Hi Sanjay7373! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternately, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing!

Sorry to bug but I was wondering why you changed the coordinates for quite a few of the States.

WildAGR (talk) 17:11, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Four digits after the decimal point is way too precise for a city, let alone a U.S. state covering thousands of square miles. According to Wikipedia's own guideline, Wikipedia:WikiProject_Geographical_coordinates#Precision_guidelines, the precision of coordinates must correspond to the width/length of the area. For most states, 1 degree is enough precision. Even for Rhode Island, the smallest state, one digit after the decimal point is suitable. 0.0001 degrees of latitude (or longitude at the equator) equals 11 meters (36 ft). That level of precision is appropriate for an individual building, not a U.S. state. Sanjay7373 (talk) 03:35, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sanjay7373,

Thank you for editing the Sylmar article with coordinate refinement and elevation. Much appreciated and liked.

The official elevation of Sylmar as 1,270 feet above sea level is fascinating to me.

Not just Sylmar, but all cities and towns are given an officially specifice elevation, even though the elevation is actually a range of heights above and below the officiall elevation. I am always fascianted with thinking of what exact place is chosen for the elevation.

In the case of Sylmar, I think that elevationof 1,270 feet may refer to the "SYLMAR SQUARE" on Foothill Boulevard at the corner of Sayre Street, a historical and cultural area of stores and eateries. It may refer to the intersection of Foothill Boulevard and Sayre Street? I would like to verify that the elevation of 1,270 feet is actually SLYMAR SQUARE. A careful inspection of a USGS Topographic maps would assist in that regard.

Wondering if there is a way to add an edit that recognizes the official elevation as being at SYLMAR SQUARE?

By the way, welcome to being an editor, I became an editor only a few years ago, but active only in the last few months.

Did you notice that I edited Sylmar article in the Topography section showing a range of elevation for the offical neighborhood known as Sylmar for the City of Los Angeles. I grew up in Sylmar, having been brought here by my parents that moved to Sylmar in 1960, but originally from Amsterdam, Holland, Nederland, below sea level, as an immigrant family arriving in the USA in 1956, sponsored by a church in Minneapolis, Minnesota, then in 1957, moved to Santa Monica, California, for three years until 1960.

Peace, 'Roy' ...Robert Jan van de Hoek (talk) 16:54, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept this invitation to join the Tropical cyclones WikiProject (WPTC), a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with tropical cyclones. WPTC hosts some of Wikipedia's highest-viewed articles, and needs your help for the upcoming cyclone season. Simply to accept!

You're interested in weather so why you didn't join us? SMB99thx my edits! 03:36, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santa Clarita, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Clara River. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santa Clarita, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sunkist.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sand Canyon, Los Angeles County, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equestrian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crossover1370,

Thank you for creating Vista Valencia Golf Course.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This golf course does not meet notability as given here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Event_Venues/Sports_task_force/Notability#Golf_courses

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 05:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Whiteguru: I created the article not because I'm interested in golf (I'm a basketball player), but because of a push to increase coverage of my hometown, Santa Clarita, California. Crossover1370 (talk | contribs) 23:53, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Santa Clarita, California you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SounderBruce -- SounderBruce (talk) 06:20, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I had expanded the article by a factor of nearly 3 times and included new information and references about all aspects of the city. Crossover1370 (talk | contribs) 06:46, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Santa Clarita, California you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Santa Clarita, California for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SounderBruce -- SounderBruce (talk) 06:01, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santa Clarita, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harry Carey.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for creating Portal:Basketball‎‎. I think the portal has potential but may not survive in its current form, as it links to several pages which haven't yet been created. Do you plan to complete the portal? You may also be interested in the 2019 MfD. Certes (talk) 13:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I will complete the portal. In the meantime, can the portal be moved to a draft? Crossover1370 (talk | contribs) 18:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It could, but that might make it difficult to complete development, because the templates behind portals rely on pages and subpages being in the expected places. WP:WikiProject Portals has plenty of useful information and advice, and the other sports portals provide a variety of models. Certes (talk) 19:34, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I cleaned up the portal a bit, and added transclusion lists, so article titles can be easily added. I strongly recommend having this as a manually maintained portal, with hand picked content for the articles and for a potential Selected images section, DYK section, etc. At the MfD, the previous portal was deleted largely because it was 1) unmaintained, 2) abandoned, 3) incomplete and 4) outdated. I support a new version of the portal if it is manually curated, because otherwise some may consider it disruptive to recreate it in a similar state to how it previously existed. Also of importance is to add links to the portal to relevant articles, navigation bars and related portals. I also added a chart to the portal's talk page which leads to lists of FA-class, GA-class, etc. articles. Pinging Certes to here, because they notified me of the new portal's creation. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:07, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for completing the portal! Crossover1370 (talk | contribs) 22:39, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't view it as complete, because it would benefit from more, such as a Selected images section, consisting of hand-curated images, a Did you know/interesting facts section, and potentially more. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:42, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You seem relatively new to Wikipedia, so here's some tips for how the portal can be improved. Also pinging JoeNMLC here, who has worked on the portal. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Very importantly, it is vital that links to the portal are placed in relevant articles in their See also sections. Otherwise, the portal will be mostly orphaned, and nobody will visit it, because nobody will know of its existence.
• The Selected picture section would benefit from more high-quality, hand-curated images. This comprises images that are manually added to the portal, as opposed to those in the General images section, which are simply transcluded from articles. More images can be found at Wikimedia Commons, such as here. It is easy to add images using the template now in place in the portal; it's easier than adding images to articles.
• A DYK / Interesting facts section would be a great addition.
• The addition of more high-quality / high-relevance Selected articles is in order.
• It's unclear if you're motivated to work on the portal or not, but if so, the creation of Selected team and In this month boxes would also be a huge improvement.

I have been on Wikipedia since July 30, 2019 and have made (as of right now) 2,518 edits. I will create a DYK section. Crossover1370 (talk | contribs) 01:03, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, way cool. I forgot to mention, if you're not aware of it, check out Wikipedia:Portal for more tips on portal building. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Nb. I went ahead and started a DYK section. More entries can be added at Portal:Basketball/Interesting facts. The status quo for DYK sections is to use content from Wikipedia:Recent additions; just scroll down and type "basketball" in the "Search archives" box. Importantly, if you are not already aware of this, if you add to the page, per Wikipedia's copyright policies, please leave an edit summary that states that information was copied and where it was copied from, the latter with a link. See this example diff for how to do so. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I was busy with other activities. I had planned to create the framework for the portal and complete it in the future. Crossover1370 (talk | contribs) 17:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vista Valencia Golf Course is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vista Valencia Golf Course until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SportingFlyer T·C 10:42, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

might even be 117F. https://explore.synopticdata.com/KPDX/24h shows 116.6°F appearing briefly and then slipping back to 115. the NWS twitter account isnt claiming it yet, but the truth will be made plain soon enough. —Soap— 01:37, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

According to the National Weather Service, the record high in Portland yesterday was 116°F.

Yes thank you .... it's a bit of a struggle to make sense of raw temperature readings that aren't intended for the general public. It seems that US weather stations in fact record in Celsius now, with precise measurements every hour and less precise measurements every five minutes. On the assumption this was one of the less precise 5-minute observations, it can only have been 47.0 °C (116.6 °F), which should therefore round to 117, but for some reason they're not claiming it as such. I'm still confused but I'm sure, as I've said, the truth will be made plain soon enough. Thanks for doing your research and also for your close attention to the articles. —Soap— 23:53, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At the recent AFD, you made the following remark

I have browsed through the articles of several high-profile WNBA players and don't see a single one with totals.

I'd like to to put that in context. I took a look at the category covering the top draft picks for the WNBA over the years. Category:Women's National Basketball Association first overall draft picks

Of these 23 entries:

3 did not play at a US college 2 US college but no stats 7 US college stats added by someone else 11 US college stats added by Sphilbrick

In other words, for articles with US college stats, I have added more than everybody else combined. When I first started adding stats, I picked up on a format that someone else had used, so it is hardly surprising that a preponderance of the articles about women's basketball players largely follow a similar format. In recent weeks, I decided to undertake an effort to add stats to the many articles that were missing stats and I started using the same format. However, I noticed while working at my approach, which was to copy the data compiled by the NCAA, drop it into an Excel file and then create the "standard" format, I realized I was excluding the majority of the information. I'm fine with some of that. I think it would be overkill to list the number of turnovers, the number of double doubles, and the number of times a player has fouled out of the game, but it began to dawn on me that the focus was on ratios despite the fact that data sources had a mixture of ratios and totals with somewhat more emphasis on totals.

That's what led me to open a discussion to talk about how we present statistics, and a tiny number of basketball editors, primarily interested in the NBA, decided that presenting only ratios made sense. They claim this was backed up by what's presented on the Internet, and when I pushed back with facts, there was no interest in collaboration or discussion.

My approach using the sub pages was a serious attempt to accommodate their strongly held, albeit irrational belief that basketball biography should only present ratios. I thought we could eat our cake and have it too by presenting a table that only portrayed ratios while allowing the reader to click a button that allowed them to see the totals. I honestly thought that was a good way to accommodate their views and my desire to share totals. As we have seen, there was opposition to that approach. I'm fine with the decision that the sub page approach isn't the best approach, but I note that several contributors to the AFD, while supporting the removal of the sub pages, felt the information belong directly in the page.

For what it's worth, adding statistics wasn't close to my end goal, it was just a precursor. I've noticed a substantial proportion of articles about women basketball players are missing images. I've had some success writing to colleges and getting permission for an image, but I always point them to the article in which the image will be used, and I don't feel comfortable asking a school to provide an image for what might be a not much more than a stub. I felt that adding statistics would add a little more "heft" to the article I've been improving references and adding some material while adding statistics. My next step was to start asking for images and then follow up with even more expansion of the article.

• Seimone Augustus college stats added by Sphilbrick
• Sue Bird college stats added by Sphilbrick
• Tina Charles (basketball) college stats added by Sphilbrick
• Margo Dydek did not play at a US college
• Brittney Griner college stats added by someone else
• Lindsey Harding college stats added by Sphilbrick
• Dena Head No college stats
• Chamique Holdsclaw No college stats
• Sabrina Ionescu college stats added by someone else
• Lauren Jackson did not play at a US college
• Jewell Loyd college stats added by Sphilbrick
• Janel McCarville college stats added by Sphilbrick
• Angel McCoughtry college stats added by Sphilbrick
• Chiney Ogwumike college stats added by Sphilbrick
• Nneka Ogwumike college stats added by someone else
• Candace Parker college stats added by someone else
• Kelsey Plum college stats added by Sphilbrick
• Breanna Stewart college stats added by Sphilbrick
• Diana Taurasi college stats added by someone else
• LaToya Thomas college stats added by Sphilbrick
• Ann Wauters did not play at a US college
• A'ja Wilson college stats added by someone else
• Jackie Young (basketball) college stats added by someone else --S Philbrick(Talk) 18:42, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick: Most of the articles above don't have totals (maybe they were removed by other editors). As a (male) basketball player myself I am aware that ratios (ex. a 70% 3-point percentage) are generally more significant than totals (ex. 500 career 3-pointers). Sure there are examples of players being celebrated for milestones (ex. 10,000 career points) but in the end, Stephen Curry is considered a good shooter because of his high shot percentage, not his total number of shots. As far as I can understand, this also holds true for women. Hardly any of our articles on NBA or WNBA players display totals. If you want basketball players' articles to display both ratios and totals you may initiate a discussion or RFC on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Basketball. Crossover1370 (talk | contribs) 00:46, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Phil/Cross - Good work on improving those articles; the Sue Bird one could especially benefit from some good editing. 2603:7000:2143:8500:4988:58A5:565D:7845 (talk) 06:14, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(no worries at all; I'm currently sending these to as many formally "unaware" people editing in the area as possible, because if a discussion at WP:AE is ever needed, a prior lack of such notifications can be very frustrating.)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in edits about, and articles related to, COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:33, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I only occasionally edit such articles. Most of my edits are related to basketball and geography (especially that of southern California). Crossover1370 (talk | contribs) 19:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 37°C. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 12#37°C until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article has a talk page. It's good form to discuss matters there, rather than edit-warring. wp:otherstuffexists is also a good read, in conjunction with wp:lede.--2603:7000:2143:8500:4988:58A5:565D:7845 (talk) 06:11, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted once, which does not break the 3-revert rule. Crossover1370 (talk | contribs) 06:33, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page 2022 Mar-a-Lago raid has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Crossover1370,

Right now, there are a lot of redirects to the targeted article and I thought this one was redundant. And also because it has been the only raid on Mar-a-Lago, the 2022 is unnecessary in the title and is an unlikely search term. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:04, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hyatt Regency Valencia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hyatt Regency Valencia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pilaz (talk) 00:55, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]