I see nobody's given you the welcoming speech yet. *Ahem.*

Hello Daibhid, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page or how to format them visit our manual of style. Experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump.

(And no, I can't remember offhand which author bio you nicked that joke from, either.)

--Paul A 04:30, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)

I'm not entirely happy about Image:Amcoa.jpg. I have a feeling that it is against Wikipedia policy to use images whose terms of permission exclude third-party use. --Paul A 09:15, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Only if that restricts others. It's routine in publishing to seek permission, even very limited permission, when it's not really needed. That provides protection against a time and money wasting legal case. It's a prudent step for many uploaders and is likely to be required much of the time when non-US people use items which qualify for fair use in the US. Sometimes US people assume incorrectly that having a license that's restrictive restricts the right to fair use, which isn't the case. Even in the US for fair use materials, it's just a cheap way for the uploader to get legal protection. Jamesday 08:12, 13 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved a couple of your Red Dwarf pages to more sensible places. I hope you don't mind. --Moochocoogle 18:36, 2 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Not at all. That's how Wikipedia works, after all, and you're right- the new headings are more sensible. --Daibhid C

Very much thanks is very much required for me to give to you. My List of Fictional Witches was a bit...empty. Being that it was my first page, it required all the help it could recieve. User:capitolZ

On Scots language you added: "although the Scottish Parliament makes legislation available in Scots, as well as English and Gaelic."

Apart from a leaflet and a report to the Education and sports comitte I am not aware of any Legislation avaible in Scots. Do you have any sources for this information?

Is Scots really an official language in Scotland? Any sources?

To answer your second question first, one source was Wikipedia itself, which lists it as such on the Scotland page. The Scottish Parliament seems to give it the same status as Gaelic, which is considered an official language. On the other hand, it's not on any street signs, and I don't believe the language bill specifically gives it that status; but then, the same could be said for Gaelic.

I dunno. I've deleted that bit until I've got more info.

As for the legislation, well I was having difficulty navigating the Parliament site and took someone's word for it. I've changed it to something I actually know for a fact, namely that the website itself offers Scots as a language option. I should have known better, and apologise.

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (| talk)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Discworld

Spam message: Having noticed you have made some great additions to the Discworld articles I thought you might be interested in this new WikiProject. It's at a very early stage and needs quite a bit of work. violet/riga (t) 21:45, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)

In the list of fictional post codes you put "FX - Fairfax". Could I ask you to tell me the source of this information? You'll have to reply here as I'm an anon. Thanks, --JS.

I'd forgotten about that. I'm afraid I cannot recall or find the source of the information, although I do recall I stumbled across it while double-checking AM for Ambridge. I'll remove it until I can get more info. Daibhid

I noticed that you have made several Shannara edits, and would like to know if you would like to join WikiProject Shannara, a WikiProject devoted to creating and improving Shannara-related articles. Thanks, Alex Nisnevich (talk) (02:38, 13 August 2005 (UTC)).[reply]

Hi! I noticed you editing some Doctor Who articles today. and thought that I would let you know that you can join a project devoted to editing the various articles related to the Doctor. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page (click "Jelly Baby?" in my signature), or on the Wikiproject talk page. Thanks!--Sean Jelly Baby? 18:59, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading the image, relating to Discworld's Stealth Chess. However, I would like to ask you to use an appropriate copyright tag so that its copyright status can be known. (Images with missing copyright status are not permitted on Wikipedia.) You have made the image yourself using other images on Wikipedia, so the most obvious choice is {{GFDL-self}}, indicating that you submit the image on Wikipedia under the terms of GFDL license.

Regards, Mike Rosoft 23:18, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The List of fictional Elvis impersonators is currently nominated for deletion. As a previous editor on that article, your opinion in this matter is valued. -Litefantastic 20:12, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear as though there are certain "editors" who wish to remove the lesser known literary punk genres, not only is this a blatant witch hunt which emerged from my argument on the Dark City talk page that the movie is a relveant component in reference to the dieselpunk genre, but also extremely vindictive against myself and those who have helped in categorising and adding content to the literay punk genres. For further info: Talk page here Piecraft 17:28, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a source for the non discworld portion of this article. Thanx.TheRingess 00:41, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Daibhid 14:23, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind words. Some people seem to resent me cleaning up their edits, and I'm glad you don't. It seems a trifle immodest and bad form to choose your own barnstar, but in this case since you ask, given the two, I think that the Diligence one seems more appropriate... --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 22:36, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. I'll wear it with pride. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 23:32, 26 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

stop removing my edit on the name thaum please.

I've not been; it's being reverted to the last edit before yours, which happens to have been mine. Daibhid C 15:01, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daibhid. I just wanted to let you know that I've recently created a Wikipedia account, thus breaking my habit of editing articles anonymously. Feel free to visit. You know me better as 8'FED. Zerrakhi 09:35, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user once bought an apple.

This user's favourite colour is Octarine.

Daibh, here are some ideas of mine. I haven't made them into templates but if there's a demand for them I might. What do you think? Zerrakhi 05:46, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

!!NEW!! I've created an "improved" version of the octarine userbox, using elipses for the link. That way the link is there, but it doesn't make the word "octarine" unreadable. Check it out at User:Zerrakhi/details and please tell me what you think. Zerrakhi 05:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright mate (and your awkward nameing system). I noticed you added some stuff from that porridgr mockumentary they did recently. I've not seen it but I found you edits interesting. I was wondering if there was any mention of Barrowclough or Mackay (obviously Fulton whatsisname is dead and Wilde hasn't been on TV in years, but they still mentioned Godber). Any interesting information from that episode and the characters lives after the series would be greatly appreciated, even if you just tell me about it on me talk page rather than add it to the article. I assure you I am not a twat.--Crestville 18:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Daibhid, thanks for the heads-up on the "Indian Superheroes". I will add your links and remove the "seven" comment. I just added the whole thing as trivia because "Krrish" was several times praised as the "first Indian Superhero", which is just not true. --Plumcouch 23:19, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I created a new userbox today - this one's about phonetics. It's on my userpage.
• User Alnaschar suggested to me recently that the real life personality of Biddy Early resembles Nanny Ogg.

Zerrakhi 14:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've been waiting for somebody to say "Hang on, what about Playback?" so long that I'd resigned myself to thinking that it was never going to happen...  :) --Paul A 06:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for starting the Armitage article. If you are interested in doing anything else in the same area we have a 2000 AD to do list. Happy editting ;) (Emperor 19:36, 12 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

List of fictional books has been nominated for deletion. If you think it deserves to stay, please visit Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_fictional_books and leave your opinion! --Bookgrrl 03:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article List of fictional characters who lack bravery, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:List of fictional characters who lack bravery. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. VegaDark 11:21, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hogfather-movie.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 17:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome job on the Spider-Ham references. That was quite an undertaking. Well done. Doczilla 22:35, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed you recently made a contribution or regularly contribute to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. I recently nominated it as the Wikipedia:Improvement Drive. I feel that it needs urgent improvement, and if you agree please vote at the Improvement Drive project page. Thanks! Thedreamdied 02:09, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clockpunk, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Clockpunk satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clockpunk (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Clockpunk during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Eyrian 17:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

I thought you deserved an explanation as to my spate of undiscussed mergers throughout Wikipedia's Discworld domain. The simplest answer is that I did it to save those articles from deletion. I edit a number of fantasy-related Wikipedia topics (Harry Potter in particular) and have seen those topics shredded by angry Wikipedians determined to eliminate anything they see as irrelevant (in their terms, "irrelevant" means, "a work of fantasy fiction I don't like or haven't heard of"). Largely due to the fact that so few people edit it, the Discworld domain on Wikipedia has remained relatively unscathed (though the Minor Discworld concepts article has faced one deletion attempt, and may face another); however, as the Cruft-Warriors forces grow, it is only a matter of time before the two of us are forced to fight back their advances. What mainly draw their claws are relatively obscure articles relating to a fantasy fiction universe, such as descriptions of the Archchancellor or Parasite universes. The best way to protect these articles is to merge them together into topics which also include less obscure elements, such as the Unseen University or Death's Domain. As Vetinari says, alloys are stronger, and the more we can keep topics linked together, the less likely they are to be destroyed. That is no guarantee that they will be safe, and there have already been some fairly ludicrous attempts at deletion for Discworld topics, but things are looking up at present. As to why I haven't discussed the mergers, well, since the two of us are the only editors who regularly tackle Discworld, it seemed I would only be discussing the matter with you, and I didn't really want to chance that you might go off on a month's holiday. Serendi^podous 19:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Thundlight1.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Duck Dodgers.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found your edits to Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart, and just have to satisfy my curiosity. Given what I read in the linked-in article via the name Alistair Stuart, I must ask why you went to the trouble to drop the final "e" from the visible text in the Brig's article? I repeat, I'm curious, not challenging. Ted Watson (talk) 21:25, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

can i say thanks for the additional info that you included in the Eastgate extension, which i am very grateful for, since i was struggling to find info for the article to contain. if you don't mind, i moved the mention of the noah's ark into the introduction since i felt it didn't fit in with the construction of the shopping centre.

although i do not come from Inverness (the lang toun is my home or better put it "offically Scotland's largest town without a cinema since 2000"), i have been a visitor to the city and the shopping centre so i have actually seen this place for real. i have to say, it's one of Scotland's most impressive places ranking alongside Perth and Stirling. Kilnburn (talk) 19:39, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Confermo ciò che aveva scritto nella pagina di discussione nell' aprile 2006. Egbert B. Gebstadter è autore anche di Ambifoni: un minimondo ottimo per lo studio della scopertività. Sono italiano e mi scuso per non aver risposto in inglese. Spero che la pagina di E.B.G. possa essere ampliata. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.30.221.80 (talk) 14:23, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!  :)

As someone who's worked on D&D and/or RPG articles before, I'm inviting you to participate in our goal to both improve articles that have been selected to be placed in the next Wikipedia DVD release, as well as nominate more to be selected for this project. Please see the WikiProject D&D talk page for more details. :) BOZ (talk) 02:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Leonard of Quirm, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonard of Quirm. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 23:13, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Lu-Tze, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lu-Tze. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 23:14, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Aziraphale, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aziraphale. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Cirt (talk) 00:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Anthony Crowley, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Crowley. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Cirt (talk) 00:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Spider-Man, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) BOZ (talk) 01:32, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Hill Valley (Back to the Future). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hill Valley (Back to the Future). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:26, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There's a new AfD nomination for an article you've previously discussed. Please stop by to voice your opinions again. CzechOut ☎ | ✍ 11:54, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Unseen University. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unseen University. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Minor Discworld concepts. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minor Discworld concepts (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:17, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Daibhid C! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Adam McNaughton - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Andy Gray (actor) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Michael Holt (author) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Timeline of fictional future events. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of fictional future events. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Unseen University. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unseen University (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of fictional television shows. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional television shows (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Power Cable, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power Cable. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Erpert (let's talk about it) 02:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed you were the last one to edit the Anna Fortune page, and you added some great info! I was the one who created the page, and I also created the Jeremy Karne, Mister America (Jeffrey Graves), and King Chimera pages and I still currently edit and work on them. I won't have to edit Jeremy's for now, since his comic run just started its break, but I still have to keep up with Justice Society of America and JSA All-Stars for Mr. America and King, let alone Anna Fortune.

To get across what I'm asking, is that would you mind taking over the Anna Fortune page? I've been trying to keep all four of the pages updated as soon as another issue of the series they appear in comes out. But since I'm pretty much the main editor for them and have to do most of the work, and when I saw you edit the Anna page, I thought maybe you could write for it when each issue of All-Stars comes out and keep her page updated with what she's been doing. And because I would rather focus on King and Mr. America instead of Anna. So please let me know what you think. Mfowler (talk) 11:14, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thank you very much! Don't feel rushed to go and quickly edit the page as soon as you get an issue, just try to keep it updated whenever you can. I will try to help out still, as well. Thanks! Mfowler (talk) 11:47, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:27, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Appelaxian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The fictional race does not meet the general notability guideline and, without reception and significance in reliable secondary sources independent of the subject, the topic of the article is not suitable for Wikipedia as a stand-alone article since it falls into WP:IINFO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jfgslo (talk) 04:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Slientknight.PNG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:29, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Adam McNaughtan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Undersourced biography, factual errors unaddressed for ages due to lack of independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy (Help!) 22:22, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Blackbury‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 20:42, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Time vortex (Doctor Who) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time vortex (Doctor Who) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 17:47, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Undead (Discworld) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Undead (Discworld) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 17:20, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Valda the Iron Maiden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional character

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 21:39, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Workforce (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fictional topic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 21:44, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article History Monks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History Monks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 11:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Robinson Heath has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG/WP:PLOT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:01, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Appellaxian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appellaxian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 01:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Micro Lad has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 01:14, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Extremists (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 12:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Middle-earth calendar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle-earth calendar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:12, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Elves (Discworld) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of this fictional race passing WP:NFICTION/GNG. Appear only in 2-3 novels. BEFORE fails to find any in-depth discussion of this race in any work. This article is pure WP:PLOT and BEFORE shows only few passing mentions that are also pure plot.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:16, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dwarfs (Discworld) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwarfs (Discworld) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:37, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Troll (Discworld) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troll (Discworld) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:28, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Intergang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Champions of Angor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTPLOT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 12:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Intergang is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Intergang until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:27, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sorcerer's World. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 12#Sorcerer's World until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:37, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Yancy Street Gang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:30, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Cheery Littlebottom has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 1 § Cheery Littlebottom until a consensus is reached. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:54, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lori Morning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. We can also consider redirecting this to List of DC Comics characters: L instead of deleting per WP:SOFTDELETE. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:25, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S.T.A.R. Labs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S.T.A.R. Labs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:42, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Project Cadmus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Cadmus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:23, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Death's Domain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Death's Domain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 11:21, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mitch Benn's Crimes Against Music has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable radio show; lacks any significant coverage in independent reliable sources, failing WP:GNG. Only refs found in Google are mere mentions or are BBC links, which is not independent of subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:01, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]