Archives

Archive 1

Hello, Eschoryii, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 21:25, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Mission Hills. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
  • Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. TJRC (talk) 04:45, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help Eschoryii (talk) 02:22, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Cast lists, at least for films, should be formatted to 25em. I've developed Template:Castlist which will handle this automatically. Note in particular that setting lists to specific numbers of columns has been deprecated. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 17:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding them to the cast sections of films. If they're well-known, that's another story, e.g. Clayton Moore, but not someone like Ray Walker. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eschoryii . I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article, Marianne Rendón. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 20:45, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eschoryii. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Rozsaphile1 (talk) 14:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so is this how the talk page works?Rozsaphile1 (talk) 14:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I typed you a note on your talk pageEschoryii (talk) 14:31, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ladies Must Play (1930 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the .
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 13:34, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Echo Park (2014 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Echo Park (2014 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:28, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eschoryii! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:28, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

5 July 2018 (UTC)018 (UTC)

Thanks for that. Would you say there is anything in particular wrong with the page on Lewis Hilsenteger?

Thank you for your advice about the infobox! I've added one. Logophile59 (talk) 13:55, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I added some categories too. Eschoryii (talk) 14:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eschoryii! You created a thread called Birthday reliable sources at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eschoryii! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:46, Wednesday, February 27, 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Please note that the venue for general discussion about the RfA process is at WT:RfA. There are also plenty of links that fully explain the process on the header template of every page concerning RfA, such as at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. You may also find WP:RFAV interesting. There has also been a recent series of articles about RfA and adminship on The Signpost, our monthly magazine. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:55, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removed my vote

We should make a yii club. RedditDuchyii (talk) 23:30, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eschoryii! You created a thread called Private communication at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please . Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what I did to not have it print out @ Special:Permalink/899241422#Advice: this only happened because some lines had a whitespace prefix (which was easy to fix with this edit). Just in case you still wondered about it, —PaleoNeonate – 08:14, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I don't know if you will get this on my talk page. I fixed the other talk page. I'm not too sure about Tym Whittier's intentions.Eschoryii (talk) 23:36, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eschoryii. You have new messages at Talk:Lamont Johnson.
Message added 06:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

(Making up for forgotten ping.) — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your new note on your user page. You did just bring Hide-and-seek to our attention. No one had noticed that it had been vandalized until you saw that strange wording. It could have stayed in that form for a long time. Thanks. StarryGrandma (talk) 21:10, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eschoryii. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 18:44, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Not sure whether you follow my talk page, but I replied there. I follow Pooh Policy, so don't continue here please. Feel free to delete this ping, it is of zero value once you are aware that I answered you. ++Lar: t/c 17:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That might be the most promising contribution I've ever seen from a newbie. On the basis of that, you'll be a very successful Wikipedian. I'll add my voice to those who've welcomed you. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 13:08, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems uncalled for. They were probably just responding to their watch list notice. Let 'em be. Rgrds. --Bison X (talk) 05:15, 7 March 2020 (UTC),[reply]

• +1 to Dweller's comment. I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia and continue to do so! Thanks, Puddleglum^2.0_{(How's my driving?)} 05:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Came here from that RFA to see if there was anything interesting. +1 to the kind note by Dweller. Rehman 12:29, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eschoryii! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Policy dispute, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(One may) see the full statement of this comment /slash "question".

Thanks, --Mike Schwartz (talk) 18:54, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

films and caring about editors

Thank you for quality articles about films such as Echo Park (2014 film), for "I am a user who will be most interested in and follow movies", and adding casts, characters and more, for improving actors' articles such as Joanna Miles, for being concerned how editors are treated, latest BBB23, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2419 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:00, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July

pale globe-thistle above the Rhine

Thank you for the honour to fill half of your like list, blushing. - Today is a birthday, of a great woman born in the 19th century, flowers and music and memory, - good song about the year at its height even on the Main page. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:30, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of your classy and engrossing user page. I am sure that I am only one of very many who have spent an enjoyable half hour browsing through it.

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:44, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]