Thanks, and the same to you. :-) A bit late, yes. :P DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 14:25, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i got on wikipidia today like i do everyday during school to read current news and such but i got on today to see that i was report for editing a page on singing by you when ive never even viewed a page on singing nor have i ever tried to edit and article why is this? - (not gonna leave my name for school reasons) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.140.187.167 (talk) 14:40, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you were not logged in, then somebody else in the school made the edit - schools generally don't have dedicated IPs for each computer. If you were logged in, then your account may have been compromised and I would recommend changing your password on it and confirming that the email on it is yours if you can still access it. dmz 00:32, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong, I never wen't near that page!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.109.47.62 (talk) 13:23, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I seem to have the same problem as the above gentlemen. I didn't do the vandalizing edit you ticked me off for. I've never worked on the Woonona article. Maybe my IP got mixed up with someone else's. 110.33.209.84 (talk) 07:33, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(AKA) User_talk:Sardaka

Hey DS2... as you can see I've expanded my WP plate per se with reviewer and helping out at ABU. How are things going for you? - Rich(MTCD)^{Talk Page} 00:29, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've been on a long vacation for some time, and will be until the next summer, unfortunately. :( As you see, I'm a student, and doing some work for a while too, to get some extra cash. ;) As my userpage says, I still edit sometimes, when I have enough free time, but won't be such an active everyday editor as I was last year. I'm technically always on IRC, using a shell account, but otherwise my presence on IRC or in Wikipedia will be quite rare... Anyway, nice to see you have progressed and gained some rights. :-) DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 10:10, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see, don't worry :) Rich(MTCD)^{Talk Page} 13:20, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have participated in WP:AFD disucssions involving semi-pro football teams in the past. The following two AFD discussions could use additional weigh-in as they appear to be stuck in "relisting" mode:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seaboard Football League
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northeastern Football Alliance

I am placing this notice on talk pages of users who have shown interest in the past, regardless of how they !voted in the discussion. If you do participate, please mention that you were asked to participate in the discussion.--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:06, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had a look now, and voted. The other one seems to be already closed, sorry I didn't reply in time. As my userpage says, I'm pretty busy nowdays, and thus will not be checking my talk page every day. However, I can be reached via IRC faster, if quick reply is needed in future. :-) DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 19:13, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DS2. Lowercase 'i'? That's what the Finnish wikipedia calls it.--Shirt58 (talk) 09:20, 20 February 2011 (UTC) ps: Räyh![reply]

Cancel that! --Shirt58 (talk) 09:21, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On some pages here in the English Wikipedia, it was linked as Elegance In Black, with upper case 'I'. Also, if you google it, you get many results with uppercase as well as lowercase. And this is not the Finnish Wikipedia, they don't essentially need to be the same. I'm anyway a little unsure which one to use, as I've seen both versions being used regularly. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 09:29, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I saw that when I Googled it too. No problem. Thanks for the quick reply! On the subject of Finnish metal, for a chuckle you might want to check out Hevisaurus.--Shirt58 (talk) 09:45, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, interesting. :D And I think I'll let Elegance In Black the way it is now, as it seems unclear how it should officially be. May someone else change in the future if necessary. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 09:49, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reverting the hate vandalism on my user page. Joe Jarvis (talk) 23:08, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, always happy to revert vandalism. :) DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 18:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just received a message when accessing Wikipedia home page:

"User talk:90.207.111.178

The recent edit that you made to the page Give it a Name has been reverted, as it appears to be :unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was :constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read :the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 12:50, 11 :September 2010 (UTC)"

I didn't even know the Give it a name article existed. Someone playing around methinks.

Jennifer Hynes —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.207.111.178 (talk) 19:54, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An unconstructive edit from your IP has indeed been done (this one), but it's propably dynamic IP or something, and thus you got the message even though you didn't do anything. Someone else had your IP earlier, and done that edit, so it's of course not your fault. :) DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have just received this:

Hi, Klein, would you mind if you discuss at WP:DRV? There is a deletion review of Wikipedia:WikiProject Conceptual Jungle listed at WP:DRV that you vote delete at WP:MFD. Please join the discussion here. Thank for your time, regards, JJ98 (Talk) 22:28, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps he forgot to tell you? Regards. --Kleinzach 02:01, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, commented. Sorry for the delay, I'm too busy with real life today. :P DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 12:59, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Institute of Business Administration, University of Dhaka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
• Esha795 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Hi Darth/Need yur opinion

Institute of Business Administration is a business school under University of Dhaka. Recently the school made big headlines in Bangladesh, as a professor was charged with terrorism charges for founding the organization Hizb ut Tahrir and was reported to have played a major role in BDR mutiny.International news agencies like BBC carried news on the professor and the organization and although it was banned by the government, the professor discharged zihadi leaflets among students in almost all universities in Bangladesh.BBC also reported it was having a major influence on the student community of Bangladesh.

As University of Bristol and DePauw university had major controversies and these controversies were not only added to their main wikipage but also had a separate wikipage just on the controversy.So to maintain neutral point of view of the article which has many unreferenced sentences and opinions i added this page .However one wiki user maintains COI and repeatedly deletes the section i have added .

The user in trying to defend the institution and not maintaining a NOPV has told "Why don't i add a rape incident in NSU's wikipage which in this case is a competing institute of IBA" Also since the professor and his organization had negative influence on the students and was with IBA although the Govt banned the organization is a bone of contention. The user Esha795 is not able to fully justify his stand on this and deletes even the "request"

which i added so that fellow wikiusers can give a neutral opinion on the topic.

Can you please advise on this and do the needful? Thanks Dualumni (talk) 18:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DARTH SIDIOUS you gave me a level 1 warning on editing some page called Mathematics: Proportionality. I have never visited that page and I have never tried editing that page. This is unacceptable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.155.128 (talk) 09:36, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't actually give you a warning. Most propably someone else had that IP of yours in use previously, whom I then warned, and now you got the message. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 12:47, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i would like to say sorry for my foolish changings of random things i now realise that i was stupid and shouldnt have said that rhinos bombed the lemurs etc and when you fixed it i said you were lame ,i think, and now i shall only edit if it is needed Lopulu (talk) 19:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello DARTH SIDIOUS 2! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Could you take a look at the disambiguation page for Stump, please. I wonder if this info really is valid: "(Stump) Clan: A cult or clan of people who honor and respect stumps and when called upon by another stump slams their fist in a ball and hits it against their forehead." --Eva Ekeblad (talk) 16:37, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FWiW Bzuk (talk) 12:25, 25 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks... a bit late. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 18:43, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for the recent vandalism performed on my behalf. Someone appears to have access to my network who shouldn't--perhaps there is a trojan on one of the computers in my house. I am investigating now. Thank you for catching this vandalism! 173.48.132.28 (talk) 00:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I didn't notice the date. I guess my IP address changed just now, and I "inherited" a bad edit. I just assumed it was recent because I had been browsing Wikipedia and didn't have any messages previously. 173.48.132.28 (talk) 00:11, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DS, I want to delete some revision history edits or lock view history page, is this possible? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fastweb13 (talk • contribs) 19:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can assure you that I did not vandalize the North Shore Country Day School page. I am a long-time faculty member there, and the edit I made over 4 months ago was factual, based on personal observation, and relevant. Please refrain from spurious accusations in the future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.161.8.105 (talk) 16:09, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adeptzare3 (talk) 05:46, 24 November 2013 (UTC) DarthSidous not only stole your username,but vandalized Jeremy with"I am Jeremy and I am the ruler of the universe so u must neel infront me." . HE MUST BE BLOCKED!!!!![reply]

hi I just want to say that I am a big fan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.239.200.73 (talk) 20:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elegance in Black is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elegance in Black until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Artem.G (talk) 18:54, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]