Yemeni women would never ever chew khat it is agadinst there religion and khat is not known as somali tea somali tea is tea — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.93.41.32 (talk) 02:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Epistemos. Thankyou for your recent contributions and moving the article on Lake Tabourie (or is it Tabourie Lake?). I have noted on the talk page that there are some conflicting sources on the official name of the village. If you are interested, would you weigh in with an opinion or help me to clarify the conventions in such a situation? Dfadden (talk) 13:29, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joe I 15:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trifolium campestre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Australian Philatelic Federation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian Philatelic Federation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Winner 42 Talk to me! 05:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ralph Basset (died 1282), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Simon de Montfort. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your not even from arncliffe or have any knowledge of the area and you decided you could edit the page and dismiss the updated information. You don't deserve this baklava Michaelangelo Angel (talk) 11:19, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We do need literacy. YOUR NOT is not. YOU'RE NOT is. arncliffe is capitalized as Arncliffe. Epistemos (talk) 05:12, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This guy doesn't even live in arncliffe and he thinks he can just delete information that has been provided by reputable sources. I even gave adequate citations and my updates were factual — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelangelo Angel (talk • contribs) 11:21, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dick Norris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clothes moth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've undone one of your moves. In British English, Governor is capitalised in that context as the representative of HMQ. Regards, WCM_email 21:09, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

British or any English that I am aware of; it is Her Majesty The Queen, BUT the queens or kings or earl or countesses or viscounts or rulers or plenipotentiaries of England or anywhere. Likewise, it is The Governor of X, Lord Algernon Muck or simply The Governor where it is implicit that Lord Muck governing, or having governed, X is referred to, BUT in the plural Lord Muck and mates were (and one may still be) governors. You shall (or should not) find "List of Kings.... List of Counts..." on Wikipedia nor should we have inflicted upon us "Lists of Governors...". No disrespect for Her Gracious is inherent in my move, simple grammar demandeth such. Regards Epistemos (talk) 08:55, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just so I make myself very clear - I am a third generation resident of Chatswood with European ancestry who settled in the area. I live, breathe and work Chatswood. I'm a local teacher, Local Historian working with the association and also a member of Chatswood's West Ward Progress Association. I am one of the leading authorities on OUR local history and I am failing to understand why on earth you feel the need to constantly remove information that has been added that is HISTORICALLY CORRECT.

Localteacher1 (talk) 11:44, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References are needed NOT unreferenced local knowledge and you are clearly not an English teacher so you should consult one to avoid constructions such as 1950's which is a plural not a possessive. Epistemos (talk) 11:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying all named accounts who have edited this article this year. There is a discussion of whether this article should contain foreign language palindromes. If you would like to comment the thread is Talk:Palindrome#Non-English_palindromes_2 Meters (talk) 21:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Epistemos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hickory lLeafstem borer moth. Since you had some involvement with the Hickory lLeafstem borer moth redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  03:16, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Epistemos. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Epistemos. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Swan Hill—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Jonathan O'Donnell (talk) 00:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Epistemos. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Wanderingpotato (talk) 00:43, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people on the postage stamps of Portuguese colonies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people on the postage stamps of Portuguese colonies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Fram (talk) 07:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Tanzania has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:LISTN, unsourced since its creation in 2008, abandoned since 2010, ends in 1982 for some reason, and is not of interest to our readers anyway (19 visits in the last 90 days).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:11, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of people on the postage stamps of Egypt has been nominated for porposed deletion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:15, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Egypt has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:49, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of people on the postage stamps of Slovakia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only four people on the list, which has been literally more maintenance tag than list since its inception in 2010. Nothing worth keeping here

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of people on the postage stamps of Australia, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of people on the postage stamps of countries (A-B) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Condah swamp and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 21#Condah swamp until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 02:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Indian bullfrog and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 9 § Indian bullfrog until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. An anonymous username, not my real name 21:55, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]