Archives

/archive 1

Re Great North of Scotland Railway, which you (or someone else) listed at WP:TFARP as a possible TFA for 20th September – just to let you know that suggestions can now be made at the TFA requests page for September, so feel free to nominate the article. As I've already spotted your sandbox in a TFA requests category, I think you're probably nearly ready to go! Thanks, Bencherlite^Talk 10:30, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is to inform you that Great North of Scotland Railway, which you nominated at WP:FAC, will appear on the Wikipedia Main Page as Today's Featured Article on 20 September 2014. The proposed main page blurb is here; you may amend if necessary. Please check for dead links and other possible faults before the appearance date. Brianboulton (talk) 21:23, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was busy editing when you added the tag. I will leave it alone now. Thanks for helping. HelenOnline 09:14, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@HelenOnline: No problems, done now. Edgepedia (talk) 09:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 978th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for today's Stockton and Darlington Railway! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Five years ago, you were recipient no. 978 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:58, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Signal boxes that are listed buildings in England, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Great Northern Railway and North Eastern Railway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Signal boxes that are listed buildings in England, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Northern Railway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edgepedia. Thanks again for reviewing my nomination. I responded to all the issues you brought up. Just wondering if you can now either support the nomination or let me know if there is anything else that needs doing. Thanks for your time, I know how long reviews take and I really appreciate it, i'm just getting overly excited about my nomination as this is my first article at FAC and it looks like its getting close to passing this time. :) Freikorp (talk) 14:06, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Edgepedia. Sorry to bring this up again, I can see from your contribution history that you haven't edited much in the last month. Nevertheless it has now been over a month since someone commented on my nomination, and it is more than half way down the 'Older nominations' list. I've long responded to all of your concerns, so I just need you to have a look at my responses/changes to your concerns and let me know if you now support the article or if there are further issues that you need me to address. Freikorp (talk) 09:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Freikorp, I'm back and recovering, but I'll see if I can't take a look this evening. Edgepedia (talk) 18:03, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Composite Beck and 2012 tube map.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:12, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I was doing some work on the six railway viaducts between Fort William and Mallaig, and noticed that you happen to be working on much the same thing, from image usage on Commons. They are the Larichmore Viaduct, Loch nan Uamh Viaduct, Borrodale Viaduct, Arnabol Viaduct, Morar Railway Viaduct, and Glenfinnan Viaduct. Do you have any suggestions or other input? The material available online is fairly scant, but they are certainly more interesting than cookie-cutter concrete bridges, and I was surprised that only Glenfinnan originally had an article. RandomPerson137 (talk) 11:24, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@RandomPerson137: – I'm not as active as I used to be ... I've been writing User:Edgepedia/WHR over a number of months on and off now. It's getting about ready to move into mainspace. I'll look at Thomas over the next couple of days and summarize what he says about Bob's concrete viaducts. Edgepedia (talk) 17:24, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is what I found:

• Thomas pp. 100-101 (Thomas, John (1971). The West Highland Railway. Pan Books. pp. 100–101. ISBN 0-330-02479-5.)

Most built with a standard span of 50 ft, including the one at Arnabol Glen; Glenfinnian uses 21 spans and Loch nan Uamh eight. A 90ft span bridge was needed to cross the river Morar.

The original design at Borrodale Burn had standard arches with piers in the stream, but the landowner insisted that the piers be clad in granite. To save costs the 86-ft high bridge was built with a central span 127 ft 6 in wide and two side spans of 20 ft. In 1899 it was featured in the American Engineering News. A review of concrete bridges by H. Gratton Tyrell published in 1909 showed that in the five years prior to Borrodale bridge only three concrete bridges had been built, all road bridges by Leibrand, whereas 52 were built in the eleven years after Borrodale.

• Thomas also has a little background:

The first part of the line as far as Fort William had been built by Lucas & Aird, but there was delays with the West Highland Railway Malliag Extension (Guarantee) bill in the commons as the Tory and Liberal parties fought over the issue of subsidies for public transport. This Act did pass in 1896, by which time Lucas & Aird (and their workers) had moved south.(Thomas pp. 92-95) New contractors were needed and Robert McAlpine & Sons were taken on with Simpson & Wilson as Engineers. Robert McAlpine & Sons was headed by Robert McAlpine "Concrete Bob"; concrete was used as it was 10 – 30 per cent cheaper than masonry. McAlpine's son Robert, then aged 28, took charge of construction, and his younger son Malcolm was appointed his assistant.(Thomas pp. 95-96)

• Construction dates (from the chronology, Thomas pp. 177-178): 21 January 1897 (First sod) to 1 April 1901 (opened)

• Thomas, John; Turnock, David (1993). The North of Scotland. A Regional History of the Railways of Great Britain Vol. 15 (2nd ed.). Pan Books. p. 278. ISBN 0-330-02479-5. has a little more detail:

The 127ft span of the bridge over the Borrodale Burn is confirmed as the longest in world at the time. Glenfinnian viaduct is 416 yd long on a curve with a radius of 12 chains, maximum height was 100ft.

• They are all listed:

Viaduct	Category	Header text
Larichmore Viaduct	B	Historic Scotland No.292
Loch nan Uamh Viaduct	B	Historic Scotland No.295
Borrodale Viaduct	A	Historic Scotland No.302
Arnabol Viaduct	B	Historic Scotland No.297
Morar Railway Viaduct	B	Historic Scotland No.296
Glenfinnan Viaduct	A	Historic Scotland No.310

These listings frequently quote their sources, which can be useful.

• @RandomPerson137: I've taken a look at the articles and at Loch nan Uamh Viaduct#Horse inside viaduct, I don't think it can be said that the rumour was confirmed; the plaque and website linked says it was corrected. I suggest "There was a local rumour that a horse had fallen inside one of the piers of Glenfinnan viaduct during construction, but in 2001 the remains of a horse was found using radio waves in pier of this viaduct."

• Hope this helps. Edgepedia (talk) 09:42, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is really great and much more than I was expecting! I've created a template for the common history of the viaducts, which will replace the current text that is common to four of them. RandomPerson137 (talk) 10:54, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also added Banavie Railway Swing Bridge, another interesting structure on the line. RandomPerson137 (talk) 15:16, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• @RandomPerson137: User:Edgepedia/WHRLB might be of interest, if you haven't already discovered it. The items in the list are ordered by distance along the line from Mallaig, and I need to add a distance column so you can revert once you've sorted by something. Edgepedia (talk) 07:54, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - there's a very large number of Category A bridges in the Highlands without articles, so I'm working through some of them. RandomPerson137 (talk) 11:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A summary of a Featured Article you nominated at WP:FAC will appear on the Main Page soon. It mostly follows the lead section; how does it look? - Dank (push to talk) 20:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dank, it looks good. As you probably noticed, I really have not been around recently. I attempted to update the article (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stockton_and_Darlington_Railway&type=revision&diff=680641684&oldid=680573239), can you please check I haven't done anything silly. Thanks again. Edgepedia (talk) 06:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The changes to the article text in that diff look fine (I generally only check text, not references). - Dank (push to talk) 10:48, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why do we have both {{British Railmotors}} and {{British steam railcar}}? You seem to have created both in September 2012, a few days apart. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Redrose, long time since I was here! They do look like only one will done. I remember calling the work I was doing British Railmotors, and then I decided that I was really working on British Steam Railcars after this discussion. I should have proposed the first for deletion (3 years ago!). Hope this makes sense. Edgepedia (talk) 17:17, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thing is, recent activity by Peter Horn (talk · contribs) means that several articles now have both where previously they had just one. I think the thing to do is for you to undo Peter Horn's recent edits, and then for you to add the {{db-author}} tag one of the templates. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:53, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merge the two as they are not identical or keep the one that has the most links. Peter Horn User talk 18:38, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Angola Horror—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Tim1965 (talk) 03:38, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Six years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:42, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]