Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Cafone requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. pablo_hablo. 23:12, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Giuseppe Rosaroll, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kingpin13 (talk) 17:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Canegrate culture, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.maasberg.ch/eKelten.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:57, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Canegrate culture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 13:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Canegrate culture, you will be blocked from editing. Imperat§ r^(Talk) 13:05, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is a duplicate of Anti-Communist Volunteer Militia, but it's much more detailed, so I'd suggest taking the content from V.A.C. and incorporating it into Anti-Communist Volunteer Militia. Once this process is finished, merge tags can be removed and V.A.C. can be made to redirect to the target article. See Help:Merging and moving pages or ask me if you need help. GregorB (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll merge the two articles but unfortunately some moderator yet delated V.A.C. I disagree on the name of Anti-Communist as in the original italian it is "Anti Comunista" the hyphen is a later error then the political name, used by the fascist party administration, was "Anti Communist Volunteer Militia" but the military denomination was Bande V.A.C. as "Bande" was the term used by italian military for irregular auxiliary forces, see the colonial italian Army use for this I would suggest a name for the Wiki article as "Anti Communist Volunteer Militia - Bande V.A.C." merginf the two use

thank you for your attention, regards

Cunibertus (talk) 14:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The issue with the article name is tricky - I can't really say which is better. But it is not critical, the article can be renamed any time. GregorB (talk) 20:40, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok, in this event I'll provide to a common definite version as soon as I'll have free time

I was thinking to a tripartition of the contents according the three enlistment areas of Montenegro, Dalmatia/Bosnia and Slovenia who also had different histories

see you soon

Cunibertus (talk) 20:49, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brunodam. Thank you. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 18:47, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an administrator, but I will help if I can... Is this regarding the sockpuppetry accusation? GregorB (talk) 20:30, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'd like to help, but I'm afraid there's really not much I can do, except maybe offer advice... GregorB (talk) 20:59, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you did submit your case in a way, at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Brunodam. The accusation is that you have already been banned from Wikipedia, as User:Brunodam. Also, that you are editing the same articles under multiple accounts. I don't see any real evidence other than circumstantial, though. GregorB (talk) 21:58, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I don't know what else there is to say. Your name is only mentioned in connection with Eritrean Ascari. The other 5 or 6 articles have apparently not been edited by you. So, if this is all, then the accusation is rather weak, and there's nothing of substance to contest anyway. GregorB (talk) 22:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Of course not. Put Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Brunodam on your watchlist and see what happens. GregorB (talk) 23:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:27, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cunibertus, the sockpuppet case has been processed, and it turns out I was entirely wrong about you. I am sincerely very sorry for my mistake. I wish you every success in your future Wiki career. Best regards, and apologies once again. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 18:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First, the rat AlasdairGreen27 attacks you with a mortal knife, then says hypocritally "sorry"....but be sure at his next attack you will be killed without pity. He is really an OBSESSED Slovenian, who can go down to paranoia within the next months or years with all the new Italian users popping up in the English Wikipedia....Ti consiglio di starne alla larga! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.69.137.14 (talk) 19:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Yes fight the evil Slavic murders! Defend the honor of your people! Fall victim to esuli nationalist hatemongering!" :) I shall dare also to "hypocritically" apologize for my wrong assumption. In Alasdair's defence, he's usually right about User:Brunodam socks. Looking forward to seeing you around, in the meantime, beware of the obsessed Slovenian killers roaming around Wikipedia. xD --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 14:17, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

yes, I understood the problem. Actually, the point was that the Bela Garda was a distinct organization, which was part of the VAC at one point. Hence my edit. Now, the Bela Garda article should be developed. Best, Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 21:55, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

intervene here: en:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Incipient edit war at Josip Broz Tito; AlasdairGreen27 was blocked for 72 hours but DIREKTOR not yet; these accounts vandalizing also foibe massacres, Istrian exodus, ecc. and harassing several valid users as you with false accuses of sockpuppetry —Preceding unsigned comment added by Giocondo (talk • contribs) 18:59, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cunibertus. I'm just wonderiing about the actual value of the Tabula clesiana page in our encyclopedia. At the moment it is simply a copy of the Latin text with little or no context. I personally do not feel that this will be much help for our readers. I have not tagged the article for deletion, because I wanted to know if you intend to expand the article. Regards, --Kudpung (talk) 19:29, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

not much as at present I haven't enough of time being in leaving for my vacations, I could only add some details

The "Tabula clesiana" is an important evidence of the rapid assimilation by the Roman world of the Alpine peoples of farmers-hunters but also from the point of view of the Roman law the first evidence of the introduction of delatores in the fiscal controversy^[1]. Cunibertus (talk) 20:06, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Company of Death, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 22:59, 4 August 2010 (UTC) I have somehow the feeling, after a long experience here, a lot of people on wiki hasn't the lightest notion about the matters they start talking about. In this case I would suggest some classic pieces of theater http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/La_battaglia_di_Legnano http://www.amatriciana.org/public/a_pubblicazioni/colossal_barbarossa_2.jpg http://www.facebook.com/photo_search.php?oid=49135283761&view=all if you look with attention the black knight in the portrait you'll see the skull and bones who was considered traditionally a distinctive of the knights of the company of death http://www3.varesenews.it/immagini_articoli/200905/dsc_0802.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Legnano Defining the Company of Death an hoax is quietly misinformed, it could have been a myth, but it is a founding myth of a state nation. Arrigo joins the Knights of Death, a group which pledges itself to fight to the death rather than suffer defeat or imprisonment. All unite to swear an oath to support the cause of Italy (Giuriam d'Talia por fine ai danni / "We swear to put an end to Italy's wrongs"). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Risorgimento some videos could also help http://www.google.it/#hl=it&tbs=vid%3A1&q=Frederick+Barbarossa+-+The+company+of+death&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&fp=704679f3961ca840 sincerelly yours Cunibertus (talk) 23:25, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Articles for deletion/Company of Death. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 00:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Yopie (talk) 00:45, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Yopie, but I didn't attack you, but your competence about the subject being your area of expertise different and you don't apparently know the matter you have criticized as I demonstrated with different sources, from your own country of origin too Cunibertus (talk) 09:54, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. That is one theory. What I'm seeing is that the names of these Italic tribes diversify along with the languages. I haven't done very much work on those articles yet. They are on my current list. I go down the list. When I get sick of the article I am on I go to the next on the list. I should be getting back to the Italics pretty quick. Meanwhile whatever I do not change remains, right or wrong. You have a strong opinion. That is not the only opinion in the sources. We want to be careful not to exclude theories that in fact are still current. What we need above all are sources. You are quite right, to research each item and give the best source is not exactly a small task. I can understand if you can't get to it right now. When I get there now that you have mentioned it I will pay especial attention the point you bring up. I only follow the sources. I can't promise an instant solution. I do not believe it was I who worked up the original material so I am always dealing with material I did not work up. When I am on it though I do the best I can to fix it. Just a couple of ground rules. The only basis you or I or any other editor has for pronouncing any theory "right" or "wrong" is its presence in a credible source. So, your or my conviction is worth nothing. If we were writing contributory scholarship it would be a different story. But, that is just what we are NOT doing. I will take a look. As I say I have the same time constraints as you (or anyone) so the articles may have to go through a process of shaping (like all the rest). Thanks for pointing this out to me. Best wishes.Dave (talk) 10:51, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your report on User:ZjarriRrethues at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. The issue is, however, one of disagreement about the content of articles, not vandalism. You may like to look at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution for suggestion of other ways to deal with the issue. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:00, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cunnibertus, thanks for the email, but please understand that tertiary sources may not be used in the body of the article in Wikipedia, but only for broad summaries in the lede, if undisputed by secondary sources. In addition, if you reference yourself without even pointing to the secondary or tertiary source, that qualifies as OR.--Sulmues ^(talk) 16:29, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw that you collaborated on articles related to Dacia and thought this could be of interest: WikiProject Dacia is looking for supporters, editors and collaborators for creating and better organizing information in articles related to Dacia and the history of Daco-Getae. If interested, PLEASE provide your support on the proposal page. Thanks!!--Codrinb (talk) 04:24, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, do you have sources for your additions to the professional history section? Those books need full referencing, even if they are refs in themself. With so much controversy surrounding this 'person' we need to be particularly careful. Thanks, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 12:30, 10 June 2011 (UTC)d[reply]

Hi, personal knowledge only at present. I knew a syrian-american Amina Arraf also Amina Abbdullah Arraf from Atlanta, an aspiring writer very active in SF and Alternative History forums and lists around 2006-2008 (Alternate History and Harry Turtledove yahoogroups amongst others). She was friend with and assisted Gaming Ad Astra Games company owner Daniel Scott Palter so I checked some Ad Astra publications (I mentioned which ones in the article) I still own and got her cited there (in my versions as Amina Aref-Lazarus and Amina Arraf). I had been in contact with Mr Palter myself and so I called him on directly. He confirmed she was the same amina and that he had also been contacted by some reporters from both the USA and abroad to confirm it. You can ask directly to Mr Palter for your own confirmation. I have his telephone number but I do not know if it is against the rules to publish it on wikipedia. But the company e-mail and telephone numbers are obviously easy to obtain from the net. Regards Cunibertus (talk) 19:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Amina Arraf" apologizes to Mr Scott Palter http://damascusgaygirl.blogspot.com/2011/06/apology-to-readers_13.html "I want to apologize clearly and explicitly and personally to Jelena Lecic, Paula Brooks, Sandra Bagaria and Scott Palter."Cunibertus (talk) 17:49, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I just wanted to let you know that I would like to merge the article White Guard (Slovenia) with the MVAC article in case you wanted to take part in the discussion. Thanks --U5K0'sTalk_{Make WikiLove not WikiWar} 22:51, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You edited certain numbers in the text without citing the changes, which makes it difficult to take them seriously. If you want to make your edits look malicious, this is a good way to do it. Please cite your edits.Keith-264 (talk) 21:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do you read ?

Comando Superiore Forze Armate A.S. ai comandi dipendenti 29 agosto 1940-XVIII (A.C.S. Carte Graziani, b. 54) N. 1/210045 di prot. Op. Comando carri armati della Libia ... II) - Le unità carri armati della Libia, da oggi, sono così ordinate:

  a) 1° Raggruppamento Carristi - comandante colonnello Pietro Aresca.
      Comando 4° reggimento fanteria carrista I battaglione carri medi XXI, LXII, LXIII battaglioni carri leggeri
      Sarà destinato ad operare col XXIII corpo d'armata.
  b) 2° Raggruppamento Carristi - comandante colonnello Antonio Trivioli.
      Il battaglione carri medi (meno una compagnia) IX, XX, LXI battaglioni carri leggeri
      Sarà destinato ad operare col gruppo divisioni libiche.
  c) Battaglione misto carri armati:
      costituito con una compagnia carri medi del II battaglione ed una compagnia carri leggeri del LX.
      (Sarà destinato ad operare col Raggruppamento Maletti.
  d) LX Battaglione carri leggeri (meno una compagnia)

     Sarà destinato ad operare col XXI corpo d'armata.

Il Maresciallo D'Italia Comandante Superiore Forze Armate A.S. Rodolfo Graziani http://www.regioesercito.it/articolivari/espcor.htm Cunibertus (talk) 21:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Umberto Klinger has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jim Carter 15:36, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone on wiki read before writing ?

1. Umberto Klinger died in 1971, he is not alive or he would also be 116 years old 2. there is a link to a page of the Italian parliament site with the commemoration for the death of a former member, who had happened in 1971

best regards

Cunibertus (talk) 16:32, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:57, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cunibertus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruno Jesi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruno Jesi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:37, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Soviet divisions 1917–45, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chita. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cunibertus. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cunibertus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cunibertus. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Lanzalonga, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jmertel23 (talk) 12:20, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lanzalonga, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 03:52, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]