I have given all necessary and possible information about this image (and others) from a 75 year old Film star magazine from a long defunct title. It had photos and very short biographies. No other information. Even the bots on this site are wreckers.(Cyberia3 (talk) 18:26, 3 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Unite Against Fascism for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. — Richard BB 10:03, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

— Richard BB 10:56, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What talkback? You are an editor and anyone who disagrees with you is automatically wrong, your highness.(Cyberia3 (talk) 19:18, 2 June 2015 (UTC))[reply]

I see that you have decided to return to editing. As has been explained and requested of you before please ensure you include reliable sources when adding content to articles. The additions you made to June Whitfield were not supported by citations and appear to be your own knowledge/research. These basic policies have not changed in the one year break you took from editing. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 17:28, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I gave up before because of the sheer vandalism of the moderator wreckers here who seem to hate the wikipedia. In the article I added to, I gave the title of the BBC radio programme I used for the information, which came from June Whitfield's own mouth. But you have removed it all proving once again that you are a wrecker.

"These basic policies have not changed in the one year break you took from editing." You mean you are still wrecking articles? I can see that for myself. I do not need a wrecker to boast about it.

Maybe you should stick to Japanese cartoons?(Cyberia3 (talk) 15:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

"I saw it on a radio program" is original research. It would certainly be helpful if you would actually read the links that have been provided to you repeatedly so that you could start to understand why you keep having the same issues regarding your edits being reverted. There are no "moderator wreckers", just admins who are vetted and trusted by the editing community to uphold the policies and guidelines that have been determined by consensus. If you do not agree with the community's consensus then start a discussion on the relevant policy or guidelines page to see if there is support to change it. Ignoring the requirements for editing here won't bring about the changes you desire and will ultimately lead to your account being blocked.--Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 19:46, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I HEARD Molly Weir, actress and writer talking on an episode of "It's a funny business" yesterday but did not bother adding to her page to save you wrecking it and the reference I gave as you did with June Whitfield. My account being blocked? I can add as a guest or even start a new account. The hard disk is ready to fail on this laptop so taking an IP address would be almost as useless as your moderating, fish girl.(Cyberia3 (talk) 07:01, 26 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

— Richard BB 15:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Hope not Hate, you may be blocked from editing. — Richard BB 16:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You mean I should just let you and other moderators wreck my work and say nothing about it. Sorry God for daring to question your infalibility (Cyberia3 (talk) 06:57, 26 June 2013 (UTC))[reply]

As I've explained countless times, you should use the talk page of an article to discuss changes to the article itself, not to discuss its subject as you did at Hope not Hate. — Richard BB 07:31, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Hope not Hate, you may be blocked from editing. — Richard BB 13:09, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Hope not Hate, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Richard BB 15:03, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop readding the material about the EDL member's suicide to the article. It is not notable, it is unsourced, and it clearly pushing a very pro-EDL and anti-HNH viewpoint. It isn't appropriate for Wikipedia. If you continue I'll have no choice but to take this to WP:AN/I. — Richard BB 15:07, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It was never ignored. About four other editors all addressed your points and proved that your claims are baseless, and yet you are the one ignoring the discussion. — Richard BB 17:00, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I am not a fan of the hate group, HNH as you obviously are as you use your position to push your own agenda here. "About four other editors"? How can you be so imprecise? You sound like you are trying to back up your personal biases with hand waving.(Cyberia3 (talk) 19:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC))[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Clive Brook.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Frisco Jenny.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:27, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Mack Brown.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Phantom of the West.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:57, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Miracle Man.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I get the pop up asking for donations and I would normally donate quite regularly to such a cause but not this. I have had too many articles I have spent a lot of time writing and posted here just casually and without warning deleted by people without a clue (eg: Space Kingley and Neufchatel-en-Bray to name two, as well as many old time film stars). I add bits now and then but will no longer waste time writing articles for uneducated and biased people to remove for the most vacuous reasons.(Cyberia3 (talk) 19:16, 2 June 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Marion Byron.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:27, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jack Buchanan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:27, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Frankie Darro.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:10, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sydney Fairbrother1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 15:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sadie Thompson1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:King John 1899.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While this image is actually public domain (the non-free tagging is incorrect), a better version of it with correct licensing information is now available on Commons.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Xover (talk) 06:34, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Irene Franklin1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. We hope (talk) 02:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC) We hope (talk) 02:23, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:E E Clive.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Esther Dale.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Claudia Dell.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Henry Gordon1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Henrietta Crosman.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Norman Foster1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Steve Geray1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:24, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Dudley Digges.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Steffi Duna1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Skeets Gallagher1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Stepin Fetchit1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Huntley Gordon1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:Lucille Gleason1.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Ketti Gallian1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Ferdinand Gottschalk1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Margot Grahame1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Ronald Shiner-2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Emma Dunn.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Bobby Breen.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low quality image. There are freely licensed, higher quality images of Breen at a comparable age, such as File:Let's_Sing_Again_(1936)_still_1.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:23, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Maude Eburne.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Edith Fellowes1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Felix Aylmer.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:02, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marguerite Churchill.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wolf Dog.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. DemonDays64 (talk) 08:55, 22 November 2020 (UTC) DemonDays64 (talk) 08:55, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Behemoth (2011 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable television film, does not meet WP:NF and WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage by independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 10:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dino Galvani1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC) Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Frances Day.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Peter Gawthorne1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:53, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Golden Hind 1581.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 November 18#Files from Who's Who on the Screen 1932/1938 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

• File:Albert Conti.jpg
• File:Alexander Field1.jpg
• File:Alf Goddard1.jpg
• File:Alfred Drayton.jpg
• File:Annie Esmond1.jpg
• File:Buddy Ebsen1.jpg
• File:Carol Goodner1.jpg
• File:Charles Farrell1.jpg
• File:Claude Gillingwater1.jpg
• File:Derrick de Marney.jpg
• File:Donald Gray1.jpg
• File:Emery Gilbert.jpg
• File:Finlay Currie.jpg
• File:Frances Dade.jpg
• File:Fred Conyngham.jpg
• File:Gene Gerrard1.jpg
• File:George Cooper (actor, born 1892).jpg
• File:George Ernest1.jpg
• File:Hal Gordon1.jpg
• File:James Ellison.jpg
• File:Jean Dixon.jpg
• File:Jimmy Godden1.jpg
• File:John Garrick1.jpg
• File:Kathleen Gibson1.jpg
• File:Kathryn Crawford.jpg
• File:Leif Erikson1.jpg
• File:Leonora Corbett.jpg
• File:Leslie Fenton1.jpg
• File:Mark Daly.jpg
• File:Mary Glynne1.jpg
• File:Muriel George1.jpg
• File:Nigel de Brulier.jpg
• File:Owen Davis Jr.jpg
• File:Paul Guilfoyle1.jpg
• File:Ralph Forbes1.jpg
• File:Renee Gadd1.jpg
• File:Richard Cooper.jpg
• File:Robert Douglas the actor.jpg
• File:Robert English1.jpg
• File:Sally Gray1.jpg
• File:Stanley Fields1.jpg
• File:Sybil Grove1.jpg
• File:Syd Crossley.jpg
• File:Tamara Desni.jpg
• File:Tom Dugan.jpg
• File:Will Fyffe1.jpg
• File:William B Davidson.jpg
• File:William Collier Snr.jpg
• File:Willie Fung1.jpg

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:51, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Norah Baring.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Berton Churchill.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:17, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vince Barnett.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

The file File:Life of Riley.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:DECORATIVE non-free use in The Life of Riley#Jackie Gleason which fails WP:NFCC#8. The screenshot itself isn't the subject of sourced critical commentary anywhere in the article and there's otherwise nothing in the article that requires readers to see this particular screenshot to understand; so, there's really no justification for its non-free use per WP:NFC#CS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:42, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Point (film), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Point (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:World Moves On.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 21:45, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wilson Coleman.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 21:47, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 September 20 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

• File:Dave Burnaby.jpg
• File:Wendy Barrie.jpg
• File:Richard Carle.jpg
• File:Phyllis Barry (actress).jpg
• File:John Boles.jpg
• File:D A Clarke Smith.jpg
• File:Wade Boteler.jpg
• File:Chili Bouchier.jpg
• File:Robert Barrat.jpg
• File:Ben Alexander.jpg
• File:Max Adrian.jpg

Thank you.

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Cats Paw.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 10:07, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Andre Beranger.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1938. See past deletion requests, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 14:19, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dorothy Boyd.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 22:13, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Claud Allister.jpg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:Delma Byron.jpg
• File:Diana Churchill.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Edmund Breon.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1938. See past deletion requests, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 13:45, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Edward Brophy.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1938. See past deletion requests, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 13:46, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:George Barbier.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1938. See past deletion requests, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 14:38, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Good Night Vienna.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 13:53, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Harry Beresford.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1938. See past deletion requests, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 14:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Helen Broderick.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1938. See past deletion requests, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 14:02, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:James Carew.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1938. See past deletion requests, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 16:59, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:John Clements.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1938. See past deletion requests, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 09:58, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Lionel Belmore.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1938. See past deletion requests, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 11:04, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Mary Brough.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1932. See past deletion requests for similar publications, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 11:17, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Nana Bryant.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1938. See past deletion requests, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 12:31, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Olive Blakeney.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1938. See past deletion requests for similar publications, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 19:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Olympe Bradna.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1938. See past deletion requests, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 19:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Paul Cavanagh.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1938. See past deletion requests, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 19:10, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Private Life Don Juan.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image that is very likely still to be copyrighted in the US until 95 years after its publication in 1934-5. See past deletion requests on similar publications, the latest at Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Felix QW (talk) 19:59, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert C Benchley.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Felix QW (talk) 20:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Arsene Lupin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Roscoe Ates.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused photo that currently has an USA copyright. Per Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom, this 1933 anonymous work in the UK had the copyright restored in the USA during 1996. This photo did not become PD in the UK until 2004. The US copyright will remain until 2029.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 18:57, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:William Bakewell 1938.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg, this 1938 anonymous work became PD in the UK during 2009. This copyright was restored in the USA during 1996. The US copyright will remain until 2034.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:10, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Thomas Beck.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg, this unused anonymous photo became PD in the UK during 2009. This is after the US copyright restoration of 1996, making it PD in the US during 2034.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:20, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Tullio Carminati1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This unused anonymous photo was published in the UK during 1938. Per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2023_September_20#File:Dave_Burnaby.jpg , this photo didnt become PD in the UK until 2009. This photo had its copyright restored in the USA during 1996 and will remain in copyright until 2034.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:23, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Tower 16C.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 14:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]