Thanks for uploading Image:Horthy the regent.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 22:25, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lajos, i have uploaded your picture Image:Mecsek hungary 1.jpg to the wikimedia commons. The image here on en: is already tagged as "nowcommons". Since i don't speak hungarian, i don't know if there are similar procedures on hu:. Maybe you can take a look? so long --Zinnmann 11:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It seems (to me, please note) there aren't. In fact, I don't work so much in hu:. Anyway, I added a line noting the picture is avaliable in commons. See you! -- Cserlajos 16:29, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I started to improve Template:Hungarian literature. I would be glad if you could check my new version. At the moment, there are two important improvements: 1. abc order (because of npov issues), 2. an extra feature: random picture (daily; see the source)

Lelkesa 19:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ABC order is rightly right, not only because of npov issues - it is rather logical. Random pictures are pretty interesting. And, all in all, the new version is more fair, somehow. But, I have to warn you, this template is highly subjective. Maybe I not added all the important authors, but added those who really does not matter. It was also criticized on its talk page because of this. A more sensible solution would be to focus on the periods of literature (I mean, to summarize an era in a separate article, and the non-important authors should be listed here.) And the Greats of the time should stay in the template. The new template what I imagine, roughly:

Time	Period	Important authors	Endre Ady, poet
Before 1000	Origins	(none)
1000-1430	Literature in Latin The emerging Hungarian literature	authors of the time
1918-	Realism style2 of the era ...	Endre Ady, György Faludy, etc.

It is not too hard to improve this into a template, but there is a problem: there are no articles to link with the periods I have given. So, a lot of typing is in our way if we want to tell the readers about Hungarian literature in English. Until we don't have enough text, the template should be kept in its current form (i.e. with your already done improvements), but then... What's your opinion? -- Cserlajos ^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think that the template is OK. NPOV doesn't mean that we cannot differentiate between more and less important poets, writers. However, consensus is needed, of course. If we want to be more objective, maybe those authors could be regarded as important who one needs to know to take a maturity exam (érettségi).

I'm proud of random pictures, the OHLM alone is a bit boring:)

Lelkesa 17:49, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Érettségi (maybe equivalent with final exam ??) - this definition seems to be okay. Cserlajos ^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:50, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kedves Lajos!

Először is elnézést6 a késői válaszért! Köszönjük szépen a gratulációt a képekhez, nagyon jól esik! Köszönjük a galéria leírást is, mindenképpen hasznosítani fogom a jövőben! Üdvözlettel:Civertan 15:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Az a fontos, hogy értesültél a galériás dologról. Még egyszer gratulálok a képekhez, tényleg remek munkák! Cserlajos ^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Szerintem tevedsz. MAr refernciat is adtam ra. Most az lehetne a problema, hogy mikent lehet meggyozni angol nyelvu wikitarsainkat, hogy ez valoban letezo fogalom ... Esetleg ha revidealnad az allaspontodat, nyilvanosan ;) ... Kosz --fz22 10:41, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nos, én nem a tárgyalt korral kapcsolatos tévedéseket vettem észre -ilyenek talán nincsenek is-, de a fogalmat tényleg még soha nem hallottam. De majd utánanézek, hátha ez csak az én kicsi, egyéni világomban van így...

P.S:Some consider since this is the Enwiki, we should communicate in English, to not to kizárjunk somevalakit from our párbeszéd. But never mind! Nyilvánosan kifejtem majd az utánanézés eredményét. Na és amikor menteni akarom a talkpage-t, nem ezt kapom: "WARNING: The database has been locked for maintenance, so you will not be able to save your edits right now. You may wish to copy-and-paste the text into a text file and save it for later." áhhh... :) Cserlajos ^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:40, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Üdv. Kicsit átírtam ezt a cikket, mert mégse az a lényeges benne, milyen gyakran emlegeti Gyurcsány meg hogy mi szeretjük-e Gyurcsányt (én nem). nézz rá, ha gondolod. – Alensha ^talk 00:29, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Már fél éve firkantottam, nem is emlékeztem rá. Arra sem, konkrétan miért. De így jobb. -- Cserlajos ^{(talk) (contribs)} 08:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

<A>

Thanks for uploading Image:Coat of arms of Budapest.png. However, the copyright tag you've used is deprecated or obsolete, and should not be used. This could be because the tag is inaccurate or misleading, or because it does not adequately specify the copyright status of the image. For a list of copyright tags that are in current use, see the "Public domain", "Free license", and "Fair use" sections of Wikipedia:Image copyright tags.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Szervusz, Lajos. Do you happen to know where exactly in Transylvania this picture of Horthy was taken? Köszönöm, Mentatus 16:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

<A>

Hello Lajos, thanks for your reply. Well, I was just curious in regard to that particular picture, I can imagine he must have toured almost all the Northern Transylvania - you don't have to collect all the stops, thanks! :) Szia, Mentatus 21:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! When asking for a speedy delete, please don't blank the page. Admins have to look at the previous content, so blanking the page adds an extra step and ironically slows down the speedy process. Thanks and happy editing! 〈REDVEЯS〉 21:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please give a reason (there's a list at WP:CSD) - giving no reason also slows down the process as admins have to go and look one up, then type it in. If you provide one, it is automagically made into the deletion summary. Thanks again! 〈REDVEЯS〉 21:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was just now looking at various Hungary-related topics when I came across some of your pictures. As someone who takes pictures for Wikipedia, I really appreciate others who do the same. Thanks! Nyttend 07:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Olvastam hogy melyik cikkeket irtal. A nagy reszet elolvastam, nagyszeru munkak. Tobb Cserlajosra van szukseg itten! Hunor-Koppany 02:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I recently expanded Bačka article with some demographics data. However, I have no data about ethnic composition of northern (Hungarian) part of the region. Since I saw that you work about geography of Hungary, perhaps you have some data about ethnic composition of Hungarian part of Bačka around Baja? Official site of Hungarian statistics have data only about Bacs-Kiskun county, but that data cannot be used because most of this county is not geographical Bačka. Is it possible to find somewhere data about ethnic composition of Bačka part of the Bacs-Kiskun county from the last 2001 census (or from any other census)? I know that after 1920, there was a separate Bacs-Bodrog county in Hungary with seat in Baja. Perhaps some demographics data could be found for this county? Or perhaps: I believe that demographics data can be found for each of the 3 districts in Hungarian Bačka: Baja, Bacsalmas and Janoshalma, so this data could be joined and we would have rough data for Hungarian Bačka. Is it possible to find the data somewhere? PANONIAN (talk) 23:11, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For example, I noticed that article about Baja have demographics data: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baja%2C_Hungary#Demographics Is this data for whole Baja district/municipality or only for the city itself? Also, do you have numbers of ethnic groups as well instead only percents? If you have this data for all 3 municipalities, Baja, Bacsalmas and Janoshalma, then we can do something with it. PANONIAN (talk) 23:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again and thanks for reply. You are correct that it would be the best solution to collect data for all settlements that are located in Hungarian Bácska, but problem is that I do not know names of all settlements that are located there and I also do not have official data about population of those settlements (We cannot be sure who posted population data into Wikipedia articles about those settlements and which sources he used). Of course, if you posted this data and if you can say that this data is correct that would be different, so perhaps you can calculate population of entire Hungarian Bácska (in its geographical borders) if you have population data for all those settlements. Anyway, if you do not have data for all settlements, at least the population of these 3 municipalities calculated together could represent rough population of Hungarian Bácska. Also, do you have a number of ethnic groups that live in those municipalities? (How many Hungarians, Roma, Croats, etc live in each of them?). PANONIAN (talk) 20:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I found this map: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Tersegunk_l.jpg is this a correct map of Hungarian Bácska? PANONIAN (talk) 18:12, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, no use - I used this map and link that you showed to me:

• http://www.nepszamlalas.hu/hun/kotetek/06/03/data/tabhun/4/load01_1_0.html
• http://www.nepszamlalas.hu/hun/kotetek/06/02/data/tabhun/4/load01_1_0.html

But, there is problem: I cannot find there data for 2 settlements: Ujmohacs and Felsokanda:

• Bácsalmási = 18 825
• Bajai = 76 753
• Jánoshalmai = 17 854
• Hajos = 3 594
• Kunfeherto = 2 357
• Balotaszallas = 1 666
• Kisszallas = 2 919
• Tompa = 4 821
• Kelebia = 3 019
• Homorud = 751
• Ujmohacs = ?
• Felsokanda = ?

PANONIAN (talk) 18:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Borland delphi 7.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:24, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Cserlajos. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Borland delphi 7.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Cserlajos/Gallery. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:45, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cserlajos, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Slheaderpohoto.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Cserlajos/Gallery. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 18:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Baja_panorama.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 04:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Cserlajos,

Thank You very much for Your Világfa image. I have used it in my article Shamanistic remnants in Hungarian folklore]. May I upload it to Wikipedia Commons? I am writing now the Hungarian coarticle (hu:A magyar népi műveltség samanisztikus emlékei), and I should like to use the image also in it.

Best wishes,

Physis 19:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You for Your quick answer, and Your proposal, too, I hope I shall find some related image in some old ethnographic book. Thank You for Your reassuring, too; also I wish much success to Your work and contributions. I shall read Your articles yet, I have just found them (e.g. hu:cseroki nyelv). I am learning Eskimo languages (my job is mathematics) and folklores, my biggest contribution was Sirenik language.

Best wishes

Physis 13:16, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Baranya coat of arms.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:58, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 13:58, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cserlajos, as I mentioned in the discussion page of this image, Oradea(Nagyvárad) has a Romanian speakers majority. Your map might show the reality of a few decades ago which is irrelevant for the purpose of this image. Please correct me if I'm wrong, Planck 03:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Bacs kiskun coat of arms.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lara❤Love 14:40, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Hungary geographical regions/body requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{tranclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Aevk1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 18:42, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you would be interested to know that the image of Horthy the regent is a photograph of a portrait done by Vitezy Erzsebet in Hungary in 1936. Her father took a photograph of this, and we have it in our posession, and after comparing it to the one shown here, have determined it is exactly the same. On our copy you can still read the artist's signature and date. Elizabeth (as she is now called) relocated to the United States, and as a matter of fact, died this morning (February 15, 2008) at the age of 96. We would be interested in finding out where the original portrait is today. If you would like more information about the artist, please let me know.Minnielaura (talk) 20:40, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:User old Hungarian script requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Radnoti miklos.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -Nard 20:34, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Autopalya_balaton.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:38, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Horthycolor.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:38, 17 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. bogdan (talk) 23:38, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wassalbert.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:42, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hungarian derivative table.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 20:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pauline l.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:01, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pauline sz.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pauline szl.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pauline t.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. How deep is Your knowledge of this language? Recently I got interested in creating of a Mansi edition of Wikipedia, but my knowledge of it rests on Wikipedia article and some pieces of text I found over the Internet. So can You give me some help in improving my skills? --ɴõɴəχүsƚ 22:34, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Horthy sebesult.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 02:51, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Üdvüzlet!

If I'm not wrong you uploaded a few characters of the Hungarian runic alphabet. I'd like to ask you, please upload all of them, cause your characters have the right symmetry that I'm looking for (right-left, I hope I'm not wrong). Currently there is a complete alphabet uploaded to commons, but its left-right symmetry. So if it's not a problem, please upload the rest of the characters.

You can also help by letting me know if I can find copyright free characters on the net so that I can upload them.

Thank you very much. --Föld-lét (talk) 15:15, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cp palos ertelmezes.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 05:32, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uralic-speaking nations has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Lfdder (talk) 14:57, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Baja runway.gif or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:47, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:Baja yacht.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Horthy memoirs.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. - Andrei (talk) 14:28, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cserlajos! Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Women writers. I'd like to invite you to become a part of WikiProject Women writers, a WikiProject aimed at improving the quality of articles about women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject Women writers page for more information. Feel free to sign your name under "Members". I look forward to your involvement!

Thanks for uploading File:Magdolna purgly.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 08:06, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bajamaphungary1.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:18, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Fidesz logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Hungary-geo-logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 02:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:User rovasiras.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hun-hist-develop has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:39, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Regular sound correspondences between Hungarian and other Uralic languages is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regular sound correspondences between Hungarian and other Uralic languages until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Stockhausenfan (talk) 21:46, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]