Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Fettlemap (talk) 23:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:CubanoBoi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:CubanoBoi/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 22:12, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 22:12, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not resubmit this without adding actual content.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:CubanoBoi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:CubanoBoi/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 01:33, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Pointless blank resubmission

KylieTastic (talk) 21:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi

Thank you for creating Vega Alta, Cuba.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Thank you so much, I’ve made a other Wikipedia page (La Luz, Cuba) but sadly when I went to cuba I didn’t take a picture to I don’t have one. Can you also review that Wikipedia page? CubanoBoi (talk) 00:55, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to. North8000 (talk) 12:08, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing La Luz and Vega Alta, may you also review La Quinta, Cuba for me? CubanoBoi (talk) 20:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@North8000: Can you also please review Aguada de Moya, Cuba? CubanoBoi (talk) 14:15, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Thank you for creating La Luz, Cuba. When you create an article like this with a "disambiguated" title, please make sure that the reader can find it from the basic name (ie La Luz), by adding or expanding a hatnote, or adding the article to a disambiguation page. This helps the reader to find the new article, and also reduces the chance of a future careless editor creating a duplicate article with a slightly different disambiguator. I've fixed this one (added it to La Luz (disambiguation)). Thanks, and Happy Editing. PamD 07:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi

Thank you for creating Aguada de Moya, Cuba.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Rincón, Cuba, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 18:41, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way I can have it into main space, there is no information about Rincón. I can’t use EcuRed since it’s a place where anyone can edit and that’s the only place that list information about it. CubanoBoi (talk) 19:09, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NGEO, requires more than a mention in OpenStreetMap to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rincón, Cuba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rincón, Cuba, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:49, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Canoa, Cuba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NGEO, requires significant coverage not simply a mention in GoMapper.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 02:50, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Sagua la Chica River and Vega Alta, Cuba. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Still needs better sourcing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rincón, Cuba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rincón, Cuba, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:31, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, CPA Benito Ramírez, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 21:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, El Cubano, Cuba, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:44, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Looking on google maps there in nothing there https://www.google.com/maps/place/Vega+Alta,+Cuba/@22.5383922,-79.81518,685m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x88d5396f7df34b19:0xcf1e982e788cc729!8m2!3d22.5506051!4d-79.8170675

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:El Cubano, Cuba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:El Cubano, Cuba, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, El Purial, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 20:59, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CubanoBoi. I saw your page and thought I'd introduce myself. I'm Puerto Rican, but I participate in several Latino wikiprojects, including the Cuba one, which I was the original member. My main purpose here is educating the "outer world" about Latin-specific issues, not just Puerto Rican ones, after all, I think of all Latino and Latina people as "hermanos"..I've originated many Cuba (or "Cuban-American" for that matter)-specific articles, like Cubana de Aviacion, Olga Guillot, Angel Robinson Garcia and etc, for example. Anyways, let me know if I can be of any help to you here! God bless! Antonio Super Latino Martin (Que hubole, huey?) 02:26, 18 July, 2022 (UTC)

Hi, I’m working on a few wikipedia pages around my home town. And three of them turned into drafts, Draft:Rincón, Cuba, Draft:CPA Benito Ramírez, and Draft:El Cubano, Cuba (yes funny name) and I’m wondering if you can help me make those into mainspace! Thank you! God bless! CubanoBoi (talk) 13:22, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing, bud!

Oh and about El Cubano, I guess it figures there must be a Cubano in Cuba...lol I used to have a basketball-games friend from Cuba (I live in Casi Mexi-err....Arizona, USA) I used to call him "El Cubano" (like "Oye! Cubano! Como esta la cosa?") It figured that in a group of Latino basketball players, only me and him were from Cuba and Puerto Rico jaja, the rest were Mexicans and Salvadoreans.

Anyways, in all due seriousness now, there is a page here on Wikipedia under wikihumour I think, that has a list of places with funny names, you might want to check it out (and perhaps add El Cubano to the list). Here in Arizona we have a city named Bagdad....when Saddam Hussein was president of Iraq and my brother had a girlfriend who lived in Bagdad, he used to joke that maybe we'd run into Saddam there and ask him for an autograph!

So yeah I'll take a look and help you out. God bless! Antonio Barracudo Martin 01:46, 19 July, 2022 (UTC) Antonio Martin (talk) 01:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added it there! CubanoBoi (talk) 14:17, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Cubano! I think one of the problems that the pages you created is that the sources on it are considered unreliable here. For example, one of the pages used for El Cubano, is a wiki page. Wiki pages, including Wikipedia itself, are always considered unreliable because anyone can write anything without any prove of it being real. I suggest that when you write again, to find reliable sources such as newspaper, television channel or magazine (preferably non-government or political party-sponsored ones of course since those could be considered unreliable as well) and use those instead. And also find some reliable sources for El Cubano, El Purial and the other articles you did already. Bueno mi amigo, gracias y Dios te bendice! Antonio Cafe, papa!!! Martin (Que se cuenta?) 20:43, 24 July, 2022 (UTC)

Alright, but for El Cubano the only source like that is OpenStreetMap (which is not a wikipage) so I’m unsure what you mean CubanoBoi (talk) 22:01, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as User:CubanoBoi/sandbox70, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 17:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is literally a sandbox page, I’m making a joke sandbox page. It’s not a real page like at all. It literally saids sandbox in the title CubanoBoi (talk) 17:38, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please be civil to other editors. Edit summaries such as this one [1] are unacceptable. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 17:36, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It’s literally a sandbox page

CubanoBoi (talk) 17:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It’s literally a sandbox page

CubanoBoi (talk) 17:40, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

@CubanoBoi: That still does not give you the right to harass other users, no matter what type of article it is. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 18:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Who am I harassing? CubanoBoi (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CubanoBoi: You called somebody a [expletive expletive] and removed their edit, which actually is a personal attack on an editor. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 19:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I said the F and the B word because the guy removed half of the infobox. I’m used to saying stuff like that on tiktok and stuff like that. I’m sorry. Please don’t ban me. CubanoBoi (talk) 19:11, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SlipyCVBN just joined for that one edit that was greifing that part of the infobox. I’m sorry I just hate how people do that for what I’m trying to make a fun little infobox. CubanoBoi (talk) 19:14, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The full story is. I copy and pasted the Ukraine war infobox and add some stuff but I couldn’t think of anything so I brought it to tiktok. I tried to do every suggestion (that’s not racist) and then I went to sleep. Overnight the video blew up and I couldn’t do every single one so I made it public. I tried to fix some typos and some things they did wrong (like { {flag| Kurdistan Workers' Party} } didn’t work so I changed it to the { {flagicon image} } thing. Then some people where griefing so I changed it and was mad so I cussed them out. Then I went back to tiktok to watch videos and checked wikipedia (I didn’t really look at the sandbox only your message) and then I went to a Amish restaurant so there wasn’t any internet and when that was happening people where being rascist and griefing and then you took down the page. Then when I was back I saw 5 notifications on wikipedia and 4 of them where about that page and you know the rest. CubanoBoi (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@CubanoBoi: Don’t worry, I’m not claiming that you’re just here to vandalize, I just wanted to make you aware of the issue so you don’t say those kinds of things again, that’s all. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 19:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand CubanoBoi (talk) 19:23, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also someone just made a new page, check the sandbox again CubanoBoi (talk) 19:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also when I said “Anyone randomly getting onto this page can edit it and do what you want. I want CHAOS.” I mean for the infobox anyone can add any place/company for belligerents since it was only a war infobox. Like I wanted randomness so it’ll be funny for tiktok. Like for example like how I added Doritos or how someone added Jeff. I did not mean for the rascism that one person caused. CubanoBoi (talk) 21:04, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CubanoBoi I just checked the new sandbox and it's rules, but, where to put my tiktok name. Bilikon (talk) 01:48, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the tiktok section, scroll down CubanoBoi (talk) 01:54, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eyesnore was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Vega Alta, Cuba. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:El Cubano, Cuba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eyesnore 17:24, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vega Alta, Cuba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		The Cuban Barnstar
		For the work you have done on places in Cuba. Flagvisioner (talk) 22:43, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I’m the only one with this on EN Wikipedia CubanoBoi (talk) 22:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Flags of country subdivisions

added links pointing to Yara and Cruces

List of city flags in North America

added links pointing to Yara and Cruces

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Montura (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:06, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw that you reverted my edit. There is no source that states that the 1933 revolution also took place in the cities of Pinar del Rio and Matanzas. That was an incorrect edit made by a known sock. You reverted to the incorrect edit again. I think that your latest 2 edits have to be reverted. Line 21 and 28 are also incorrect. But it seems that you already saw it yourself.

About the SPI, please read here: Inversiveskills2021. Thanks. RenaatPeeters (talk) 03:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah thank you, you can put it back but I reverted it since you removed the infobox tho CubanoBoi (talk) 11:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vega Alta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:53, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you put a source in the article saying the all-red flag was the party flag? I may have missed it. Liliana ^(UwU) 22:40, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://havanatimes.org/diaries/dimitri/the-forgotten-flag/ CubanoBoi (talk) 22:41, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t put sources for flags tho so I put it in the section where you say what you did CubanoBoi (talk) 22:41, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/cu%7D.html#cpc CubanoBoi (talk) 22:43, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Sur (San José de las Lajas), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sur (San José de las Lajas) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 06:35, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources do not support notability and much of the prose does not make sense.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sur (San José de las Lajas) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:59, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:CubanoBoi/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just letting you know: I spent 3 - 4 hours vectorizing the flag of Caimito. I ask that you do not ask me to vectorize something unless there is evidence it is free. Flagvisioner (talk) 02:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I put it back on there, I’m sorry CubanoBoi (talk) 12:16, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On Wikimedia Commons? As I said, I only vectorize flags if there is evidence it is free. Flagvisioner (talk) 00:49, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, Wikipedia I’ll only ask from now on if the file is free CubanoBoi (talk) 12:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Council Electoral National of Cuba, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready to be moved to the mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page so that it can be reviewed by an Articles for Creation patroller. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 00:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. Thank you for creating Coat of arms of Santa Clara, Cuba. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 21:21, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:13, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rincón, Cuba, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 15:44, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Los Cedros, Santiago de Cuba, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 04:13, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Cuban flags Is now available. Alexphangia Talk 21:16, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough in-depth coverage to show that it passes WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CPA Benito Ramírez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

El Purial, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 23:09, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating La Jaiba (Matanzas). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:07, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

La Jaiba (Matanzas), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 12:39, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cerebellum was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I recommend merging with San José de las Lajas.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sur (San José de las Lajas) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cerebellum (talk) 14:35, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fusté and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 09:46, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. Thank you for your work on Piedra (Camajuaní). User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Not everyone is going to know what a CPA in this context refers to. When I first read it, I thought: "What is so notable about this accountant?" Also, assuming this is a populated place, you need something to show that it is officially designated.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:31, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969:, thank you. I just added the link! CubanoBoi (talk) 23:17, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, El Perico (Encrucijada), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:13, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Cayo Hueso (Encrucijada), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:43, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Camajuaní, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Remedios.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:El Cubano, Cuba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Council Electoral National of Cuba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Sandino (Santa Clara), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:53, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "El Cubano".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Los Cedros, Santiago de Cuba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There's nothing to indicate that this is notable per WP:GEOLAND, and the sources cited are insufficient to satisfy WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CPA Benito Ramírez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:05, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Villa I (Consolación del Sur), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Majash2020 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cayajabo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Majash2020 (talk) 04:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Los Cedros".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:57, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clearfrienda was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Article doesn't seem to meet WP:NPOL, as 'major' local political figures must have significant press coverage or meet WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cayo Hueso (Encrucijada) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clearfrienda ^💬 23:28, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cayo Hueso (Encrucijada), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Clearfrienda ^💬 20:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Flag of Santiago de Cuba.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:21, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Seal of Santiago de Cuba.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Julio Antonio Mella (disambiguation). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and no categories and too many not-notable entries. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 01:38, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sur (San José de las Lajas), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Benito Ramírez (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:36, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vega Alta, Cuba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cifuentes.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sandino (Santa Clara), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, first off it is so cool to see another Inter Miami fan here! I saw your message in Wikimedia Commons. I would appreciate if we just talked here, my Wikimedia talk page is a mess and I would not like our convo to be lost.

As to your question: I did not upload my video anywhere, I just have it in my phone for safekeeping in case it is nominated for deletion due to suspected copyright infringement (they ARE screen shots, so I understand the doubt). I'm not 100% firm on how Wikimedia works, but I can say I have had no issue with any of my uploads after specifying that "it is a screenshot from a video I took on my mobile device."

The biggest discussion I had about my pictures was the one ones regarding Gavi, Ansu Fati, Pablo Torre, Álex Collado. (yes, I took those pics!) It was a constant back and forth about who actually owned the images and it was immediately settled when I submitted the video's metadata by email. Hopefully you won't be taken to that extent but that is just some food for thought.

Let me know if you have any questions and happy editing! TheSoccerBoy^{(𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕜)} 00:13, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSoccerBoy^{(𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕜)} Thanks! If your wondering how commons files work, then anything that you took a picture of/drew/etc is your own work, you can make it under any of the commons copyright tags (I use {{cc-zero}}, aka anyone can use it without giving credit) but you can use any for commons. I’m pretty sure you are allowed to upload it onto commons, but am unsure if it’s considered MLS/Inter Miami/DRV PNK Stadium property. I’m going to look into that

Anyways, thanks! CubanoBoi (talk) 00:25, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I somewhat knew about the “own work” part but thanks for clarifying about cc-zero, definitely will keep that in mind. As for properties, I can assure you that it is 100% okay to upload pictures of anything, by that I mean the stadium and players. The only thing that could potentially be copyrighted is if you take a picture of the scoreboard replays and/or upload a screenshot from a TV transmission of a match. Other than that, you are okay if you take pictures yourself.

Some advice about images though, make sure you upload from a good visible angle. Check my uploads for example, not the best quality but it’s something. Make sure the players aren’t herded up, my personal rule of thumb is a maximum of two people a picture, with the 2nd person cropped out as much as possible without making it look like a skyscraper-shaped rectangle either. That’s just me though, hope that can help you in a way. Happy editing! TheSoccerBoy^{(𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕜)} 01:28, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSoccerBoy You can upload the video if it’s your own work onto Commons then. CubanoBoi (talk) 20:52, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSoccerBoy, do you have any photos of Sunderland? Just created the page for him. CubanoBoi (talk) 18:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I do not have any pictures of him yet. I will be attending the games against Houston Dynamo on the 27th of this month and the game against Charlotte October 18th, I will try to get some pictures then! TheSoccerBoy^{(𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕜)} 04:35, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm sorry editor, I don't think this passes WP:GEOLAND.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CPA Benito Ramírez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 21:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Villa I (Consolación del Sur), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delvis Lumpuy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delvis Lumpuy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JTtheOG (talk) 16:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cayajabo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm really struggling. Emotionally I want to accept this, but I think it is the wrong side of the borderline. Our brief is to accept drafts which we believe have a better than 50% chance of surviving an immediate deletion discussion.

I cannot spot the notability in a Wikipedia sense. UBPCs are good things, but there's nothing that you have shown us that stands out about this one. It's simply a good thing.

Prove me wrong.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:UBPC Crescencio Valdés and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:35, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Villa I".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 10:51, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Julio Antonio Mella (disambiguation), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:El Perico (Encrucijada), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fusté, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:05, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Luis Alberto Villegas, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:26, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Vueltas.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fusté".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:CPA Benito Ramírez, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! A couple months ago you asked me for pics of Sunderland for the article you created. I’m glad to inform you that I took some when I attended the season opener against Real Salt Lake, I have added it to his article already. Vamos Inter! TheSoccerBoy^{(𝕥𝕒𝕝𝕜)} 07:10, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. Thank you for your work on Tyler Hall (soccer). Anwegmann, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

A simple search shows that Tyler Hall barely meets the standards for WP:SIGCOV, so I am approving the creation of the page for now. But the fact that the article itself does not include any independent sources, another editor could challenge this article on WP:TOOSOON grounds.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Anwegmann}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Anwegmann (talk) 00:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello CubanoBoi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Lázaro Reyes, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lázaro Reyes.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Anwegmann}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Anwegmann (talk) 01:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Luis Alberto Villegas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, CubanoBoi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Luis Alberto Villegas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 4-112 (Cuba). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 06:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:4-112 (Cuba) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:4-112 (Cuba) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 07:57, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Circuito Sur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batabanó.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

State Highway 4-112 (Cuba), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:52, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CubanoBoi. Thank you for your work on Lawson Sunderland. Another editor, Demt1298, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this article for Wikipedia. I have marked it reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Demt1298}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Demt1298 (talk) 18:55, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Quinta Avenida (Havana), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 07:24, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]