Archive 1 (January 3, 2006 – September 18, 2006)

Archive 2 (September 22, 2006 – July 6, 2007)

Archive 3 (July 6, 2007 – May 16, 2008)

I have nominated Category:Categories named after universities and colleges ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Bencherlite^Talk 17:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. --Eliyak T·C 17:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eliyak: Even tho as you note publicly on your user page (that may indicate a negative POV as regards Yiddish since Yeshivish is also based on Yiddish and Hebrew as well as the Aramaic of the Talmud) please note:

However, I have noted that recently in a few articles whose words are used in both Hebrew and Yiddish, you removed the Category:Yiddish words and phrases. I have reverted your edits because Hebrew, together with Old German are the two main linguistuic pillars and cores of Yiddish and Yiddish cannot exists without them (of course Yiddish has absorbed and adapted words and phrases from all the cultures and countries in Eastern Europe where Jews found themselves.) A while ago the process of trying to identify some key Yiddish words (that are indeed originally from Hebrew) but are very important and very obvious Yiddish words -- such as Mazel Tov for example was begun in that regard, because those kind of Hebrew words are standard in Yiddish as well. So please do not remove that category from words that have an obvious known use in Yiddish. Thank you. IZAK (talk) 08:23, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Judaism Newsletter Issue I -- Sivan, 5768

Main Project Page Talk Page Judaism Portal Categories To Do Judaism AFD/RFC What's This? Shalom aleichem sports fans, and welcome to the first of what I hope will be a monthly newsletter with the need-to-know information about our fair WikiProject. If you have any questions or comments, or would like to recommend a story for the newsletter, click to leave a message on the Newsletter Coordinator's talk page. In the News WikiProject Good Articles is doing sweeps over all our current good articles to ensure they still meet criteria. For more information and how you can help, check out WikiProject Good Articles Sweeps. GA status for the article Jew has been put on hold pending a few minor revisions. A list of things that need to be done to return this top importance article to its proper status can be found here. Jerusalem is a Featured Article Candidate! Go forth, my people, and !vote! To Do One new Judaism-related article was created this month, the long requested Hebrew Punctuation. Thanks to Epson291 for creating it. Remember, folks, there are over forty standing requests for Judaism articles, so whenever you get the opportunity make sure to go create a few. In the right column you will see a listing of our most popular articles. All of these articles got 170,000+ page hits in the past month, and they should be on everyone's watchlist so we can keep them vandalism-free. Spread the word! No, not the Word... (well, you can do that too) I'm talking about inviting knowledgeable users to join the project. You can proclaim your undying love of WikiProject Judaism in methods mild to wild, check the project template page and member list for examples. We also now have a flashy advertisement, to use it add {{Wikipedia ads|ad=148}} to your userpage. Quick Stats On the date of publish, we had... 275 Project Members 6152 articles 2341 of which are Stubs 15 of which are Good 8 of which are Featured New Members Benignuman Bernstein2291 Shevashalosh Yudel Most Popular Articles By page hits. Source. Israel The Holocaust Judaism Ten Commandments Ark of the Covenant

This newsletter was automatically delivered by ShepBot because you are a member of the WikiProject. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) on 04:26, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You removed the category Category:Talmud concepts and terminology with the notation "not a Talmudic method". Why? I don't see how there could be any question about its being a Talmudic term and the name of a Talmudic concept, so I don't understand why it shouldn't go in the category. The category refers to concepts and terminology, and makes no mention of "methods". I don't understand why the question of whether it's a "method" or not is relevant. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 18:47, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice touch-ups. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 15:49, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. A credible authors' reference is being "overrided" by edit-warring. I recently tried to add to the telescope article but this editor seems to think that his opinion overrides a VERY credible author in Mr. Richard Powers. I've been blocked before for edit-warring recently, so I don't want this to be another incident on my record.

Anyway, the other editor seemed to have asked his friend-type editors to form a consensus, so I will do the same. The Islamic connection here is, Al-Haytham. He is FUNDAMENTAL to the telescope and the FATHER of optics. By definition, the summary can include him since the radio and electro-magnetic telescopes are derogatory to the average person looking at the article; I wanted to add it to the history section since it looked cleaner. Can you help your fellow InternetHero?? InternetHero (talk) 21:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you reverted my adding an {{in-universe}} tag to the article. While I believe it is such, the substance of my edit was not that the story is fiction, rather that it is treated as fact. As you rightly say in your edit summary, the historicity of the bible is contentious, and so I took objection to style like:

"Samson is a Herculean figure, who is granted tremendous strength through the Spirit of the LORD to combat his enemies and perform heroic feats unachievable by ordinary men"

"Samson lived when God was punishing the Israelites by giving them "into the hand of the Philistines."

et cetera. What I do like is quotes like this:

"He is described in the Book of Judges chapters 13 to 16.[1][2][3] He is believed to be buried in Tel Tzora in Israel overlooking the Sorek valley."

I recognise, in retrospect, that that specific tag was not quite appropriate for the situation. I maintain, however, that the article does need to be written from a third-party perspective, from outside the religion, and it is for that reason that, even if I did believe the bible to be true, I believe that the article falls into the same category as fiction, for the purposes of what perspective it needs to be written.

However, please let me know if I'm off-base here. I won't revert you, but I am interested to know what you think. — Werdna • talk 07:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Judaism Newsletter Issue II -- Tammuz, 5768

WikiProject Judaism (talk/to do) WikiProject Jewish History (talk/to do) WikiProject Kabbalah (talk/to do) Now with 200% more Jewishness! Yes, folks, we're moving on up. This newsletter is now the newsletter for both WikiProject Judaism, WikiProject Jewish History, and WikiProject Kabbalah. In the future, I may split them, but for now I think we'll be just fine with one. As always, any questions or comments should be directed to me, L'Aquatique. A Special Dispatch Just a note, not aimed at anyone in particular. By order of the administrative cabal, it is officially not cool (and possibly dickish) to call someone an anti-semite when they aren't being anti-semitic. Anti-semitic is a very charged word, and it's important only to use it when you're absolutely sure it applies, lest it become the subject of a Godwin-esque law. Remember Hanlon's Razor: never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity. In the News A new class on the importance scale has been added- C Class- which covers articles better than start but not quite to B Class yet. It is up to the WikiProjects to decide whether to adopt them or not. Currently, there has been little discussion within our Projects, so if you feel strongly either way be sure to note so at your Project[s]. There is a proposal to reword the section on NPOV regarding religious articles. Please see Wikipedia_talk:NPOV#Religion section - Disputes between historians or scientists and religious_views to weigh in. Thanks largely to the efforts of Xyz7890, a new navbox has come into being featuring Halakha topics. See: Template talk:Halakha to join in the conversation about how it can best be improved. To Do The Simple English Wikipedia is beginning a project of creating and improving articles related to religion, including Judaism. At the present time, volunteers are needed to propose our most important subjects for articles to be created. The official working list is here and a more extended list is here. If you are unsure of proper topics, you might try checking our lists of top importance level articles: Judaism and Jewish History. (WikiProject Kabbalah currently doesn't have such a list) [Simple English] WikiProject Christianity is considering running a monthly drive wherein two or three top importance articles from English Wikipedia are simplified and moved over to S.E. They have extended an offer to work with us in creating a similar project for Judaism related articles. For questions or volunteer opportunities, please contact User:John Carter. WikiProject Kabbalah is in dire need of an article rating system for quality and importance. If you are familiar with that system and have some time on your hands, please create one. It could also use some infoboxes... New Members Judaism: Big maybe, Janirai, Jfdwolff, Joseph.mahal, Joshua Weiss, LisaLiel, Rcjavid, Yehudi, YY, Agent204.15, Gilad73, Joseph.mahal, Noah03 Jewish History: Noah03 Kabbalah: None. Won't you ? New Articles Habib ben Elisha Faturechi (Thanks PhatJew!) There are some 40 odd standing requests for Judaism related articles. Please make them! I would, but I'm too busy writing this. . Quick Links Judaism Portal Kabbalah Portal Articles for Deletion Request for Comment Article Requests WikiProject Judaism Stats 281 Project Members 6155 articles 2342 of which are Stubs 15 of which are Good 8 of which are Featured WikiProject Jewish History Stats 69 Project Members 1124 articles 241 of which are Stubs 10 of which are Good 10 of which are Featured WikiProject Kabbalah Stats 12 Project Members 165 articles 87 of which are Stubs 1 of which is Good 1 of which is Featured

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list.

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 02:32, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eliyak! Looking at the history of this, it looks like you yourself objected to the use of Template:in-universe and attempted to come up with something with better wording. I think the difficulty here is that the in-universe series itself -- just the name of the template, even if its contents were completely changed -- has a history on Wikipedia of referring to and and connoting Fictional universes. The term "in-universe" is explained in WP:WAF in a way that completely contrasts it with the "Real World", which is a bit different from a source whose historical value is simply disputed or contradicted. I would suggest moving completely away from the "in-universe" series of templates. As I explained on the relevant TfD discussions, my belief here is that we shouldn't use any special Bible-specific template, simply one that references the policy problem involved. Even Template:BibleAsFact, which currently has the most support of all the disputed templates, suffers from the problem that at first glance it appears to be equivalent to a claim that the Bible is false. My suggestion here would be that any template should speak in positive language, what to do rather than what is wrong. One could say "Please attribute Biblical narratives to their source" or "Please add additional perspectives", for example, rather than, "Don't present the Bible as fact" etc. This would address the relevant policy issues (attribution and balance) without creating a template that claims or appears to claim that the Bible is false, and without describing it in language that WP:WAF says refers to fiction. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 09:04, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why are the concepts of Kiddush and Chillul Hashem not of Top importance in your mind? Are they of any less importance than the Rambam, the Kosel, Hillel HaZaken, or the Baal Shem Tov? I'd rather not get into an edit war with you, but the concepts of Kiddush and Chillul H' are among the most important in [[Judaism|Yidishkeit]. -- Avi (talk) 23:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When I updated WP:JEW and WP:JH to use assessment templates in the first place, I thought I made those subtle changes, I guess not. Anyway, it's probably better to be in concert with all the other Wikiprojects, so I'll defer on these. Thanks. -- Avi (talk) 05:03, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Judaism Newsletter Issue III -- Av, 5768

WikiProject Judaism (talk/to do) WikiProject Jewish History (talk/to do) WikiProject Kabbalah (talk/to do) "Censorship" of names of G-d There is an interesting discussion currently taking place regarding whether or not it is acceptable to censor (i.e. G-d, HaShem->YodHey) names of G-d in articles to protect Jews who may be reading or editing the article. You can weigh in here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Judaism#Yahweh. Article Cleanup Lists User:B. Wolterding has generously offered us use of his bot to generate lists that show which articles of ours are tagged for cleanup. You can read more about this service here: User:B._Wolterding/Cleanup_listings and if you would like to take him up on his offer, contact him on his talk page. In the News There is a collaboration drive to get Holocaust in Lithuania to good article status. For information about how you can help, see the talk page or contact User:Piotrus. WikiProject Kabbalah's only Featured and Good articles have been removed from the WikiProject, on the grounds that neither article (Diane Keaton and David Beckham, respectively) actually mention the subject's affiliation with Kabbalah. If you have sourced information linking either of these people to Kabbalah, please add it so the articles can be returned to the WikiProject. After a rather heated discussion, there are now two barnstars for use by the Jewish WikiProjects, {{The Jewish Barnstar}} and {{The New Jewish Barnstar}}, and you can choose which one you would like to use.. Remember: barnstars are for rewarding users who are doing good work on the project or on Judaism, Jewish History, or Kabbalah articles, and anyone can give anyone else a barnstar. If you see a user who you thinks deserves a thank you, give them a barnstar! To Do/Help Requests If you have some spare time on your hands, we could use an article about a Kabbalah scholar named Moshe Idel. According to HG there are quite a few sources easily available, you can contact him if you have questions. Be sure to nominate it for DYK if the finished article is eligible. The folks at Shimon Peres need some assistance from someone familiar with both the Hebrew calendar and language to help them figure out the subject's birthday. If you can help, please see Talk:Shimon_Peres#Birthday. New Members Judaism: Arigont, Avi, CheskiChips, Pini00001, Shirulashem, TaliaNadel, Tyciol, yehoshuafriedla Jewish History: 5768altalena, AniMate, User:Yosef.garibaldi.gmail, Pinnecco, Shirulashem, Tyciol Kabbalah: Shuliavrumi New Articles Bezalel Rudinsky (thanks Shirulashem!}, Jewish tartan (thanks Briangotts!), Hebrew spelling (thanks Epson291) We get a lot of articles that are being created and not announced! By announcing new articles, you attract attention to them, and the more people looking and editing the better they will get. If you would like your new article to appear in the newsletter, add it here for Judaism and Kabbalah and here for Jewish History. There are some 40 odd standing requests for Judaism related articles. Please make them! I would, but I'm too busy writing this. . Quick Links Judaism Portal Kabbalah Portal Israel Portal Articles for Deletion Request for Comment Article Requests WikiProject Judaism Stats 291 Project Members 6248 articles 2356 of which are Stubs 18 of which are Good 6 of which are Featured WikiProject Jewish History Stats 77 Project Members 1141 articles 244 of which are Stubs 10 of which are Good 10 of which are Featured WikiProject Kabbalah Stats 13 Project Members 165 articles 87 of which are Stubs 0 of which are Good 0 of which are Featured

This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, barnstars, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique[approves|this|message] 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 21:11, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eliyak: Wikipedia:Etiquette is important, as are as a number of key related Wikipedia expected behaviors and notions, especially if from time to time you nominate articles or categories for deletion. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion#How to list pages for deletion:

While not required, it is generally considered courteous to notify the good-faith creator and any main contributors of the articles that you are nominating for deletion. Also consider notifying WikiProjects listed on the discussion page. Do not notify bot accounts or people who have made only insignificant 'minor' edits. To find the main contributors, look in the page history or talk page of the article and/or use TDS' Article Contribution Counter. For your convenience, you may use {{subst:AFDWarningNew|Article title}} ~~~~ (for creators who are totally new users), {{subst:AFDWarning|Article title}} ~~~~ (for creators), or {{subst:Adw|Article title}} ~~~~ (for contributors or established users). You can determine the main contributors of the articles by entering the page name at Wikipedia Page History Statistics.

A contributor of your caliber should make it a point to abide by this courtesy as a matter of procedure so that editors who are not familiar with Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism or other "Deletion sorting" notifications, can get a chance to be notified right away and fairly ON THEIR OWN USER TALK PAGES that their work is being nominated for deletion. No doubt you would appreciate it and expect it if it was your work that was being nominated for deletion ! ! ! I have notified User Nathan000000 (talk · contribs) [1] that you have nominated his Mardon stub for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mardon by using the {{subst:AFDWarning|Article title}} ~~~~ (for creators) template. Thank you for your attention to this matter. IZAK (talk) 10:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For catching the poor assessment status. They have been reassessed! DRosenbach (Talk | Contribs) 07:59, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ha -- then I misunderstood...in that case, these two really even deserve 'HIGH' and should b downgraded to Mid-level. It's sometimes tough to say, because each project drafts independant criteria.

Well, you deserve the barnstar just as well for your precise contributions to the articles in the Jewish mainspace, as well as the rest. DRosenbach ^{(Talk | Contribs)} 16:33, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish jurists, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 11:12, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice edits! Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 18:44, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear I am being appreciated! --Eliyak T·C 18:50, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what you're referring to, but your changes imply an impermanent color photo before Maxwell's. If there was such, it needs a source. What are you referring to? Dicklyon (talk) 22:09, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you restore so many old discussions with this edit? Stifle (talk) 13:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your recategorisation. They should not be taken out of the top level category, as otherwise there is no way of telling from categories which ones still exist. Cheers, пﮟოьεԻ 57 14:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's certainly the case for Category:Political parties in the United Kingdom, and in my mind is the most sensible way of categorising them - there's no harm in articles being in several different categories, and were it not for the main category, there would be no way of seeing which ones are currently extant. пﮟოьεԻ 57 14:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ekiyak: Thank you for informing me on my talk page about your nomination of Category:Jewish organizations based in Israel for deletion, however, for other editors who may also have an interest, it would have helped to place a notification at both Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel and Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism as well, which I have now done [2] [3] and indicated as such by placing the {{subst:delsort|Israel}}<small>~~~~</small> and {{subst:delsort|Judaism}}<small>~~~~</small> template/s at the CFD page at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 October 6#Category:Jewish organizations based in Israel which I have done as well [4]. Hopefully you agree that when experienced editors nominate anything for deletion they should adhere to the highest standards of notifying not just creators of the articles and categories but also to let a wider spectrum of editors know via the notification pages such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel and Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Judaism. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 09:24, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not need a lecture every time I fail to notify an author or list a discussion. These are courtesies- ones of which I am aware and usually follow. If I do not, I consider it a lapse on my part, but I ask you to refrain from these patronizing messages. --Eliyak T·C 11:15, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. -- I saw that you fixed the base 1/10 number in Non-integer representation, but then undid your correction. Is 8149.126₍₁₀₎ = 6219.418_(.1) correct? I thought it wasn't, and was going to make that change. Algr (talk) 05:35, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I figured it out. The ones place does not cross the decimal point. Algr (talk)

Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years#Category:Years. This seems a repurposing sufficient to require discussion. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eliyak, why was my edit reversed? You haven't given any reason for it http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elijah&diff=247997634&oldid=247973362. Safeguarded (talk) 16:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Grójec County, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Grójec County has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Grójec County, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:40, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your chronological/hierarchical tree for the Mishnah rabbis was marked on Rabbi Hiyya's article as being "confusing", so I made it more clear.

What do you think of the changes? 66.169.200.147 (talk) 06:32, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I don't see that the new version is any better. --Eliyak T·C 11:20, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Talmudsmall.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:30, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ktree32s.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 09:04, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting my failed experiment. Work commitments have meant I have not been able to put the time in that it justified.

However I am puzzled why you have added another category to Category:Railway station openings by year navbox templates [5] as the next stage will be to delete all these templates and the category. --Stewart ^{(talk | edits)} 20:22, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've just updated Template:Manga by decade category header and Template:Anime by decade category header to automatically categorize the transcluded categories into Category:Manga by decade of first release, Category:Anime by decade of first release, Category:Manga by year of first release, and Category:Anime by year of first release in response to your recent work doing so manually (well, using AWB). I was wondering if you could now remove these categories from the manga and anime by year categories, since the template now automatically categorizes them? Thanks in advance! —Dinoguy1000 20:57, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Chicago Barnstar
		I have just noticed your hard work in adding {{Geographic Location}} to the Community areas of Chicago. This was an important and thankless contribution to the project.TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 17:32, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Interest (emotion), which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

I just discovered that nobody ever bothered to inform you of this CFD! Cgingold (talk) 19:45, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's all right - I saw it anyway. --Eliyak T·C 16:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eliyak. You have new messages at Dinoguy1000's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

「ダイノガイ千？！」^{(Dinoguy1000)} 18:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Eliyak: It seems like one or two people keep changing Shalom bayit back to Shlom bayit for grammatical reasons. I would like to open this up to a consensus discussion. Please add your opinion at Talk:Shlom bayit#Requested move. Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 23:37, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Say, I made a new renaming proposal - please have a look. Cgingold (talk) 23:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish American activists, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Cgingold (talk) 13:34, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Return Again, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

The article is very poor and struggles to meet Wikipedia's requirements. Although I'm not an expert I doubt the song has any real notability and would only be interesting to a select group of people.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DotComCairney 20:04, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The requested URL /~jnot4610/bibref.php was not found on this server."

This seems to be your creation: bibleverse-lb and it needs looking into. Or please direct this issue to someone who can take care of this. WurmWoode^T 06:13, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ritual Decalogue had malformed usage of the template, I found the documentation for the parameters, basicly NONE, but figured out how to repair Ritual Decalogue anyway. When I discovered in testing that the site referenced for the verses was no longer available — so I left you the above note. I checked and it works now. Glad you had the time to hunt down the correct site and fix the template. WurmWoode^T 03:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eliyak! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Baruch Gigi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Paskesz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. —ShadowRanger ^(talk|stalk) 22:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Molad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:34, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of Biblical names. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Biblical names. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fur seals and sea lions, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ucucha 22:49, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eliyak: Following a recent request at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism#Outlines on religions for an Outline of Judaism for a series that already included Outline of Islam, Outline of Christianity, Outline of Buddhism, Outline of Hinduism, I then created and filled in Outline of Judaism as best I could. I looked over how some of the other "Outlines" were done, and then I took the Introduction directly from the Judaism article via cut and paste, and I then basically tried to use as many of the templates from Category:Jews and Judaism templates. It's a good start but can use improvement and polishing. Based on your knowledge and expertise could you please review it and improve it. Thanks, IZAK (talk) 15:20, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A TFD has been opened on Template:Religious text primary. The TfD was opened on 2 December; so is due to close in two days time. Notification being sent to all participants in the previous discussion Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2008_July_30#Template:BibleAsFact. Jheald (talk) 23:41, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did a mass deletion of all of the userspace pages that you accidentally created. I'm pretty sure everything went okay with the mass deletion, but wanted to double check. The tool is not really intended for cases like this, but for vandals who create lots of junk articles. Everything deleted was prefixed with User:Eliyak/music/. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:32, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eliyak, It appears that you are responsible for the following sentence in the article about Carl Suphus Lumholtz the Author of "Amongst Cannibals" from 1888

"It should be pointed out that regardless of the title of the book, Queensland Aboriginals were not (and still are not) known to consume human flesh." I do understand and agree with your intention, but I think it is perhaps slightly overdone. Surely I do not think any culture on earthy universalle was in the habit of hunting for human flesh as a source of food. Which is not the same as saying that it never happened, indeed it happened in a murder case in Germany only a few years ago and there are evidence that it happened in China during the cultural revolution where people were starving. Lumholtz overdid this thing to boost the sale of his book.

However, what may be classified as ritual cannibalism, meaning consuming sections of a dead body, either as a mark of respect and grief or to appropriate the spiritual strength of a slain enemy, were widespread, and it its this that was misused to depict Aboriginal people as cannibals hunting for human flesh as a source of food. Yet we need to be careful here we assist no one in depicting contemporary white settler as complete fools. They were prejudiced and also what we have come to call racist (a word from 1930, not used previously) in the extreme, but there are countless reports of people actually eye-witnessing ritual cannibalism and this is where this exaggerated allegation originates.

I do not wish to correct in your sentence, but I would suggest that you reduced it to something like

"Queensland Aborigines were never known to hunt for human flesh as a source of food."

This is a correct sentence and you can then make a link and leave the general issue of cannibalism ritual or otherwise to a specialist article in its own right and someone who know more and are capable of explaining this in a correct, yet also culturally and politically sensitive manner. As it is now I would say you sentence is glaringly wrong and a bit too political correct to be of assistance to anyone. Ritual cannibalism were widespread, but it has been grossly misused to claim genuine cannibalism in a degrading manner, so as to make excuses for genocidal behaviour, dispossessing and murder people of another culture and skin colour.

I had to deal with the subject my self in a study which will later appear as a book - this section in the chapter I call 'THEIR ENEMIES’ STRENGTH ADDED TO THEIR OWN…' This in fact is a quote from James Morrill who had lived for seventeen years with the Bindals near present day Bowen. Morrill always strenuously denied that this tribe or any of their neighbours were ever engaged in eating the flesh of their enemies. Yet he spoke of a frequent practice of dissecting the bodies of slain enemies aimed at conquering and internalising the spiritual powers and to prevent the spiritual resurrection and multiplication of a slain enemy. The Bindals and their neighbours used to, he wrote,

…cut their enemies up in strips, dry them and distribute the pieces through the tribe, by which means they think they have their enemies’ strength added to their own, and that they will be lucky in hunting and fishing.

Morrill who lived seventeen years until 1862 or thereabout amongst others with the very tribe Lumholtz encounted 20th years later, and he was no a racist or classically prejudiced man. Indeed, he left no opportunity to defend his friends and there are evidence to suggest that this kid of thing he described happened in most Qld tribes also that they collected kidney and kidney fat from dead enemies exactly as described by Lumholtz. It was seemingly believed that a man's spiritual mana was connected to kidney's and you will find this mentioned throughout Australia.

Helsned 21 January 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helsned (talk • contribs) 14:14, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Talmudsmall.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:52, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Categories by association, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:50, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Total chalakim has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:12, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mizrahi Jews topics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you.

Category:Objects by topic, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:06, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Objects by status, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:07, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Government and politics images, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Eleassar ^{my talk} 11:09, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Early whales, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ucucha (talk) 21:03, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Geographic Location 2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. TBrandley ^{(what's up)} 02:32, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish communal organizations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:44, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Publications by company, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 15:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the discussion at Talk:National_heritage_site#Requested_move, since it concerns (among other things) a category you created. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:14, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Free, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:25, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leonard Matanky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loyola University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Years by topic, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 09:19, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Culture by location, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 11:47, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Succesion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bazj (talk) 18:40, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2014 October 20#Template:Succesion. Bazj (talk) 08:53, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Australia Wikipedia administration, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 08:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure you saw my revert of you removal of a kosher food category, but I thought I'd drop a note anyways. Categories are helpful for indexing and items in a reasonable way. The argument that "Kosher certification is widespread. By this logic, Coca Cola and Mars_(chocolate_bar) should be included too." is one that suggests valid and registered items are not suitable to be indexed by what they are. I can't think of a reason to not categorize something despite it being a valid entry in said catagory. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish activists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Wlmg (talk) 06:57, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dave Rubin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libertarian Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eliyak. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Religious observances, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 01:13, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kash Jackson has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Category:Years by topic, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:45, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eliyak. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

שלום רב

מה המקור שלך 
גדעון חרלפCharlapg (talk) 10:12, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:40, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Illinois gubernatorial election, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Libertarian Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Eliyak. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish activists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 23:11, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Eliyak! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jefferson, Cleveland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Not the same neighborhood in Cleveland

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cards84664 (talk) 18:39, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Identity, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:09, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kash Jackson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kash Jackson (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:34, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Images of Jewish literature requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:51, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Suicides by occupation has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fram (talk) 14:36, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Images of the Jewish Temples and the Temple Mount requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:38, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Objects has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 21:23, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Objects has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:20, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Geographic Location 2 has been nominated for merging with Template:Adjacent communities. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Frietjes (talk) 15:44, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Alcorn´s Pocket Gopher and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 15#Alcorn´s Pocket Gopher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:14, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Cherrie´s Pocket Gopher and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 15#Cherrie´s Pocket Gopher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish websites has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Longhornsg (talk) 22:11, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jews by occupation has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:15, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 2 § Category:Education by city or town on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 17:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 February 16 § Category:Recreation by city on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Aidan721 (talk) 16:02, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Works by date has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Science fiction genre has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 2 § Science fiction genre until a consensus is reached. TompaDompa (talk) 22:13, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Travelers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:53, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Suicides by occupation has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PARAKANYAA (talk) 17:37, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]