match with the updated stats, so I have fixed that. Please remember to update the date in any future edits. Thanks and happy editing RedPatch (talk) 18:43, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Werner Bickelhaupt article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 12:13, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That source calls him 'Warner Beckenhoft', not 'Werner Bickelhaupt'. 14:35, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello FNH004! Your additions to Mohammed Sujan have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:32, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not re-add old match statistics. Wikipedia is not RSSSF. Geschichte (talk) 12:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohammed Sujan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dhak.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How are you brother? Please knock me when you free? 0027748529948 my What'sapp no? 105.0.0.133 (talk) 14:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi....How are are? Please knock me to my Facebook linkhttps://www.facebook.com/sumiazadkhan.

MD Hydrogen 123 (talk) 13:22, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello please knock me on 0027748529948 in this no. I am a Wikipedian. I need to speak with you urgent. MD Hydrogen 123 (talk) 14:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

His height is 1.80 M, so please don’t edit agian.If you have any doubt go and measure himself. P.H.TARU (talk) 17:28, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I seen it and it’s wrong! Even Atiqur Rahman Fahad is shorter than Anisur Rahman. And this article said he is 1.77 and it’s a joke.So,please stop changing.And this article is full with wrong information. If you go and check Diraj Singh's height in ISL & FC Goa's official website you can see his height is 1.8 but according to this article it’s 1.84. So,I suggest you to stop.And Anisur Rahman Zico's height 1.80 m confirmed by Bashundhara Kings's officials. P.H.TARU (talk) 20:23, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay you created Foysal Ahmed Fahim's article before your creation, I created his article in 2020 whem he got chance in Bangabandhu Gold Cup,but ot got deleted later.So,it was still in my list. P.H.TARU (talk) 20:25, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kaiser Hamid, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:36, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bangladesh national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FNH004,

Thank you for creating Javier Cabrera (football manager).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for the article, Linkedin would not be considered a reliable source if you could replace with a better one that would be great!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 ^Talk 13:24, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How are you? Please knock me 0027748529948 my Whatapps no. I want to speak with you about soccer related topics. 105.0.4.143 (talk) 09:07, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Hervé Renard article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 19:21, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page was formerly deleted and protected by @Sir Sputnik: - please ask them for their views. At most it should be restored and moved to draft. GiantSnowman 09:23, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello brother please knock me in Whatappss in this no 0027748529948 I need to talk with you urgent. MD Hydrogen 123 (talk) 07:50, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi... MD Hydrogen 123 (talk) 06:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi me on my Whatapss no 01924044825 as soon as possible? MD Hydrogen 123 (talk) 06:18, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not duplicate existing templates, as you did at Template:Buriram United. For information on renaming a page, see Wikipedia:Moving a page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:10, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My gut says no, but feel free to raise at WP:RSN for wider review. GiantSnowman 12:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FNH004. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mohamed Atikuzzaman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:14, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi brother can you create Pioneer Football League Bangladesh article? MD Hydrogen 123 (talk) 10:35, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I can, but I am not sure if it meets Wikipedia notability since the previous article was deleted. FNH004 (talk) 11:07, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reply my previous sms. Can you add me in Whatsapps we have to share our football related statistics each others? Its been long time I were knock you but you doesn't reply. Salute. MD Hydrogen 123 (talk) 13:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

instead of whatsapp can we use facebook?? FNH004 (talk) 13:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes boss? Here is my Facebook link https://www.facebook.com/sumiazadkhan add me now? MD Hydrogen 123 (talk) 14:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Like at your edit at Tabish Hussain - an edit summary is not enough. GiantSnowman 18:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FNH004 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 45.125.222.73. Place any further information here. FNH004 (talk) 10:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed proxy. Yamla (talk) 10:18, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

FNH004 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 45.125.222.73. Block was supposed to be over by 23 August but now it has been set to the 26th. Also I have have not used VPN since the first block so I don't understand why it has been extended.FNH004 (talk) 09:48, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Yes, the block is back on for a couple of days. They usually work that way; I don't know why. I suggest that you go to WP:IPECPROXY and follow the instructions there to request IP block exemption, which will moot this. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:20, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello! I saw you changed the name of BFF U-18 Football Tournament to league. But round-robin league and cup tournament is whole different thing.

The tournament is started from 2013-14 and organised with same format till 2019. The current league isn’t the updated or changed version of the tournament, rather it's a fully different competition which will replace the tournament.

So you shouldn’t merge the both competitions. I hope you understand and change your edits. Also, we've to create a different article for the u16 league. If you don't bring changes, then I've do it later and undo your edits.

If you wish to have detailed conversation with me, you can check my user page where you’ll find my social media profiles. Diptadg17 (talk) 13:59, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ill revert my changes. Also will you create the BFF U-18 Football League article separately? FNH004 (talk) 15:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of stadiums in Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bashundhara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shahedul Alam Shahed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jawaharlal Nehru Stadium.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Metro Express Barishal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 14:22, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not copy and paste work from the draftspace like you did for Draft:Rupayan Group Cumilla, you are creating unnecessary work for the review team. Regards. Hughesdarren (talk) 09:18, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And again with Monarch Mart Padma. Hughesdarren (talk) 10:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello FNH004,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Monarch Mart Padma for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Monarch Mart Padma to be deleted, you can , but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:26, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AFC Uttara official logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:45, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AFC Uttara Current Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 20:53, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I am interested to have chat with you. As you have highest number of contributions in Bangladeshi football articles in recent times, I think we should be in touch with each other.

Can you give me any kind of account link or number? Or you can also find my Facebook, Twitter and Instagram account on my user page. I'm waiting for your response. Diptadg17 (talk) 12:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok, ill message you on facebook FNH004 (talk) 13:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Monaem Khan Raju requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monaem Khan Raju. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:05, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Acme Chattogram instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Acme Chattogram and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:51, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FNH004. Thank you for your work on Sawpan Kumar Das. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:44, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mizanur Rahman Mizan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:43, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bangladesh Womens League Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of football stadiums in Bangladesh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rangpur and Jamalpur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2021 disestablishments in Bangladesh indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 01:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're contributing tremendously, in articles related to Bangladeshi and Indian football here. Bro, I need your little help: is there any single Indian player in Bangladeshi club since Rajib Ghosh's contract with Mohammedan Sporting Dhaka in 2009–10? I think there are Indian players in lower division leagues of Bangladesh from 2010 to till date! Unearthed I think. If you help me letting me know about some of the names, I'll be overwhelmed 😇!

Ok, I will let you know immediately if I find any news regarding this.FNH004 (talk) 18:24, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was able to find one player so far, Fiaz Alam [1]. If i find any more I let you know. Also check 2013–14 Bangladesh Football Premier League apparently there was another Indian playing for Uttar Baridhara Club, but I cant find anything about him.FNH004 (talk) 18:35, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Keisuke Goto, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) WP:NFOOTY is no longer a valid SNG, so GNG must be met. It needs several refs from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG. It should have at least 3 of those. Please remember that routine sports coverage does not satisfy GNG, and that interviews, being primary sources, do not go to notability either. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:24, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

এর কি কোন সমাধান আছে? শুধু এইটুকুই জানতে চাচ্ছি HridoyKundu (talk) 03:34, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have been looking into this matter for a while hopefully we find a solution by the next few months, another user Diptadg17 will start a discussion on this soon I think.FNH004 (talk) 05:49, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thanks a lot! ☺️ HridoyKundu (talk) 09:32, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shahinur Kabir Shimul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Striker.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dhaka University footballers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. S.A. Julio (talk) 08:18, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 Dhaka Third Division Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Uttara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rupayan City Cumilla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rupayan City Cumilla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

M.parvage (talk) 08:22, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, the gray color usually means that the match has been cancelled, nullified or abandoned. No need to color it in gray if it's unofficial. Mentioning it in the round parameter is enough! Dl.thinker (talk) 15:43, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok, Ill change it. FNH004 (talk) 15:48, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please insert full references instead of bare ones. Egeymi (talk) 15:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

takes time to fill it, i would have done it if you gave me 3 more minutes FNH004 (talk) 15:54, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, next time I'll wait. Egeymi (talk) 16:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've seen you struggling to understand the differences between scores and result. International Scores and Results both aren't the same. Score means how many goals he have been scored and the result means the actual goals total achieved by the team. You can check it here: https://wikidiff.com/score/result

If you already knew that then why you just continuously reverting the fake information on Tariq Kazi, Morsalin and Rakib Hossain? do you understand football or what? if you don't understand football then you should leave it. Wikipedia should be informative with valid. Thanks. Atiqul Islam Sakib (talk) 05:22, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bro ur talking to yourself, u just responded to your own question. Idk who ur trying to fool. Anyways, I have created over 50 articles on Bangladeshi football, so, u don’t have to teach me how it works. Most articles use “score” like how I use it and I will keep on doing the same. Y dont u go and change how most articles use “score” section first and then talk to me. FNH004 (talk) 05:53, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello FNH004, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 2015–16 Bangladesh Championship League, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: INVALID: speedy deletion is not for move requests. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:46, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In a recent edit to Bangladesh national under-23 football team, you inserted the wikitext </br>. This is invalid HTML; line breaks must be written as <br> or <br/>. See MDN's article on the subject for more information. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:45, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FNH004, hope this finds you well. I removed your CSD tag from FC Brahmanbaria. To have an article at that location you'd be best drafting an article at Draft:FC Brahmanbaria and using {{db-move|Draft:FC Brahmanbaria|YOUR REASON FOR MOVE on the page FC Brahmanbaria. You can also try to nominate the redirect for deletion at WP:Redirects for discussion using WP:REDYES as your rationale, but if you're going to have a draft article ready within the next 7 days, it would probably be faster to draft and then use the db-move tag as outlined above. Feel free to ping me with any question. Cheers! TartarTorte 14:21, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will use the draft method instead since it seems simpler. Thanks. FNH004 (talk) 15:30, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FNH004. Thank you for your work on Tsenda Dorji. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello there! I hope you're having a wonderful day. I'm pleased to inform you that your page complied with Wikipedia's policies, so it has been marked as reviewed. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 15:21, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hope you are doing well, all I can say is that I loved your contributions on articles covering South Asian football, and your contributions in Pakistan articles, as you can see it was a whole mess with much of information missing. I am yet to finish the whole revamp and add as much information as you did in Bangladesh articles I'm impressed by that. I just saw you added Kabir Ahmed along with Abdul Ghafoor which was already there scoring the goals in the match against Israel in the 1960 Asian Cup qualifiers in the Pakistan national football team results page. Can you provide a source for that because the only thing I could find here states someone by the name "Amar" and Faqir Hussain scoring the goals.

Also if you have the time and more information about the stats of the matches in the page please feel welcome to contribute as much in the Pakistan related articles, your countributions are very helpful here. Cheers and thank you very much Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 17:24, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I found the info about Kabir's goal against Israel in a Book. However, I did not add Ghafoor in the scorer list, it was done beforehand by someone else. FNH004 (talk) 17:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just found the report of the match with all the lineups, unfortunately with the goals missing on the Pakistan side. According to RSSSF this was the Line-up: Mohd Siddique - Irshad Mohammed, Abid Hussain, Abdul Ghafoor, Abdul Qayum Khan Changezi - Kabir Ahmed, Masoodul Hassan, Abdullah - Fakir Hussain, Mohd Oomer, Abdullah Yusuf. Kabir was indeed present in the midfield, but before your replacement it stated Omar as one of the scorers, which is of the forwards in the lining, and also bears resemblance with the name in the 11vs11 report. Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 23:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, yes the goals are showing in the end, Mohammad Omer scoring in the 49th minute and Abdul Ghafoor scoring in the 57th minute, so the details were accurate before. Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 23:26, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ig u should change it according to the RSSSF report FNH004 (talk) 06:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheikh Russel KC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Landry Ndikumana.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2023 SAFF Championship squads. Thanks! Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 14:00, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2023 SAFF Championship squads. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 15:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at 2023 SAFF Championship. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The squads can be included in the article on the championship.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 SAFF Championship squads and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia articles require independent secondary sources with in depth coverage of the subjects. These are not evident here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 SAFF Championship squads and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 02:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amir Hakim Bappy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Hakim Bappy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2001–02 National Football League (Bangladesh), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dinajpur District.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FNH004. Thank you for your work on Hassan Ahmedul Haque. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:20, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FNH004. Thank you for your work on Sanish Shrestha. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FNH004. Thank you for your work on Shakil Hossain (footballer). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:41, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FNH004. Thank you for your work on Tareq Miah. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 12:23, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, FNH004. Thank you for your work on Shahin Ahammad. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks FNH004 (talk) 15:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FNH004, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 10:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanks FNH004 (talk) 15:40, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:György Kottán in 1972.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. IagoQnsi (talk) 07:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dhaka Senior Division Football League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself on what is a logo. This, this, and this are not logos. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 11:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

—Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well im not new to wikipedia so, i dont understand why your acting like an admin and policing me around. I certainly did not do anything wrong while editing those pages (if so bring it up to an admin and have me blocked or sth) and Id like it if you'd stop bothering me. Thanks. FNH004 (talk) 14:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So if you're not new here, could you maybe explain why you're adding unreliable sources like forum and a WP:RSSELF to contentious topics? And no I don't want you to get blocked. You're a valuable editor here. I just need to let you know that what you're doing isn't appropriate! —Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Who said it was unreliable other than you? First, consult with an admin and if he/she agrees with you, delete them all you want I could not care less tbh. You can't be making decisions on Wikipedia on your own without dispute. The site has been used to source numerous articles which were accepted after review, so I don't understand how all of a sudden you deem it unreliable. I've also noticed that you have been removing sources constantly from articles without consulting an admin or any higher authority on Wiki. I suggest you stop policing football articles since you have very little knowledge about them. FNH004 (talk) 14:32, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Football is not my thing and that I've very little knowledge about them but that's not what's important here. We're talking about whether a source is reliable or not, but it seems like you might not be aware of WP:RSSELF which clearly states Internet forums are all examples of self-published media. and that Never use self-published sources as independent sources about other living people, even if the author is an expert. Use WP:COMMONSENSE! —Saqib (talk I contribs) 14:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How about you WP:STFU and get an admins approval to remove sources from the specific site. I've noticed you're currently amidst discussion, so until it reaches conclusion you should refrain from removing sources, since so far, from most reviewers, the cite has been considered acceptable. FNH004 (talk) 14:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As an admin I'm telling you to not add blogs to articles/list/pages for the use of referencing as they arent considered reliable for this matter. As an admin I'm also telling you to watch your language or youll be on the end of a short sharp block Amortias (T)(C) 15:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

none of them were blogs btw please just discuss here and stop bothering me FNH004 (talk) 15:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. Another admin here - stop using blogs, and also the next time you tell someone to "STFU" or similar you'll be blocked indefinitely. If you want to continue contributing here, follow the rules or be blocked. Black Kite (talk) 18:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand, but what "blogs"? None of the sources I used were blogs. According to their consensus, the sources might be unreliable, but they are not blogs. FNH004 (talk) 18:13, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And also what do you mean by "No"?? FNH004 (talk) 18:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Black Kite and Amortias: Please note the namecalling in edit summary Kazi Salahuddin (Diff 1226419883) —Saqib (talk I contribs) 15:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's somehow an insult? OMFG 0 freedom of speech on this site cant say anything. Anyhow, if that somehow offended you I do apologise. FNH004 (talk) 16:03, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Black Kite and Amortias: Could you please communicate the said user to just stop vandalising pages. It seems it's not only me or FNH004 who are having problems with him, so maybe he needs to rectify himself as he has done the same mistake with someone else before. I will let him do whatever it pleases him if he has a problem with a certain source and just move on and sort all that mess he created out if he deems it as a "blog" or whatever, but just had a look at this and now I am seeing RSSSF (have a look at the intro of the page for information about what it is) is "unacceptable source". Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 18:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Throwawayjamal047, Thanks for highlighting that, it was a mistake on my part. I'm sure that no other reliable source was deleted. If there was, please provide the diff. —Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, FNH004, Please, slow down. I agree with @Saqib and other admins above that your behavior is clearly immature. Name-calling isn't going to get you anywhere. Your immaturity in the RSN thread is even more concerning. Saqib highlighted legitimate concerns with the source in question, and what was your response? Name calling in a diff, like a 4 year old. This is highly unacceptable for an editor with over 20!K edits to their name, and a potential violation of WP:NPA. I am genuinely mad at your behavior, I would say something worse, but NPA prevents me from doing that. (You can construct a sentence yourself with the f and s words.) Please be careful, I can tell that you are one nanometer away from a block. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 23:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Damn relax my boi, I'm done arguing with that guy, its been two or three days since and I've forgotten about him. I only got mad because he started removing content without consulting an admin or coming to a unanimous decision first and I understand that I got a little too emotional (my bad). Also, he has a knack for accusing people without proof, which naturally can piss anyone off. Anyways, I'm done with that dispute so dw. FNH004 (talk) 10:28, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	You are a net positive for the project and have written some really important articles. There is only one active editor on Bangladeshi sports articles, and that is you. Remember to keep calm and take a break if things become too heated. I have seen too many good editors catch bans for silly things. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 22:34, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

It should be added to the main article. No need to create separate article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2023 SAFF Championship squads and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 14:12, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023–24 Sheikh Jamal Dhanmondi Club season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sekou Sylla.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:21, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kashaituly SKP logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After carefully examining the squads for the 1960 and 1962 editions of the Merdeka Cup where Pakistan participated, it is very possible that this picture [2] belongs to the 1960 edition instead of 1962 where the team finished finalist, as Qayyum Changezi is present there and he wasn't participating in 1962. This article also affirms the pic belong to 1960, while here it says it is the finalist team in 1962. Just asking, is the man standing at the left of the Malayan PM Sheikh Saheb Ali who coached in 1960. Looks like him but not sure. If so then it will clear my confusion.

1960 squad: https://www.britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0003221/19600802/158/0008

1962: https://britishnewspaperarchive.co.uk/viewer/bl/0003221/19620906/176/0013 Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 20:31, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not Shaheb Ali, but the man standing next to Changezi is most likely Kabir Ahmed who participated in the 1960 edition, so im guessing this pic is from 1960. FNH004 (talk) 06:03, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What about this pic. I have a strong feeling it is the same competition in 1960 from the few players I identified so far. Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 23:14, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think so as well i can see Shaheb Ali standing ninth from the left and i think thats Kabir sitting first from the right FNH004 (talk) 06:16, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This pic is 100% from the 1960 edition. I have a book which confirms it. FNH004 (talk) 06:34, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks Throwawayjamal047 (talk) 14:40, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you confirm the goalkeeper here is Balai Dey. In this source it states the name of every player but obviously a bit low resolution so I can't see properly but I think his first name is written there. JayFT047 (talk) 18:28, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Most probably is since he was in the squad during Pakistan's China tour. He appears to be the same person as in this picture, which is definitely him. FNH004 (talk) 18:37, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain your edit? shazid (আলাপ) 16:43, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That table represents best tournament finishes prior to the current (2024) edition. It's consistent with most football tournament pages. FNH004 (talk) 16:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 September 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Bimal Kar (footballer), which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 18:07, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating the goalscorers at the Football at the 1985 South Asian Games article. Regarding the match on 22 December 1985, could you confirm Shaukat Mufti scored a goal. Agha Saeed scored two goals 100%, but I have doubts on the other. JayFT047 (talk) 00:07, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I got the info on him scoring against Bangladesh and Nepal from here. Can you provide me with the source from where you learned that he scored against Maldives as well. I'll try searching from other places in the meantime. FNH004 (talk) 14:09, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This and this were the sources for the two goals against Maldives for Agha Saeed. Here is a snippet pic from Times of India also saying he scored twice against Maldives, with another pic of Shaukat Mufti below stating he "scored the second goal for Pakistan". However over here it says Mufti scored against Bangladesh and Nepal, just like you found out, but no mention of him scoring against Maldives.

That's why I'm a bit confused, either he did score against Maldives or the Times of India snippet was from the bronze medal match against Nepal stating Saeed scored twice in the earlier match. JayFT047 (talk) 14:38, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chalana Chameera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	Football (Soccer) Barnstar
	For your outstanding contributions to articles related to South Asian football. Your thorough research and dedication to accuracy have significantly improved and shaped the articles. I sincerely hope you keep up your remarkable work. JayFT047 (talk) 16:55, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please have a look at the Pakistan national football B team article I just created. Basically the RSSSF source of the Quaid-e-Azam International Cup state clearly that the Pakistan Red and White of the 1976, 1985 and the 1986 editions is the B team, while in the 1982 edition the Pakistan Blue team is stated as the "youth team". And the 1987 is a mess with incomplete data where 4 Pakistani teams competed (Pakistan Green, White, Blue and Yellow) with no conclusion in RSSSF which team was which. In the 1993 SAARC Gold Cup, the Pakistan White team which was clearly staten as the B team in Quaid Cup is stated as " Pakistan Junior team" instead in the RSSSF source there. Dont know if to indicate those as the B team or the under-20/youth team.

Nonetheless for now I have indicated the 1982 and 1993 teams as the B team as many B teams consisted of youth international players. Would like to have your input here. JayFT047 (talk) 03:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Couldnt find anytg in the 1987 tournament, since Bangladesh also sent a B team "BFF XI" but im guessing Pakistan White to be the senior team. FNH004 (talk) 09:46, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]