Hello, CurtisNaito, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Dismas|^(talk) 05:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are involved in a recently-filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Catflap08 and Hijiri88 and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 00:17, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A case-amendment request in which you were involved has been archived at WT:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88. For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 14:04, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is unbelievably unacceptable, and exactly the kind of thing that you were blocked for before. The next step is ANI—and given it's a repeat offense, it'll likely be a very long block. Get consensus on the talk page, period, and no games. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 05:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My point was that you should have just tagged the portion of the article that you are concerned about, not the entire article. When you tagged the article, you didn't even say anything on the talk page to indicate your reasons. Therefore, it's quite unclear which section you want altered. Just tagging the whole article without giving any reason is not particularly useful, especially since the large majority of the article's content is not new and not the subject of any talk page dispute.CurtisNaito (talk) 13:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't put the tags there and you know it, so stop this play-acting. Bottom line: Hands off until you get consensus, and consensus does not mean you and TH1980. Curly Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 13:59, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The tags were placed there a year ago and refer to disputes that are long since over. If a new neutrality dispute were to appear then you could put the tags back, but even then I still think you should put the tags only over the part of the article that is in dispute. The point of tags is to aid improving the article, but if you just tag it without giving a single reason, it does not serve any useful purpose. You shouldn't put the tags back unless you plan on initiating some dialogue to explain yourself.CurtisNaito (talk) 14:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pursuant to consensus at this ANI thread, this is formal notice that you are indefinitely topic banned from articles relating to Japan, broadly construed. Katie^talk 13:08, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CurtisNaito. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Japan Echo Web logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Train2104 (t • c) 00:08, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An amendment request, requesting suspension of Remedy 3 of Catflap08 and Hijiri88 case has been archived at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Catflap08 and Hijiri88. The case has been amended as following:

Remedy 3 (Hijiri88: Topic ban (I)) of the Catflap08 and Hijiri88 arbitration case is suspended for a period of six months. During the period of suspension, this restriction may be reinstated by any uninvolved administrator, as an arbitration enforcement action, should Hijiri88 fail to adhere to any normal editorial process or expectations in the area defined in the topic ban remedy. After six months from the date this motion is enacted, if the restriction has not been reinstated or any reinstatements have been successfully appealed to the Arbitration Committee, the restriction will automatically lapse.

Passed 8 to 0 with 1 abstention by motion at 12:38, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

For the Arbitration Committee, Kostas20142 (talk) 13:37, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bombing of the Soji-ji Ossuary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable bombing. I couldn't find any reliable sourcing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koridas 📣 16:31, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]