Hi! I'm currently attempting to bring all horror film related articles up to a higher standard. If you're interested in helping, please contact me!--Sean Black | Talk 20:16, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

bonjour Dubliner,

avant de supprimer une mention dans 1 article, tu devrais prendre la peine de lire tout l'article... tu aurais vu que dans le chapitre "politique" il y a une explication du nom "Ulster".

pour respecter le travail du membre qui a rédigé cet article, il me semble que tu devrais remettre l'ancienne version (please, revert).

merci, bienvenue et amitiés

83.193.206.199 10:28, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You mean a Wikiproject? That's a fantastic idea, and I'd love to do it. I'll see what I can put together, but we'll have to get a few other people interested.--Sean Black | Talk 20:34, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is this how you reply? I'm not sure, so please bare with me. I'm sure your French is very good, and you are right, the accent mark over the e would make an "ay" sound. There have been many arguements at many forums over how you pronounce Clemence's name. I choose to go with Poe-zee because when she was asked her name at the Goblet of Fire press junket Clemence says Poe-zee, not Poe-ay-zee. Since Clemence is French, and it is her name I will continue to say Poe-zee, untill informed otherwise.

--Ayashe | Talk 03:43, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Today, the National Bank of Slovakia decided on the motifs to be used on Slovak euro coins. I haven't been able to find information about it on the internet, however upon emailing the NBS directly, I quickly received a detailed answer, including a pdf file containing all eight euro coin designs. Could you extract the images from this file, just like you did for the new designs on euro coins? I'd need to email the pdf to you, naturally, since it's not available on the internet AFAIK. Thanks! ナイトスタリオン ✉ 14:32, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I just sent you an e-mail now from the address to send them to [REMOVED] but I wasn't sure which you'd check first so I thought I'd just let you know here too. - RedHotHeat 16:21, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, actually, it *is* available online, I just wasn't able to find it without the assistance of a really helpful person from the NBS... The text is here, and the images are in this pdf. Thanks a lot! ナイトスタリオン ✉ 06:42, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok. I am working on extracting them, but unlike the others, these are on a blue background, AND have been antialiased to it, so I'll either have to remove the antialiasing (which is why I said I'm working on them) or leave it as blue. Which do you think is better? Personally I think white, since it would match the rest. - ^R_H^e_o^d_t 08:03, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I think that would most likely be for the best, unless it's unmanageably difficult. ナイトスタリオン ✉ 09:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please upload the coins pictures to the Commons? I have tried to copy them to the German wikipedia, but they do not work there. In the long run, they will be needed in many other wikis, as well. Thanks. Juro 01:31, 23 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you like to be involved in connecting with more eurovision wikipedians to do up the eurovision pages in a more coherent manner? I have come across the Eurovision wikiproject page. It may be an idea to have a look there and see how we could improve the eurovision coverage. --Alan Frize 17:48, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed you changed Family Guy to Num3ers, saying Family Guy was on TV3. I would just like to know, when? I don't recall them ever showing it. - ^R_H^e_o^d_t 11:43, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, TV3 were pretty good at hiding it on their schedule. It went out after midnight from Sept 2002 till around May 2003. -- Lochaber 20:53, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What countries released it in March? Plus just add it on there. Duh. Here, I'll do it. You'll like it, Trust me. User:Tcatron565

Someday but certainly within our lifetime having different currencies will be a thing of the past. We will have a global currency that is redeemable for sustainable levels of access of individuals to potable water, nutrition, living space, medical services and transportation. I can't wait to get chipped and looking at you, neither can you. 84.160.247.104 02:43, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the Half Blood Prince film page she deserves to be in Preimlary. In fact I haven't been very happy with the page since Zetawoof, made some serious trimmings. He says everything needs a source on this page and surely it doesn't. I'm going to move Emma Watson to Cast (Preimlary). In fact I'm thinking of redesigning the whole page. ForestH2

Please see the new page. In fact I'm going to have a little "go" at the page right now and move stuff around. ForestH2

We don't know if Emma Watson will return. It seems possible as she stated at BBC Newsround. Her character will be in the screenplay.--ForestH2

Did you actually use the old PNG to create a vector file? I still have the original vector file (I think it's an EPS/AI) which I used to create a PNG, so it might be better to convert that to SVG. - LeonWhite 22:26, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The HDI value that I used for the EU as a whole was 0.922. If you look up the list, the place EU would be in, is 9th because you must remove all the EU Member States from the list to prevent double counting. Page Up 12:17, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, yours is a better trace. "NBC_logo.svg" seems like a better name, though (the format is used in a lot of places, plus the page title is more readable) -- would you consider uploading yours over mine instead?

I used Delineate for mine. Sean Hayford O'Leary 04:57, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I've moved your logo to Image:NBC_logo.svg and updated links to it. I just checked out Inkscape -- looks nice. Sean Hayford O'Leary 06:06, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Greenland coat of arms.svg. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know that you cannot upload SVG logos under fair use. -- 9cds^(talk) 19:26, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you trying to delete this image? Why? Or who is? I made the image and there is nothing wrong with it. Evertype 21:00, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I can upload it as SVG. I know I have it somewhere. Cheers Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 01:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I never realized my mistake. Thanks for pointing it out. I think I mixed it up with the date it was published on (a Friday) by the IRMA. -- Underneath-it-All 14:47, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RedHotHeat.

It is a nice image you've created, but you haven't specified any license for it. I've added the template {{Insignia}} to show that the actual use of the image is restricted since it is an official symbol, but {{Symbol}} is not a real license and should be replaced with one. Please specify if your image is covered by GFDL, PD or a third license. Regards. Valentinian ^(talk) 01:03, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, the old .png version is located on Commons, not Wikipedia as such. Is it ok with you if the .svg image is uploaded to Commons? Regards. Valentinian ^(talk) 01:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad it is ok to upload it to Commons, but please specify which license your image falls under. The tag you've chosen does not specify the copyright situation. Is your image GFDL, PD, CC or something different? Please change {{symbol}} to the correct tag. Thanks in advance. Valentinian ^(talk) 21:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. The tag I needed concerned the work you'd done on the image. Since you normally release images to PD, I have tagged this image as {{PD-user}} (= a PD image drawn by you). If a user creates his own drawing of a coat of arms, the copyright status can be different from the original image. As I understand the situation, you've created a new image but used an old one as inspiration / for tracing purposes, this means that this image is independent of the first one, and that the copyright of the image belongs to you. If an image is simply converted through an automatic image converter program (e.g. from .jpg -> .png) the copyright situations remains the same as on the original image. (This is extremely longhaired, I know.)

The status as an official symbol has no relevancy for the image's copyright status, and is covered by the {{insignia}} template. Please take a look at the image's page and see if the tagging is ok with you. Regards. Valentinian ^(talk) 12:00, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there—Economy of the Republic of Ireland is currently in the FARC list. Nothing much has been done to improve the article since its nomination for FA Review. I wonder whether you're able to assist. It would be a pity if te article were de-listed. Tony 14:10, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Neptune.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from Greece. I saw you wrote that Mambo will be released in Ireland as well.How do you know it? Or do you make assumptions? And i like very much your page:) how did u make it? Greetings!--Chronisgr 19:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah i mean the userbox. And Mambo! won't be released in the UK by Sony BMG but by All Around The World which also released Cascada's Everytime we touch in the UK. Has it been released there by this label?--Chronisgr 19:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

how can it be 97% possible ? Has AATW released any CDs in Ireland? Here's their website: http://www.aatw.co.uk/--Chronisgr 19:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's no official announcement about Mambo release in Ireland in AATW website. Only about the United Kingdom..

Yeah but neither Sony BMG announcement abour European releases of Mambo included Ireland. Anyway,if you know someone who may know about future releases in Irish market pls ask him about Mambo.. Ah don't forget to take a look at Helena's #1 MSN community: http://groups.msn.com/AntiqueElenaPaparizou-NikosPanagiotidis/

OK it's not that i don't believe you're from Ireland or you know everything on music industry..it's just i want to be 100% sure. I really hope it release there but i doubt if it's going to enter the charts or at least get a good place. It all depends on promo since Helena isn't popular there.

Hi, would you mind uploading Image:Neptune.svg to Commons: in order to allow other language Wikipedias to use it. It would be nice on your side as it will also allow to replace the Image:Neptune symbol.ant.png. Greetings, Goldie (tell me) 08:07, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to say that not only is it extremely common for Irish owned channels, or non-Irish, operating to Ireland channels; it is effectively the norm for them to have UK licences, not Irish. With UK licences we have: Setanta's massive group:

1. Setanta Sports 1
2. Setanta Sports 2
3. NASN
4. Rangers TV
5. Celtic TV
6. Setanta Sports 3 (the PPV service)

We then have the Maxtron channels:

1. TWC
2. ActionMax
3. Movies4Men

Then theres Bubble Hits and formerly Channel 6 too. There are also the Irish services of the Viacom channels:

1. MTV Ireland
2. Nickelodeon Eire
3. Nick Jr. Eire
4. Paramount Comedy Ireland

And Sky's:

1. Sky One
2. Sky Sports One
3. Sky News Ireland

With commercial Irish licences, we have:

1. TV3
2. City Channel
3. Setanta Ireland
4. Channel 6

And lots of cable company channels like Chorus Sports and Waterford Cabletext - although most of these don't even have licences. I think that shows that it -is- "Extremely common". Its the entire BCI regulatory package - Irish content, the advertising code, the news requirements, the Irish language requirements that they don't want, and it effectively matches the situation in Sweden - where all their commercial channels bar a very few are UK licenced too. --Kiand 15:53, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I still see an Irish TV channel as one that is Irish owned or targetted, not nessacerily both at the same time. As goes Nick Jr Ireland - on satellite. NTL haven't picked up the Irish feed yet I believe. Of that, TWC/ActionMax/Movies4Men are all Irish - channels are based in Howth. Sky News Ireland, Sky One Ireland, etc, etc, etc are Irish as they solely target Ireland. By your reasoning, Bubble Hits isn't Irish as it targets a UK audience. Should the Viacom channels be called Canadian, as thats where they're from? And so on. "Not unheard of" is fine, thats not what I was complaining about - what I was complaining about is that it is extremely common, despite what you said in your edit summary. --Kiand 16:37, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, TV3 haven't been Irish owned for nearly 7 years :P. They're now Australian. --Kiand 16:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No bother, really, just wanted to rant a bit :p. Nick Jr. for Ireland has a seperate UK licence and a satellite feed all of its own IIRC, but due to editor amount disparity and a general lack of interest in Ireland by most UK editors, I wouldn't expect it to be mentioned. --Kiand 18:12, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Thanks for this nice template. I have two questions:

1. I feel my link from "Patent" towards "European patent law" is not quite appropriate. A separate article entitled "European Union patent law" should probably be created for the sake of consistency. What do you think?
2. There is an article called Intellectual property in Romania. I am considering creating redirects in the template towards this article like this: Romanian copyright law, Romanian trademark law, Romanian patent law, until Romanian copyright law, Romanian trademark law, Romanian patent law are created. What do you think?

--Edcolins 14:19, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the Romanian question... I forgot Romania was not in the EU yet... --Edcolins 14:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested "European Union patent law" to be created. I will think about creating it in the near future in such a manner that the content is sufficiently different from European patent law... --Edcolins 15:09, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, excellent. --Edcolins 16:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THis is good, would it be possible to have a rating-10 for uniformity? Thanks. Rich Farmbrough, 18:18 22 September 2006 (GMT).

'Tis done, the lazy man's way. {{rating-10}} Rich Farmbrough, 19:38 22 September 2006 (GMT).

Yea, I've been able to implement your template on a few articles since I discovered it. It's awesome, good job eh? Cheers. -- Reaper X 20:49, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. - ^Рэд_хот 22:30, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is ample discussion on the Talk page and in the Manual of Style about this exact topic. Please give that a read.--chris.lawson 02:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, WP:MOS-TM, where "Adidas" is cited as one of the specific instances we capitalise.--chris.lawson 17:03, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I see that you have spent a lot of effort to {{Infobox central bank}}. I have some thoughts and would like to discuss with you. The printers and mints are already included on the currency page. Having the same data over multiple places should be kept minimal because any update on those must be global. So only the most vital information should be duplicated. IMHO, printers and mints aren't the most important on the subject of central bank. ISO code is debatable. Established date, foreign reserve amount, and head of the central bank attribute would be nice. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 17:51, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You said "Author requests deletion (I know it doesn't say it as criteria for images on WP:CSD, but it doesn't list it as non-criteria either) because it is an orphan". I just thought that I would let you know that it is a criteria, name G7 ("Author requests deletion"). You would use {{db-author}}. Hope that helps. --TheParanoidOne 11:31, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I didn't do it in time. I'm still very busy both on wiki and in real life. =) --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 17:04, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? Could you please name these articles?--Chronisgr 11:07, 15 October 2006 (UTC) I think you're right. What a stupid mistake.--Chronisgr 11:29, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning this up. It turns out that the problem was that I signed inside the template parameters (adding ~~~~ before the closing braces:}}). I obviously didn't preview this correctly or something. The other issue I've been having with this template of late is the picture showing up in the middle of it and disrupting the text. Any ideas? Thanks again.—Chidom ^talk  14:06, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That would be it. I didn't know about including the leading colon. Thanks.—Chidom ^talk  14:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your addition to the Scientology article. Please realize that that is a "hot" area and all edits must strictly conform to WP:V and WP:NOR. Your "presumption" is completely OR and has no support from the available information so I editted it out. Not only that but it is likely not even the case as Scientology probably registered as many scientology.xx domain names internationally as possible starting at least 10 years ago to protect their copyrights and it had nothing to do with the presence of an org or mission in the country. --Justanother 20:00, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded Image:Crypto clipart1.svg and Image:Crypto clipart2.svg. I never got around to doing much with these, so I hope you find them useful for derivative works. Cheers! -- Wapcaplet 04:28, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]